7+-+Tutorial+Solutions

pdf

School

University of Toronto *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

B10

Subject

Finance

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

7

Uploaded by SuperHumanSnakeMaster872

Report
MGFB10H3 Principles of Finance Tutorial 7 Solutions to Exercises 1. Suppose that the assumptions of MPT are satisfied. There are two risky assets and a risk-free asset. You observe expected returns and standard deviations of portfolios of two investors that have chosen their portfolios according to the MPT: E ( R 1 ) = 10%, E ( R 2 ) = 15%, σ 1 = 20%, σ 2 = 40%. (a) A third investor comes into the market. This investor is highly risk averse, and wants to have as low standard deviation as possible. What is the return that this third investor should expect to earn? (b) A fourth investor can stomach a portfolio with standard deviation of returns of 50%. What is the return that this fourth investor should expect to earn? (c) The two risky assets enter equally into the market (tangency) portfolio (i.e., weight of each one is 0 . 50). Expected returns of these two assets are E ( R A ) = 0 . 08 and E ( R B ) = 0 . 12. What is the standard deviation of the market portfolio? (d) Suppose that the standard deviations of the two risky assets are σ A = 15% and σ B = 29 . 411%. What is the covariance σ AB and correlation ρ AB of returns of the two assets? (e) Suppose that you cannot invest in the risk-free asset but only in the two risky assets. Describe the portfolio that will give the lowest standard deviation. What is the expected return and standard deviation of this portfolio. Solution: (a) We know that these two investors must have portfolios on the capital market line, which is described by E ( R P ) = R f + E ( R M ) - R f σ M σ P Plugging in the numbers, we get 0 . 10 = R f + E ( R M ) - R f σ M · 0 . 20 0 . 15 = R f + E ( R M ) - R f σ M · 0 . 40 These are two equations with two unknowns (risk-free rate and Sharpe ratio ( SR ), or intercept and slope). We can solve them to find R f = 0 . 05 and SR = 0 . 25. The minimum risk the third investor can achieve is σ = 0, which would earn him/her the risk-free rate, so this investor’s return will be 5%. 1 _ 2722 21092923891
(b) All we have to do is plug the numbers into the CML formula: E ( R P ) = R f + E ( R M ) - R f σ M σ P = 0 . 05 + 0 . 25 · 0 . 50 = 0 . 175 = 17 . 5% (c) Expected return on the market portfolio is E ( R M ) = 0 . 50 · 0 . 08 + 0 . 50 · 0 . 12 = 0 . 10 We can now find the standard deviation of the market portfolio: E ( R M ) - R f σ M = 0 . 25, or 0 . 10 - 0 . 05 σ M = 0 . 25, or σ M = 0 . 20 (d) We just have to use the variance formula: σ 2 M = w 2 A σ 2 A + w 2 B σ 2 B + 2 · w A · w B · σ AB Plugging in the numbers, we get 0 . 20 2 = 0 . 50 2 · 0 . 15 2 + 0 . 50 2 · 0 . 29411 2 + 2 · 0 . 50 · 0 . 50 · σ AB Solving this is easy, and gives σ AB = 0 . 0255. To find correlation, we have to recall the correlation formula ρ AB = σ AB σ A σ B = 0 . 0255 0 . 15 · 0 . 29411 = 0 . 578 (e) We know that the weight in stock A is w MV P A = σ 2 B - σ A σ B ρ AB σ 2 A + σ 2 B - 2 σ A σ B ρ AB = σ 2 B - σ AB σ 2 A + σ 2 B - 2 σ AB = 0 . 29411 2 - 0 . 0255 0 . 15 2 + 0 . 29411 2 - 2 · 0 . 0255 = 1 . 0517 So you would have to have a weight of 1 . 0517 in the first risky asset, and - 0 . 0517 in the second risky asset. The expected return of this portfolio is E ( R P ) = 1 . 0517 · 8% - 0 . 0517 · 12% = 7 . 7932% Standard deviation of this portfolio is σ P = 1 . 0517 2 · 0 . 15 2 + 0 . 0517 2 · 0 . 29411 2 - 2 · 1 . 05217 · 0 . 0517 · 0 . 0255 = 14 . 95% 2. All assumptions of MPT hold and you choose your portfolio following the MPT. Sup- pose that you can borrow or lend money to the bank at the risk-free rate R f = 2%. The capital market line that starts at this risk-free rate and is tangent to the effi- cient frontier has a slope of 0 . 40 and the tangency portfolio M has standard deviation σ M = 10%. 2 _ 2722 21092923891
