Point Quarter Lab (1)
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Virginia Commonwealth University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
317
Subject
Geography
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by CaptainEchidnaMaster879
Results
This study was conducted at the Rice center and it was a fairly sunny day with a chilly
atmosphere. The density (D) , relative density (RD), basal area (BA), relative basal area (RBA),
and relative frequency( RF), and Important Value (IV) of the various tree species were calculated
by Excel (Table 1) . The mean point to plant distance is 3.07 and mean per plant area is 9.43.
Loblolly pine was the dominant species amongst all the species observed in the forest. Loblolly
species had the greatest density followed by the Red Maple which was second ( Figure
1).
Loblolly species had the greatest importance value which was 210.56 and then the Red Maple
had the second largest importance value which was 46.42 Figure 2).
Discussion
Based on the results the Loblolly Pine and Red Maple were the dominant tree
species in this forest location.
The Loblolly pine has the
highest importance value and highest density which is
674.51 .Loblolly species are one of the most planted tree species in North America and are able
to live in a wide range of environments, for example they go from Delaware and expand till
Florida (Fei and Steiner 2007 ). This tree species is extremely common in most places with few
exceptions such as the Mississippi River Valley and Texas. It is known to grow in the north due
to the temperature and in the west because of the low precipitation (Fei and Steiner 2007).The
second dominant species in this forest was the Red Maple tree species which had a density of
171.14 .Red Maple trees have been known to be abundant in North America and continue to
expand throughout the region (Walters and Yawney 1990). A study done by Walters and Yaney
explains how the Red Maple not only continues to grow even more but it is starting to expand on
to regions where it did not grow before such as Illonois and Missouri (Walter and Yawney 1990).
The Loblolly pine is a mixed hardwood
forest and is suffering due to the effects of tree
cutting (Dahlgreen and Driscoll 1994). Tree cutting on this species has had detrimental effects
such as a decrease in nutrients for the forest environment (Dahlgreen and Driscoll 1994).The
Loblolly species is constantly being affected by human activities such as thinning in order to
control the density in the forest and leaving space for other trees to grow (Carino and Biblis
2009).
Due to the high presence of
Loblolly Pine and the clear evidence on the usage of this
tree species this forest succession stage is a secondary succession because there are various
disturbances to this forest but the soil is still intact in the area
For future studies we can focus on the long term effect of climate affecting the forest.
This study would be conducted over a year and the density of the forest would be calculated at
the end of each seasonal period to see whether or not the climate if there is a drastic difference of
the density of the forests between the different seasonal periods.
Literature Cited:
Carino, H.F. and Biblis, E.J. (2009) 'Impact of stand density on the quality and value of 35-year-old
loblolly pine plantation sawtimber: a case study',
Forest Products Journal
, 59: 62-66
DAHLGREN, R. A., & DRISCOLL, C. T. (1994). The effects of whole-tree clear-cutting on soil
processes at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire, USA.
Plant and Soil
,
158
(2), 239–262.
Fei, S., & Steiner, K. C. (2007). Evidence for increasing red maple abundance in the eastern
united states. Forest Science, 53(4), 473-477.
I,_____Sonakshi Rout________________________________,state that “on my honor, I
have neither given nor received aid on this assignment, and I pledge that I am in compliance
with the VCU Honor System.” _
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Appendix
Table 1.
Data summary for all species per hectare; (D) density; (RD%) relative density; (RBA%)
relative basal area; (RF%) relative frequency; (IV) importance value.
Common
Name
D
RD %
RBA %
Rf %
IV
Loblolly Pine
674.5158
67
76.56072
67
210.5607
Red Maple
171.1458
17
12.42683
17
46.42683
Sweet Gum
70.4718
7
5.563198
7
19.5632
Southern Red
Oak
40.2696
4
1.984047
4
9.984047
Blackgum
10.0674
1
0.392881
1
2.392881
Green Ash
10.0674
1
0.565748
1
2.565748
Tulip Poblar
10.0674
1
0.7229
1
2.7229
White Oak
10.0674
1
1.143283
1
3.143283
White Elm
10.0674
1
0.640395
1
2.640395
Total
1006.74
100
100
100
300
Figure 1.
Density of each species per hectare
Figure 2.
Importance value for each species observed