NYSE_INGR_2010

MARKET SALES Other Beverages Food 49 % 10 % Paper and Corrugating Brewing 9 % 12 % Animal Nutrition 11 % Unique geographic position Proven business model Strong balance sheet Diverse customer base 1 2 3 4 5 6 Broad ingredient portfolio We will continue to build on our successful business model, which employs a regional approach with a global perspective. Experienced and talented employees 9 % (Based on fourth quarter 2010 net sales) Our competitive advantages: We will continue to build on our successful bus which employs a regional approach with a globa ASIA / AFRICA Strong potential for growth driven by population increases and consumer demand for convenience foods. Fourth quarter 2010 net sales 17 % EUROPE Firm position in a diverse market with growth opportunities in clean label and health and wellness ingredients. Fourth quarter 2010 net sales 5 % CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 1

Dairy Corn Products provides important ingredients to help yogurts, smoothies, flavored milks, ice creams, and cheeses meet consumer taste and texture desires. Our N-Dulge ™ texturizers provide firm, creamy mouth-feel in everything from yogurts and custards to sour cream and milk-based energy drinks. Our customers can also use our PRECISA ™ texture systems to give reduced-fat dairy offerings the same rich, creamy texture as traditional dairy products. And an increasing number of yogurt and dairy customers are fortifying their products with our health and wellness ingredients including NutraFlora ® , a prebiotic fiber to help consumers maintain digestive health. At the same time, our products can also enable our customers to replace more costly ingredients such as dairy solids, gelatin and fats, reducing costs while still producing an outstanding product. Confection Corn Products’ innovative solutions and breadth of ingredients help our confectionery customers delight consumers with both sugar-free options and full calorie indulgences. Our complete line of sweeteners allows us to help formulate desirable treats with specific levels of sweetness suitable for virtually all types of candies. For gummy and gel candies, texture is critical to our customers. Our growing line of modified starches provides the chewiness and mouth-feel that candy-lovers crave. And, for the growing segment of con- sumers looking for sweetness and taste without the calories, we offer stevia and a line of polyol- based ingredients that replace sugar and syrups in products like sugar-free gums and mints. INGREDIENTS FOR SUCCESS 4 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL FOOD

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 7 Personal Care Natural, bio-based ingredients are gaining increased popularity in the global personal care market. Our Farmal ® line of personal care prod- ucts touches virtually every aspect of that market with sustainable, plant-based ingredients for lotions, creams, powders, soaps and shampoos. Our ingredients give personal care products many of the attributes that consumers demand. In cosmetics, they provide oil absorption and moisturizing benefits. They give creams and lotions a softer feel and reduced tackiness. They also create a richer, thicker lather in body washes, soaps and shaving creams, and added smooth- ness and softness in deodorants. For babies, our corn starch has long been used as a safer alternative to talc-based powders. Similarly, our starches and syrups provide non-irritating alter- natives to petroleum-based ingredients in face washes and cosmetics. Pharmaceutical In a variety of ways, starches and sweeteners play an important role in supporting and facilitating certain medical and pharmaceutical applications. Our specialty starches not only help pharmaceuti- cal companies form their medicines, they provide coatings that make pills easier to swallow. And our sweeteners make consumption of pills and syrups easier and more palatable, particularly for children. Our sugar-free line of polyols also prevents cough syrups from crystallizing. Hospitals rely on our intravenous dextrose to supply vitally needed nutrition to their patients. And our line of health and wellness ingredients offers products that help to maintain cognitive, bone, digestive, and heart health as well as provide fortification options such as added fiber and gluten-free solutions. INGREDIENTS FOR SUCCESS OTHER MARKETS

PART I Item 1. Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Item 1A. Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 Item 2. Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 Item 3. Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . .13 Item 6. Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29 Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .58 Item 9A. Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .58 Item 9B. Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .58 PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59 Item 11. Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59 Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59 PART IV Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59 Signatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .62 Table of Contents to Form 10-K

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 3 Our European region consists of specialty starch operations in England, Germany and South Africa. The regions’ two facilities are in Hamburg, Germany and Goole, England. In addition to the operations in which we engage directly, we have strategic alliances through technical license agreements with companies in South Africa and Venezuela. As a group, our strategic alliance partners produce high fructose, glucose and high maltose syrups (both corn and tapioca), regular, modified, waxy and tapioca starches, dextrose and dextrins, maltodextrins and caramel color. These products have leading positions in many of their target markets. Competition The starch and sweetener industry is highly competitive. Many of our products are viewed as basic commodity ingredients that com- pete with virtually identical products and derivatives manufactured by other companies in the industry. The US is a highly competitive market where there are other corn refiners, several of which are divisions of larger enterprises. Some of these competitors, unlike us, have vertically integrated their corn refining and other opera- tions. Competitors include ADM Corn Processing Division (“ADM”) (a division of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company), Cargill, Inc., Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas, Inc., and several others. Our opera- tions in Mexico and Canada face competition from US imports and local producers including ALMEX, a Mexican joint venture between ADM and Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas, Inc. In South America, Cargill has corn-refining operations in Brazil. Many smaller local corn and tapioca refiners also operate in many of our markets. Competition within our markets is largely based on price, quality and product availability. Several of our products also compete with products made from raw materials other than corn. High fructose corn syrup and mono- hydrate dextrose compete principally with cane and beet sugar products. Co-products such as corn oil and gluten meal compete with products of the corn dry milling industry and with soybean oil, soybean meal and other products. Fluctuations in prices of these competing products may affect prices of, and profits derived from, our products. Customers We supply a broad range of customers in over 60 industries. Approximately 31 percent of our 2010 net sales were to compa- nies engaged in the processed foods industry and approximately 14 percent of our 2010 net sales were to companies engaged in the soft drink industry. Additionally, sales to the animal feed market and the brewing industry represented approximately 13 percent and 11 percent of our 2010 net sales, respectively. Raw Materials Corn is the basic raw material we use to produce starches and sweeteners. The supply of corn in the United States has been, and is anticipated to continue to be, adequate for our domestic needs. The price of corn, which is determined by reference to prices on the Chicago Board of Trade, fluctuates as a result of various factors including: farmer planting decisions, climate, and government policies (including those related to the production of ethanol), livestock feeding, shortages or surpluses of world grain supplies, and domestic and foreign government policies and trade agreements. The Company also uses tapioca, potato, rice and sugar as a raw material. Corn is also grown in other areas of the world, including Canada, Mexico, Europe, South Africa, Argentina, Brazil, China, Pakistan and Kenya. Our affiliates outside the United States utilize both local supplies of corn and corn imported from other geographic areas, including the United States. The supply of corn for these affiliates is also generally expected to be adequate for our needs. Corn prices for our non-US affiliates generally fluctuate as a result of the same factors that affect US corn prices. Due to the competitive nature of our industry and the availability of substitute products not produced from corn, such as sugar from cane or beets, end product prices may not necessarily fluctuate in a manner that correlates to raw material costs of corn. We follow a policy of hedging our exposure to commodity fluctuations with commodities futures contracts for certain of our North American corn purchases. Our firm-priced business is hedged. Other business may or may not be hedged at any given time based on management’s judgment as to the need to fix the costs of our raw materials to protect our profitability. See Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, in the section enti- tled “Commodity Costs” for additional information. Research and Development With the acquisition of National Starch, the Company has obtained a global research and development capability concentrated in Bridgewater, New Jersey. Activities at Bridgewater include plant science and physical, chemical and biochemical modifications to food formulation, as well as development of non-food applications such as starch-based biopolymers. In addition, Corn Products has product application technology centers that direct our product development teams worldwide to create product application solu- tions to better serve the ingredient needs of our customers. Product development activity is focused on developing product applications for identified customer and market needs. Through this approach, we have developed value-added products for use by customers in various industries. We usually collaborate with customers to develop

6 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL from August 2001 until February 2002, as the Controller from 1997 to 2001, as the Vice President of Finance for Refineries de Maiz, CPC’s Argentine subsidiary, from 1995 to 1997, as the Director of Finance and Planning for CPC’s Latin America Corn Refining Division from 1993 to 1995, and as the Vice President and Comptroller of Canada Starch Operating Company Inc., the Canadian subsidiary of CPC, and as the Vice President of Finance of the Canadian Corn Refining Business from 1989. Mr. Fortnum is a member of the Boards of Directors of the Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce, the Corn Refiners Association and Greenfield Ethanol, Inc. He holds a Bachelors degree in Economics from the University of Toronto and completed the Senior Business Administration Course offered by McGill University. Diane J. Frisch 56 Senior Vice President, Human Resources since October 1, 2010. Ms. Frisch previously served as Vice President, Human Resources, from May 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010. Prior to that, Ms. Frisch served as Vice President of Human Resources and Communications for the Food Americas and Global Pharmaceutical Packaging busi- nesses of Rio Tinto’s Alcan Packaging, a multinational company engaged in flexible and specialty packaging, from January 2004 to March 30, 2010. Prior to being acquired by Alcan Packaging, Ms. Frisch served as Vice President of Human Resources for the flexible packaging business of Pechiney, S.A. an aluminum and packaging company with headquarters in Paris and Chicago, from January 2001 to January 2004. Previously, she served as Vice President of Human Resources for Culligan International Company; Vice President and Director of Human Resources for Alumax Mill Products, Inc., a division of Alumax Inc.; Director of Human Resources for U.S. Reduction Company; and Manager of Human Resources for American Can Company. Ms. Frisch holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Psychology from Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY, and a Master of Science in Industrial Relations from the University of Wisconsin in Madison. Kimberly A. Hunter 49 Corporate Treasurer since February 2004. Ms. Hunter previously served as Director of Corporate Treasury from September 2001 to February 2004. Prior to that, she served as Managing Director, Investment Grade Securities at Bank One Corporation, a financial institution, from 1997 to 2000 and as Vice President, Capital Markets of Bank One from 1992 to 1997. Ms. Hunter holds Bachelors degrees in Government and Economics from Harvard University and a Masters in Business Administration from the University of Chicago. Mary Ann Hynes 63 Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer since October 1, 2010. Ms. Hynes previously served as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from March 2006 to September 30, 2010 and, addition- ally, Chief Compliance Officer since January 2008. Prior to that, Ms. Hynes was Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Chief Legal Officer for IMC Global Inc., a producer and distributor of crop nutrients and animal feed ingredients, from July 1999 to October 2004, and a consultant to The Mosaic Company, also a producer and distributor of crop nutrients and animal feed ingredi- ents, from October 2004 to October 2005. The Mosaic Company acquired IMC Global Inc. in October 2004. She holds a Bachelors of Political Science and Mathematics from Loyola University, Juris Doctor and Master of Laws – Taxation degrees from John Marshall Law School and an Executive Masters of Business Administration degree from the Lake Forest Graduate School of Business in Chicago. Robin A. Kornmeyer 62 Vice President since September 2002 and Controller since January 2002. Mr. Kornmeyer previously served as Corporate Controller at Foster Wheeler Ltd., a worldwide engineering and construction company, from 2000 to 2002. He holds a Bachelors degree in Economics and Business Administration from Lebanon Valley College, Annville, Pennsylvania. John F. Saucier 57 Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy and Global Business Development since October 1, 2010. Mr. Saucier previously served as Vice President and President Asia/Africa Division and Global Business Development from November 2007 to September 30, 2010. Mr. Saucier previously served as Vice President, Global Business and Product Development, Sales and Marketing from April 2006 to November 2007. Prior to that, Mr. Saucier was President, Integrated Nylon Division of Solutia Inc., a specialty chemical manufacturer from May 2004 to March 2005, and Vice President of Solutia and General Manager of its Integrated Nylon Division from September 2001 to May 2004. Solutia Inc. and 14 of its US subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions under the bankruptcy laws in December 2003. Mr. Saucier holds Bachelors and Masters degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Missouri and a Masters degree in Business Administration from Washington University in St. Louis.

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 9 Changes in consumer preferences and perceptions may lessen the demand for our products, which could reduce our sales and profitability and harm our business. Food products are often affected by changes in consumer tastes, national, regional and local economic conditions and demographic trends. For instance, changes in prevailing health or dietary prefer- ences causing consumers to avoid food products containing sweetener products in favor of foods that are perceived as being more healthy, could reduce our sales and profitability, and such a reduction could be material. Increasing concern among consumers, public health professionals and government agencies about the potential health concerns associated with obesity and inactive lifestyles represent a significant challenge to some of our cus- tomers, including those engaged in the soft drink industry. The uncertainty of acceptance of products developed through biotechnology could affect our profitability. The commercial success of agricultural products developed through biotechnology, including genetically modified corn, depends in part on public acceptance of their development, cultivation, distribution and consumption. Public attitudes can be influenced by claims that genetically modified products are unsafe for consumption or that they pose unknown risks to the environment even if such claims are not based on scientific studies. These public attitudes can influence regulatory and legislative decisions about biotechnology even where they are approved. The sale of the Company’s products which may contain genetically modified corn could be delayed or impaired because of adverse public perception regarding the safety of the Company’s products and the potential effects of these products on animals, human health and the environment. Our profitability could be negatively impacted if we fail to maintain satisfactory labor relations. Approximately 39 percent of our US and 54 percent of our non-US employees are members of unions. Strikes, lockouts or other work stoppages or slow downs involving our unionized employees could have a material adverse effect on us. Our reliance on certain industries for a significant portion of our sales could have a material adverse affect on our business. Approximately 31 percent of our 2010 sales were made to companies engaged in the processed foods industry and approxi- mately 14 percent were made to companies in the soft drink industry. Additionally, sales to the animal feed market and the brewing industry represented approximately 13 percent and 11 percent of our 2010 net sales, respectively. If our processed foods customers, soft drink customers, brewing industry customers or animal feed customers were to substantially decrease their pur- chases, our business might be materially adversely affected. An outbreak of a life threatening communicable disease could negatively impact our business. If the economies of any countries where we sell or manufacture products are affected by an outbreak of a life threatening commu- nicable diseases such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (“SARS”) or the Avian Flu, it could result in decreased sales and unfavorably impact our business. Government policies and regulations in general, and specifically affecting agriculture-related businesses, could adversely affect our operating results. Our operating results could be affected by changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies, laws and regulations, and other activi- ties of United States and foreign governments, agencies, and similar organizations. These conditions include but are not limited to changes in a country’s or region’s economic or political condi- tions, trade regulations affecting production, pricing and marketing of products, local labor conditions and regulations, reduced protec- tion of intellectual property rights, changes in the regulatory or legal environment, restrictions on currency exchange activities, currency exchange fluctuations, burdensome taxes and tariffs, and other trade barriers. International risks and uncertainties, including changing social and economic conditions as well as terrorism, political hostilities, and war, could limit our ability to transact business in these markets and could adversely affect our revenues and operating results. Due to cross-border disputes, our operations could be adversely affected by actions taken by the governments of countries where we conduct business.

10 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL The recognition of impairment charges on goodwill or long-lived assets could adversely impact our future financial position and results of operations. In 2010, we recorded a $24 million write-off for impairment and restructuring charges for the closure of our Chilean manufacturing plant. In 2009, we recorded a write-off of $119 million of goodwill pertaining to our operation in South Korea. See Note 4 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K for additional information regarding these write-offs. We perform an annual impairment assessment for goodwill and, as necessary, for long-lived assets. If the results of such assess- ments were to show that the fair value of our property, plant and equipment or goodwill were less than the carrying values, we could be required to recognize a charge for impairment of goodwill and/or long-lived assets and the amount of the impairment charge could be material. Our annual impairment assessment as of September 30, 2010 did not result in any additional impairment charges for the year. Even though it was determined that there was no additional long-lived asset impairment as of September 30, 2010, the future occurrence of a potential indicator of impairment, such as a signifi- cant adverse change in the business climate that would require a change in our assumptions or strategic decisions made in response to economic or competitive conditions, could require us to perform an assessment prior to the next required assessment date of September 30, 2011. Changes in our tax rates or exposure to additional income tax liabilities could impact our profitability. We are subject to income taxes in the United States and in various other foreign jurisdictions. Our effective tax rates could be adversely affected by changes in the mix of earnings by jurisdiction, changes in tax laws or tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, and material adjustments from tax audits. In particular, the carrying value of deferred tax assets, which are predominantly in the US, is dependent upon our ability to gen- erate future taxable income in the US. In addition, the amount of income taxes we pay is subject to ongoing audits in various juris- dictions and a material assessment by a governing tax authority could affect our profitability. Operating difficulties at our manufacturing plants could adversely affect our operating results. Producing starches and sweeteners through corn refining is a capital intensive industry. We have 37 plants and have preventive maintenance and de-bottlenecking programs designed to maintain and improve grind capacity and facility reliability. If we encounter operating difficulties at a plant for an extended period of time or start up problems with any capital improvement projects, we may not be able to meet a portion of sales order commitments and could incur significantly higher operating expenses, both of which could adversely affect our operating results. We also use boilers to generate steam required in our manufacturing processes. An event that impaired the operation of a boiler for an extended period of time could have a significant adverse effect on the operations of any plant where such event occurred. We may not have access to the funds required for future growth and expansion. We may need additional funds for working capital to grow and expand our operations. We expect to fund our capital expenditures from operating cash flow to the extent we are able to do so. If our operating cash flow is insufficient to fund our capital expenditures, we may either reduce our capital expenditures or utilize our gen- eral credit facilities. We may also seek to generate additional liquidity through the sale of debt or equity securities in private or public markets or through the sale of non-productive assets. We cannot provide any assurance that our cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund anticipated capital expenditures or that we will be able to obtain additional funds from financial markets or from the sale of assets at terms favorable to us. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flows or raise sufficient additional funds to cover our capital expenditures, we may not be able to achieve our desired operating efficiencies and expansion plans, which may adversely impact our competitiveness and, therefore, our results of operations. Increased interest rates could increase our borrowing costs. From time to time we may issue securities to finance acquisitions, capital expenditures, working capital and for other general corporate purposes. An increase in interest rates in the general economy could result in an increase in our borrowing costs for these financings, as well as under any existing debt that bears interest at an unhedged floating rate.