(a) What is the expected return E ( R M ) of this tangency portfolio? (b) Suppose you are quite risk averse and can tolerate standard deviation of just 5%. How much of your wealth should you allocate to the tangency portfolio M and how much should you deposit to the bank at rate R f ? What is your expected return? (c) How much do you need to allocate to the tangency portfolio and the risk-free asset to achieve an expected return of 5%? What is the standard deviation of the resulting portfolio? (d) If you cannot borrow and want to create a portfolio with the highest possible Sharpe ratio, what is the highest expected return that you can achieve? Solution: (a) The slope of the capital market line is the Sharpe ratio: SR = E ( R M ) - R f σ M = E ( R M ) - 0 . 02 0 . 10 = 0 . 40 , which can be easily solved to get E ( R M ) = 0 . 06 = 6%. (b) You know that the standard deviation of a portfolio consisting of a risk-free and a risky asset is σ P = w M σ M = w M · 0 . 10 = 0 . 05 So you should allocate w M = 0 . 5 of your money to the risky asset, and the remaining half to the risk-free asset. Expected return of the resulting portfolio is E ( R P ) = 0 . 5 · 6% + 0 . 5 · 2% = 4% (c) Expected return of the portfolio is E ( R P ) = w M · 6% + (1 - w M ) · 2% = 5% Solving this, we get w M = 0 . 75. So you need to allocate 75% of your money to the tangency portfolio, and put the remaining 25% of it in the bank. The standard deviation of the resulting portfolio is σ P = w M σ M = 0 . 75 · 0 . 10 = 0 . 075 = 7 . 5% (d) If you cannot borrow, the highest expected return you can achieve is E ( R M ) = 6%, which is what you’d get if you put all your money in the tangency portfolio. The standard deviation of this portfolio is obviously equal to σ M = 10%. 3. All assumptions of MPT hold and you choose your portfolio following the MPT. Sup- pose you have $100 , 000 in cash and you borrow another $15 , 000 from the bank at the annual risk-free rate of 4%. You invest everything in a portfolio P with annual expected return of 15% and standard deviation of 25%. 3 _ 2722 21092923891
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
(a) What is the Sharpe ratio of your overall portfolio? (b) What is your realized return if the portfolio P goes up by 25% over a year? (c) What is your realized return if the portfolio P goes down by 25% over a year? Solution: (a) The easy way of finding the Sharpe ratio is to simply observe that Sharpe ratio of your portfolio of risky and risk-free assets is the same as the Sharpe ratio of any other portfolio on the capital market line such as portfolio P you are investing in: SR P = 0 . 15 - 0 . 04 0 . 25 = 0 . 44 A slightly longer way is to calculate expected return and standard deviation of your overall investment. The expected return is E ( R P ) = 1 . 15 · 15% - 0 . 15 · 4% = 16 . 65% Standard deviation is σ P = 1 . 15 · 25% = 28 . 75% So Sharpe ratio is SR P = 16 . 65 - 4 28 . 75 = 0 . 44 (b) The value of your portfolio in one year if the portfolio goes up by 25% is $115 , 000 · 1 . 25 = $143 , 750. Out of this amount, you have to pay the bank back $15 , 000 · 1 . 04 = $15 , 600. So the money available to you is $143 , 750 - $15 , 600 = $128 , 150. And hence your realized return was 28 . 15%. (c) The value of your portfolio in one year if the portfolio goes down by 25% is $115 , 000 · 0 . 75 = $86 , 250. Out of this amount, you have to pay the bank back $15 , 000 · 1 . 04 = $15 , 600. So the money available to you is $86 , 250 - $15 , 600 = $70 , 650. And hence your realized return was - 29 . 35%. So borrowing to invest amplifies your return both in the up markets and down markets (this is known as leverage). 4. All assumptions of MPT are satisfied. There are two risky assets: stocks A and B , and a risk-free asset. An investor has $15,000 to invest, and optimally allocates $7,500 of it to stock A , $4,500 to stock B , and deposits the rest in the risk-free asset. Expected returns on the two stocks are E ( R A ) = 5% , E ( R B ) = 10%. The overall portfolio of the investor has an expected return of 6%. (a) Find the weights of stocks A and B in the market (tangency) portfolio. What is the expected return of the market portfolio? (b) A second investor wants to have a portfolio with minimum possible risk. What is the expected return on this portfolio? 4 _ 2722 21092923891
(c) Suppose the standard deviation of the market portfolio is σ M = 20%. A third investor wants his overall portfolio to have a standard deviation of 15% and has $10,000 to invest. Describe how much money this investor will allocate to stocks A and B and the risk-free asset. What is the expected return of his portfolio? Solution: (a) The weights that the investor allocates to stocks A and B are w A = 0 . 5, w B = 0 . 3. Denote by w M A and w M B = 1 - w M A the weights of stocks A and B in the market portfolio. We know that investor’s weight in the underlying assets A and B depends on how much you invest in the market portfolio M , w M , and on the composition of the portfolio M itself, w M A and w M B : w A = w M w M A (1) w B = w M w M B = w M ( 1 - w M A ) (2) From equations ( 1 ) and ( 2 ), we see that w M A = w A w M = w A w A + w B , which implies that w M A = 0 . 625 and therefore w M B = 1 - 0 . 