Vargas Charry, Carlos (1009740826) _ Assignment 3

Name: Carlos Andres Vargas Charry Student ID: 1009740826 Course: CIV1508 Airport Planning & Engineering Professor: Naren Doshi ASSIGNMENT # 3 - TERMINALS (1) Develop the requirements for the two terminal buildings (i.e. the O-D terminal vs. the Hub terminal) based on a Level of Service “C” and compare them in terms of: Given Data: Departures: (1) departure curb length For this case, the number of passengers who will use the departure curb was taken, that is, those who begin their trip from this airport. Transfer passengers will not use this area, as they will move from one plane to another. By having a greater number of passengers using this area, building number 1 will require a greater departure curb length. Enplaned peak Hour Pass (Originating Plus Transfer) 2000 Deplaned peak Hour Pass (Terminating Plus Transfer) 2000 O-D Hub Percentage of Transferring Pass 25% 75% Proportion of trans pass checked in airside 75% 75% Transferring Pass 1000 3000 non-Transferring Pass 3000 1000 Checked in airside 750 2250 Checked in landside 250 750 Total passengers using Departure Curb 3000 1000 4000 O-D 1500 Vehicle Type Design Hour Demand in Vehicles Peak of 15 Min as % of Demand Vehicle Dwell Time Peak 15 min Demand in Min Vehicle Length (ft) Peak 15 min Demand (ft*min) Peak 15 min Demand (ft) Auto 375 94 0 0 22 0 0 Auto Pass 750 188 1.5 282 22 6204 413.6 Taxi 300 75 2 150 22 3300 220 Bus 75 19 3.5 66.5 50 3325 222 Total 855 Existing Curbfront Length 700 ft Effective Double Parking Capacity 1400 ft Existing Capacity Ratio 0.61 Ratio from to Existing Level of Service (LOS) C 0.55 0.65 Required LOS Cubfront Range From 658 ft to 778 ft HUB 500 Vehicle Type Design Hour Demand in Vehicles Peak of 15 Min as % of Demand Vehicle Dwell Time Peak 15 min Demand in Min Vehicle Length (ft) Peak 15 min Demand (ft*min) Peak 15 min Demand (ft) Auto 125 31 0 0 22 0 0 Auto Pass 250 63 1.5 95 22 2079 138.6 Taxi 100 25 2 50 22 1100 73 Bus 25 6 3.5 21 50 1050 70 Total 282 Existing Curbfront Length 240 ft Effective Double Parking Capacity 480 ft Existing Capacity Ratio 0.59 Ratio from to Existing Level of Service (LOS) C 0.55 0.65 Required LOS Cubfront Range From 217 ft to 256 ft

Name: Carlos Andres Vargas Charry Student ID: 1009740826 Course: CIV1508 Airport Planning & Engineering Professor: Naren Doshi (2) departure concourse area In this case, in the first building, fewer passengers need to be processed outside the airside, so the necessary area is smaller. (3) queuing area for the check-in (4) number of check-in desks required. Because the second building requires a higher percentage of passengers not processed at airside, a larger queuing Check-in area and a greater number of positions are necessary. O-D 50% of peak hour passengers arrived in the first 15 min a 2000 peak hour number originating passengers b 250 peak hour transfer passengers not processed airside v 1.1 number of visitors per passenger y 20 average occupancy time per person s 1.9 LOS C Visitors Domestic International 0 0.7 0.45 0 0 1 0.25 0.35 0.25 0.35 2 0.05 0.2 0.1 0.4 Total v 1.1 A 4228 sq.m HUB 50% of peak hour passengers arrived in the first 15 min a 2000 peak hour number originating passengers b 750 peak hour transfer passengers not processed airside v 1.1 number of visitors per passenger y 20 average occupancy time per person s 1.9 LOS C Visitors Domestic International 0 0.7 0.45 0 0 1 0.25 0.35 0.25 0.35 2 0.05 0.2 0.1 0.4 Total v 1.1 A 4703 sq.m O-D a 2000 peak hour number originating passengers b 250 peak hour transfer passengers not processed airside t1 2 average processing time per passenger N 75 Check-in Counters Average Width Position 5 Typically 4-6 ft Depth Check-in Queue 25 Typically 15-25 ft Length of Check-in Counters 375 ft Queue Area 5625 sq.ft HUB a 2000 peak hour number originating passengers b 750 peak hour transfer passengers not processed airside t1 2 average processing time per passenger N 92 Check-in Counters Average Width Position 5 Typically 4-6 ft Depth Check-in Queue 25 Typically 15-25 ft Length of Check-in Counters 458 ft Queue Area 6875 sq.ft