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 11 We may not successfully identify and complete acquisitions or strategic alliances on favorable terms or achieve anticipated synergies relating to any acquisitions or alliances, and such acquisitions could result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures and require significant management resources. We regularly review potential acquisitions of complementary businesses, technologies, services or products, as well as potential strategic alliances. We may be unable to find suitable acquisition candidates or appropriate partners with which to form partnerships or strategic alliances. Even if we identify appropriate acquisition or alliance candidates, we may be unable to complete such acquisitions or alliances on favorable terms, if at all. In addition, the process of integrating an acquired business, including National Starch, technol- ogy, service or product into our existing business and operations may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. Integration of an acquired company also may require significant management resources that otherwise would be available for ongoing development of our business. Moreover, we may not real- ize the anticipated benefits of any acquisition, including National Starch, or strategic alliance, and such transactions may not gener- ate anticipated financial results. Future acquisitions could also require us to issue equity securities, incur debt, assume contin- gent liabilities or amortize expenses related to intangible assets, any of which could harm our business. Our inability to contain costs could adversely affect our future profitability and growth. Our future profitability and growth depends on our ability to contain operating costs and per-unit product costs and to maintain and/or implement effective cost control programs, while at the same time maintaining competitive pricing and superior quality products, customer service and support. Our ability to maintain a competitive cost structure depends on continued containment of manufacturing, delivery and administrative costs, as well as the implementation of cost-effective purchasing programs for raw materials, energy and related manufacturing requirements. If we are unable to contain our operating costs and maintain the productivity and reliability of our production facilities, our prof- itability and growth could be adversely affected. Volatility in the stock market, fluctuations in quarterly operating results and other factors could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. The market price for our common stock may be significantly affected by factors such as our announcement of new products or services or such announcements by our competitors; technologi- cal innovation by us, our competitors or other vendors; quarterly variations in our operating results or the operating results of our competitors; general conditions in our or our customers’ markets; and changes in the earnings estimates by analysts or reported results that vary materially from such estimates. In addition, the stock market has experienced significant price fluctuations that have affected the market prices of equity securities of many com- panies that have been unrelated to the operating performance of any individual company. No assurance can be given that we will continue to pay dividends. The payment of dividends is at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be subject to our financial results and the availability of surplus funds to pay dividends. ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None ITEM 2. PROPERTIES We operate, directly and through our consolidated subsidiaries, 37 manufacturing facilities, all of which are owned. In addition, we lease our corporate headquarters in Westchester, Illinois and our National Starch facility in Bridgewater, New Jersey. The following list details the locations of our manufacturing facilities within each of our three geographic regions: North America Cardinal, Ontario, Canada London, Ontario, Canada Port Colborne, Ontario, Canada San Juan del Rio, Queretaro, Mexico Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico Mexico City, Edo, Mexico Stockton, California, U.S. Bedford Park, Illinois, U.S. Mapleton, Illinois, U.S. Indianapolis, Indiana, U.S. North Kansas City, Missouri, U.S. Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S. Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.

12 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL South America Baradero, Argentina Chacabuco, Argentina Balsa Nova, Brazil Cabo, Brazil Conchal, Brazil Mogi-Guacu, Brazil Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Trombudo, Brazil Barranquilla, Colombia Cali, Colombia Lima, Peru Asia/Africa Lane Cove, Australia Shanghai, China Shouguang, China Eldoret, Kenya Cornwala, Pakistan Faisalabad, Pakistan Ichon, South Korea Inchon, South Korea Ban Kao Dien, Thailand Kalasin, Thailand Sikhiu, Thailand Europe Hamburg, Germany Goole, United Kingdom We believe our manufacturing facilities are sufficient to meet our current production needs. We have preventive maintenance and de-bottlenecking programs designed to further improve grind capacity and facility reliability. We have electricity co-generation facilities at all of our US and Canadian plants with the exception of Indianapolis, North Kansas City, Charleston and Mapleton, as well as at our plants in San Juan del Rio, Mexico; Baradero, Argentina; and Balsa Nova and Mogi- Guacu, Brazil, that provide electricity at a lower cost than is available from third parties. We generally own and operate these co-generation facilities, except for the facilities at our Stockton, California; Cardinal, Ontario; and Balsa Nova and Mogi-Guacu, Brazil locations, which are owned by, and operated pursuant to co-generation agreements with, third parties. In recent years, we have made significant capital expenditures to update, expand and improve our facilities, spending $159 million in 2010. We believe these capital expenditures will allow us to operate efficient facilities for the foreseeable future. We currently anticipate that capital expenditures for 2011 will approximate $280 million to $300 million. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS On October 21, 2003, we submitted, on our own behalf and on behalf of our Mexican affiliate, CPIngredientes, S.A. de C.V., (previously known as Compania Proveedora de Ingredientes) a Request for Institution of Arbitration Proceedings Submitted Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”) (the “Request”). The Request was sub- mitted to the Additional Office of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes and was brought against the United Mexican States. In the Request, we asserted that the imposition by Mexico of a discriminatory tax on beverages con- taining HFCS in force from 2002 through 2006 breached various obligations of Mexico under NAFTA. The case was bifurcated into two phases, liability and damages, and a hearing on liability was held before a Tribunal in July 2006. In a Decision dated January 15, 2008, the Tribunal issued an order holding that Mexico had violated NAFTA Article 1102, National Treatment. In July 2008, a hearing regarding the quantum of damages was held before the same Tribunal. We sought damages and pre- and post-judgment interest totaling $288 million through December 31, 2008. In an award rendered August 18, 2009, the Tribunal awarded damages to the Company in the amount of $58.4 million, as a result of the tax and certain out-of-pocket expenses incurred by CPIngredientes, together with accrued interest (the “Award”). On October 1, 2009, we submitted to the Tribunal a request for correction of the Award to avoid effective double taxation on the amount of the Award in Mexico. On January 24 and 25, 2011, we received cash payments totaling $58.4 million from the Government of the United Mexican States pursuant to an award rendered in our favor by the Tribunal in 2009 (and corrected in 2010). Mexico made this payment pursuant to an agreement with Corn Products International that provides for terminating pending post-award litigation and waiving post-award interest. The $58.4 million award will be recorded in the Company’s first quarter 2011 consolidated financial statements. See also Note 13 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements. We are currently subject to various other claims and suits arising in the ordinary course of business, including certain envi- ronmental proceedings. We do not believe that the results of such legal proceedings, even if unfavorable to us, will be material to us. There can be no assurance, however, that such claims or suits or those arising in the future, whether taken individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS There were no matters submitted to a vote of our security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the quarter ended December 31, 2010.

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 13 ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES Shares of our common stock are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “CPO.” The number of holders of record of our common stock was 6,600 at January 31, 2010. We have a history of paying quarterly dividends. The amount and timing of the dividend payment, if any, is based on a number of factors including estimated earnings, financial position and cash flow. The payment of a dividend is solely at the discretion of our Board of Directors. Future dividend payments will be subject to our finan- cial results and the availability of surplus funds to pay dividends. The quarterly high and low sales prices for our common stock and cash dividends declared per common share for 2009 and 2010 are shown below. 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 2010 Market prices High $35.73 $37.62 $39.36 $48.00 Low 26.23 30.25 28.70 37.12 Per share dividends $««0.14 $««0.14 $««0.14 $««0.14 2009 Market prices High $31.15 $28.97 $32.37 $31.90 Low 17.80 18.04 24.15 26.70 Per share dividends $««0.14 $««0.14 $««0.14 $««0.14 Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities: The following table summarizes information with respect to our purchases of our common stock during the fourth quarter of 2010. Maximum Number (or Total Approximate Number Dollar Value) of Shares of Shares Purchased that may yet as part be Purchased Total of Publicly Under the Number Average Announced Plans or of Shares Price Paid Plans or Programs at (shares in thousands) Purchased Per Share Programs end of period Oct. 1 – Oct. 31, 2010 – – – 4,685 shares Nov. 1 – Nov. 30, 2010 – – – 4,685 shares Dec. 1 – Dec. 31, 2010 – – – 4,685 shares Total – – – On November 17, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized an extension of our stock repurchase program permitting us to purchase up to 5 million shares of our outstanding common stock through November 30, 2015. The stock repurchase program was authorized by the Board of Directors on November 7, 2007 and would have expired on November 30, 2010. As of December 31, 2010, we had 4.7 million shares available for repurchase under this program. ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA Selected financial data is provided below. (in millions, except per share amounts) 2010 (a) 2009 2008 2007 2006 Summary of operations: Net sales $4,367 $3,672 $3,944 $3,391 $2,621 Net income attributable to CPI 169 (b) 41 (c) 267 198 124 Net earnings per common share of CPI: Basic $««2.24 (b) $÷0.55 (c) $÷3.59 $÷2.65 $÷1.67 Diluted $««2.20 (b) $÷0.54 (c) $÷3.52 $÷2.59 $÷1.63 Cash dividends declared per common share of CPI $««0.56 $÷0.56 $÷0.54 $÷0.40 $÷0.33 Balance sheet data: Working capital $÷«862 $÷«480 $÷«438 $÷«415 $÷«320 Property, plant and equipment – net 2,123 1,564 1,447 1,500 1,356 Total assets 5,071 2,952 3,207 3,103 2,645 Long-term debt 1,681 408 660 519 480 Total debt 1,769 544 866 649 554 Redeemable common stock – 14 14 19 44 Total equity (d) $2,002 $1,704 $1,406 $1,626 $1,349 Shares outstanding, year end 76.0 74.9 74.5 73.8 74.3 Additional data: Depreciation and amortization $÷«155 $÷«130 $÷«128 $÷«125 $÷«114 Capital expenditures 159 146 228 177 171 (a) Includes National Starch from October 1, 2010 forward. (b) Includes $14 million of after-tax charges for bridge loan and other financing costs ($0.18 per diluted common share), after-tax acquisition-related costs of $26 million ($0.34 per diluted common share), after-tax charges of $22 million ($0.29 per diluted common share) for impaired assets and other costs primarily associated with our operations in Chile and after-tax charges of $18 million ($0.23 per diluted common share) relating to the sale of National Starch inventory that was adjusted to fair value at the acquisition date in accordance with business combination accounting rules. See Notes 3, 4 and 6 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information. (c) Includes after-tax charges for impaired assets and restructuring costs of $110 million, or $1.47 per diluted common share. See Note 4 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information. (d) Includes non-controlling interests. Part II

14 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Overview On October 1, 2010, we completed our acquisition of National Starch, a global provider of specialty starches, from Akzo Nobel N.V., a global coatings and specialty chemicals company, headquar- tered in The Netherlands. We acquired 100 percent of National Starch through asset purchases in certain countries and stock purchases in certain countries. The purchase price was $1.354 billion in cash, subject to certain post-closing adjustments. The funding of the purchase price was provided principally from borrowings. The results of National Starch are included in our consolidated financial results from October 1, 2010 forward. The acquisition positions us with a broader portfolio of products, enhanced geographic reach, and the ability to offer customers a broad range of value-added ingredient solutions for a variety of their evolving needs. National Starch had sales of $1.2 billion in 2009 and provides us with, among other things, 11 additional manufac- turing facilities in 8 countries, across 5 continents. The acquisition also provides additional sales and technical offices around the world. With the acquisition, we now employ approximately 10,700 people in North America, South America, Asia/Africa and Europe. We operate 37 manufacturing facilities in 15 countries; have sales offices in 29 countries, and have research and ingredient develop- ment centers in key global markets. See Note 3 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the acquisition. We are one of the world’s largest corn refiners and a major supplier of high-quality food ingredients, industrial products and specialty starches derived from the wet milling and processing of corn and other starch-based materials. The corn refining industry is highly competitive. Many of our products are viewed as commodi- ties that compete with virtually identical products manufactured by other companies in the industry. As noted above, we have 37 manufacturing plants located throughout North America, South America, Asia/Africa and Europe, and we manage and operate our businesses at a local level. We believe this approach provides us with a unique understanding of the cultures and product require- ments in each of the geographic markets in which we operate, bringing added value to our customers. Our sweeteners are found in products such as baked goods, candies, chewing gum, dairy products and ice cream, soft drinks and beer. Our starches are a staple of the food, paper, textile and corrugating industries. Critical success factors in our business include managing our significant manufacturing costs, including corn and utilities. In addi- tion, due to our global operations we are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We use derivative financial instruments, when appropriate, for the purpose of minimizing the risks and/or costs associated with fluctuations in commodity prices, foreign exchange rates and interest rates. Also, the capital intensive nature of the corn wet milling industry requires that we generate significant cash flow on a yearly basis in order to selec- tively reinvest in the business and grow organically, as well as through strategic acquisitions and alliances. We utilize certain key metrics relating to working capital, debt and return on capital employed to monitor our progress toward achieving our strategic business objectives (see section entitled “Key Performance Metrics”). Our business improved in 2010 as net sales, operating income, net income and diluted earnings per common share grew from the year ago period. Organic volume growth, lower corn costs, improved plant utilization rates and the impact of owning National Starch in the fourth quarter drove the earnings improvement. Additionally, we enhanced our financial flexibility in 2010 by enter- ing into a new $1 billion revolving credit facility. We continue to see economic recovery in many of our international markets and expect our business to grow in 2011. We currently expect that our future operating cash flows and borrowing availability under our credit facilities will provide us with sufficient liquidity to fund our anticipated capital expenditures, dividends, and other investing and/or financing strategies for the foreseeable future. Results of Operations We have significant operations in North America, South America, Asia/Africa and Europe. For most of our foreign subsidiaries, the local foreign currency is the functional currency. Accordingly, rev- enues and expenses denominated in the functional currencies of these subsidiaries are translated into US dollars at the applicable average exchange rates for the period. Fluctuations in foreign cur- rency exchange rates affect the US dollar amounts of our foreign subsidiaries’ revenues and expenses. The impact of currency exchange rate changes, where significant, is described below. As a result of the acquisition of National Starch, there are significant fluctuations in our financial statements as compared to 2009. While we will identify significant fluctuations due to the acquisition, our discussion below will also exclude the impact of the acquisition, where appropriate, to provide a more comparable and meaningful analysis. Additionally, we have added a new region for our acquired operations in Europe. See also Note 14 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 15 2010 Compared to 2009 Net Income Attributable to CPI Net income attributable to CPI for 2010 more than quadrupled to $169 million, or $2.20 per diluted common share, from 2009 net income of $41 million, or $0.54 per diluted common share. Our results for 2010 include $14 million of after-tax charges for bridge loan and other financing costs ($0.18 per diluted common share), after-tax acquisition-related costs of $26 million ($0.34 per diluted common share), after-tax costs of $18 million ($0.23 per diluted common share) relating to the sale of National Starch inventory that was adjusted to fair value at the acquisition date in accordance with business combination accounting rules, and after-tax restructuring charges of $22 million ($0.29 per diluted common share) for impaired assets and other costs primarily associated with the closing of our plant in Chile. Our 2009 results include an after-tax charge of $110 million ($1.47 per diluted common share) for impaired assets and restructuring costs. See also Note 4 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information pertaining to the asset impairments and restructurings. Without the bridge loan and other financing costs, and the impairment, restructuring and acquisition-related charges, net income for 2010 would have grown 65 percent over 2009, while our diluted earnings per common share would have risen 61 per- cent. This net income growth primarily reflects an increase in operating income across all of our regions principally driven by organic sales volume growth, improved plant utilization rates, lower corn costs, stronger foreign currencies and the earnings from the acquired National Starch operations. Net Sales Net sales for 2010 increased to $4.37 billion from $3.67 billion in 2009, as sales grew in each of our regions. A summary of net sales by geographic region is shown below: (in millions) 2010 2009 Increase % Change North America $2,439 $2,268 $171 8% South America 1,241 1,012 229 23% Asia/Africa 617 392 225 58% Europe 70 – 70 NM Total $4,367 $3,672 $695 19% The increase in net sales reflects a 21 percent volume improvement and favorable currency translation of 4 percent due to stronger foreign currencies, which more than offset a price/ product mix decline of 6 percent primarily reflecting the normal relationship between lower corn costs and a corresponding decline in selling prices. Net sales from the acquired National Starch oper- ations totaled $351 million, representing approximately 10 percent of our 19 percent sales increase. Additionally, we had strong organic volume growth across all of our regions and particularly in our international businesses. Co-product sales of approximately $781 mil- lion for 2010 increased 16 percent from $673 million in 2009, as improved volume and currency translation more than offset lower selling prices. Co-product sales from acquired operations contributed approximately $22 million, or 3 percent, of the increase. Sales in North America increased 8 percent driven by sales contributed by the acquired National Starch operations. Excluding the acquired operations, net sales in North America were flat as a 10 percent volume improvement and a 2 percent increase attrib- utable to currency translation was offset by a price/product mix decline of 12 percent. Volumes grew across the region, led by strong organic growth in Mexico where demand for sweeteners from the beverage industry was particularly strong. Improved demand in Canada and the US also contributed to the organic volume growth in the region. Sales in South America increased 23 percent, as volume growth of 14 percent driven by strong demand from various industries and favorable currency translation of 10 percent more than offset a price/product mix decline of 1 per- cent. Sales from acquired operations contributed 2 percent of the sales growth in the region. Sales in Asia/Africa increased 58 percent, driven in part by sales contributed by acquired operations. Excluding the acquired operations, Asia/Africa net sales increased 34 percent, reflecting volume growth of 20 percent, primarily driven by signifi- cantly higher demand for sweeteners in South Korea, price/product mix improvement of 9 percent and a 5 percent benefit from currency translation associated with stronger Asian currencies. Europe sales reflect sales from our European operations that were acquired as part of the National Starch acquisition. Cost of Sales Cost of sales for 2010 increased 16 percent to $3.64 billion from $3.15 billion in 2009. More than half of this increase reflects costs associated with sales of National Starch products in the fourth quarter of 2010. The remainder of the increase was driven principally by volume growth and currency translation, which more than offset lower corn costs. Currency translation caused cost of sales for 2010 to increase approximately 5 percent from 2009, reflecting the impact of stronger foreign cur- rencies. Gross corn costs per ton for 2010 declined approximately 11 percent from 2009 driven by lower market prices for corn. Energy costs for 2010 increased approximately 14 percent from the prior year principally due to increased volume and stronger foreign currencies. Our gross profit margin for 2010 was 17 per- cent, compared to 14 percent in 2009, reflecting improved profit margins throughout our business.

