CCI Assessment Brief for Canvas 18.9.23_2078257472

pdf

School

Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

DS-113

Subject

Finance

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

Uploaded by ChiefLightning11606

1 School of Education Assessment brief For the summative assessment for module 772059 Contemporary and Critical Issues in Education: theory, policy and context Assessment title Portfolio of four items. Assessment method/word count/no. of assessment component parts A portfolio (or bricolage) of tasks, aligned directly with programme competencies, which will help you to demonstrate your knowledge understanding, skills and develop attributes directly related to employability. Assessment size Three portfolio items showing engagement with module tasks (2,000 words equivalent). One portfolio item evaluating an article or book chapter (3,000 words). A total of four items in the portfolio. Programme Competencies assessed PC1 Evaluating critically theories, policies, issues and practices and their application locally, nationally and globally. PC4 The facility to recognise, articulate, evaluate and critique local, national and global contexts for education. PC6 Analyse and evaluate critically interdisciplinary approaches to education-related activity. Professional Competencies N/A Explanation/Breakdown of the assessment components/elements See below. To pass the module you must submit four items in the portfolio.

2 What you need to submit to complete the assessment The portfolio is be made up of four items. Three of these items evidence your engagement with activities during the module, for example study skills tasks undertaken during workshops or preparatory tasks undertaken in-between taught sessions. These are developmental tasks and will be assessed on a pass/fail basis. They can be presented in note form, diagrams, lists, whatever format enables you to show your learning from and engagement with, the module materials. You will choose three items from the range that you produce during the module. The fourth item will be assessed more formally and your tutor will give detailed feedback. This is a focussed, critical review of a book chapter or journal article on an issue relating to a contemporary issue in education or an aspect of critical theory. The word count for this item is 3,000 words. Any words over this limit will not be assessed and you risk not meeting this assessment’s competencies. Please check carefully your word limit before submission No matter the format of your portfolio, you will be assessed on: 1) Evidence of engagement with study skills tasks and activities (three items) 2) Identification of an appropriate chapter or article on a contemporary issue in education or an aspect of critical theory 3) Demonstration of critical engagement with an item of published work (the article or book chapter), including through personal reflection on its strengths and limitations 4) Recognition of the local, national or global context to which the chapter or article relates, and evaluation how it relates to that context and might apply to others 5) Evaluation how the content of the chapter or article might apply to professional practice within education or other areas Guidance on how to formal and present the four portfolio items will be provided in the module workshops. Where you need to submit your work For your assessment, the following should be submitted to the Assessment section of Canvas for module 772059: 1) A portfolio comprising: a. three items, each presenting one example of a study skills task or a preparatory task for a workshop. b. the critical review of a book chapter or journal article on an issue relating to a contemporary issue in education or an aspect of critical theory (3,000 words).

3 Submission deadline and time Portfolio (4 items) to be submitted by 2pm on Wednesday 10 th January 2024. You should submit the review of the book chapter or article to the Ca nvas ‘practice submission’ first and look at the Turnitin score. Work that has a higher score than 20% will be flagged up for investigation for academic misconduct. There is a guide to Turnitin here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cm2FMfGXjaw and how to check your work for originality/plagiarism here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHosw1gUQuo How you will receive your feedback In Canvas via the rubric and with comments in the message section of canvas. You will receive feedback within 20 working days of the assignment deadline (i.e. 28 actual days). Academic integrity You must cite all sources using Harvard Hull Acceptable use of AI You need to identify if/when/where you have used AI (Artificial Intelligence) such as ChatGPT Criteria Criteria against which your work will be graded and feedback provided. A rubric will be used. This is available on Canvas Formative support Group discussion and feedback sessions (see module outline). You will receive feedback from module tutors as a part of this process. Exemplars Examples will be shared during the module workshops, using examples in development from peers. Assessment Submission template This will be provided on Canvas.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

4 Further information/guidance about the assessment and links to additional support In the review of the journal article or book chapter you will need to reference, and back up any assertions that you make with reference to relevant literature. Your work must be referenced according to the University’s Harvard guidelines. • Your work needs to be written in font size 12, spaced 1.5 and with page numbers. • Please ensure you carefully proof-read and do a spellcheck and grammar check in MSWord before submitting your work • Should be written in the first person (i.e. use ‘I’). • Draw on relevant literature with the inclusion of references and a references list. • Be presented according to academic conventions e.g. spelling, grammar, punctuation, referencing etc. • Demonstrate your critical engagement with the published article or chapter that you have chosen to critique. https://libguides.hull.ac.uk/SkillsGuides There are lots of resources here. Additional considerations If you cannot submit on time, due to e.g. a medical condition, you can apply for additional considerations. If you fail the module. You will normally be given an opportunity to re-sit. This process is organized by the HUB, not by your module lecturers. You will receive an email message about this. If you use AI such as ChatGPT then you must: i. Maintain a full record of the entire discussion you have with the AI tool and share it within your assignment. Include the entire AI-discussion that you had within your assignment submission as an Appendix and label it “AI discussion transcript” – this can be as many pages as you want. It will not count towards the word count. Report the date of the discussion and the name of the LLM model used (e.g. ChatGPT 3.5, ChatGPT 4, Claude2 etc...). ii. Try not to use multiple discussion threads. Keep everything in one place and present only one AI discussion transcript. This will help in demonstrating your use of the tools when called upon. iii. The AI discussion transcript that is presented in the Appendix should have numbered pages for ease of reference (see point iv below).

5 iv. We will treat ChatGPT or Bard, or any other AI as an original author. However, you are allowed to use only direct quotations from LLMs at this stage; present them within direct quotation marks “….” and include the corresponding page number from the AI discussion transcript. Example text: The challenges of conceptualising digital technologies are escalating because the nature of digital assets is “dynamic, multifaceted, and ever -evolving.. Digital assets encompass a wide range of intangible elements that pose unique considerations and intricacies, making their conceptualization and management a formidable task” (ChatGPT, p.4). v. AI-systems are prone to hallucinations. Augment the AI-output by at least one or two additional academic resources so that you can approach the argument from various perspectives. These can be corroborating or contrasting views, or both. Bring in real-life business-oriented examples, or a case- study framed insight that will put things into context. Example text: The challenges of conceptualising digital technologies are escalating because the nature of digital assets is “dynamic, multifaceted, and ever -evolving. Digital assets encompass a wide range of intangible elements that pose unique considerations and intricacies, making their conceptualization and management a formidable task” (ChatGPT, p.4). This is supported by the research conducted by Zuboff (2021) where she argues that intangibility has many facets as the virtualization of assets makes them harder to consider, particularly in cloud-based services and distributed architectures like blockchain. Dhillon (2022) argues that this problem is critical for information security: if we do not get a grasp on the nature of digital assets then how do we know what we are supposed to protect from cyberattacks and how can we risk-prioritise such assets?