Rubric_ Group assignment - Geography of Health - F2023

11/6/23, 2:47 PM Preview Rubric: Group assignment rubric - Geo716 - Geography of Health - F2023 - Toronto Metropolitan University https://courses.torontomu.ca/d2l/common/dialogs/nonModal/blank.d2l?d2l_body_type=1&d2l_nonModalDialog_cb=previewRubric_08026613954446833&d2l_non… 1/5 Group assignment rubric Course: Geo716 - Geography of Health - F2023 Criteria Excellent Very good Good Unsatisfactory Criterion Score Relevance of Ideas / 5 5 points Demonstrates sophistication of thought -Appropriately explains/define s key terms -Central ideas are clearly communicated -Information is relevant and on topic - Comprehensiv e yet limited enough to be manageable - Complexity & uncertainties are recognized 4 points Clearly states central ideas around topic but may have minor lapses in development or reasoning -Begins to acknowledge the complexity of central ideas & the possibility of other points of view -Sometimes bogged down in less relevant details -Attempts to define terms 3.5 points Communicatio n & construction of topic and arguments less effective or relevant -Does not explore nuance or acknowledge other views -Less attention given to defining terms 2.5 points Does not present clear topic or central ideas or does not respond appropriately to the assignment’s objectives - Communicatio n and arguments are vague or under- developed

11/6/23, 2:47 PM Preview Rubric: Group assignment rubric - Geo716 - Geography of Health - F2023 - Toronto Metropolitan University https://courses.torontomu.ca/d2l/common/dialogs/nonModal/blank.d2l?d2l_body_type=1&d2l_nonModalDialog_cb=previewRubric_08026613954446833&d2l_non… 2/5 Criteria Excellent Very good Good Unsatisfactory Criterion Score Creativity, Organization & Style / 5 5 points Information is well presented, interesting, inspiring, creative & engaging -Uses a logical organizational structure for presenting subject, purpose, target audience, etc. -Guides the audience through the chain of reasoning or progression of ideas -Flows well, good pacing, etc. -Demonstrates excellent use of group work time and strong group collaboration, including proper use of 'walk along' method 4 points Somewhat interesting & creative -Shows a logical progression of ideas -Some logical links may be lacking, yet for the most part clearly relates back to central idea -Could improve upon some elements of delivery (e.g. pacing, eye contact, volume, etc.) -Demonstrates some use of group work time and some collaboration among group members, including some use of 'walk along' method 3.5 points Lacking creativity, not very engaging -Ideas are arranged randomly rather than using any evident logical structure -Content may relate to central idea, but logic not always explained -May be overly general -May lack coherence -unfocused, or repetitive -Delivery needs strengthening -Questionable use of group work time and limited use of the 'walk along' method 2.5 points Not engaging or creative -Organization is random, lacking coherence - Content may not all relate to central idea -Contains several awkward or ungrammatical sentences -Misuses words -Volume, pacing was inadequate, lack of rapport, etc. -Did not make good use of group work time and did not engage in 'walk along' method at all

11/6/23, 2:47 PM Preview Rubric: Group assignment rubric - Geo716 - Geography of Health - F2023 - Toronto Metropolitan University https://courses.torontomu.ca/d2l/common/dialogs/nonModal/blank.d2l?d2l_body_type=1&d2l_nonModalDialog_cb=previewRubric_08026613954446833&d2l_non… 4/5 Total / 25 Criteria Excellent Very good Good Unsatisfactory Criterion Score Activity and participation as an active and supportive group member / 5 Presence at presentation and ability to answer questions / 5 5 points Excellent and demonstrated active engagement in all aspects of the assignment process, including brainstorming and contributing ideas, informing interview guide, actively participating in filming and editing processes, and contributing to a timely completion of the project. 4 points Demonstrated active engagement in most aspects of the assignment process, including brainstorming and contributing ideas, informing interview guide, participating in filming and editing processes, and contributing to a timely completion of the project. 3.5 points Has demonstrated active engagement in the development of the overall project; could have contributed more to group discussion, brainstorming, filming or editing process, but overall had a part to play in the final product. 2.5 points Has contributed to the final product in a significantly limited way. Group members reports some difficulties in engagement, and a demonstrated absence in group discussions and key aspects of the project. 5 points Present and able to effectively answer questions provided to the group 4 points Present and able to could have better answered questions provided to the group 3.5 points Present and but was challenged in responding to questions provided to the group 2.5 points Present, but was unable to responding to questions provided to the group

11/6/23, 2:47 PM Preview Rubric: Group assignment rubric - Geo716 - Geography of Health - F2023 - Toronto Metropolitan University https://courses.torontomu.ca/d2l/common/dialogs/nonModal/blank.d2l?d2l_body_type=1&d2l_nonModalDialog_cb=previewRubric_08026613954446833&d2l_non… 5/5 Overall Score Excellent 25 points minimum Very good 18 points minimum Good 16 points minimum Unsatisfactory 12 points minimum