16 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL Selling, General and Administrative Expenses Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses for 2010 were $370 million, up from $247 million in 2009. This increase primarily reflects SG&A expenses of the acquired National Starch operations and $35 million of costs pertaining to the acquisition of National Starch. Higher compensation-related costs, a return to more historical run rates and stronger foreign currencies also contributed to the increase in SG&A expenses. Currency translation caused operating expenses for 2010 to increase approximately 4 percent from a year ago, reflect- ing the impact of stronger foreign currencies. SG&A expenses for 2010 represented 8 percent of net sales, up from 7 percent in 2009. Other Income – net Other income-net of $10 million for 2010 increased from other income-net of $5 million in 2009. This increase primarily reflects higher tax recoveries and a $2 million gain asso- ciated with a customer bankruptcy settlement. Operating Income A summary of operating income is shown below: Favorable Favorable (Unfavorable) (Unfavorable) (in millions) 2010 2009 Variance % Change North America $249 $177 $÷72 41% South America 163 138 25 18% Asia/Africa 62 17 45 268% Europe 3 – 3 NM Corporate expenses (51) (54) 3 5% Acquisition costs (35) – (35) NM Impairment/ restructuring charges (25) (125) 100 80% Charge for fair value mark-up of acquired inventory (27) – (27) NM Operating income $339 $153 $186 122% Operating income for 2010 increased to $339 million from $153 million in 2009. Operating income for 2010 and 2009 include impairment/restructuring charges of $25 million and $125 million, respectively. We also incurred $35 million of acquisition-related costs in 2010. Additionally, our current year results include the flow through of $27 million of costs associated with acquired National Starch inventory that was marked up to fair value at the acquisition date in accordance with business combination accounting rules. Without the impairment, restructuring, inventory mark-up charge and acqui- sition-related costs, operating income for 2010 would have grown 53 percent over the year ago period. Approximately 15 percent of this growth was attributable to earnings from the acquired National Starch operations. The remaining increase of 38 percent reflects organic earnings growth in each of our regions principally driven by higher volume, lower corn costs, improved plant utilization rates and favorable currency translation. Currency translation associated with stronger foreign currencies caused operating income to increase by approximately $20 million from 2009. North America operating income increased 41 percent to $249 million from $177 million a year ago. Approximately one-third of this growth was attributable to earnings from acquired operations. The remaining increase was primarily driven by organic volume growth, lower corn costs and improved plant utilization rates. Currency translation associated with the stronger Canadian dollar caused operating income to increase by approximately $8 million in the region. South America operating income increased 18 percent to $163 million from $138 mil- lion in 2009. This increase primarily reflects improved earnings in the Southern Cone of South America and Brazil driven by strong volume growth and favorable currency translation. Translation effects associated with stronger South American currencies (particularly the Brazilian Real) caused operating income to increase by approx- imately $11 million in the region. Asia/Africa operating income more than tripled to $62 million from $17 million a year ago, due in part, to earnings from acquired operations. Without the earnings from acquired operations, operating income almost tripled reflecting strong organic volume growth, particularly in South Korea and higher product selling prices. Stronger foreign currencies caused operating income to increase by approximately $1 million in the region. Europe operating income represents earnings from our oper- ations that were acquired as part of the National Starch acquisition. Financing Costs – net Financing costs-net increased to $64 million in 2010 from $38 million in 2009. This increase primarily reflects a $20 million charge for bridge loan financing costs recorded in the third quarter of 2010. In connection with the acquisition of National Starch we had obtained a bridge loan financing commitment of $1.35 billion. As a result of our September 2010 sale of $900 mil- lion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes and the entry into our new $1 billion revolving credit facility (see also Liquidity and Capital Resources section), we terminated the $1.35 billion bridge term loan facility. Fees associated with the bridge loan totaling $20 million were expensed to financing costs in September 2010. Without this charge, financing costs for 2010 would have increased approximately 18 percent from the prior year period, primarily reflecting higher average borrowings due to the National Starch acquisition and higher interest rates, partially offset by a reduction in foreign currency transaction losses and an increase in interest income driven by higher cash positions. Provision for Income Taxes Our effective income tax rate was 36.1 percent in 2010, as compared to 59.5 percent in 2009. Our effective income tax rate for 2010 reflects the impacts of the National Starch acquisition costs and the Chilean charges for impaired assets and other related costs and an increase to the valuation allowance for Chile. Our effective income tax rate for 2009 reflects the tax effect of the goodwill write-off and an increase to the valuation allowance in Korea. Without the impact of the impairment and restructuring charges, our effective income tax rate for 2010 and 2009 would have been approximately 33 percent and 35 percent, respectively. See also Note 8 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 17 Net Income Attributable to Non-controlling Interests Net income attributable to non-controlling interests increased to $7 million in 2010 from $6 million in 2009. The increase from 2009 mainly reflects the effect of improved earnings from our operations in Pakistan. Comprehensive Income We recorded comprehensive income of $287 million, as compared with $327 million a year ago. The decrease primarily reflects an unfavorable variance in the currency translation adjustment and reduced gains on cash flow hedges, which more than offset our net income growth. The unfavorable variance in the currency translation adjustment reflects a more moderate strengthening in end of period foreign currencies rela- tive to the US dollar, as compared to a year ago, when end of period foreign currency appreciation was more significant. 2009 Compared to 2008 Net Income attributable to CPI Net income attributable to CPI for 2009 decreased 85 percent to $41 million, or $0.54 per diluted common share, from 2008 net income of $267 million, or $3.52 per diluted common share. Our results for 2009 include a $125 million charge ($110 million after-tax, or $1.47 per diluted common share) for impaired assets and restructuring costs that was recorded in the second quarter of 2009. The charge consists of a $119 million write-off of goodwill pertaining to our operations in South Korea, a $5 million write-off of impaired assets in North America and a $1 million charge for employee severance and related benefit costs primarily attributable to the termination of employees in our Asia/ Africa region. See also Note 4 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements. Our results for 2008 included $16 million of expenses ($11 million net of income taxes, or $0.14 per diluted com- mon share) related to the terminated merger with Bunge Limited. While the decrease in net income includes the impact of the impairment and restructuring charges, it also reflects a significant decline in operating income across all of our regions principally driven by reduced co-product selling prices, higher North American corn costs, foreign currency devaluations and lower sales volumes. Increased financing costs also contributed to the decline. Net Sales Net sales for 2009 decreased to $3.67 billion from $3.94 billion in 2008, as sales declined in each of our regions. A summary of net sales by geographic region is shown below: (in millions) 2009 2008 Decrease % Change North America $2,268 $2,370 $(102) (4) % South America 1,012 1,120 (108) (10) % Asia/Africa 392 454 (62) (14) % Total $3,672 $3,944 $(272) (7) % The decrease in net sales reflects unfavorable currency translation of 5 percent attributable to weaker foreign currencies and a 2 percent volume decline due to reduced demand attributable to the global economic recession. Price/product mix was relatively flat. Co-product sales of approximately $673 million for 2009 decreased 23 percent from $871 million in 2008, driven primarily by lower pricing, and to a lesser extent, by reduced volume and foreign currency weakness. We expect improved co-product sales in 2010 driven by higher market prices, particularly for corn oil. Sales in North America decreased 4 percent primarily due to a 4 percent volume reduction principally driven by weak demand in the United States. Price/product mix improvement of 1 percent was offset by a 1 percent decline attributable to currency transla- tion relating to a weaker Canadian dollar. Price/product mix improved despite the unfavorable impact of approximately $114 million from lower co-product selling prices. Sales in South America decreased 10 percent, primarily due to unfavorable currency translation attrib- utable to weaker South American currencies, which reduced sales by approximately 10 percent. Improved volume of 3 percent, driven principally by increased shipments to the brewing industry, was offset by a price/product mix decline of 3 percent that was mainly due to lower co-product values. Sales in Asia/Africa decreased 14 percent, reflecting an 11 percent decline attributable to currency translation associated with weaker Asian/African currencies and a 3 percent volume reduction due to lower demand. Price/product mix was up slightly. Cost of Sales Cost of sales for 2009 decreased 3 percent to $3.15 billion from $3.24 billion in 2008. The decrease principally reflects reduced volume and currency translation. Currency trans- lation attributable to the stronger US dollar caused cost of sales for 2009 to decrease approximately 5 percent from 2008. Gross corn costs for 2009 were relatively unchanged from 2008, as higher corn costs in North America were offset by reduced costs in South America and the impact of currency translation associated with weaker foreign currencies. Energy costs for 2009 decreased approximately 1 percent from 2008. Our gross profit margin for 2009 was 14 percent, compared to 18 percent in 2008, principally reflecting reduced profitability and margins throughout our business. Selling, General and Administrative Expenses SG&A expenses for 2009 were $247 million, down from $275 million in 2008. This decrease primarily reflects weaker foreign currencies and reduced compensation-related costs. Currency translation caused operating expenses for 2009 to decrease approximately 4 percent from 2008, reflecting the weaker foreign currencies. Additionally, bad debt expense decreased $4 million from 2008. Our bad debt expense was higher than normal in 2008 due to the global eco- nomic crisis. We may be required to provide for additional credit losses in the future should the global economy deteriorate in the future. SG&A expenses for 2009 represented 7 percent of net sales, consistent with 2008.

18 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL Other Income – net Other income-net of $5 million for 2009 increased slightly from other income-net of $4 million in 2008. Other income for 2009 includes various insurance and tax recoveries approximating $2 million and a $2 million gain from the sale of land. Other income for 2008 includes $16 million of costs pertaining to the terminated Bunge merger. Other income for 2008 also includes various insurance and tax recoveries approximating $8 mil- lion and a $5 million gain from the sale of land. Fee and royalty income of $1 million for 2009 declined $1 million from 2008. Operating Income A summary of operating income is shown below: Favorable Favorable (Unfavorable) (Unfavorable) (in millions) 2009 2008 Variance % Change North America $«177 $313 $(136) (44) % South America 138 151 (13) (9) % Asia/Africa 17 38 (21) (56) % Corporate expenses (54) (52) (2) (3) % Impairment/ restructuring charges (125) – (125) NM Costs of terminated merger – (16) 16 NM Operating income $«153 $434 $(281) (65) % Operating income for 2009 decreased to $153 million from $434 million in 2008. This decrease partially reflects the impact of the $125 million impairment and restructuring charge that we recorded in the second quarter of 2009. The 2008 results include $16 million of expenses related to the terminated merger with Bunge. Without the impairment and restructuring charge for 2009 and the Bunge expenses for 2008, operating income would have declined 38 percent to $278 million in 2009 from $450 million in 2008, as earnings declined across all of our regions. Currency translation caused operating income to decline by approximately $25 million from 2008, reflecting weaker foreign currencies. North America operating income decreased 44 percent to $177 million from $313 million in 2008, as earnings declined throughout the region. The decline primarily reflects lower co-product pricing, higher corn costs and reduced sales volumes attributable to the weak economy. Currency translation attributable to the weaker Canadian dollar caused operating income to decline by approxi- mately $5 million in the region. South America operating income decreased 9 percent to $138 million from $151 million in 2008, as translation effects associated with weaker South American currencies caused operating income to decline by approximately $16 million in the region. Reduced product selling prices, particularly for co-products, also contributed to the earnings decline in the region. Lower corn costs partially offset the unfavorable translation impact of the weaker South American currencies and decreased product selling prices in the region. Asia/Africa operating income decreased 56 percent to $17 million from $38 million in 2008, as earnings declined throughout the region and most significantly in South Korea and Pakistan. These earnings declines primarily reflect reduced sales volume attributable to the difficult economy and a government power rationing program in Pakistan, higher corn costs and weaker foreign currencies. Currency translation attribut- able to weaker foreign currencies reduced operating income by approximately $4 million in the region. Financing Costs-net Financing costs-net increased to $38 million in 2009 from $29 million in 2008. The increase mainly reflects foreign currency transaction losses and a reduction in interest income, which more than offset a decrease in interest expense driven by lower interest rates. Capitalized interest for 2009 was $7 million, as compared to $8 million in 2008. Provision for Income Taxes Our effective income tax rate was 59.5 percent in 2009, as compared to 32.0 percent in 2008. The increase primarily reflects the tax effect of our goodwill write-off and an increase to our valuation allowance in Korea in the second quarter of 2009. Without the impact of the impairment and restruc- turing charges, our effective income tax rate for 2009 would have been approximately 35 percent. See also Note 8 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements. Net Income Attributable to Non-controlling Interests Net income attributable to non-controlling interests decreased to $6 million in 2009 from $8 million in 2008. The decrease from 2008 mainly reflects the effect of lower earnings in Pakistan and China. Comprehensive Income (Loss) We recorded comprehensive income of $327 million, as compared with a comprehensive loss of $212 million in 2008. The increase primarily reflects the effects of our corn and gas hedging contracts and favorable variances in the currency translation adjustment, which more than offset our lower net income. The favorable variances in the currency transla- tion adjustment reflect a strengthening in end of period 2009 foreign currencies relative to the US dollar, as compared to 2008 when end of period foreign currencies had weakened. Stronger end of period currencies in Brazil, Canada, Colombia and South Korea accounted for most of the favorable translation variance.

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 19 Liquidity and Capital Resources At December 31, 2010, our total assets were $5.07 billion, up from $2.95 billion at December 31, 2009. This increase primarily reflects the National Starch acquisition. Unrealized gains on com- modity hedging contracts, higher trade receivables driven by sales growth, increased inventories and translation effects associated with stronger end of period foreign currencies relative to the US dollar also contributed to the increase in total assets. Total equity increased to $2.00 billion at December 31, 2010 from $1.70 billion at December 31, 2009, primarily reflecting our net income for 2010 and a decrease in the accumulated other comprehensive loss due to favorable foreign currency translation and deferred gains on our commodity hedging contracts. On September 2, 2010, we entered into a new three-year, senior unsecured $1 billion revolving credit agreement (the “Revolving Credit Agreement”). This new credit facility replaced our previously existing $500 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility. We paid fees of approximately $8 million relating to the new credit facility, which are being amortized to interest expense over the three-year term of the facility. Subject to certain terms and conditions, we may increase the amount of the revolving credit facility under the Revolving Credit Agreement by up to $250 million in the aggregate. All committed pro rata borrowings under the revolving facility will bear interest at a variable annual rate based on the LIBOR or base rate, at our election, subject to the terms and conditions thereof, plus, in each case, an applicable margin based on our leverage ratio (as reported in the financial statements delivered pursuant to the Revolving Credit Agreement). The Revolving Credit Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, covenants, events of default, terms and conditions, including limitations on liens, incurrence of debt, mergers and significant asset dispositions. We must also comply with a leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio covenant. The occurrence of an event of default under the Revolving Credit Agreement could result in all loans and other obligations under the agreement being declared due and payable and the revolving credit facility being terminated. At December 31, 2010, there were $275 million of borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility. In addition, we have a number of short-term credit facilities consisting of operating lines of credit. At December 31, 2010, we had total debt outstanding of $1.77 billion, compared to $544 million at December 31, 2009. In addition to the borrowings under the Revolving Credit Agreement, the debt includes $350 million (principal amount) of 3.2 percent notes due 2015, $200 million of 6.0 percent senior notes due 2017, $200 million of 5.62 percent senior notes due 2020, $400 million (principal amount) of 4.625 percent notes due 2020, $250 million (principal amount) of 6.625 percent senior notes due 2037 and $88 million of consolidated subsidiary debt consisting of local country short-term borrowings. Corn Products International, as the parent company, guarantees certain obligations of its consolidated subsidiaries. At December 31, 2010, such guarantees aggregated $57 million. Management believes that such consolidated sub- sidiaries will meet their financial obligations as they become due. Historically, the principal source of our liquidity has been our internally generated cash flow, which we supplement as neces- sary with our ability to borrow on our bank lines and to raise funds in the capital markets. In addition to borrowing availability under our Revolving Credit Agreement, we also have approximately $475 million of unused operating lines of credit in the various foreign countries in which we operate. The weighted average interest rate on our total indebtedness was approximately 5.5 percent and 5.3 percent for 2010 and 2009, respectively. The weighted average interest rate for 2010 excludes the $20 million of bridge loan fees charged to financing costs in 2010. Net Cash Flows A summary of operating cash flows is shown below: (in millions) 2010 2009 Net income $176 $÷47 Charge for fair value mark-up of acquired inventory 27 – Bridge loan financing cost charge 20 – Write-off of impaired assets 19 124 Depreciation and amortization 155 130 Deferred income taxes (30) – Stock option expense 6 5 Changes in working capital 45 257 Other (24) 23 Cash provided by operations $394 $586 Cash provided by operations was $394 million in 2010, as compared with $586 million in 2009. The decrease in operating cash flow primarily reflects a reduction in cash flow from working capital activities. The decline in cash flow from working capital activities was driven principally by a $224 million year over year change in our margin accounts related to corn futures and option contracts. To manage price risk related to corn purchases in North America, we use derivative instruments (corn futures and options contracts) to lock in our corn costs associated with firm-priced customer sales contracts. We are unable to hedge price risk related to co-product sales. As the market price of corn fluctuates, our

20 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL derivative instruments change in value and we fund any unrealized losses or receive cash for any unrealized gains related to outstanding corn futures and option contracts. Due to the substantial change in the market price of corn in 2008, we were required to fund significant losses associated with our derivative instruments, particularly during the second half of 2008. As expected, these cash payments were recovered in 2009 when the related corn was used in our manufacturing process and we collected the pro- ceeds from the sales of our products to our customers. In 2010, margin account activity was lower reflecting less volatile commodity prices than in 2009/2008. We plan to continue to use corn futures and option contracts to hedge the price risk associated with firm- priced customer sales contracts in our North American business and accordingly, we will be required to make or be entitled to receive, cash deposits for margin calls depending on the movement in the market price for corn. Listed below is our primary investing and financing activities for 2010: (in millions) Sources (Uses) of Cash Acquisition of National Starch $(1,354) Capital expenditures (159) Proceeds from borrowings 1,289 Payments on debt (77) Dividends paid (including dividends of $3 to non-controlling interests) (45) In connection with the acquisition of National Starch, on September 17, 2010, we issued and sold $900 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes (the “Notes”) as follows: Premium Selling (in millions) Principal (Discount) Price 3.2% notes due November 1, 2015 $350 $(1) $349 4.625% notes due November 1, 2020 400 (1) 399 6.625% notes due April 15, 2037 150 8 158 $900 $«6 $906 We paid debt issuance costs of approximately $7 million relating to the Notes, which will be amortized to interest expense over the lives of the respective notes. Additionally, the premium and discounts on the Notes will be amortized to interest expense over the lives of the respective notes. Interest on the 3.2 percent notes and the 4.625 percent notes is required to be paid semi-annually on May 1st and November 1st, commencing May 1, 2011. Interest on the 6.625 percent notes is required to be paid semi-annually on April 15th and October 15th, commencing October 15, 2010. The Notes are redeemable, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, at our option. See Note 6 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regard- ing the Notes. As a result of the sale of the Notes and the completion of the new revolving credit facility, we terminated the $1.35 billion bridge term loan facility that we had previously arranged. Fees associated with the bridge loan totaling $20 million were expensed to financing costs in September 2010. We had an agreement with certain common stockholders (collectively the “holder”), relating to 500,000 shares of our com- mon stock, that provided the holder with the right to require us to repurchase those common shares for cash at a price equal to the average of the closing per share market price of our common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the date that the holder exercised the put option. This put option was exercisable at any time, until January 2010, when it expired. The shares asso- ciated with the put option were classified as redeemable common stock in our consolidated balance sheet prior to the expiration of the put option. The carrying value of the redeemable common stock was $14 million at December 31, 2009. Effective with the expiration of the agreement, we discontinued reporting the shares as redeemable common stock and reclassified the $14 million from redeemable common stock to additional paid-in capital. On November 17, 2010, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.14 per share of common stock. The cash dividend was paid on January 25, 2011 to stockholders of record at the close of business on December 31, 2010. We currently anticipate that capital expenditures for 2011 will be in the range of $280 million to $300 million. We currently expect that our future operating cash flows and borrowing availability under our credit facilities will provide us with sufficient liquidity to fund our anticipated capital expenditures, dividends, and other investing and/or financing strategies for the foreseeable future. Hedging We are exposed to market risk stemming from changes in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. In the normal course of business, we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions, authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities. These transactions utilize exchange traded derivatives or over-the-counter derivatives with investment grade counterparties. Our hedging transactions may include but

