GGR Problem Set 1 (2)
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Toronto *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
205
Subject
Geology
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
Pages
9
Uploaded by SuperHumanApeMaster741
GGR Problem Set 1
1.
Compare and contrast the properties of sand, silt, and clay in soils. In your answer,
explain how the different particle sizes influence soil properties and behavior.
(
9 marks
)
Sand, silt, and clay particles are three common mineral components that make up soil.
The particle sizes of these soils give them distinct properties and influence their
behaviors, aeration, water retention, and nutrient availability.
Firstly, sand particles have the largest particle size. The diameter of the sand particle
sizes ranges from
2.0 to 0.05 millimeters
. Sandy soils generally have large pore spaces
and a grainy and loose texture. The particles are additionally rounded or angular. The
large particle size and pore spaces means that sandy soils have good aeration and are
generally not very compact. Combined with the low attraction to other sand particles
and water, sandy soils have difficulty retaining water, and are excellent at water
drainage. Sandy soils also have challenges retaining nutrients, since the large pore
space in the soil allows for leaching. The particle size of sandy soils affects its texture,
but also affects the soil’s behaviors. Due to large particle size and large pore space,
sandy soils are unable to retain water or to hold onto usable ingredients, but they have
good aeration.
Secondly, the size of silt particles fall between sand and clay particle sizes, ranging
from
0.05 to 0.002 millimeters
. Silty soils have smaller pore spaces than sandy soils.
While they have a similar shape to sandy soils, rounded or angular, they have a smooth
and powdery texture when they are moist. They have less aeration than sandy soils
since they have less pore space between particles. Additionally, their particles have
medium attraction to other silt particles and after, which means that they can hold more
water than sandy soils, but less water than clay soils. They have some ability for
nutrient retention. Since silt particles are smaller than sandy particles, and have more
pore space than sandy particles, they are able to retain water and nutrients more than
sandy soils.
Lastly, clay particles have the smallest particles, with a diameter of
less than 0.002
millimeters
. Clay soils have a flat platelet shape. The small particle size means that it
has a sticky and malleable texture. Clay soils do not have food aeration because of the
small particles’ strong attraction to other clay particles, water, and other substances.
Additionally, this, along with the small pore space between particles, means that clay
particles have excellent water but have a high risk of waterlogging. Cations in clay
particles are attracted to the high surface area of clay particles, and ensures nutrient
retention.
The proportions of sand, silt, and clay in soils determine soils’ textures, properties, and
behaviors. Particle size and pore space affects water retention, drainage, aeration, and
nutrient retention.
2.
(a) In your own words, define loam. (
1 mark
)
A loam, also called a loamy soil, is a type of mineral soil with the proportions of 50% soil
solids (minerals and organic matter) and 50% pore space (water and air). Loamy soil is
special because of its mineral composition – around 40% silt, 40% sand, and 20% clay.
Loam is a good soil for many garden plants because of its ability to hold moisture and
drain well so that air reaches the roots of the plant.
3.
(a) Using the soil texture classes triangle below (Figure 2), determine the textural classes
of the following soils: (
3 marks
)
●
Soil 1: 40% sand, 10% silt, 50% clay –
Sandy Clay
●
Soil 2: 10% sand, 45% silt –
Silty Clay
●
Soil 3: 45% silt, 15% clay –
Loam
Figure 2- A soil texture triangle classifies soils based on the percentages of sand, silt, and clay.
(Source: Weil and Brady, 2019, Figure 4.7)
(b) Which of the three soils from 3(a) would you expect to be the best for agriculture?
Explain your reasoning (
2 marks
).
Out of the three soils, loamy soil would be the agriculture because it has good drainage
and water retention, nutrient retention, and versatility.
Loam soil is a balanced mixture of sand, silt, and clay particles. The combination of these
soils gives loamy soil good drainage and water retention. Loamy soil doesn't dry out or
get water logged, it can therefore hold the right amount of moisture for most plant roots
and prevents water logging, which is ideal for most plants.
In addition, loam soil has a strong ability to retain essential nutrients to plants. The silt
and clay in loam enables the soil to hold onto and release nutrients when necessary. The
ability to hold onto the nutrients makes loamy soil fertile, providing a healthy amount of
nutrients to plants.
Lastly, loam soil supports many crops – vegetables, fruits, grains, decorative/ ornamental
plants, and is able to provide an adequate growing medium for both agricultural and
horticultural plants. This versatility is convenient for agriculture since the soil is effective
for so many plants.
(c) Which of these three soils would you expect to have the highest water-holding
capacity? Explain your reasoning (
2 marks
).
Out of the three soils, Soil 2 – Silty Clay – is likely to have the highest water-holding
capacity. Soils with high proportions of clay or silt have a larger amount of smaller
particles making it easier for the soil to retain water, as compared to soils with high
amounts of large particles (found in sand) that allow for water drainage. Soil 2 is made up
of 10% sand, 45% silt, and 45% clay. This means that 90% of the soil is made up of
smaller particles with a strong ability to hold onto water. However, the low amounts of
sand means that there is a high chance of water-logging with Soil 2.