Name: Carlos Andres Vargas Charry Student ID: 1009740826 Course: CIV1508 Airport Planning & Engineering Professor: Naren Doshi (6) departure lounge (plus snack/bar facility) area (7) gate hold rooms (domestic and international shown separately) For hold rooms, in the case of Domestic passengers: 146 seats per plane, according to data, 80% load factor, 50% seated passengers, space required for seated and standing passengers, and other conditions to satisfy LOS C. Arrivals: (8) passport control – arrivals queuing area (9) passport control – number of positions (10) baggage claims area (excluding claim devices) (11) number of baggage claim devices SINGLE HOLDROOM APPROACH INPUTS OUTPUTS # of Seats on Design Aircraft 146 Load Factor 80% # of Design Passengers 117 Percent Seated 50% Percent Standing 50% Seated Passenger Space Requirement (sq. ft.) 15 Standing Passenger Space Requirement (sq. ft.) 10 Seated & Standing area (sq. ft.) 1,460 Allowance for Amenities ( Increase ) 5% High Utilization Factor ( Increase ) 20% Holdroom Sharing Factor ( Decrease ) 10% Adjusted Seated and Standing Area (sq. ft.) 1,660 Podium Width/Position (ft) 8.0 Depth of Podium to back wall (ft) 8 Podium Queue Depth (ft) 15 Area per Podium Position (sq. ft.) 184 Number of Podium Positions 1 Total Podium and Queue Area (sq. ft.) 184 Boarding/ Egress Corridor Width (ft) 6 Depth of Holdroom (ft) 25 Boarding/ Egress Corridor per Bridge (sq. ft.) 150 Number of Bridges/ Doors 1 Boarding Corridor Area (sq. ft.) 150 Total Holdroom Area (sq. ft.) 2,000 Total Domestic Holdrooms (6) 12,000 DOMESTIC (LOS C) SINGLE HOLDROOM APPROACH INPUTS OUTPUTS # of Seats on Design Aircraft 269 Load Factor 80% # of Design Passengers 215 Percent Seated 50% Percent Standing 50% Seated Passenger Space Requirement (sq. ft.) 15 Standing Passenger Space Requirement (sq. ft.) 10 Seated & Standing area (sq. ft.) 2,690 Allowance for Amenities ( Increase ) 5% High Utilization Factor ( Increase ) 20% Holdroom Sharing Factor ( Decrease ) 10% Adjusted Seated and Standing Area (sq. ft.) 3,050 Podium Width/Position (ft) 8.0 Depth of Podium to back wall (ft) 8 Podium Queue Depth (ft) 15 Area per Podium Position (sq. ft.) 184 Number of Podium Positions 1 Total Podium and Queue Area (sq. ft.) 184 Boarding/ Egress Corridor Width (ft) 6 Depth of Holdroom (ft) 25 Boarding/ Egress Corridor per Bridge (sq. ft.) 150 Number of Bridges/ Doors 1 Boarding Corridor Area (sq. ft.) 150 Total Holdroom Area (sq. ft.) 3,400 Total International Holdrooms (4) 13,600 INTERNATIONAL (LOS C) O-D a 1000 peak hour number international passengers Increase in time 0.00 t1 5 average processing time per passenger N 83 Number of Officers Area per passenger LOS C 10.8 Typically 4-6 ft Queue Area 900 ft HUB a 1000 peak hour number international passengers Increase in time 0.00 t1 5 average processing time per passenger N 83 Number of Officers Area per passenger LOS C 10.8 Typically 4-6 ft Queue Area 900 ft

Name: Carlos Andres Vargas Charry Student ID: 1009740826 Course: CIV1508 Airport Planning & Engineering Professor: Naren Doshi (12) queue area in the arrivals customs hall (13) arrival customs - number of officer positions Since the passenger transfer of buildings two is much greater, it is necessary to allocate more queue area. Considering that 80% of these passengers need customs check, according to the assigned data. (14) arrivals concourse waiting area (meters/greeters’ area) (15) arrivals curb length Number of Arriving Passengers 2000 Space per passenger arrived 17.23 sq.ft Baggage Claims Area 34460 sq.ft Device Capacity Baggage per hr 600 Baggage per passengers 2 Baggage pieces 4000 Number of Baggag Claim Divices 7 O-D 80% Deplaned transferring Passengers 500 Passengers Checked in airside 375 75% Passenger needing lanside check in 100 Required space queue LOS C 12.9 sq.ft Queue Area 1290 sq.ft Processing Passangers per Hour 20 Number of officer positions 5 HUB 80% Deplaned transferring Passengers 1500 Passengers Checked in airside 1125 75% Passenger needing lanside check in 300 Required space queue LOS C 12.9 sq.ft Queue Area 3870 sq.ft Processing Passangers per Hour 20 Number of officer positions 15 O-D Deplaned non tranferring Passengers (terminating) 1500 Required space queue LOS C 12.9 sq.ft Queue Area 19350 sq.ft O-D Deplaned non tranferring Passengers (terminating) 500 Required space queue LOS C 12.9 sq.ft Queue Area 6450 sq.ft