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 21 are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments such as commodity futures, options and swap contracts, forward cur- rency contracts and options, interest rate swap agreements and treasury lock agreements. See Note 5 of the notes to the consoli- dated financial statements for additional information. Commodity Price Risk We use derivatives to manage price risk related to purchases of corn and natural gas used in the manufac- turing process. We periodically enter into futures, options and swap contracts for a portion of our anticipated corn and natural gas usage, generally over the following twelve to eighteen months, in order to hedge price risk associated with fluctuations in market prices. These derivative instruments are recognized at fair value and have effectively reduced our exposure to changes in market prices for these commodities. We are unable to hedge price risk related to co-product sales. Unrealized gains and losses associated with marking our commodities-based derivative instruments to market are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”). At December 31, 2010, our accumulated other compre- hensive loss account (“AOCI”) included $54 million of gains, net of tax of $32 million, related to these derivative instruments. It is anticipated that approximately $53 million of these gains, net of tax, will be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months. We expect the gains to be offset by changes in the underlying commodities cost. Foreign Currency Exchange Risk Due to our global operations, we are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. As a result, we have exposure to translational foreign exchange risk when our foreign operation results are translated to US dollars (USD) and to transactional foreign exchange risk when transactions not denominated in the functional currency of the operating unit are revalued. We primarily use foreign currency forward contracts, swaps and options to selectively hedge our foreign currency trans- actional exposures. We generally hedge these exposures up to twelve months forward. As of December 31, 2010, we had $41 mil- lion of net notional foreign currency forward contracts that hedged net asset transactional exposures. Interest Rate Risk We are exposed to interest rate volatility with regard to future issuances of fixed-rate debt, and existing and future issuances of variable-rate debt. Primary exposures include US Treasury rates, LIBOR, and local short-term borrowing rates. We use interest rate swaps and Treasury Lock agreements from time to time to hedge our exposure to interest rate changes, to reduce the volatility of our financing costs, or to achieve a desired propor- tion of fixed versus floating rate debt, based on current and projected market conditions. At December 31, 2010, we did not have any interest rate swaps or Treasury Lock agreements outstanding. In conjunction with a plan to issue the 5.62 percent Senior Series A Notes and in order to manage exposure to variability in the benchmark interest rate on which the fixed interest rate of the Senior Series A Notes would be based, we had previously entered into a Treasury Lock agreement (the “T-Lock”) with respect to $50 million of these borrowings. The T-Lock was designated as a hedge of the variability in cash flows associated with future interest payments caused by market fluctuations in the benchmark interest rate between the time the T-Lock was entered and the time the debt was priced. It is accounted for as a cash flow hedge. The T-Lock expired on April 30, 2009 and we paid approximately $6 million, representing the losses on the T-Lock, to settle the agreement. The losses are included in AOCI in the equity section of our balance sheet and are being amortized to financing costs over the ten-year term of the Senior Series A Notes. See also Note 6 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. In conjunction with a plan to issue the 3.2 percent Senior Notes due November 1, 2015 (the “2015 Notes”) and the 4.625 percent Senior Notes due November 1, 2020 (the “2020 Notes”), and in order to manage our exposure to variability in the benchmark inter- est rates on which the fixed interest rates of these notes would be based, we entered into T-Lock agreements with respect to $300 million of the 2015 Notes and $300 million of the 2020 Notes (the “T-Locks”). The T-Locks were designated as hedges of the variability in cash flows associated with future interest payments caused by market fluctuations in the benchmark interest rate between the time the T-Locks were entered and the time the debt was priced. The T-Locks are accounted for as cash flow hedges. The T-Locks were terminated on September 15, 2010 and we paid approximately $15 million, representing the losses on the T-Locks, to settle the agreements. The losses are included in AOCI and are being amortized to financing costs over the terms of the 2015 and 2020 Notes. See also Note 6 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. At December 31, 2010, our accumulated other comprehensive loss account included $14 million of losses (net of tax of $9 million) related to Treasury Lock agreements. It is anticipated that $2 million of these losses (net of tax of $1 million) will be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months.

22 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL Contractual Obligations and Off Balance Sheet Arrangements The table below summarizes our significant contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010. Information included in the table is cross-referenced to the notes to the consolidated financial state- ments elsewhere in this report, as applicable. (in millions) Payments due by period Contractual Note Less than 2 – 3 4 – 5 More than Obligations reference Total 1 year years years 5 years Long-term debt 6 $1,675 $÷÷– $275 $350 $1,050 Interest on long-term debt 6 883 76 151 139 517 Operating lease obligations 7 196 38 58 40 60 Pension and other postretirement obligations 9 537 29 59 61 388 Purchase obligations (a) 968 258 190 102 418 Total $4,259 $401 $733 $692 $2,433 (a) The purchase obligations relate principally to power supply agreements, including take or pay energy supply contracts, which help to provide us with an adequate power supply at certain of our facilities. (b) The above table does not reflect unrecognized income tax benefits of $29 million, the timing of which is uncertain. See Note 8 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information with respect to unrecognized income tax benefits. On January 20, 2006, Corn Products Brazil (“CPO Brazil”) entered into a Natural Gas Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Companhia de Gas de Sao Paulo – Comgas (“Comgas”). Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, Comgas supplies natural gas to the cogeneration facility at CPO Brazil’s Mogi Guacu plant. This Agreement will expire on March 31, 2023, unless extended or terminated under certain conditions specified in the Agreement. During the term of the Agreement, CPO Brazil is obligated to purchase from Comgas, and Comgas is obligated to provide to CPO Brazil, certain minimum quantities of natural gas that are specified in the Agreement. The price for such quantities of natural gas is determined pursuant to a formula set forth in the Agreement. The price may vary based upon gas commodity cost and transportation costs, which are adjusted annually; the distribu- tion margin which is set by the Brazilian Commission of Public Energy Services; and the fluctuation of exchange rates between the US dollar and the Brazilian real. We estimate that the total minimum expenditures by CPO Brazil through the remaining term of the Agreement will be approximately $228 million based on current exchange rates as of December 31, 2010 and estimates regarding the application of the formula set forth in the Agreement, spread evenly over the remaining term of the Agreement. These amounts are included in the purchase obligations disclosed in the table above. See also Note 10 of the notes to the consolidated financial state- ments for additional information. We currently anticipate that in 2011 we will make cash contributions of $8 million and $11 million to our US and non-US pension plans, respectively. See Note 9 of the notes to the consol- idated financial statements for further information with respect to our pension and postretirement benefit plans. Key Performance Metrics We use certain key metrics to monitor our progress towards achieving our long-term strategic business objectives. These metrics relate to our return on capital employed, our financial leverage, and our management of working capital, each of which is tracked on an ongoing basis. We assess whether we are achieving an adequate return on invested capital by measuring our “Return on Capital Employed” (“ROCE”) against our cost of capital. We monitor our financial leverage by regularly reviewing our ratio of debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“Debt to Adjusted EBITDA”) and our “Debt to Capitalization” percentage to assure that we are properly financed. We assess our level of work- ing capital investment by evaluating our “Operating Working Capital as a percentage of Net Sales.” We believe the use of these metrics enables us to better run our business and is useful to investors. As previously mentioned, we acquired National Starch on October 1, 2010 for $1.354 billion in cash, most of which was provided by long-term financing. Since our year-end 2010 consoli- dated income statement includes the operating results of National Starch for only three months, yet our consolidated balance sheet reflects the full amount of the new debt, certain of our metric calculations for 2010 are adversely impacted. The metrics below include certain information (including Capital Employed, Adjusted Operating Income, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Current Assets, Adjusted Current Liabilities and Operating Working Capital) that is not calculated in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). Management uses non-GAAP financial measures internally for strategic decision making, fore- casting future results and evaluating current performance. By disclosing non-GAAP financial measures, management intends to provide a more meaningful, consistent comparison of our operating results and trends for the periods presented. These non-GAAP financial measures are used in addition to and in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP and reflect an additional way of viewing aspects of our operations that, when viewed with our GAAP results, provide a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our business. These non-GAAP measures should be considered as a supplement to, and not as a substitute for, or superior to, the corresponding measures calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 23 Non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with GAAP; therefore, the information is not necessarily compara- ble to other companies. A reconciliation of non-GAAP historical financial measures to the most comparable GAAP measure is provided in the tables below. Our calculations of these key metrics for 2010 with comparisons to the prior year are as follows: Return on Capital Employed (dollars in millions) 2010 2009 Total equity * $1,704 $1,406 Add: Cumulative translation adjustment * 228 363 Redeemable common stock * 14 14 Share-based payments subject to redemption * 8 11 Total debt * 544 866 Less: Cash and cash equivalents * (175) (107) Capital employed * (a) $2,323 $2,553 Operating income $÷«339 $÷«153 Adjusted for: Acquisition costs 35 – Impairment and restructuring charges 25 125 Charge for fair value mark-up of acquired inventory 27 – Adjusted operating income $÷«426 $÷«278 Income taxes (at effective tax rates of 33.1% in 2010 and 34.6% in 2009) ** (141) (96) Adjusted operating income, net of tax (b) $÷«285 $÷«182 Return on capital employed (b ÷ a) 12.3% 7.1% * Balance sheet amounts used in computing capital employed represent beginning of period balances. **The effective income tax rate for 2010 and 2009 exclude the impacts of acquisition costs and impairment and restructuring charges. Including these charges, the Company’s effective income tax rate for 2010 and 2009 were 36.1 percent and 59.5 percent, respectively. Listed below is a schedule that reconciles our effective income tax rates under US GAAP to the adjusted income tax rates. Income before Provision for Effective Income Income Taxes (a) Income Taxes (b) Tax Rate (b÷a) 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 As reported $275 $115 $÷99 $68 36.1% 59.5% Add back: Acquisition costs 35 – 9 – Impairment/ restructuring charges 25 125 3 15 Adjusted-non-GAAP $335 $240 $111 $83 33.1% 34.6% Debt to Adjusted EBITDA Ratio (dollars in millions) 2010 2009 Short-term debt $÷÷«88 $136 Long-term debt 1,681 408 Total debt (a) $1,769 $544 Net income attributable to CPI $÷«169 $÷41 Add back: Acquisition costs 35 – Impairment and restructuring charges 25 125 Charge for fair value mark-up of acquired inventory 27 – Net income attributable to non-controlling interest 7 6 Provision for income taxes 99 68 Interest expense, net of interest income of $6 and $1, respectively 62 32 Depreciation and amortization 155 130 Adjusted EBITDA (b) $÷«579 $402 Debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio (a ÷ b) 3.1 1.3 Debt to Capitalization Percentage (dollars in millions) 2010 2009 Short-term debt $÷÷«88 $÷«136 Long-term debt 1,681 408 Total debt (a) $1,769 $÷«544 Deferred income tax liabilities $÷«249 $÷«111 Redeemable common stock – 14 Share-based payments subject to redemption 8 8 Total equity 2,002 1,704 Total capital $2,259 $1,837 Total debt and capital (b) $4,028 $2,381 Debt to capitalization percentage (a ÷ b) 43.9% 22.8% Operating Working Capital as a Percentage of Net Sales (dollars in millions) 2010 2009 Current assets $1,753 $1,045 Less: Cash and cash equivalents (302) (175) Deferred income tax assets (18) (23) Adjusted current assets $1,433 $÷«847 Current liabilities $÷«891 $÷«565 Less: Short-term debt (88) (136) Deferred income tax liabilities (12) (9) Adjusted current liabilities $÷«791 $÷«420 Operating working capital (a) $÷«642 $÷«427 Net sales (b) $4,367 $3,672 Operating working capital as a percentage of net sales (a ÷ b) 14.7% 11.6%

24 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL Commentary on Key Performance Metrics In accordance with our long-term objectives, we set certain goals relating to these key performance metrics that we strive to meet. As previously mentioned, the timing of the National Starch acquisi- tion adversely impacted certain of our metric calculations for 2010 as described below. Looking forward, as we benefit from a full year of results from the acquired operations, grow our business and reduce indebtedness, we believe that we can achieve our metric targets in the foreseeable future. However, no assurance can be given that these goals will be attained and various factors could affect our ability to achieve not only these goals, but to also continue to meet our other performance metric targets. See Item 1A “Risk Factors” and Item 7A “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.” The objectives set out below reflect our current aspirations in light of our present plans and existing circumstances. We may change these objectives from time to time in the future to address new opportunities or changing circumstances as appro- priate to meet our long-term needs and those of our shareholders. Return on Capital Employed Our long-term goal is to achieve a Return on Capital Employed in excess of 8.5 percent. In deter- mining this performance metric, the negative cumulative translation adjustment is added back to total equity to calculate returns based on the Company’s original investment costs. Our ROCE for 2010 increased to 12.3 percent from 7.1 percent in 2009, principally driven by our operating income growth. Additionally, a reduced capital employed base and a slightly lower effective income tax rate for 2010 contributed to the ROCE improvement. The capital employed base used in our 2010 ROCE computation decreased $230 million from the prior year. Our effective income tax rate for 2010, excluding the impact of acquisition costs and impairment and restructuring charges, was 33.1 percent, down from 34.6 percent in 2009. Including acquisition-related costs, impairment and restructuring charges and our actual effective income tax rate, our ROCE for 2010 was 9.3 percent, as compared with 2.4 percent in 2009. Debt to Adjusted EBITDA Ratio Our long-term objective is to maintain a ratio of debt to adjusted EBITDA of less than 2.25. As a result of the debt we incurred to finance the acquisition of National Starch, this ratio rose to 3.1 at December 31, 2010, from 1.3 at December 31, 2009. We expect to lower this ratio to a level consistent with our long-term objective as our earnings grow in 2011 and we reduce our indebtedness. Debt to Capitalization Percentage Our long-term goal is to maintain a Debt to Capitalization percentage in the range of 32 to 35 percent. At December 31, 2010, our Debt to Capitalization percentage was 43.9 percent, up from a very low 22.8 percent a year ago, primarily reflecting the debt we incurred to finance the acquisition of National Starch. We are focused on lowering this ratio to our targeted range by growing our earnings and reducing indebtedness over time. Operating Working Capital as a percentage of Net Sales Our long-term goal is to maintain operating working capital in a range of 8 to 10 percent of our net sales. At December 31, 2010, the metric was 14.7 percent, up from the 11.6 percent of a year ago, primarily reflecting the impact of the National Starch acquisition. Because our net sales include only three months of sales from the acquired operations (as opposed to a full year), this metric is higher than it would have otherwise been. The increase in the metric also reflects higher working capital at our historical operations that more than offset the impact of our organic sales growth. We will continue to focus on managing our working capital in 2011. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial state- ments requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions. We have identified below the most critical accounting policies upon which the financial statements are based and that involve our most complex and subjective decisions and assessments. Our senior management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these policies with members of the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. These accounting policies are provided in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. The discussion that follows should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Long-lived Assets We have substantial investments in property, plant and equipment and goodwill. For property, plant and equip- ment, we recognize the cost of depreciable assets in operations over the estimated useful life of the assets, and we evaluate the

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 25 recoverability of these assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. For goodwill we perform an annual impairment assessment (or more frequently if impairment indicators arise). We have chosen to perform this annual impairment assessment in September of each year. An impairment loss could be recog- nized in operating earnings if the fair value of goodwill or property, plant and equipment is less than its carrying amount. For long-lived assets, we test for recoverability whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. In analyzing the fair value of goodwill and assessing the recoverability of the carrying value of property, plant and equip- ment, we have to make projections regarding future cash flows. In developing these projections, we make a variety of important assumptions and estimates that have a significant impact on our assessments of whether the carrying values of goodwill and prop- erty, plant and equipment should be adjusted to reflect impairment. Among these are assumptions and estimates about the future growth and profitability of the related business unit, anticipated future economic, regulatory and political conditions in the busi- ness unit’s market, the appropriate discount rates relative to the risk profile of the unit or assets being evaluated and estimates of terminal or disposal values. Due to a devastating earthquake, in February 2010, our plant in Llay-Llay, Chile suffered significant damage. In the second quarter of 2010, we determined that the carrying amount of a significant portion of the plant and equipment exceeded its fair value and therefore these assets were impaired. As a result, we recorded a $24 million charge for impaired assets and other related costs. We also wrote off $119 million of goodwill related to our South Korean operations in the second quarter of 2009. As we integrate National Starch, we will address whether there is a need to consolidate manufacturing facilities or redeploy assets to areas where we can expect to achieve a higher return on our investment. This review may result in the closing or selling of certain of our 37 manufacturing facilities. The closing or selling of any of the facilities could have a significant negative impact on the results of operations in the year that the closing or selling of a facility occurs. Even though it was determined that there was no additional long-lived asset impairment as of December 31, 2010, the future occurrence of a potential indicator of impairment, such as a signifi- cant adverse change in the business climate that would require a change in our assumptions or strategic decisions made in response to economic or competitive conditions, could require us to perform an assessment prior to the next required assessment date of December 31, 2011. Income Taxes We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. This method recognizes the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between book and tax bases of assets and liabilities and provides a valuation allowance when deferred tax assets are not more likely than not to be realized. We have considered forecasted earnings, future taxable income, the mix of earnings in the jurisdictions in which we operate and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in determining the need for a valuation allowance. In the event we were to determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in the future, we would increase the valuation allowance and make a corresponding charge to earnings in the period in which we make such determination. Likewise, if we later determine that we are more likely than not to realize the net deferred tax assets, we would reverse the applicable portion of the previously provided valuation allowance. At December 31, 2010, the Company main- tained a valuation allowance of $29 million against certain foreign tax credits and foreign net operating losses that management has determined will more likely than not expire prior to realization. The valuation allowance at December 31, 2010, with respect to foreign tax credit carry-forwards, decreased to $4 million from $15 million at December 31, 2009. The valuation allowance with respect to foreign net operating losses increased to $25 million at December 31, 2010 from $20 million at December 31, 2009. We are regularly audited by various taxing authorities, and sometimes these audits result in proposed assessments where the ultimate resolution may result in us owing additional taxes. We establish reserves when, despite our belief that our tax return positions are appropriate and supportable under local tax law, we believe there is uncertainty with respect to certain positions and we may not succeed in realizing the tax benefit. We evaluate these unrecognized tax benefits and related reserves each quarter and adjust the reserves and the related interest and penalties in light of changing facts and circumstances regarding the probability of realizing tax benefits, such as the settlement of a tax audit or the expiration of a statute of limitations. We believe the estimates and assumptions used to support our evaluation of tax benefit realiza- tion are reasonable. However, final determinations of prior-year tax liabilities, either by settlement with tax authorities or expiration of statutes of limitations, could be materially different than estimates reflected in assets and liabilities and historical income tax provisions. The outcome of these final determinations could have a material effect on our income tax provision, net income, or cash flows in the period in which that determination is made. We believe our tax positions comply with applicable tax law and that we have adequately provided for any known tax contingencies.

