Bernie Maddoff Research Paper.edited (1)

docx

School

kabianga University College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

MISC

Subject

Finance

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by DrElectronSardine35

1 Bernie Madoff Scandal and Regulation of Hedge funds Students Name Institutional Affiliation Course Instructor Due Date

2 Bernie Madoff Scandal and Regulation of Hedge funds Introduction The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reported on December 11, 2008, that Bernard L. Madoff of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC had been arrested for operating a $65 billion Ponzi scam. This news resulted in a widespread financial panic. An inquiry into Madoff's activities revealed that the SEC's operational processes were responsible for its inability to recognize Madoff early in his career. The SEC's credibility suffered once this information became public. This analysis seeks to determine the extent to which the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) failed to detect the scandal earlier and the use of an interdisciplinary problem-solving approach in response to the crisis. The disciplines included in problem solving the case include finance, economics, business, law and technology. This is accomplished by recognizing and evaluating the overarching and underlying themes in the response methods. Literature Review Overview of the Issue The Bernie Madoff controversy was a $50 billion Ponzi scheme and fraud perpetrated by Madoff Securities LLC. The controversy erupted in 2008 and sent shockwaves across the United States and the globe. The world has seen several Ponzi scams. However, this one was exceptional since it had been operating in one of the most heavily regulated sectors for almost two decades. People questioned the presence and competency of regulatory agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission in light of the Madoff fraud (SEC). The SEC was unable to uncover this fraud until it was too late. Madoff was caught only when his two sons learned about their father's illicit activities and exposed them to the police. Later, Madoff was charged with financial fraud

3 and embezzlement; he pleaded guilty without a trial and is now serving a 150-year jail term (Lokanan, 2022). The Ponzi Scheme One of the most confusing parts of the Bernie Madoff case is why he committed fraud in the first place. Madoff's genuine brokerage firm was phenomenally successful, and he and his family amassed enormous riches. Because he had no urgent financial responsibilities, he did not need to defraud thousands of customers out of billions of dollars. The Ponzi scam was conducted by Madoff's firm utilizing the wealth management division as a front. It was a classic Ponzi scam whose simplicity was astonishing. Investors were enticed to invest their money with Madoff by the lure of large profits. Madoff did nothing more than deposit the funds into his account at Chase Manhattan Bank when investors supplied the funds. He earned "returns" on the investments of earlier investors by rewarding them with funds from more current investors. Trading statements provided by customers, purporting to demonstrate the amount of money earned, were complete fabrications. Madoff convinced his investors that they could reduce their exposure to risk by acquiring blue-chip assets in combination with derivatives. Even when the market was in a downturn, he could give investors substantial and consistent returns. He said his investments needed to be simpler for prospective investors to comprehend. Customers who were already using the service and those contemplating using it meekly accepted this definition of who they were since the advertised rewards on investment were enticing. As a consequence of his conduct, both Madoff and his fund achieved infamy. He was a marketing master who gave investors the sense that they belonged to an exclusive group. These investors believed they had a crucial role in something unique. Due to the restricted number of participants, many investors hoped they would be able to

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

4 join in future offers if they withdrew their funds. Sadly, all Madoff did was operate a Ponzi scheme in which he received money from new investors, paid dividends and fulfilled redemption requests for current investors, and retained a (significant) portion of the profits for himself. The scheme was ended before Bernard Madoff's sons turned him in, despite an SEC employee's admission that Madoff's promised profits were unlikely to have been accomplished (Ortner, 2019). Reasons for Failure to Detect the Scandal In the aftermath of the Madoff Ponzi scam, the Securities and Exchange Commission inspector general delivered a damning report on the agency's failure to identify the vast fraud. One of the most devastating conclusions of the study was that many SEC offices simultaneously probed Madoff without anybody knowing. Between 1992 and 2008, the SEC received at least six complaints that may have blown the flag on Madoff's fraud. According to the inspector general's findings, at one point, two separate offices administered concurrent copies of the same test without being aware of the other office's actions. American investors lost billions of dollars because Madoff was able to evade detection. This scammer could deceive the financial authorities because they were still employing 1930s technology, such as pen and paper, to address the digital difficulties of the twenty-first century. Investors, markets, and regulatory goals all suffered as a consequence. According to Sattybayeva (2019), In contrast to data that is searchable and accessible to the public, the overwhelming majority of information collected by primary regulators is kept as unencrypted papers. Many of these records needed to be submitted in line with compliance laws that went into force after the Great Depression's stock market collapse.