Name: Carlos Andres Vargas Charry Student ID: 1009740826 Course: CIV1508 Airport Planning & Engineering Professor: Naren Doshi Total Terminal Area = 4228 + 522.29 + 975.48 + 1114.84 + 1263.32 + 1003.35 + 3201.74 + 119.84 + 1797.16 Total Terminal Area ≈ 14125.22 sq.m For O-D passengers: O-D Passenger Area = 75% of Total Terminal Area O-D Passenger Area = 0.75 * 14125.22 = 10593.92 sq.m For connecting passengers: Connecting Passenger Area = 25% of Total Terminal Area Connecting Passenger Area = 0.25 * 14125.22 = 3531.30 sq.m Assuming the cost is uniform for all parts of the terminal and directly proportional to the area: If the total cost is C: Cost for O-D passengers = 75% of C Cost for connecting passengers = 25% of C Cost difference = Cost for O-D passengers - Cost for connecting passengers Cost difference = 0.75 * C - 0.25 * C Cost difference = 0.5 * C Therefore, based on the area allocation, O-D passengers should pay 50% more than connecting passengers to cover the cost of construction and maintenance of the terminal, assuming that cost is directly proportional to the area and is the only factor considered for the cost allocation. (3) Again using your spreadsheet determine how many more peak hour passengers each of the two terminals could process if Level of Service "D" is deemed acceptable. Base you flexibility analysis on the following eight requirements only: (1) departure concourse area O-D 1500 Vehicle Type Design Hour Demand in Vehicles Peak of 15 Min as % of Demand Vehicle Dwell Time Peak 15 min Demand in Min Vehicle Length (ft) Peak 15 min Demand (ft*min) Peak 15 min Demand (ft) Auto 375 94 0 0 22 0 0 Auto Pass 750 188 1.5 282 22 6204 413.6 Taxi 300 75 2 150 22 3300 220 Bus 75 19 3.5 66.5 50 3325 222 Total 855 Existing Curbfront Length 550 ft Effective Double Parking Capacity 1100 ft Existing Capacity Ratio 0.78 Ratio from to Existing Level of Service (LOS) D 0.65 0.85 Required LOS Cubfront Range From 503 ft to 658 ft HUB 500 Vehicle Type Design Hour Demand in Vehicles Peak of 15 Min as % of Demand Vehicle Dwell Time Peak 15 min Demand in Min Vehicle Length (ft) Peak 15 min Demand (ft*min) Peak 15 min Demand (ft) Auto 125 31 0 0 22 0 0 Auto Pass 250 63 1.5 95 22 2079 138.6 Taxi 100 25 2 50 22 1100 73 Bus 25 6 3.5 21 50 1050 70 Total 282 Existing Curbfront Length 180 ft Effective Double Parking Capacity 360 ft Existing Capacity Ratio 0.78 Ratio from to Existing Level of Service (LOS) D 0.65 0.85 Required LOS Cubfront Range From 166 ft to 217 ft