26 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL No taxes have been provided on undistributed foreign earnings that are planned to be indefinitely reinvested. If future events, including changes in tax law, material changes in estimates of cash, working capital and long-term investment requirements, necessi- tate that these earnings be distributed, an additional provision for withholding taxes may apply, which could materially affect our future effective tax rate. Retirement Benefits We sponsor non-contributory defined benefit plans covering substantially all employees in the United States and Canada, and certain employees in other foreign countries. We also provide healthcare and life insurance benefits for retired employees in the United States and Canada. The net periodic pension and postretirement benefit cost was $18 million in 2010 and $16 million in 2009. The Company estimates that net periodic pension and postretirement benefit expense for 2011 will include approximately $6 million relating to the amortization of its accumulated actuarial loss and prior service cost included in accumulated other comprehen- sive loss at December 31, 2010. In order to measure the expense and obligations associated with these retirement benefits, our management must make a variety of estimates and assumptions, including discount rates used to value certain liabilities, expected return on plan assets set aside to fund these obligations, rate of compensation increase, employee turnover rates, retirement rates, mortality rates, and other factors. These estimates and assumptions are based on our historical experience, along with our knowledge and understanding of current facts, trends and circumstances. We use third-party specialists to assist management in evaluating our assumptions and estimates, as well as to appropriately measure the costs and obligations associated with our retirement benefit plans. Had we used different estimates and assumptions with respect to these plans, our retirement benefit obligations and related expense could vary from the actual amounts recorded, and such differences could be material. Additionally, adverse changes in investment returns earned on pension assets and discount rates used to calculate pension and related liabilities or changes in required pension funding levels may have an unfavorable impact on future pension expense and cash flow. See also Note 9 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements. New Accounting Standards In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements . The Update requires entities to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. In addition, the Update requires entities to present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The disclosures related to Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measure- ments are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The disclosures related to Level 3 fair value measurements are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The Update requires new disclosures only, and will have no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operation, or cash flows. In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts to modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units having a carrying value of zero or less. The Update requires an entity having such a reporting unit to assess whether it is more likely than not that the reporting units’ goodwill is impaired. If the entity determines that it is more likely than not that the goodwill of such a reporting unit is impaired, the entity should perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test for that reporting unit. Any resulting goodwill impairment should be recorded as a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings in the period of adoption. Any goodwill impairments occurring after the initial adoption of the guidance in this Update should be included in earnings. The Update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of the guidance contained in this Update is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations to address diversity in practice regarding the presentation of pro forma revenue and earnings disclosures pertaining to business combinations. The Update requires that entities present combined pro forma disclosures for business combinations consummated in the current year, as if the business combination occurred at the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. Additionally, the Update requires a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The Update is effective prospec- tively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period begin- ning on or after December 15, 2010. The implementation of the guidance in this Update affects future disclosures only, and will not impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operation, or cash flows.

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 27 Forward Looking Statements This Form 10-K contains or may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company intends these forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for such statements. These statements include, among other things, any predictions regarding the Company’s prospects or future financial condition, earnings, revenues, tax rates, capital expenditures, expenses or other financial items, any statements concerning the Company’s prospects or future operations, including manage- ment’s plans or strategies and objectives therefor and any assumptions, expectations or beliefs underlying the foregoing. These statements can sometimes be identified by the use of forward looking words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “plan,” “project,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “continue,” “pro forma,” “forecast” or other similar expressions or the nega- tive thereof. All statements other than statements of historical facts in this report or referred to in or incorporated by reference into this report are “forward-looking statements.” These statements are based on current expectations, but are subject to certain inher- ent risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and are beyond our control. Although we believe our expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on reason- able assumptions, stockholders are cautioned that no assurance can be given that our expectations will prove correct. Actual results and developments may differ materially from the expectations expressed in or implied by these statements, based on various factors, including the effects of global economic conditions and their impact on our sales volumes and pricing of our products, our ability to collect our receivables from customers and our ability to raise funds at reasonable rates; fluctuations in worldwide markets for corn and other commodities, and the associated risks of hedg- ing against such fluctuations; fluctuations in the markets and prices for our co-products, particularly corn oil; fluctuations in aggregate industry supply and market demand; the behavior of financial markets, including foreign currency fluctuations and fluctuations in interest and exchange rates; continued volatility and turmoil in the capital markets; the commercial and consumer credit environ- ment; general political, economic, business, market and weather conditions in the various geographic regions and countries in which we manufacture and/or sell our products; future financial performance of major industries which we serve, including, without limitation, the food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, paper, corrugated, textile and brewing industries; energy costs and availability, freight and shipping costs, and changes in regulatory controls regarding quotas, tariffs, duties, taxes and income tax rates; operating difficulties; boiler reliability; our ability to effectively integrate and operate acquired businesses, including National Starch; labor disputes; genetic and biotechnology issues; changing consumption prefer- ences and trends; increased competitive and/or customer pressure in the corn-refining industry; and the outbreak or continuation of serious communicable disease or hostilities including acts of terrorism. Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made and we do not undertake any obliga- tion to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of the statement as a result of new information or future events or developments. If we do update or correct one or more of these statements, investors and others should not conclude that we will make additional updates or correc- tions. For a further description of these and other risks, see Item 1A- Risk Factors above and subsequent reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Interest Rate Exposure Approximately 79 percent of our borrowings at December 31, 2010 are fixed rate bonds and loans. Interest on the remaining 21 percent of our borrowings is subject to change based on changes in short-term rates, which could affect our interest costs. See also Note 6 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements entitled “Financing Arrangements” for further informa- tion. A hypothetical increase of 1 percentage point in the weighted average floating interest rate for 2010 would have increased our interest expense and reduced our pretax income for 2010 by approximately $2 million. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the carrying and fair values of long-term debt were as follows: 2010 2009 Carrying Fair Carrying Fair (in millions) amount value amount value 4.625% senior notes, due November 1, 2020 $÷«399 $÷«393 $÷÷– $÷÷– 3.2% senior notes, due November 1, 2015 349 351 – – 6.625% senior notes, due April 15, 2037 258 262 99 94 6.0% senior notes, due April 15, 2017 200 214 200 204 5.62% senior notes, due March 25, 2020 200 212 – – US revolving credit facility, due September 2, 2013 275 275 – – US revolving credit facility, replaced September 2, 2010 – – 109 109 Total long-term debt $1,681 $1,707 $408 $407

28 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL In conjunction with a plan to issue the 5.62 percent Senior Series A Notes and in order to manage exposure to variability in the benchmark interest rate on which the fixed interest rate of the Senior Series A Notes would be based, we had previously entered into a Treasury Lock agreement (the “T-Lock”) with respect to $50 million of these borrowings. The T-Lock was designated as a hedge of the variability in cash flows associated with future interest payments caused by market fluctuations in the benchmark interest rate between the time the T-Lock was entered and the time the debt was priced. It is accounted for as a cash flow hedge. The T-Lock expired on April 30, 2009 and we paid approximately $6 million, representing the losses on the T-Lock, to settle the agreement. The losses are included in the accumulated other comprehensive loss account (“AOCI”) in the equity section of our balance sheet and are being amortized to financing costs over the ten-year term of the Senior Series A Notes. In conjunction with a plan to issue the 3.2 percent Senior Notes due November 1, 2015 (the “2015 Notes”) and the 4.625 percent Senior Notes due November 1, 2020 (the “2020 Notes”), and in order to manage our exposure to variability in the bench- mark interest rates on which the fixed interest rates of these notes would be based, we entered into T-Lock agreements with respect to $300 million of the 2015 Notes and $300 million of the 2020 Notes (the “T-Locks”). The T-Locks were designated as hedges of the variability in cash flows associated with future inter- est payments caused by market fluctuations in the benchmark interest rate between the time the T-Locks were entered and the time the debt was priced. The T-Locks are accounted for as cash flow hedges. The T-Locks were terminated on September 15, 2010 and we paid approximately $15 million, representing the losses on the T-Locks, to settle the agreements. The losses are included in AOCI and are being amortized to financing costs over the terms of the 2015 and 2020 Notes. Commodity Costs Our finished products are made primarily from corn. In North America, we sell a large portion of finished products at firm prices established in supply contracts typically lasting for periods of up to one year. In order to minimize the effect of volatility in the cost of corn related to these firm-priced supply contracts, we enter into corn futures contracts, or take other hedging positions in the corn futures market. These con- tracts typically mature within one year. At expiration, we settle the derivative contracts at a net amount equal to the difference between the then-current price of corn and the futures contract price. While these hedging instruments are subject to fluctuations in value, changes in the value of the underlying exposures we are hedging generally offset such fluctuations. While the corn futures contracts or other hedging positions are intended to minimize the volatility of corn costs on operating profits, occasionally the hedging activity can result in losses, some of which may be material. Outside of North America, sales of finished products under long-term, firm-priced supply contracts are not material. Energy costs represent a significant portion of our operating costs. The primary use of energy is to create steam in the produc- tion process and to dry product. We consume coal, natural gas, electricity, wood and fuel oil to generate energy. The market prices for these commodities vary depending on supply and demand, world economies and other factors. We purchase these commodi- ties based on our anticipated usage and the future outlook for these costs. We cannot assure that we will be able to purchase these commodities at prices that we can adequately pass on to customers to sustain or increase profitability. We use derivative financial instruments to hedge portions of our natural gas costs, primarily in our North American operations. Our commodity price hedging instruments generally relate to contracted firm-priced business. Based on our overall commodity hedge exposure at December 31, 2010, a hypothetical 10 percent decline in market prices applied to the fair value of the instruments would result in a charge to other comprehensive income of approxi- mately $41 million, net of income tax benefit. It should be noted that any change in the fair value of the contracts, real or hypotheti- cal, would be substantially offset by an inverse change in the value of the underlying hedged item. Foreign Currencies Due to our global operations, we are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. As a result, we have exposure to translational foreign exchange risk when our foreign operation results are translated to USD and to transactional foreign exchange risk when transactions not denominated in the functional currency of the operating unit are revalued. We selectively use derivative instruments such as forward contracts, currency swaps and options to manage transactional foreign exchange risk. Based on our overall foreign currency transactional exposure at December 31, 2010, a hypothetical 10 percent decline in the value of the USD would have resulted in a transactional foreign exchange loss of approximately $8 million. At December 31, 2010, our accu- mulated other comprehensive loss account included in the equity section of our consolidated balance sheet includes a cumulative translation loss of $180 million. The aggregate net assets of our foreign subsidiaries where the local currency is the functional currency approximated $1.5 billion at December 31, 2010. A hypo- thetical 10 percent decline in the value of the US dollar relative to foreign currencies would have resulted in a reduction to our cumulative translation loss and a credit to other comprehensive income of approximately $166 million.

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 29 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders Corn Products International, Inc.: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Corn Products International, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity and redeemable equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010. We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompa- nying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial state- ments are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all mate- rial respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over finan- cial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial state- ments in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial posi- tion of Corn Products International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The scope of management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 includes all of the subsidiaries of Corn Products International, Inc., except for National Starch, which was acquired on October 1, 2010. The consolidated net sales of Corn Products International, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2010 were $4.37 billion of which National Starch represented $351 million. The consolidated total assets of Corn Products International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 were $5.07 billion of which National Starch represented $1.95 billion. Our audit of internal control over finan- cial reporting of Corn Products International, Inc. also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of National Starch. /s/ KPMG LLP Chicago, Illinois February 28, 2011 ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

30 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL (in millions, except per share amounts) Years Ended December 31, 2010 2009 2008 Net sales before shipping and handling costs $4,632 $3,890 $4,197 Less – shipping and handling costs 265 218 253 Net sales 4,367 3,672 3,944 Cost of sales 3,643 3,152 3,239 Gross profit 724 520 705 Selling, general and administrative expenses 370 247 275 Other (income) – net (10) (5) (4) Impairment/restructuring charges 25 125 – 385 367 271 Operating income 339 153 434 Financing costs – net 64 38 29 Income before income taxes 275 115 405 Provision for income taxes 99 68 130 Net income 176 47 275 Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests 7 6 8 Net income attributable to CPI $÷«169 $÷÷«41 $÷«267 Weighted average common shares outstanding: Basic 75.6 74.9 74.5 Diluted 76.8 75.5 75.9 Earnings per common share of CPI: Basic $÷2.24 ÷$÷0.55 $÷3.59 Diluted 2.20 0.54 3.52 See notes to the consolidated financial statements. Consolidated Statements of Income

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 31 (in millions, except share and per share amounts) As of December 31, 2010 2009 Assets Current assets Cash and cash equivalents $÷««302 $÷««175 Accounts receivable – net 735 440 Inventories 678 394 Prepaid expenses 20 13 Deferred income tax assets 18 23 Total current assets 1,753 1,045 Property, plant and equipment, at cost Land 163 125 Buildings 593 461 Machinery and equipment 3,809 3,272 4,565 3,858 Less: accumulated depreciation (2,442) (2,294) 2,123 1,564 Goodwill (less accumulated amortization of $11 and $11, respectively) 635 238 Other intangible assets (less accumulated amortization of $6 and $2, respectively) 364 7 Deferred income tax assets 71 3 Investments 12 10 Other assets 113 85 Total assets $«5,071 $«2,952 Liabilities and equity Current liabilities Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt $÷÷««88 $÷««136 Deferred income taxes 12 9 Accounts payable 535 319 Accrued liabilities 256 101 Total current liabilities 891 565 Non-current liabilities 240 142 Long-term debt 1,681 408 Deferred income taxes 249 111 Redeemable common stock (500,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009) stated at redemption value – 14 Share-based payments subject to redemption 8 8 CPI stockholders’ equity Preferred stock – authorized 25,000,000 shares – $0.01 par value, none issued – – Common stock – authorized 200,000,000 shares – $0.01 par value – 76,034,780 and 74,819,774 issued at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively 1 1 Additional paid-in capital 1,120 1,082 Less: Treasury stock (common stock; 11,529 and 433,596 shares at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively) at cost (1) (13) Accumulated other comprehensive loss (190) (308) Retained earnings 1,046 919 Total CPI stockholders’ equity 1,976 1,681 Non-controlling interests 26 23 Total equity 2,002 1,704 Total liabilities and equity $«5,071 $«2,952 See notes to the consolidated financial statements. Consolidated Balance Sheets

32 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL (in millions) Years ended December 31, 2010 2009 2008 Net income $176 $÷47 $«275 Other comprehensive income (loss): Gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $12, $28 and $77, respectively 20 (45) (127) Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) on cash flow hedges included in net income, net of income tax effect of $34, $117 and $63, respectively 54 199 (105) Actuarial loss on pension and other postretirement obligations, settlements and plan amendments, net of income tax (7) (5) (15) Losses related to pension and other postretirement obligations reclassified to earnings, net of income tax 3 2 2 Unrealized loss on investment, net of income tax – – (3) Currency translation adjustment 48 135 (231) Comprehensive income (loss) $294 $333 $(204) Less: Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests 7 6 8 Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to CPI $287 $327 $(212) See notes to the consolidated financial statements. Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 33 Equity Accumulated Share-based Additional Other Non- Redeemable Payments Common Paid-In Treasury Comprehensive Retained Controlling Common Subject to (in millions) Stock Capital Stock Income (Loss) Earnings Interests Stock Redemption Balance, December 31, 2007 $1 $1,082 $(57) $(115) $«÷694 $21 $«19 $÷9 Net income attributable to CPI 267 Net income attributable to non-controlling interests 8 Dividends declared (40) (4) Losses on cash flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $77 (127) Amount of gains on cash flow hedges reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $63 (105) Unrealized loss on investment, net of income tax (3) Repurchases of common stock (1) Issuance of common stock on exercise of stock options (9) 20 Stock option expense 5 Other share-based compensation (2) 9 2 Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation 5 Change in fair value of redeemable common stock 5 (5) Currency translation adjustment (231) Actuarial loss on postretirement obligations, net of income tax (15) Losses related to postretirement obligations reclassified to earnings, net of income tax 2 Effects of changing pension plan measurement date and related impact on service cost, interest cost and expected return on plan assets for October 1 – December 31, 2007, net of income tax (1) Other (3) Balance, December 31, 2008 $1 $1,086 $(29) $(594) $÷«920 $22 $«14 $11 Net income attributable to CPI 41 Net income attributable to non-controlling interests 6 Dividends declared (42) (3) Losses on cash flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $28 (45) Amount of losses on cash flow hedges reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $117 199 Repurchases of common stock (3) Issuance of common stock on exercise of stock options (7) 11 Stock option expense 5 Other share-based compensation (1) 8 (3) Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation 1 Currency translation adjustment 135 Purchase of non-controlling interests (2) (1) Actuarial loss on postretirement obligations, settlements and plan amendments, net of income tax (5) Losses related to postretirement obligations reclassified to earnings, net of income tax 2 Other (1) Balance, December 31, 2009 $1 $1,082 $(13) $(308) $÷«919 $23 $«14 $÷8 Net income attributable to CPI 169 Net income attributable to non-controlling interests 7 Dividends declared (42) (3) Gains on cash flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $12 20 Amount of losses on cash flow hedges reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $34 54 Repurchases of common stock (5) Issuance of common stock on exercise of stock options 5 17 Stock option expense 6 Other share-based compensation 7 Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation 6 Currency translation adjustment 48 Expiration of put option 14 (14) Actuarial loss on postretirement obligations, settlements and plan amendments, net of income tax (7) Losses related to postretirement obligations reclassified to earnings, net of income tax 3 Other (1) Balance, December 31, 2010 $1 $1,120 $÷(1) $(190) $1,046 $26 $÷«– $÷8 See notes to the consolidated financial statements. Consolidated Statements of Equity and Redeemable Equity