5 Exhibit 21 is one of the hundreds of documents that public businesses, mutual funds, and other organizations must file to the SEC (Hoff, 2018). This form requires that all subsidiaries of publicly traded corporations be included. Most of the materials received are in PDF format, which is notorious for making it impossible to extract meaningful information. Some organizations in the IT industry scrape data from PDFs in a laborious and inefficient effort to get the necessary information. In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission needs a consistent identifier for each company it oversees, preventing it from quickly accessing the filings, history, and other data sources linked with a particular organization. When this collecting method is used by eight of the most important financial institutions, thousands of forms, and hundreds of reporting systems, the extent of the issue becomes evident, and legislative action is required. Solutions The topic of hedge fund disclosure obligations is the center of this case. This deception would have been discovered sooner if the assets had been confirmed, and the culprits would have faced sanctions. Should investors be entitled to complete information about their hedge fund managers' investing strategy and decisions? Hedge fund managers think requiring their funds to register with the SEC and be transparent will deter investors. Mutual funds would be upgraded to hedge fund status. The returns would then revert to normal, and hedge fund investors would earn less. Unsurprisingly, hedge funds are adamantly opposed to legislation requiring them to give the government information about their various assets and credit risk. On the other hand, the requirement for confidentiality and the safeguarding of a competitive edge must be balanced against the constitutionally guaranteed right of investors not to be taken advantage of. As with

6 Bernie Madoff, a hedge fund might falsify its returns to steal as much money as possible from its investors. Funds may hide their actual performance data during times of low performance in the false idea that their performances would improve in succeeding quarters. Because of this motive, Congress worked hard to enact the Financial Transparency Act. In line with the multiple existing regulations, the Financial Transparency Act requires the nine primary financial agencies to offer standardized data fields and formats for the information they gather (McDaniel, 2019). The Financial Transparency Act requires regulatory bodies to use the same identification number and collaborate on certain critical data types. One of these categories is the identification of firms that are subject to regulation, and the introduction of such data standards would produce a plethora of benefits. Requiring hedge funds to declare their holdings to regulators, according to corporate ethics expert Thomas Donaldson, would have a detrimental influence on financial market innovation and degrade investment expertise. Donaldson feels that this would be harmful to the industry. Furthermore, monitoring and applying legislation is complex since so many different investment methods must be considered when drafting rules. Instead, he proposed that the hedge fund industry create an industry standard. Customers and management must agree on the minimal transparency required to meet industry standards. It is critical to encourage hedge fund managers to act ethically. There are two issues with the suggested method. First, the hedge fund industry must be persuaded to publish transparency guidelines. Members of the industry must then be actively urged to meet these standards. Finally, the business must be regulated. Which factors should the industry examine before making this decision? The most crucial competitive advantage hedge fund managers believe they have is their distinctive trading and investing

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

7 tactics, according to most industry analysts. Why would they make a concerted attempt to develop transparency rules if it seems detrimental to their economic interests? One factor that may push corporations to establish disclosure regulations is the possibility of future regulation. There is no need for the industry to develop transparency regulations if it turns out that the danger was never significant. Another factor that may persuade hedge funds to embrace a disclosure standard created independently is the market. When dealing with hedge fund excesses, the market provides considerable corrective forces. As a result, if consumers depart the hedge fund business in large numbers owing to a lack of trust, the sector may be forced to take action to maintain its current level of profitability. This massive drop in trust could only have resulted in widespread deception or a financial catastrophe triggered by hedge funds' excessive risk-taking. Both of these scenarios are improbable. The market would be more efficient if hedge funds were compelled to disclose their credit exposures and holdings. Will Donaldson's worries make it more difficult for the banking sector to innovate and be creative? The answer to this question may include two additional questions. What does it mean to be innovative in the financial sector? Is the vast majority of it helpful to society? Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker says that the last crucial financial innovation was the automated teller machine. Previously, lawmakers, financial media representatives, and business experts all felt that financial advances increased the economy's productivity. There are fewer and fewer raucous cries due to the 2008 financial crisis. Shadow banking, collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), subprime lending, and credit default swaps (CDS) all contributed to the amplification of risks and the severity of the consequences of a drop in the value of US homes (Laby, 2022). These many financial instruments and vehicles are all