625 = 0 . 375. The expected return of the market portfolio is thus E ( R M ) = w M A E ( R A ) + w M B E ( R B ) = 0 . 625 · 5% + 0 . 375 · 10% = 6 . 875% . (b) The lowest possible risk this investor can achieve is zero. The return he’ll receive is equal to the risk-free rate. To calculate it, recall that the expected return of the overall portfolio of the first investor is E ( R P ) = w A E ( R A ) + w B E ( R B ) + (1 - w A - w B ) R f , or 6 = 0 . 5 · 5 + 0 . 3 · 10 + 0 . 2 · R f . Solving this gives R f = 2 . 5%, which is the return the second investor will earn. (c) His allocation into the market portfolio can be most easily found from σ P = w M · σ M 15 = w M · 20 , which gives w M = 0 . 75, and therefore w R f = 1 - w M = 0 . 25, w A = w M w M A = 0 . 75 · 0 . 625 = 0 . 46875, and w B = w M ( 1 - w M A ) = 0 . 75 · (1 - 0 . 625) = 0 . 28125. So the third investor should allocate $4,687.50 into stock A , $2,812.50 into stock B and depost the remaining $2,500 into the risk-free asset. The third investor will earn an expected return of E ( R P ) = R f + E ( R M ) - R f σ M σ P = 2 . 5 + 6 . 875 - 2 . 5 20 · 15 = 5 . 7813% 5 _ 2722 21092923891
or equivalently E ( R P ) = w M E ( R M ) + w RF R f = 0 . 75 · 6 . 875 + 0 . 25 · 2 . 5 = 5 . 7813% , or equivalently E ( R P ) = w A E ( R A ) + w B E ( R B ) + w RF R f = 0 . 46875 · 5 + 0 . 28125 · 10 +0 . 25 · 2 . 5 = 5 . 7813%. 5. Consider three asset classes: stocks, bonds and riskless cash and assume the following Portfolio Expected return Standard deviation Risk-free ( R f ) 0.0% 0.0% Bonds ( R B ) 5.0% 8.0% Stocks ( R S ) 10.0% 20.0% (a) Assume that an equally weighted portfolio of cash, stocks and bonds has a stan- dard deviation of 7 . 0%. What must be the correlation between stocks and bonds? (b) Assume a mean-variance investor’s optimal portfolio (this is the investor that chooses the optimal portfolio according to the MPT) is invested 55 . 36% in bonds, 18 . 26% in stocks, has a standard deviation of 5 . 53% and a Sharpe ratio of 0 . 83. Given this information, compute the composition, standard deviation and ex- pected return on the tangency portfolio. (c) Given the information from the previous point, compute the composition and standard deviation of the mean-variance portfolio with 10% expected return. (d) Consider the mean-variance frontier without the riskless asset and assume (for this question only) that the correlation between stocks and bonds is equal to zero. Is the portfolio that is 100% invested into bonds a mean-variance efficient portfolio? Explain. Solution: (a) We can compute the correlation by using the portfolio variance formula: σ 2 ( R B / 3 + R S / 3) = 1 / 3 2 σ 2 ( R B ) + 1 / 3 2 σ 2 ( R S ) + 2 / 9 σ ( R B , R S ) . Solving for covariance gives σ ( R B , R S ) = - 0 . 00115. Now using the definition of correlation we have ρ ( R B , R S ) = σ ( R B , R S ) σ ( R B ) σ ( R S ) = - 0 . 071875 . 6 _ 2722 21092923891
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
(b) Using the optimal portfolio of the mean-variance investor we can find the weights of the tangency portfolio w M Bonds = 0 . 5536 0 . 5536 + 0 . 1826 = 0 . 75197 w M Stocks = 1 - 0 . 75197 = 0 . 24803 . Using the weights and the information we have about the two risky assets we have E ( R M ) = 0 . 75197 × 0 . 05 + 0 . 24803 × 0 . 1 = 0 . 0624 . To find the volatility we can either use the volatility of the portfolio formula σ ( R M ) = p 0 . 75197 2 × 0 . 08 2 + 0 . 24803 2 × 0 . 1 2 + 2 × 0 . 75197 × 0 . 24803 × ( - 0 . 00115) = 0 . 0752 . Alternatively, we can use the fact that all the efficient portfolios lie on the CML. We know that the slope of this line is max SR = E ( R M ) - R f σ ( R M ) = 0 . 83 , therefore σ ( R M ) = 0 . 0624015 0 . 83 = 0 . 0752 (c) The CML is described by the following equation E ( R P ) = R f + max SR × σ ( R P ) , or, equivalently E ( R P ) = w M E ( R M ) + (1 - w M ) R f = R f + w M ( E ( R M ) - R f ) σ P = w M σ M Plugging in the values we have 0 . 1 = w M 0 . 0624015 w M = 0 . 1 / 0 . 0624015 = 1 . 60253 . The standard deviation of this portfolio can be found using the w M and σ M σ P = 1 . 60253 × 0 . 0752 = 0 . 1205 = 12 . 05% , or, alternatively, using the equation of the CML σ P = 0 . 1 / 0 . 83 = 0 . 1205 = 12 . 05% . The composition of this portfolio is w Bonds = 1 . 60253 × 0 . 75197 = 1 . 20505 , w Stocks = 1 . 60253 × 0 . 24803 = 0 . 397475 . (d) No, a portfolio that is fully invested in bonds is not a mean-variance efficient portfolio. The all-bond portfolio lies on the inefficient part of the mean-variance frontier. 7 _ 2722 21092923891