34 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL (in millions) Years ended December 31, 2010 2009 2008 Cash provided by (used for) operating activities: Net income $÷÷176 $÷«47 $«275 Non-cash charges (credits) to net income: Charge for fair value mark-up of acquired inventory 27 – – Bridge loan financing cost charge 20 – – Write-off of impaired assets 19 124 – Depreciation and amortization 155 130 128 Deferred income taxes (30) – 12 Stock option expense 6 5 5 Foreign currency transaction losses (gains) 2 6 (9) Changes in working capital: Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses (45) (3) (43) Inventories (51) 82 (91) Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 123 (64) (29) Decrease (increase) in margin accounts 18 242 (295) Deposit with tax authority – – (13) Other (26) 17 (19) Cash provided by (used for) operating activities 394 586 (79) Cash provided by (used for) investing activities: Capital expenditures (159) (146) (228) Proceeds from disposal of plants and properties 3 5 9 Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired of $82 in 2010 (1,272) (4) – Cash used for investing activities (1,428) (145) (219) Cash provided by (used for) financing activities: Payments on debt (77) (340) (56) Proceeds from borrowings 1,289 8 313 Bridge loan financing costs (20) – – Debt issuance costs (15) – – Dividends paid (including to non-controlling interests) (45) (45) (42) Repurchases of common stock (5) (3) (1) Issuance of common stock 22 4 11 Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation 6 1 5 Cash provided by (used for) financing activities 1,155 (375) 230 Effects of foreign exchange rate changes on cash 6 2 – Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 127 68 (68) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 175 107 175 Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $÷÷302 $«175 $«107 See notes to the consolidated financial statements. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 35 NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS Corn Products International, Inc. (“CPI” or “the Company”) was founded in 1906 and became an independent and public company as of December 31, 1997. The Company operates domestically and internationally in one business segment, the production and sale of starches and sweeteners derived from wet milling and processing of corn and other starch-based materials, for a wide range of industries. NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Presentation The consolidated financial statements consist of the accounts of the Company, including all significant subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions are elimi- nated in consolidation. The preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events. These estimates and the underlying assumptions affect the amounts of assets and liabilities reported, disclosures about contingent assets and liabilities, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Such estimates include the value of purchase consideration, valua- tion of accounts receivable, inventories, goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived assets, legal contingencies, guarantee obliga- tions, and assumptions used in the calculation of income taxes, and pension and other postretirement benefits, among others. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best esti- mates and judgment. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Management will adjust such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstance dictate. Foreign currency devaluations, corn price volatility, access to difficult credit markets, and declines in the global economic environment have combined to increase the uncertainty inherent in such estimates and assumptions. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with preci- sion, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in those estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the financial state- ments in future periods. Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries, other than those whose functional currency is the US dollar, are translated at current exchange rates with the related translation adjustments reported in equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Income statement accounts are translated at the average exchange rate during the period. Where the US dollar is considered the functional currency, monetary assets and liabilities are translated at current exchange rates with the related adjustment included in net income. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated at historical exchange rates. The Company incurs foreign currency transaction gains/losses relating to assets and liabilities that are denominated in a currency other than the functional cur- rency. For 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company incurred foreign currency transaction gains (losses) of ($2 million), ($6 million) and $9 million, respectively. The Company’s accumulated other compre- hensive loss included in equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheets includes cumulative translation loss adjustments of $180 million and $228 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Cash and cash equivalents Cash equivalents consist of all instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less, and which have virtually no risk of loss in value. Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Costs are determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Investments Investments in the common stock of affiliated companies over which the Company does not exercise significant influence are accounted for under the cost method and are carried at cost or less. The Company’s wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary has an investment that is accounted for under the cost method. The carrying value of this investment was $6 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009. Investments that enable the Company to exercise significant influence, but do not represent a controlling interest, are accounted for under the equity method; such investments are carried at cost or less, adjusted to reflect the Company’s pro- portionate share of income or loss, less dividends received. The Company did not have any investments accounted for under the equity method at December 31, 2010 or 2009. The Company also has equity interests in the CME Group Inc. and in Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation, which it classifies as available for sale secu- rities. These investments are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recorded to other comprehensive income. The Company would recognize a loss on its investments when there is a loss in value of an investment that is other than temporary. Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

36 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL Property, Plant and Equipment and Depreciation Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depre- ciation. Depreciation is generally computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of depreciable assets, which range from 10 to 50 years for buildings and from 3 to 25 years for all other assets. Where permitted by law, accelerated depreciation methods are used for tax purposes. The Company reviews the recoverability of the net book value of property, plant and equipment for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the net book value of an asset may not be recoverable from estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. If this review indicates that the carrying values will not be recovered, the carrying values would be reduced to fair value and an impairment loss would be recognized. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets Goodwill ($635 million and $238 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively) represents the excess of cost over fair value of net assets acquired. The Company also has other intangible assets ($364 million at December 31, 2010 and $7 million at December 31, 2009, respec- tively). The carrying amount of goodwill and other intangible assets by geographic segment as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 was as follows: (in millions) At December 31, 2010 2009 North America $558 $137 South America 104 94 Asia/Africa 177 14 Europe 160 – Total $999 $245 The Company assesses goodwill for impairment annually (or more frequently if impairment indicators arise). The Company has chosen to perform this annual impairment assessment in September of each year. The Company has completed the required impairment assessments and determined there to be no goodwill impairment for 2010. In 2009, the Company wrote off $119 million of goodwill pertaining to its South Korean operations. See Note 4 for additional information regarding this impairment charge. Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes operating revenues at the time title to the goods and all risks of ownership transfer to customers. This transfer is considered complete when a sales agreement is in place, delivery has occurred, pricing is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured. In the case of consigned inventories, the title passes and the transfer of owner- ship risk occurs when the goods are used by the customer. Taxes assessed by governmental authorities and collected from customers are accounted for on a net basis and thereby excluded from revenues. Hedging Instruments The Company uses derivative financial instruments principally to offset exposure to market risks arising from changes in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. Derivative financial instruments used by the Company consist of commodity futures and option contracts, forward currency contracts and options, interest rate swap agree- ments and treasury lock agreements. The Company enters into futures and option contracts, which are designated as hedges of specific volumes of commodities (corn and natural gas) that will be purchased and processed in a future month. These derivative financial instruments are recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. The Company has also, from time to time, entered into interest rate swap agreements that effectively con- verted the interest rate on certain fixed rate debt to a variable interest rate and, on certain variable rate debt, to a fixed interest rate. The Company periodically enters into treasury lock agreements to lock the benchmark rate for an anticipated fixed rate borrowing. See also Note 5 and Note 6 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. On the date a derivative contract is entered into, the Company designates the derivative as either a hedge of variable cash flows to be paid related to interest on variable rate debt, as a hedge of market variation in the benchmark rate for a future fixed rate debt issue or as a hedge of certain forecasted purchases of corn or nat- ural gas used in the manufacturing process (“a cash-flow hedge”), or as a hedge of the fair value of certain debt obligations (“a fair- value hedge”). This process includes linking all derivatives that are designated as fair-value or cash-flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, or to specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions. For all hedging relation- ships, the Company formally documents the hedging relationships and its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge transactions, the hedging instrument, the hedged item, the nature of the risk being hedged, how the hedging instrument’s effectiveness in offsetting the hedged risk will be assessed, and a description of the method of measuring ineffectiveness. The Company also formally assesses, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows or fair values of hedged items. When it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or that it has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively. Changes in the fair value of floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps, treasury locks or commodity futures and option contracts that are highly effective and that are designated and qualify as cash-flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income, net of appli- cable income taxes. Realized gains and losses associated with changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps and treasury locks

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 37 are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) to the Consolidated Statement of Income over the life of the underlying debt. Gains and losses on commodity hedging contracts are reclassified from AOCI to the Consolidated Statement of Income when the finished goods produced using the hedged item are sold. The maximum term over which the Company hedges exposures to the variability of cash flows for commodity price risk is 24 months. Changes in the fair value of a fixed-to- floating interest rate swap agreement that is highly effective and that is designated and qualifies as a fair-value hedge, along with the loss or gain on the hedged debt obligation, are recorded in earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of a derivative instrument that qualifies as either a cash-flow hedge or a fair-value hedge is reported in earnings. The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it is determined that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows or fair value of the hedged item, the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, the derivative is de-designated as a hedging instrument because it is unlikely that a forecasted transaction will occur, or manage- ment determines that designation of the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate. When hedge accounting is discontinued, the Company continues to carry the derivative on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at its fair value, and gains and losses that were included in AOCI are recognized in earnings. Stock-based Compensation The Company has a stock incentive plan that provides for stock-based employee compensation, includ- ing the granting of stock options and shares of restricted stock, to certain key employees. Compensation expense is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the Company’s stock-based employee compensation plan. The plan is more fully described in Note 12. Earnings per Common Share Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted aver- age number of shares outstanding (including redeemable common stock for years prior to 2010), which totaled 75.6 million for 2010, 74.9 million for 2009 and 74.5 million for 2008. Diluted earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding, including the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and other shares associated with long-term incentive compensation plans. The weighted average number of shares outstanding for diluted EPS calculations was 76.8 million, 75.5 million and 75.9 million for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In 2010, 2009 and 2008, options to purchase approxi- mately 1.4 million, 2.3 million and 1.3 million shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of the weighted average number of shares outstanding for diluted EPS because their effects were anti-dilutive. Risks and Uncertainties The Company operates domestically and internationally in one business segment. In each country, the business and assets are subject to varying degrees of risk and uncertainty. The Company insures its business and assets in each country against insurable risks in a manner that it deems appropri- ate. Because of this geographic dispersion, the Company believes that a loss from non-insurable events in any one country would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations as a whole. Additionally, the Company believes there is no significant con- centration of risk with any single customer or supplier whose failure or non-performance would materially affect the Company’s results. Recently Adopted Accounting Standards Effective July 1, 2009, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“ASC 105”). ASC 105 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) as the source of authoritative United States gener- ally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied to nongovernmental entities and it is not intended to change or alter previously existing US GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes all previously existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards and the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, the FASB now issues Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”). The FASB does not consider ASUs as authoritative in their own right. ASUs serve only to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the bases for conclu- sions with respect to the change or changes to the Codification. The adoption of the Codification did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In September 2006, the FASB issued guidance pertaining to the accounting and disclosure for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. Among other things, the guidance requires companies to: (i) recognize in the balance sheet, a net liability or asset and an offsetting adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income, to record the funded status of defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans; (ii) meas- ure plan assets and obligations that determine its funded status as of the end of the company’s fiscal year; and (iii) recognize in com- prehensive income the changes in the funded status of a defined benefit pension and postretirement plan in the year in which the changes occur. The requirement to recognize the funded status of a benefit plan and the disclosure requirements were effective as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006. The requirement to measure the plan assets and benefit obligations as

38 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL of the year-end balance sheet date is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. Accordingly, the Company began measuring its plan assets and benefit obligations using a December 31st balance sheet date, effective December 31, 2008. Previously, the Company had used a September 30th measurement date. The change to using a year-end balance sheet measurement date did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. See also Note 9 of the notes to the consoli- dated financial statements for additional information. In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance establishing new accounting and reporting standards for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Among other things, the guidance clarifies that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary (previously referred to as a minority interest in a subsidiary) is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that is to be reported as equity in the consolidated balance sheet, as opposed to being reported in the mezzanine section of the balance sheet between liabilities and equity. Under the guidance, consoli- dated net income is reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the non-controlling interest. The guidance also requires disclosure of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling interest on the face of the consolidated statement of income. Additionally, it establishes a single method of accounting for changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that does not result in deconsol- idation and clarifies that such transactions are equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial interest in the subsidiary. The guidance also requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. The Company adopted the new guidance effective January 1, 2009. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated finan- cial statements. As required, the prior year consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on CPI’s previ- ously reported net income or cash flows. In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance on how acquirers recognize and measure the consideration transferred, identifiable assets, liabilities assumed, noncontrolling interest, and goodwill acquired in a business combination. The guidance also expands required disclosures surrounding the nature and financial effects of business combinations. The revised guidance is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, how- ever the guidance will impact the accounting for future business combinations and the effect will be dependent upon the acquisi- tions at that time. In February 2008, the FASB issued revised guidance related to fair value measurements, which among other things, partially deferred the effective date to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for certain non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities. The Company adopted the guidance with respect to financial assets and liabilities in 2008. The application of the guidance related to non-financial assets and liabilities, effective January 1, 2009, did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated finan- cial statements. In March 2008, the FASB issued guidance intended to improve transparency in financial reporting by requiring additional disclosures with respect to derivative instruments and hedging activities, with particular emphasis as to the effects that such items have on the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of an entity. The requisite disclosures are provided in Note 5 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements. In June 2008, the FASB issued guidance stating that unvested share-based payment awards which contain rights to receive non- forfeitable dividends (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities, and should be included in the two-class method of computing earnings per share. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2008 and for interim periods within those years. The adoption of the guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In December 2008, the FASB amended the disclosure requirements for employer’s disclosure of plan assets for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. The objective of the additional disclosure requirements is to provide users of financial statements with an understanding of how investment allocation decisions are made, the major categories of plan assets held by the plans, the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, significant concentration of risk within the Company’s plan assets, and for fair value measurements determined using significant unobservable inputs a reconciliation of changes between the beginning and ending balances. The addi- tional requisite disclosures are provided in Note 9 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements. In April 2009, the FASB issued additional guidance on factors to consider in estimating fair value when there has been a signifi- cant decrease in market activity for a financial asset. The additional guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance that requires publicly- traded companies to provide disclosures on the fair value of financial instruments in interim and annual financial statements. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The required disclosures are provided in Note 5 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 39 In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance related to business combinations that amends and clarifies application issues associated with initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. It is effective for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The revised guidance will impact the accounting and disclo- sures arising from contingencies in business combinations and the effect will be dependent upon the acquisitions at that time. In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance that establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are filed with the SEC. The guidance defines subsequent events and also required that companies disclose the date through which they have evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855) , which amends Topic 855 to remove the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. The adoption of the guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s consoli- dated financial statements. In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-12, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share . ASU 2009-12 allows, as a practical expedient, companies that have investments that are within the scope of this ASU to use net asset value per share of the investment as a fair value measurement without further adjust- ment. The Company adopted this standard, which applies to certain benefit plan assets, in 2009. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. NOTE 3. ACQUISITIONS On October 1, 2010, Company completed its acquisition of National Starch, a global provider of specialty starches, from Akzo Nobel N.V., a global coatings and specialty chemicals company, headquartered in The Netherlands. The Company acquired 100 per- cent of National Starch through asset purchases in certain countries and stock purchases in certain countries. The purchase price was $1.354 billion in cash, subject to certain post-closing adjustments and other finalizations to the valuation. The funding of the purchase price was provided principally from borrowings. See Note 6 for infor- mation regarding the Company’s borrowing activity. The Company incurred $35 million of acquisition costs and a $20 million charge for bridge loan financing costs related to the acquisition in 2010. The results of National Starch are included in the Company’s consolidated results from October 1, 2010 forward. The acquisition positions the Company with a broader portfolio of products, enhanced geographic reach, and the ability to offer customers a broad range of value-added ingredient solutions for a variety of their evolving needs. National Starch had sales of $1.2 billion in 2009 and provides the Company with, among other things, 11 additional manufacturing facilities in 8 countries, across 5 continents. The acquisition also provides additional sales and tech- nical offices around the world. With the acquisition, the Company now employs approximately 10,700 people in North America, South America, Asia/Africa and Europe. It operates 37 manufacturing facilities in 15 countries; has sales offices in 29 countries, and has research and ingredient development centers in key global markets. The allocation of the preliminary purchase price to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their fair values as of October 1, 2010, is provided below. Goodwill represents the amount by which the purchase price exceeds the fair value of the net assets acquired. It is estimated that approximately 15 percent of the goodwill associated with this acquisition is deductible for tax purposes. (in millions) Working capital $÷«219 Property, plant and equipment 549 Other assets 119 Intangible assets 359 Goodwill 392 Non-current liabilities assumed (284) Total preliminary purchase price $1,354 National Starch Results of Operations Following is financial information for the National Starch operations included in the Company’s results since October 1, 2010. October 1, 2010 through (in millions) December 31, 2010 Net sales $351 Net income attributable to National Starch 8 Included in the results from the acquired National Starch business was a one-time increase in cost of sales of $27 million relating to the sale of National Starch inventory that was adjusted to fair value at the acquisition date in accordance with business combination accounting rules.

40 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL Pro Forma Financial Information Selected unaudited pro forma results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, assuming the National Starch acquisition occurred as of January 1, 2009, are presented below: (in millions, except per share) 2010 2009 Net sales $5,323 $4,897 Net income attributable to CPI 283 61 Pro forma earnings per common share of CPI: Basic $÷3.74 $÷0.81 Diluted $÷3.68 $÷0.81 For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and for the year ended December 31, 2009, the National Starch financial statements excluded the effects of financing and taxes since Akzo Nobel, its previous parent company, used a centralized approach for cash management and to finance its global operations, as well as to manage its global tax position. A 33 percent tax rate was used to tax effect pro forma adjustments. The Company made other acquisitions during the last three years, none of which, either individually or in the aggregate, were material. All of the Company’s acquisitions were accounted for under the purchase method. NOTE 4. ASSET IMPAIRMENT AND RESTRUCTURING CHARGES On February 27, 2010, a devastating earthquake occurred off the coast of Chile. The Company’s plant in Llay-Llay, Chile suffered damage, including damage to the waste-water treatment facility, corn silos, water tanks and warehousing. There was also structural damage to the buildings. A structural engineering study was com- pleted during the quarter ended June 30, 2010. Based on the results of the study and other factors, the Company determined that the carrying amount of a significant portion of the plant and equipment exceeded its fair value and therefore, these assets were impaired. As a result, the Company recorded a $24 million charge for impaired assets and employee severance and related benefit costs associated with the termination of employees in Chile in its 2010 Statement of Income. As of December 31, 2010, the employee terminations were completed and the restructuring accrual was fully utilized. Shipments to customers in Chile are being fulfilled from the Company’s plants in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. In the second quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a $125 million charge to its Statement of Income for impaired assets and restructuring costs. The charge included the write-off of $119 mil- lion of goodwill pertaining to the Company’s operations in South Korea and a $5 million charge to write-off impaired assets in North America. Additionally, the Company recorded a $1 million charge for employee severance and related benefit costs primarily attrib- utable to the termination of employees in its Asia/Africa region. The employee terminations have been completed and the restructuring accrual has been fully utilized. Goodwill is tested for impairment using a two-step process. In the first step, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying value. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of its net assets, goodwill is not considered impaired and no further testing is required. If the carrying value of the net assets exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, a second step of the impairment assessment is performed in order to determine the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill. Determining the implied fair value of goodwill requires a valuation of the report- ing unit’s tangible and intangible assets and liabilities in a manner similar to the allocation of purchase price in a business combina- tion. If the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of its goodwill, goodwill is deemed impaired and is written down to the extent of the difference. The Company reviews its long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. As required under United States generally accepted accounting principles, the impairment analysis for long-lived assets occurs before the goodwill impair- ment assessment. If the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets exceeds its fair value, the asset may need to be written down to its fair value. NOTE 5. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES The Company is exposed to market risk stemming from changes in commodity prices (corn and natural gas), foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. In the normal course of business, the Company actively manages its exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions, authorized under estab- lished policies that place clear controls on these activities. These transactions utilize exchange traded derivatives or over-the-counter derivatives with investment grade counterparties. Derivative financial instruments currently used by the Company consist of commodity futures, options and swap contracts, and forward currency contracts and options. Commodity Price Hedging The Company’s principal use of derivative financial instruments is to manage commodity price risk in North America relating to anticipated purchases of corn and natural gas to be used in the manufacturing process, generally over the next twelve to eighteen months. The Company maintains a commodity- price risk management strategy that uses derivative instruments to minimize significant, unanticipated earnings fluctuations caused by commodity-price volatility. For example, the manufacturing of the Company’s products requires a significant volume of corn and natural gas. Price fluctuations in corn and natural gas cause the actual pur- chase price of corn and natural gas to differ from anticipated prices.