4.
(a) Differentiate between particle density and bulk density with respect to soils
(
2 marks
).
Particle Density (D
p
) is the density of solid particles in a sample of soil,
excluding pore space (water and air). It measures the mass of soil solid per unit
volume and has the unit M/m
3
or kg/m
3
. Bulk density (D
b
) is the density of the
entire sample of soil, both soil solids and pore spaces). It has the units M/m
3
or
kg/m
3
.
Particle density is found by dividing the weight of soil solids by the the volume
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
of soil solids, and is given by the formula: D
p
=
.
??𝑖?ℎ? ?? ??𝑖? ???𝑖??
?????? ?? ??𝑖? ???𝑖??
Bulk density is found by dividing the weight of oven dry soil with the total
volume of soil, including solids and pore space. It is given in the formula:
D
b
=
.
??𝑖?ℎ? ?? ??𝑖? (???? ??𝑦 ??𝑖?)
?????? ?? ??𝑖? (???𝑖?+????)
(b) Calculate the particle density and the bulk density of the following soil
given.
●
weight of soil solids = 1 Mg (Note: 1 megagram (Mg) = 1 million
grams)
●
volume of soil solids = 0.55 m
3
●
volume of pores = 0.2 m
3
(
4 marks
)
Particle Density
D
p
=
??𝑖?ℎ? ?? ??𝑖? ???𝑖??
?????? ?? ??𝑖? ???𝑖??
D
p
=
1 𝑀?
0.55 ?
3
D
p
= 1.818 Mg/m
3
Bulk Density
D
b
=
??𝑖?ℎ? ?? ??𝑖? (???? ??𝑦 ??𝑖?)
?????? ?? ??𝑖? (???𝑖?+????)
D
b
=
1 𝑀?
(0.55+0.2) ?
3
D
b
= 1.333 Mg/m
3
THEREFORE, the particle density of the soil is 1.818 Mg/m
3
and the bulk density is 1.33
Mg/m
3
, rounded to the third decimal.
(c) Imagine the soil in 4(b) was uniform throughout a given area and that half
of the area was cultivated using conventional methods for many years while
the other half of the area was left uncultivated. If the above value for bulk
density was for the cultivated soil, would you expect the value of bulk
density for the uncultivated soil to be higher or lower than for the cultivated
soil? Explain your reasoning (
3 marks
)
The bulk density of the uncultivated soil would likely be lower than the bulk
density of cultivated soil. Over time, the cultivation practices that are used will
destroy organic matter, compact the soil, and disrupt soil structure. Cultivation
also makes the soil more susceptible to erosion, which reduces the porosity of
the
soil, and leads to an increased bulk density of the cultivated soil.
Uncultivated soil, on the other hand, is more likely to maintain the natural soil
structure, with better aeration and more pore space. Therefore, the uncultivated
soil will likely have lower bulk density than the cultivated soil.
5.
(a) Calculate the particle density and bulk density of a soil given:
●
Weight of soil solids = 4.8 Mg
●
volume of soil (solids + pores) = 3 m
●
volume of pores = 0.7 m
3
(
4 marks
)
Particle Density
D
p
=
??𝑖?ℎ? ?? ??𝑖? ???𝑖??
?????? ?? ??𝑖? ???𝑖??
D
p
=
4.8 𝑀?
(3−0.7) ?
3
D
p
= 2.087 Mg/m
3
Bulk Density
D
b
=
??𝑖?ℎ? ?? ??𝑖? (???? ??𝑦 ??𝑖?)
?????? ?? ??𝑖? (???𝑖?+????)
D
b
=
4.8 𝑀?
3 ?
3
D
b
= 1.6 Mg/m
3
THEREFORE, the particle density of the soil is 2.087 Mg/m
3
and the bulk density is 1.6 Mg/m
3
,
rounded to the third decimal place.
(b) Compare your value of bulk density in 5(a) with the value of bulk density you
calculated in 4(b). Which value of bulk density would suggest a soil that is more
compact? Which value of bulk density would suggest a soil that has higher porosity?
Explain your reasoning for each (
4 marks
)
The higher value of bulk density suggests a more compact soil. In this case this is the soil
in 5(a), which has a bulk density of 1.6 Mg/m
3
. This is because soil that is more compact
has less pore space and results in the soil having higher bulk density.
On the other hand, the lower value of bulk density indicates high porosity. This is the soil
in 4 (b) that has a bulk density of 1.333 Mg/m
3
. High porosity means that there is a lot of
pore space in the soil sample, which results in bulk density being lower.
6.