8 relatively innovations. One gets the impression that they were designed to benefit bankers and other financial industry players rather than society. As a result, the experience of the preceding decade or so suggests that if financial institutions were permitted to develop unrestrictedly, they would undoubtedly improve. However, the value of these advancements could be better. Donaldson believes that hedge funds need to become more morally responsible in the future. This will only be possible if ethics is restored in finance. If the dominant economic culture and zeitgeist are ones in which ethics and money are inextricably linked, voluntary disclosure regulations will face no pushback (as it is now). Many people, including those in academia, the financial media, business, and politics, see economics and its progeny, finance, as legitimate subjects of scientific research. In other words, finance is concerned with facts, not values. Values are included in ethics. As a result, the two are classified as separate. This negative mindset has almost entirely penetrated Anglo-Saxon economies and financial activities. This institute's objective is to replace the current zeitgeist with a mentality that makes ethical behavior the norm in the financial industry. Furthermore, raising data standards would make it much simpler for financial sector regulators to spot danger. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and state tax authorities worked together in the 1990s to standardize individual taxpayers' data fields and tax filing forms. As a result, companies like Intuit were able to create tax preparation software like TurboTax, which many Americans utilize throughout tax season. If financial authorities switched from paper to data, existing software might help banks, public firms, and other financial organizations automate compliance procedures. This would be similar to how TurboTax now aids taxpayers. In practice, if several agencies used the same data and formats, the software might combine their reporting duties. Several countries, notably Australia, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom,

9 have already started standardized data to consolidate submissions to many organizations. The United States had to make up lost ground. Furthermore, replacing paper documents with digital data will open up new opportunities for the IT industry. Disclosure of financial data by technology companies for investor decision- making, analysis of this data to detect hidden risks, and reporting automation to reduce compliance costs are all possibilities. Despite this, there is precedence for a legislative solution to the problem, such as the Financial Transparency Act, which would update our regulators. The Data Legislation, establishing a consistent, government-wide data framework for information about federal expenditures, was decisively passed by Congress in 2014, and President Obama signed it into law. President Obama signed this bill into law. The Data Act would increase transparency for taxpayers, leading to better management of internal government processes and the automation of grant and contractor reporting. In terms of financial sector regulation, the Financial Transparency Act is equivalent to the Data Act. It is not a matter of collecting more or different data from consumers or the financial industry. The federal government already collects a large amount of information about individuals living in the United States. Instead, this regulation improves total information-collecting efficiency by making greater use of previously gathered data. This fosters transparency and reduces the time consumers and businesses spend each year on unneeded paperwork. Conclusion The backward character of US regulators, as shown by the Madoff case, is not only in sharp contrast to the data-driven business they are tasked with safeguarding, but it is also a problem in and of itself. Our investors, the markets, and our consumers will all suffer due to this. Those responsible for reporting financial regulation or who utilize it will be relieved to learn that

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

10 it will soon transition from archaic paper records to searchable data. Improved judgments by investors and regulators and lower compliance costs will result in faster economic development and more consumer confidence.

11 References Hoff, S. B. (2018). Fraud: An American History from Barnum to Madoff. International Social Science Review , 94 (2), 1o-1o. Laby, A. B. (Ed.). (2022). The Cambridge Handbook of Investor Protection . Cambridge University Press. Lokanan, M. (2022). Restorative Justice: Application to Corporate Fraud. In New Approaches to CSR, Sustainability and Accountability, Volume IV (pp. 137-162). Springer, Singapore. McDaniel, C. C. (2019). Madoff Madness: A Textual Analysis of the SEC's response to the Madoff Ponzi Scheme (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech). Ortner, S. B. (2019). Capitalism, Kinship, and Fraud: The Case of Bernie Madoff. Social Analysis , 63 (3), 1-23. Sattybayeva, N. (2019). How Did the Most Sophisticated Investors Fall into Madoff’s Trap?.