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 41 To manage price risk related to corn purchases in North America, the Company uses corn futures and options contracts that trade on regulated commodity exchanges to lock in its corn costs associated with firm-priced customer sales contracts. The Company uses over-the-counter gas swaps to hedge a portion of its natural gas usage in North America. These derivative financial instruments limit the impact that volatility resulting from fluctua- tions in market prices will have on corn and natural gas purchases and have been designated as cash flow hedges. Unrealized gains and losses associated with marking the commodity hedging contracts to market are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and included in the equity section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets as part of accumulated other comprehensive income/ loss (“AOCI”). These amounts are subsequently reclassified into earnings in the month in which the related corn or natural gas is used or in the month a hedge is determined to be ineffective. The Company assesses the effectiveness of a commodity hedge con- tract based on changes in the contract’s fair value. The changes in the market value of such contracts have historically been, and are expected to continue to be, highly effective at offsetting changes in the price of the hedged items. The amounts representing the ineffectiveness of these cash flow hedges are not significant. At December 31, 2010, the Company’s AOCI account included $54 million of gains, net of tax of $32 million, pertaining to commodi- ties related derivative instruments that hedge the anticipated cash flows from future transactions, most of which are expected to be recognized in earnings within the next twelve months. Transactions and events expected to occur over the next twelve months that will necessitate reclassifying these derivative losses to earnings include the sale of finished goods inventory that includes previ- ously hedged purchases of corn and the usage of hedged natural gas. Cash flow hedges discontinued during 2010 were not material. Interest Rate Hedging The Company assesses its exposure to variability in interest rates by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rates that may adversely impact future cash flows and the fair value of existing debt instruments, and by evaluating hedging opportunities. The Company maintains risk management control systems to monitor interest rate risk attributable to both the Company’s outstanding and forecasted debt obligations as well as the Company’s offsetting hedge positions. The risk management control systems involve the use of analytical techniques, including sensitivity analysis, to estimate the expected impact of changes in interest rates on the fair value of the Company’s outstanding and forecasted debt instruments. Derivative financial instruments that have been used by the Company to manage its interest rate risk consist of Treasury Lock agreements (“T-Locks”) and interest rate swaps. The Company periodically enters into T-Locks to fix the benchmark component of the interest rate to be established for certain planned fixed-rate debt issuances (see also Note 6). The T-Locks are designated as hedges of the variability in cash flows associated with future inter- est payments caused by market fluctuations in the benchmark interest rate until the fixed interest rate is established, and are accounted for as cash flow hedges. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of the T-Locks are recorded to AOCI until the consumma- tion of the underlying debt offering, at which time any realized gain (loss) is amortized to earnings over the life of the debt. The net gain or loss recognized in earnings during 2010, 2009 and 2008, representing the amount of the Company’s hedges’ ineffective- ness, was not significant. The Company has also, from time to time, entered into interest rate swap agreements that effectively converted the interest rate on certain fixed-rate debt to a variable rate. These swaps called for the Company to receive interest at a fixed rate and to pay interest at a variable rate, thereby creating the equivalent of variable-rate debt. The Company designated these interest rate swap agreements as hedges of the changes in fair value of the underlying debt obligation attributable to changes in interest rates and accounted for them as fair value hedges. Changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps designated as hedging instruments that effectively offset the variability in the fair value of outstanding debt obligations are reported in earnings. These amounts offset the gain or loss (that is, the change in fair value) of the hedged debt instrument that is attributable to changes in interest rates (that is, the hedged risk) which is also recognized in earnings. The Company did not have any Treasury Lock or interest rate swap agreements outstanding at December 31, 2010 or 2009. On March 25, 2010, the Company issued $200 million of 5.62 percent Senior Series A Notes due March 25, 2020 (the “Series A Notes”). See Note 6 for additional information regarding the Series A Notes. In conjunction with a plan to issue the Series A Notes and in order to manage exposure to variability in the bench- mark interest rate on which the fixed interest rate of these notes would be based, the Company had previously entered into a Treasury Lock agreement (the “T-Lock”) with respect to $50 million of these borrowings. The T-Lock was designated as a hedge of the variabil- ity in cash flows associated with future interest payments caused by market fluctuations in the benchmark interest rate between the time the T-Lock was entered and the time the debt was priced. It is accounted for as a cash flow hedge. The T-Lock expired on April 30, 2009 and the Company paid approximately $6 million, representing the losses on the T-Lock, to settle the agreement. The losses are included in AOCI and are being amortized to financing costs over the ten-year term of the Series A Notes.

42 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL In connection with the acquisition of National Starch, on September 17, 2010, the Company issued and sold $900 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes (the “Notes”). The Notes consist of $350 million aggregate principal amount of 3.2 percent notes due November 1, 2015 (the “2015 Notes”), $400 million aggregate principal amount of 4.625 percent notes due November 1, 2020 (the “2020 Notes”), and $150 million aggregate principal amount of 6.625 percent notes due April 15, 2037. See Note 6 for additional information regarding the Notes. In conjunction with a plan to issue these long-term fixed-rate Notes and in order to manage its exposure to variability in the benchmark interest rates on which the fixed interest rates of the Notes would be based, the Company entered into T-Lock agreements with respect to $300 million of the 2015 Notes and $300 million of the 2020 Notes (the “T-Locks”). The T-Locks were designated as hedges of the variability in cash flows associated with future inter- est payments caused by market fluctuations in the benchmark interest rate between the time the T-Locks were entered and the time the debt was priced. The T-Locks are accounted for as cash flow hedges. The T-Locks were terminated on September 15, 2010 and the Company paid approximately $15 million, representing the losses on the T-Locks, to settle the agreements. The losses are included in AOCI and are being amortized to financing costs over the terms of the 2015 and 2020 Notes. At December 31, 2010, the Company’s AOCI account included $14 million of losses (net of tax of $9 million) related to Treasury Lock agreements. Cash flow hedges discontinued during 2010 were not material. Foreign Currency Hedging Due to the Company’s global operations, it is exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. As a result, the Company has exposure to translational foreign exchange risk when its foreign operation results are translated to US dollars (USD) and to transactional foreign exchange risk when transactions not denominated in the functional currency of the operating unit are revalued. The Company primarily uses derivative financial instruments such as foreign currency forward contracts, swaps and options to manage its transactional foreign exchange risk. These derivative financial instruments are primarily accounted for as fair value hedges. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had $41 million of net notional foreign currency forward contracts that hedged net asset transactional exposures. By using derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures, the Company exposes itself to credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is the risk that the counterparty will fail to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes the Company, which creates credit risk for the Company. When the fair value of a deriva- tive contract is negative, the Company owes the counterparty and, therefore, it does not possess credit risk. The Company minimizes the credit risk in derivative instruments by entering into over-the- counter transactions only with investment grade counterparties or by utilizing exchange-traded derivatives. Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that results from a change in commodity prices or interest rates. The market risk asso- ciated with commodity-price and interest rate contracts is managed by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken. The fair value and balance sheet location of the Company’s derivative instruments accounted for as cash flow hedges are presented below: Fair Value of Derivative Instruments (in millions) Fair Value Fair Value Derivatives Designated Balance At At Balance At At as Hedging Sheet Dec. 31, Dec. 31, Sheet Dec. 31, Dec. 31, Instruments Location 2010 2009 Location 2010 2009 Accounts payable and Commodity Accounts accrued contracts receivable-net $65 $26 liabilities $4 $18 Total $65 $26 $4 $18 At December 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding futures and option contracts that hedge approximately 100 million bushels of forecasted corn purchases. Also at December 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding swap and option contracts that hedge approximately 11 million mmbtu’s of forecasted natural gas purchases. Additional information relating to the Company’s derivative instruments is presented below (in millions): Amount of Amount of Losses Gains (Losses) Reclassified Recognized in from AOCI OCI on Derivatives into Income Location of Losses Derivatives Year Year Reclassified Year Year in Cash Ended Ended from Ended Ended Flow Hedging Dec. 31, Dec. 31, AOCI into Dec. 31, Dec. 31, Relationships 2010 2009 Income 2010 2009 Commodity Cost of contracts $«47 $(77) sales $87 $315 Interest rate Financing contracts (15) 4 costs, net 1 1 Total $«32 $(73) $88 $316 At December 31, 2010, the Company’s AOCI account included approximately $53 million of gains on commodity hedging contracts, net of income taxes, which are expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months. The Company expects the gains to be offset by changes in the underlying commodities cost. Additionally, at December 31, 2010, the Company’s AOCI account included approximately $2 million of losses on Treasury Lock agreements, net of income taxes, which are expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months.

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 43 Presented below are the fair values of the Company’s financial instruments and derivatives for the periods presented: Short-term borrowings consist of the following at December 31: (in millions) 2010 2009 Borrowings in various currencies (at rates ranging from 1% to 15% for 2010 and 1% to 11% for 2009) $88 $136 Current maturities of long-term debt – – Total short-term borrowings $88 $136 On March 25, 2010, the Company entered into a Private Shelf Agreement (the “Shelf Agreement”) with Prudential Investment Management, Inc. providing for the issuance of senior promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount of $200 million. On March 25, 2010, pursuant to the Shelf Agreement, the Company issued 5.62 percent Senior Series A Notes due March 25, 2020 in an aggregate principal amount of $200 million (the “Series A Notes”). The Series A Notes rank equally with the Company’s other senior unsecured debt. Interest on the Series A Notes is required to be paid semi-annually on March 25th and September 25th, beginning in September 2010. The Series A Notes are subject to optional prepayment by the Company at 100 percent of the princi- pal amount plus interest up to the prepayment date and, in certain circumstances, a make-whole amount. Proceeds from the sale of the Series A Notes have been used for general corporate purposes. The Shelf Agreement contains various covenants which are substantially similar to the covenants in the Company’s revolving credit facility, including financial covenants that require maintenance of a maximum debt to EBITDA ratio and a minimum interest cover- age ratio, as well as covenants that restrict the Company’s ability to incur debt, create liens and merge with other entities. The Shelf Agreement also contains customary events of default. On September 2, 2010, the Company entered into a new three-year, senior unsecured $1 billion revolving credit facility.The new credit facility replaced the Company’s previously existing $500 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility. The Company paid fees of approximately $8 million relating to the new credit facility, which are being amortized to interest expense over the three-year term of the facility. The Company had $275 million of borrowings out- standing under the revolving credit facility at December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2010 As of December 31, 2009 (in millions) Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Available for sale securities $÷÷÷«6 $÷6 $÷÷÷– $÷– $÷÷3 $÷3 $÷÷– $÷– Derivative assets 65 64 1 – 26 26 – – Derivative liabilities 4 – 4 – 18 2 16 – Long-term debt 1,707 – 1,707 – 407 – 407 – Level 1 inputs consist of quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. The carrying values of cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and short-term borrowings approximate fair values. Commodity futures, options and swap contracts, which are designated as hedges of specific volumes of commodities are recognized at fair value. Foreign currency forward contracts, swaps and options hedge transactional foreign exchange risk related to assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency and are recognized at fair value. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt is estimated based on quota- tions of major securities dealers who are market makers in the securities. Presented below are the carrying amounts and the fair values of the Company’s long-term debt at December 31, 2010 and 2009. 2010 2009 Carrying Fair Carrying Fair (in millions) amount value amount value 4.625% senior notes, due November 1, 2020 $÷«399 $÷«393 $÷÷– $÷÷– 3.2% senior notes, due November 1, 2015 349 351 – – 6.625% senior notes, due April 15, 2037 258 262 99 94 6.0% senior notes, due April 15, 2017 200 214 200 204 5.62% senior notes, due March 25, 2020 200 212 – – US revolving credit facility, due September 2, 2013 275 275 – – US revolving credit facility, replaced September 2, 2010 – – 109 109 Total long-term debt $1,681 $1,707 $408 $407 NOTE 6. FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS The Company had total debt outstanding of $1.77 billion and $544 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Short- term borrowings at December 31, 2010 and 2009 consist primarily of amounts outstanding under various unsecured local country operating lines of credit.

44 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL Subject to certain terms and conditions, the Company may increase the amount of the revolving facility under the Revolving Credit Agreement by up to $250 million in the aggregate. All commit- ted pro rata borrowings under the revolving facility will bear interest at a variable annual rate based on the LIBOR or base rate, at the Company’s election, subject to the terms and conditions thereof, plus, in each case, an applicable margin based on the Company’s leverage ratio (as reported in the financial statements delivered pursuant to the Revolving Credit Agreement). The Revolving Credit Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, covenants, events of default, terms and conditions, including limitations on liens, incurrence of debt, mergers and significant asset dispositions. The Company must also comply with a leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio covenant. The occurrence of an event of default under the Revolving Credit Agreement could result in all loans and other obligations under the agreement being declared due and payable and the revolving credit facility being terminated. In connection with the acquisition of National Starch, on September 17, 2010, the Company issued and sold $900 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes (the “Notes”) as follows: Premium Selling (in millions) Principal (Discount) Price 3.2% notes due November 1, 2015 $350 $(1) $349 4.625% notes due November 1, 2020 400 (1) 399 6.625% notes due April 15, 2037 150 8 158 $900 $«6 $906 The Company paid debt issuance costs of approximately $7 million relating to the Notes, which are being amortized to interest expense over the lives of the respective notes. Additionally, the premium and discounts on the Notes will be amortized to interest expense over the lives of the respective notes. Interest on the 3.2 percent notes and the 4.625 percent notes is required to be paid semi-annually on May 1st and November 1st, commencing May 1, 2011. Interest on the 6.625 percent notes is required to be paid semi-annually on April 15th and October 15th, commencing October 15, 2010. The Notes are redeemable, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, at the Company’s option at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) 100 percent of the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed; and (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon (not including any portion of such payments of interest accrued as of the date of redemption), discounted to the date of redemption on a semi-annual basis (assuming a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) at the Treasury Rate (as defined), plus 30 basis points, plus, in each case, accrued interest thereon to the date of redemption. As a result of the sale of the Notes and the entry into the new revolving credit facility, the Company terminated the $1.35 billion bridge term loan facility that it had previously arranged. Fees asso- ciated with the bridge loan totaling $20 million were expensed to financing costs in September 2010. Long-term debt consists of the following at December 31: (in millions) 2010 2009 4.625% senior notes, due November 1, 2020, net of discount of $1 $÷«399 $÷÷– 3.2% senior notes, due November 1, 2015, net of discount of $1 349 – 6.625% senior notes, due April 15, 2037, net of prem. of $8 and disc. of $1, respectively 258 99 6.0% senior notes, due April 15, 2017 200 200 5.62% senior notes, due March 25, 2020 200 – US revolving credit facility, due September 2, 2013 (at LIBOR indexed floating rate) 275 – US revolving credit facility, replaced Sept. 2, 2010 (at LIBOR indexed floating rate) – 109 Total $1,681 $408 Less: current maturities – – Long-term debt $1,681 $408 The Company’s long-term debt matures as follows: $275 million in 2013, $350 million in 2015, $200 million in 2017, $600 million in 2020 and $250 million in 2037. Corn Products International, Inc. guarantees certain obligations of its consolidated subsidiaries, which aggregated $57 million and $21 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. In conjunction with a plan to issue the Series A Notes and in order to manage exposure to variability in the benchmark interest rate on which the fixed interest rate of these notes would be based, the Company had previously entered into a Treasury Lock agreement (the “T-Lock”) with respect to $50 million of these borrowings. The T-Lock was designated as a hedge of the variability in cash flows associated with future interest payments caused by market fluctu- ations in the benchmark interest rate between the time the T-Lock was entered and the time the debt was priced. It is accounted for as a cash flow hedge. The T-Lock expired on April 30, 2009 and the Company paid approximately $6 million, representing the losses on the T-Lock, to settle the agreement. The losses are included in AOCI and are being amortized to financing costs over the ten-year term of the Series A Notes. In conjunction with a plan to issue the $350 million aggregate principal amount of 3.2 percent senior notes due November 1, 2015 (the “2015 Notes”) and the $400 million aggregate principal amount of 4.625 percent senior notes due November 1, 2020 (the “2020 Notes”) and in order to manage its exposure to variability in the benchmark interest rates on which the fixed interest rates of these notes would be based, the Company entered into T-Lock