(a) Imagine a plot of land (plot A) that has an initial (year 1) surface soil bulk density of
1.2 Mg/m
3
. In year 2, after harvesting operations occurred, the bulk density of the surface
soil in that same plot of land was 1.65 Mg/m
3
. In year 3, after further harvesting, the bulk
density of the surface soil in that same plot of land was 1.80 Mg/m
3
. Assuming that this
mineral soil is dominated by quartz, what is the overall change in the percent pore space
of the surface soil in plot A? (
2 marks
)
First calculate the percentage of pore space per year.
Percentage pore space = (1- bulk density/ particle density) * 100)
●
Particle density for quartz is around 2.65 Mg/m
3
.
Year 1:
Percentage pore space = [1 - (1.2/2.65)]*100
Percentage pore space = 54.717%
Year 3
Percentage pore space = [1 - (1.8/2.65)]*100
Percentage pore space = 32.075%
Overall change in percentage pore space from year 1 to year 3.
Overall change = 32.075% - 54.717%
Overall change = -22.642
THEREFORE, the overall change in the percentage of pore space in plot A from year 1
to year 3 is around -22.642%.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
(b) On a neighboring plot of land (plot B) with the same soil type and same initial bulk
density as plot A, a different harvesting operation is performed. In year 3, the bulk
density of the surface soil in plot B was 1.35 Mg/m
3
. Discuss the differences and changes
in bulk density between the two plots of land. In your answer, consider the impact of
different harvesting operations on soil bulk density over time. (
3 marks
)
Plot A sees an increase in bulk density over time, while Plot B sees a decrease in bulk
density over time.
Plot A might see an increase in bulk density because of harvesting practices that result in
soil compaction. This could include the use of heavy machinery, tire pressure on soil, and
even a lack of soil management.
Plot B, on the other hand, likely sees a decrease in bulk density due to better harvesting
practices. This could include practices like crop rotation, attempting to reduce
compaction, or improving the structure of the soil.
7.
(a) A given parcel of land has dimensions of 1 km x 3 km. If the required concentration
of fertilizer for this parcel of land is 1125 kg / hectare, how many kilograms of fertilizer
are required? Note: watch your units! (
2 marks
)
Area of land = 1 km x 3 km = 3 km
2
1 km
2
= 100 hectares
3 km
2
= 300 hectares
Fertilizer required = 1125 kg/ hectare
So, for 300 hectares.
1125 kg x 300 hectares = 337,500 kg.
THEREFORE, 337,500 kg of fertilizer are required for the parcel of land.
(b) A neighboring farmer has a parcel of land with the same dimensions and a clay loam
soil. They require the same concentration of fertilizer for this parcel of land as given in
7(a). How many kilograms of fertilizer are required for their parcel of land? (
1 mark
)
The neighboring farmer requires the same concentration of fertilizer for their parcel of
land that is equal in dimensions. This means that the neighboring farmer requires the
same amount of kilograms of fertilizer for their parcel of land, 337,500 kg.
THEREFORE, 337,500 kg of fertilizer are required for the neighbor’s parcel of land.
8.
(a) Figure 3 shows two soil profiles. Based on the Soil Taxonomy classification system,
soil (A) would be classified as a Mollisol and soil (B) would be an Ultisol.
Draw or clearly annotate each soil profile in Figure 3 highlighting some of the
important characteristics that distinguish these profiles (e.g., colours, major
horizon designations, horizon depths, vegetation types, etc.). (
4 marks
)
(a)
Mollisol
(b)
Ultisol
Figure 3 - Examples of a Mollisol (A) and an Ultisol (B) soil profile. (Source: USDA, n.d.
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/resources/education-and-teaching-materials/the-twelve-orders-of-soil-taxono
my/
).
(b) Briefly explain how soil forming factors and processes contribute to the
differences we see in typical soil profiles for Mollisols and Ultisols. (
4 marks
)
Soil-forming factors such as climate, organisms, and topography contribute to
the differences in typical soil profiles for Mollisols and Ultisols.
Mollisols form in regions with moderate to semi-arid climates. These climates
provide adequate moisture and temperature conditions to support the slow
decomposition of organic matter, leading to the organic-rich surface horizons.
Ultisols, on the other hand, develop in warm, humid climates with higher
temperatures and significant rainfall. This promotes leaching, removal of
minerals, and the translocation of clays from upper and lower horizons.
The moderate climate and lush vegetation that mollisols develop in allow it to
have a large organic matter accumulation and the formation of a dark,
organic-rich A horizon. Ultisols develop in warm, humid climates where
organic matter decomposes more quickly. This potentially limits the
accumulation of organic-rich horizons.
Mollisols are commonly found in flat to gently sloping landscapes with good
drainage conditions. This allows for organic matter preservation and nutrient
retention. Ultisols are found in various landscape positions, this includes slopey
terrains. This would increase leaching and the development of clay-rich
horizons in deeper layers.
The soil-forming factors interact to produce distinct soil profiles for Mollisols
and Ultisols. Mollisols have fertile, dark, organic-rich surface horizons, and are
suitable for agriculture. Conversely, Ultisols exhibit leaching and clay
accumulation horizons, and are relatively infertile, making them challenging for
agriculture.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help