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 45 agreements with respect to $300 million of the 2015 Notes and $300 million of the 2020 Notes (the “T-Locks”). The T-Locks were designated as hedges of the variability in cash flows associated with future interest payments caused by market fluctuations in the benchmark interest rate between the time the T-Locks were entered and the time the debt was priced. The T-Locks are accounted for as cash flow hedges. The T-Locks were terminated on September 15, 2010 and the Company paid approximately $15 million, repre- senting the losses on the T-Locks, to settle the agreements. The losses are included in AOCI and are being amortized to financing costs over the terms of the 2015 and 2020 Notes. NOTE 7. LEASES The Company leases rail cars, certain machinery and equipment, and office space under various operating leases. Rental expense under operating leases was $33 million, $29 million and $30 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Minimum lease payments due on leases existing at December 31, 2010 are shown below: (in millions) Year Minimum Lease Payments 2011 $38 2012 32 2013 26 2014 21 2015 19 Balance thereafter 60 NOTE 8. INCOME TAXES The components of income before income taxes and the provision for income taxes are shown below: (in millions) 2010 2009 2008 Income (loss) before income taxes: United States $«(26) $÷25 $÷70 Foreign 301 90 335 Total $275 $115 $405 Provision for income taxes: Current tax expense US federal $÷«(4) $÷÷2 $÷15 State and local 2 1 2 Foreign 131 65 101 Total current $129 $÷68 $118 Deferred tax expense (benefit) US federal $÷«(8) $÷«(3) $÷11 State and local (1) (1) 2 Foreign (21) 4 (1) Total deferred $«(30) $÷÷– $÷12 Total provision $÷99 $÷68 $130 Deferred income taxes are provided for the tax effects of temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Significant temporary differences at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are summarized as follows: (in millions) 2010 2009 Deferred tax assets attributable to: Employee benefit accruals $÷34 $÷30 Pensions 43 19 Hedging/derivative contracts – 17 Net operating loss carryforwards 28 23 Foreign tax credit carryforwards 20 24 Goodwill 27 8 Other – 9 Gross deferred tax assets $152 $130 Valuation allowance (31) (44) Net deferred tax assets $121 $÷86 Deferred tax liabilities attributable to: Property, plant and equipment $250 $180 Hedging/derivative contracts 22 – Other 21 – Total deferred tax liabilities $293 $180 Net deferred tax liabilities $172 $÷94 Net operating loss carryforwards at December 31, 2010 include state net operating losses of $2 million and foreign net operating losses of $26 million. The state net operating losses expire in vari- ous years through 2030. Foreign net operating losses of $22 million will expire in 2011 through 2021 if unused, while $4 million may be carried forward indefinitely. The foreign tax credit carryforwards of $20 million at December 31, 2010 will expire in 2011 through 2019 if not utilized. Income tax accounting requires that a valuation allowance be established when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. In making this assessment, management considers the level of historical taxable income, sched- uled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, tax planning strategies and projected future taxable income. The Company maintains a valuation allowance of $31 million against certain foreign tax credits, foreign net operating losses and deferred tax assets that management has determined will more likely than not expire prior to realization. The valuation allowance at December 31, 2010, with respect to foreign tax credit carryforwards, decreased to $4 million from $15 million at December 31, 2009. The valuation allowance with respect to foreign net operating losses increased to $25 million at December 31, 2010 from $20 million at December 31, 2009. In addition, the valua- tion allowance at December 31, 2010 with respect to the deferred tax asset associated with the future tax amortization of goodwill in Korea decreased to $1 million from $9 million at December 31, 2009. A valuation allowance of $1 million was established during 2010 against deferred tax assets related to certain fixed assets that were written off for book purposes in Chile.

46 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL A reconciliation of the US federal statutory tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rate follows: 2010 2009 2008 Provision for tax at US statutory rate 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% Tax rate difference on foreign income 0.31 0.50 (3.09) State and local taxes – net 0.15 0.28 0.63 Change in valuation allowance – foreign tax credits (2.26) 0.51 0.23 Change in foreign statutory tax rates – (0.94) (0.83) Korea goodwill write-off, net of valuation allowance – 25.50 – Chile asset write-off, net of valuation allowance 2.13 – – Non-deductible National Starch acquisition costs 1.22 – – Other items – net (0.46) (1.40) 0.06 Provision at effective tax rate 36.09% 59.45% 32.00% Provisions are made for estimated US and foreign income taxes, less credits that may be available, on distributions from foreign subsidiaries to the extent dividends are anticipated. No provision has been made for income taxes on approximately $1.056 billion of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries at December 31, 2010, as such amounts are considered permanently reinvested. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for 2010 and 2009 is as follows: (in millions) 2010 2009 Balance at January 1 $22 $19 Additions for tax positions related to prior years 1 2 Reductions for tax positions related to prior years (1) – Additions based on tax positions related to the current year 10 4 Reductions related to a lapse in the statute of limitations (3) (3) Balance at December 31 $29 $22 Of the $29 million at December 31, 2010, $26 million represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate in future periods. The Company accounts for interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. The Company had accrued interest and penalties of $4 million as of December 31, 2010 and $1 million as of December 31, 2009. The Company is subject to US federal income tax as well as income tax in multiple state and non-US jurisdictions. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has concluded its audit of all years through 2006. The Company remains subject to potential examination in Canada for the years 2004 to 2010, Brazil for the years 2006 to 2010 and Mexico for the years 2005 to 2010. The statute of limitations is generally open for the years 2004 to 2010 for various other non-US jurisdictions. In 2008 and 2007, the Company made deposits of approximately $13 million and $17 million, respectively, to the Canadian tax authori- ties relating to an ongoing audit examination. The Company did not make any additional deposits relating to this ongoing audit examina- tion in 2010. The Company has settled $2 million of the claims and is in the process of appealing the remaining items from the audit. The Company believes that it has adequately provided for the most likely outcome of the appeal process. It is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will increase or decrease within twelve months of December 31, 2010. The Company currently estimates that such increases or decreases will not be significant. NOTE 9. BENEFIT PLANS The Company and its subsidiaries sponsor noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all employees in the United States and Canada, and certain employees in other foreign countries. Plans for most salaried employees provide pay-related benefits based on years of service. Plans for hourly employees generally provide benefits based on flat dollar amounts and years of service. The Company’s general funding policy is to make con- tributions to the plans in amounts that are within the limits of deductibility under current tax regulations. Certain foreign countries allow income tax deductions without regard to contribution levels, and the Company’s policy in those countries is to make the contri- bution required by the terms of the applicable plan. Domestic plan assets consist primarily of common stock, corporate debt securities and short-term investment funds. Domestic salaried employees are covered by a defined benefit “cash balance” pension plan, which provides benefits based on service and Company credits to the participating employees’ accounts of between 3 percent and 10 percent of base salary, bonus and overtime. The Company also provides healthcare and/or life insurance benefits for retired employees in the United States, Canada and Brazil. US salaried employees are provided with access to post- retirement medical insurance through Retirement Health Care Spending Accounts. US salaried employees accrue an account during employment, which can be used after employment to pur- chase postretirement medical insurance from the Company and Medigap or through Medicare HMO policies after age 65. The accounts are credited with a flat dollar amount and indexed for inflation annually during employment. The accounts also accrue interest credits using a rate equal to a specified amount above the yield on five-year Treasury notes. Employees can use the amounts accumulated in these accounts, including credited inter- est, to purchase postretirement medical insurance. Employees become eligible for benefits when they meet minimum age and service requirements. The Company has the right to modify or terminate these benefits. Healthcare benefits for retirees outside the United States, Canada and Brazil are generally covered through local government plans.

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 47 The Company completed the acquisition of National Starch from Akzo Nobel effective October 1, 2010. This acquisition increased the Company’s sponsored defined benefit pension obligations in the United States, Canada and Mexico, as well as adding pension obligations in Germany and Japan. In addition, this acquisition increased the Company’s sponsored postretirement benefit pension obligations in the United States and Canada. The results below include the pension and postretirement plan liabilities relating to the acquired business, as well as the net periodic benefit cost associated with these plans for the fourth quarter of 2010. Pension Obligation and Funded Status The changes in pension benefit obligations and plan assets during 2010 and 2009, as well as the funded status and the amounts recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the Company’s pension plans at December 31, 2010 and 2009, were as follows: US Plans Non-US Plans (in millions) 2010 2009 2010 2009 Benefit obligation At January 1 $÷84 $«79 $123 $÷98 Service cost 5 3 3 2 Interest cost 7 5 10 8 Benefits paid (7) (3) (7) (8) Actuarial loss (gain) (9) 4 25 11 Business combination 164 – 43 – Curtailment/Settlement – (4) – (1) Foreign currency translation – – 8 13 Benefit obligation at December 31 $244 $«84 $205 $123 Fair value of plan assets At January 1 $÷69 $«58 $116 $÷96 Actual return on plan assets 10 11 14 11 Employer contributions 31 7 9 5 Benefits paid (7) (3) (7) (8) Settlements – (4) – (1) Business combination 101 – 18 – Foreign currency translation – – 7 13 Fair value of plan assets at December 31 $204 $«69 $157 $116 Funded status $«(40) $(15) $«(48) $÷«(7) Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of: US Plans Non-US Plans (in millions) 2010 2009 2010 2009 Non current asset $÷– $÷– $«(1) $(6) Current liabilities 1 – 2 1 Non current liabilities 39 15 47 12 Net amount recognized $40 $15 $48 $«7 Amounts recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss consist of: US Plans Non-US Plans (in millions) 2010 2009 2010 2009 Net actuarial loss $12 $25 $52 $29 Prior service cost 2 2 – – Transition obligation – – 4 4 Net amount recognized $14 $27 $56 $33 The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $405 million and $172 million at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Information about plan obligations and assets for plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets is as follows: US Plans Non-US Plans (in millions) 2010 2009 2010 2009 Projected benefit obligation $244 $84 $58 $13 Accumulated benefit obligation 238 77 50 11 Fair value of plan assets 204 69 19 – Included in the Company’s pension obligation are nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain key employees. All ben- efits provided under these plans are unfunded, and payments to plan participants are made by the Company. Components of net periodic benefit cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income consist of : US Plans Non-US Plans (in millions) 2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008 Service cost $«5 $«3 $«3 $«3 $«3 $«3 Interest cost 7 5 5 10 8 8 Expected return on plan assets (7) (4) (5) (10) (9) (9) Amortization of actuarial loss 1 1 – 1 – 1 Amortization of transition obligation – – – – – 1 Amortization of prior service cost – – 1 – – – Settlement/ Curtailment – 1 – – 1 1 Net pension cost $«6 $«6 $«4 $«4 $«3 $«5

48 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL For the US plans, the Company estimates that net pension expense for 2011 will include approximately $2 million relating to the amortization of its accumulated actuarial loss and prior service cost included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2010. For the non-US plans, the Company estimates that net pension expense for 2011 will include approximately $3 million relating to the amortization of its accumulated actuarial loss, prior service cost and transition obligation included in accumulated other comprehen- sive loss at December 31, 2010. Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income for 2010 consist of: (in millions) US Plans Non-US Plans Net actuarial loss/(gain) $(14) $21 Amortization of actuarial loss (1) (1) Amortization loss recognized due to settlement – (1) Exchange rate – 3 Total recorded in other comprehensive income (15) 22 Net periodic benefit cost 6 4 Total recorded in other comprehensive income and net periodic benefit cost $÷(9) $26 The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine the Company’s obligations under the pension plans: US Plans Non-US Plans 2010 2009 2010 2009 Discount rate 5.35% 5.85% 5.73% 7.24% Rate of compensation increase 2.75% 2.75% 3.79% 4.12% The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine the Company’s net periodic benefit cost for the pension plans: US Plans Non-US Plans 2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008 Discount rate 5.85% 6.05% 6.20% 7.24% 8.63% 6.74% Expected long- term return on plan assets 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 7.37% 7.65% 7.25% Rate of compensation increase 2.75% 2.75% 2.75% 4.12% 5.30% 4.39% The Company has assumed an expected long-term rate of return on assets of 7.25 percent for US plans and 7.37 percent for non-US plans. In developing the expected long-term rate of return assumption on plan assets, which consist mainly of equity and debt securities, management evaluated historical rates of return achieved on plan assets and the asset allocation of the plans, input from the Company’s independent actuaries and investment consultants, and historical trends in long-term inflation rates. Projected return estimates made by such consultants are based upon broad equity and bond indices. The discount rate reflects a rate of return on high quality fixed income investments that match the duration of the expected benefit payments. The Company has typically used returns on long-term, high quality corporate AA bonds as a benchmark in establishing this assumption. The discount rate is reviewed annually. Plan Assets The Company’s investment policy for its pension plans is to balance risk and return through diversified portfolios of equity instruments, fixed income securities, and short-term invest- ments. Maturities for fixed income securities are managed such that sufficient liquidity exists to meet near-term benefit payment obligations. For US pension plans, the weighted average target range allocation of assets was 38–72 percent with equity man- agers, 30–58 percent with fixed income managers and 1-3 percent in cash. The asset allocation is reviewed regularly and portfolio investments are rebalanced to the targeted allocation when considered appropriate. The Company’s pension plan weighted average asset allocation as of December 31, 2010 for US plans and non-US plans and as of December 31, 2009 for US plans and for non-US plans is as follows: US Plans Non-US Plans Asset Category 2010 2009 2010 2009 Equity securities 54% 53% 46% 51% Debt securities 43% 46% 43% 47% Other 3% 1% 11% 2% Total 100% 100% 100% 100%

CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL 49 The fair values of the Company’s plan assets, by asset category and level, are as follows: Asset Category Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010 Quoted Prices in Significant Significant Active Markets for Observable Unobservable Identical Assets Inputs Inputs (in millions) (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Total US plans: Equity index: US (a) $÷82 $÷82 International (b) 26 26 Real estate (c) 2 2 Fixed income index: Intermediate bond (d) 16 16 Long bond (e) 71 71 Cash (f) 7 7 Total US plans $7 $197 $204 Non-US plans: Equity index: US (a) $÷21 $÷21 Canada (g) 29 29 International (b) 22 22 Real estate (c) 1 1 Fixed income index: Long bond (h) 67 67 Other (i) 10 10 Cash (f) 7 7 Total Non-US Plans $7 $150 $157 (a) This category consists of a passively managed equity index fund that tracks the return of large capitalization US equities. (b) This category consists of a passively managed equity index fund that tracks an index of returns on international developed market stocks. (c) This category consists of a passively managed equity index fund that tracks a US real estate equity securities index that includes stocks of real estate investment trusts and real estate operating companies. (d) This category consists of a passively managed fixed income index fund that tracks the return of intermediate duration US government and investment grade corporate bonds. (e) This category consists of a passively managed fixed income fund that tracks the return of long duration US government and investment grade corporate bonds. (f) This category represents cash or cash-like instruments. (g) This category consists of a passively managed equity index fund that tracks the return of large and midsized capitalization equities traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange. (h) This category consists of a passively managed fixed income index fund that tracks the return of the universe of Canada government and investment grade corporate bonds. (i) This category consists of an investment product provided by an insurance company that offers returns that are subject to a minimum guarantee. All significant pension plan assets are held in collective trusts by the Company’s US and non-US plans (the “Plan”). The fair values of shares of collective trusts are based upon the net asset values of the funds reported by the fund managers as of the balance sheet date (level 2 inputs). This may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Plan believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with those of other market partici- pants, the use of different methodologies could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date. In 2010, the Company made cash contributions of $31 million and $8 million to its US and non-US pension plans, respectively. The Company anticipates that in 2011 it will make cash contribu- tions of $8 million and $11 million to its US and non-US pension plans, respectively. Cash contributions in subsequent years will depend on a number of factors including the performance of plan assets. The following benefit payments, which reflect anticipated future service, as appropriate, are expected to be made: (in millions) US Plans Non-US Plans 2011 16 10 2012 16 10 2013 15 11 2014 15 12 2015 15 11 Years 2016 – 2020 91 67 The Company and certain of its subsidiaries also maintain defined contribution plans. The Company makes matching con- tributions to these plans based on a percentage of employee contributions. Amounts charged to expense for defined contri- bution plans totaled $8 million, $6 million and $6 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Postretirement Benefit Plans The Company’s postretirement benefit plans currently are not funded. The information presented below includes plans in the United States, Brazil, and Canada. The changes in the benefit obligations of the plans during 2010 and 2009, and the amounts recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010 and 2009, are as follows: (in millions) 2010 2009 Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation At January 1 $66 $59 Service cost 2 2 Interest cost 4 4 Plan amendment – (1) Actuarial loss 4 3 Benefits paid (3) (2) Business combination 14 – Foreign currency translation 1 1 At December 31 $88 $66 Fair value of plan assets – – Funded status $88 $66

50 CORN PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of: (in millions) 2010 2009 Current liabilities $÷3 $÷2 Non current liabilities 85 64 Net amount recognized $88 $66 Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss consist of: (in millions) 2010 2009 Net actuarial loss $16 $13 Prior service cost 1 1 Net amount recognized $17 $14 Components of net periodic benefit cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income consisted of the following: (in millions) 2010 2009 2008 Service cost $2 $2 $2 Interest cost 4 4 3 Amortization of actuarial loss 2 1 1 Net periodic benefit cost $8 $7 $6 The Company estimates that postretirement benefit expense for 2011 will include approximately $1 million relating to the amortiza- tion of its accumulated actuarial loss and prior service cost included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2010. Changes in amounts recorded in other comprehensive income for 2010 consist of: (in millions) Net actuarial loss $÷4 Amortization of actuarial loss (1) Total recorded in other comprehensive income 3 Net periodic benefit cost 8 Total recorded in other comprehensive income and net periodic benefit cost $11 The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine the Company’s obligations under the postretirement plans: 2010 2009 Discount rate 5.69% 6.22% The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine the Company’s net postretirement benefit cost: 2010 2009 2008 Discount rate 6.22% 6.66% 6.58% The discount rate reflects a rate of return on high quality fixed income investments that match the duration of expected benefit payments. The Company has typically used returns on long-term, high-quality corporate AA bonds as a benchmark in establishing this assumption. The discount rate is reviewed annually. The following assumptions were made in measuring the Company’s postretirement benefit obligation: US Canada Brazil 2011 increase in per capita cost 7.50% 7.50% 10.00% Ultimate trend 4.50% 5.00% 5.50% Year ultimate trend reached 2028 2016 2020 In addition, for Canada, the Company assumed an increase in the per capita cost of dental benefits of 4.0 percent per year. Note that the Canada London Union Plan is not affected by health care trend rates. (in millions) Sensitivity to Trend Assumptions 2010 One-percent increase in trend rate Effect on service cost and interest cost components $÷1 Effect on year-end benefit obligations 11 One-percent decrease in trend rate Effect on service cost and interest cost components «(1) Effect on year-end benefit obligations $«(9) Estimated Future Benefit Payments The following benefit payments, which reflect anticipated future service, as appropriate, are expected to be made under the Company’s postretirement benefit plans: (in millions) 2011 $3 2012 3 2013 4 2014 4 2015 4 Years 2016 – 2020 $27 The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 provides a federal subsidy to employers sponsoring retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. The Company receives a Medicare Part D subsidy for the certain retirees. The impact of the Medicare Part D subsidy is immaterial for benefit payment cashflows.