Name: Carlos Andres Vargas Charry Student ID: 1009740826 Course: CIV1508 Airport Planning & Engineering Professor: Naren Doshi In this case, using LOS D increases the required range for the Curb length to 0.65-0.85 (2) queuing area for the check-in With LOS D, there is a reduction in the position size to the required minimum. (3) departure lounge (plus snack/bar facility) area (4) gate hold room ( domestic and international separate ) area O-D a 2000 peak hour number originating passengers b 250 peak hour transfer passengers not processed airside t1 2 average processing time per passenger N 75 Check-in Counters Average Width Position 4 Typically 4-6 ft Depth Check-in Queue 15 Typically 15-25 ft Length of Check-in Counters 300 ft Queue Area 1500 sq.ft HUB a 2000 peak hour number originating passengers b 750 peak hour transfer passengers not processed airside t1 2 average processing time per passenger N 92 Check-in Counters Average Width Position 4 Typically 4-6 ft Depth Check-in Queue 15 Typically 15-25 ft Length of Check-in Counters 367 ft Queue Area 1833 sq.ft SINGLE HOLDROOM APPROACH INPUTS OUTPUTS # of Seats on Design Aircraft 146 Load Factor 70% # of Design Passengers 102 Percent Seated 50% Percent Standing 50% Seated Passenger Space Requirement (sq. ft.) 10 Standing Passenger Space Requirement (sq. ft.) 7 Seated & Standing area (sq. ft.) 869 Allowance for Amenities ( Increase ) 5% High Utilization Factor ( Increase ) 20% Holdroom Sharing Factor ( Decrease ) 10% Adjusted Seated and Standing Area (sq. ft.) 990 Podium Width/Position (ft) 8.0 Depth of Podium to back wall (ft) 8 Podium Queue Depth (ft) 15 Area per Podium Position (sq. ft.) 184 Number of Podium Positions 1 Total Podium and Queue Area (sq. ft.) 184 Boarding/ Egress Corridor Width (ft) 6 Depth of Holdroom (ft) 25 Boarding/ Egress Corridor per Bridge (sq. ft.) 150 Number of Bridges/ Doors 1 Boarding Corridor Area (sq. ft.) 150 Total Holdroom Area (sq. ft.) 1,300 Total Domestic Holdrooms (6) 7,800 DOMESTIC (LOS C) SINGLE HOLDROOM APPROACH INPUTS OUTPUTS # of Seats on Design Aircraft 269 Load Factor 70% # of Design Passengers 188 Percent Seated 50% Percent Standing 50% Seated Passenger Space Requirement (sq. ft.) 10 Standing Passenger Space Requirement (sq. ft.) 7 Seated & Standing area (sq. ft.) 1,601 Allowance for Amenities ( Increase ) 5% High Utilization Factor ( Increase ) 20% Holdroom Sharing Factor ( Decrease ) 10% Adjusted Seated and Standing Area (sq. ft.) 1,820 Podium Width/Position (ft) 8.0 Depth of Podium to back wall (ft) 8 Podium Queue Depth (ft) 15 Area per Podium Position (sq. ft.) 184 Number of Podium Positions 1 Total Podium and Queue Area (sq. ft.) 184 Boarding/ Egress Corridor Width (ft) 6 Depth of Holdroom (ft) 25 Boarding/ Egress Corridor per Bridge (sq. ft.) 150 Number of Bridges/ Doors 1 Boarding Corridor Area (sq. ft.) 150 Total Holdroom Area (sq. ft.) 2,200 Total International Holdrooms (4) 8,800 INTERNATIONAL (LOS C)

Name: Carlos Andres Vargas Charry Student ID: 1009740826 Course: CIV1508 Airport Planning & Engineering Professor: Naren Doshi (4) You have been asked to determine the possible impact of new security arrangements and the introduction of self-service check-in kiosks. Again, assuming level of service "C" the questions you have been asked to answer are as follows: (1) average check in time will increase to 3 minutes per passenger – how many more check-in counters will be required? With the increase of 1 minute of passenger processing for each passenger, the number of check-in counters will increase from 75 (O-D) and 92 (HUB), to 113 in (O-D) and 138 (HUB). That is, 38 in O-D, and 46 in HUB. (2) a departures passport control facility is to be added with a processing rate of 20 seconds per passenger – How many of these positions will be required? Thanks to the increase of 20 seconds per processing of each passenger, 6 more officers will have to be added to meet the demand, that is, from 83 to 89. O-D a 2000 peak hour number originating passengers b 250 peak hour transfer passengers not processed airside Increase in time 1 min because new security arrangement t1 2 average processing time per passenger N 112.5 Check-in Counters Average Width Position 5 Typically 4-6 ft Depth Check-in Queue 25 Typically 15-25 ft Length of Check-in Counters 562.5 ft Queue Area 8438 sq.ft HUB a 2000 peak hour number originating passengers b 750 peak hour transfer passengers not processed airside Increase in time 1 min because new security arrangement t1 2 average processing time per passenger N 138 Check-in Counters Average Width Position 5 Typically 4-6 ft Depth Check-in Queue 25 Typically 15-25 ft Length of Check-in Counters 688 ft Queue Area 10313 sq.ft O-D a 1000 peak hour number international passengers Increase in time 0.33 min because new security arrangement t1 5 average processing time per passenger N 89 Number of Officers Area per passenger LOS C 10.8 Typically 4-6 ft Queue Area 960 ft HUB a 1000 peak hour number international passengers Increase in time 0.33 min because new security arrangement t1 5 average processing time per passenger N 89 Number of Officers Area per passenger LOS C 10.8 Typically 4-6 ft Queue Area 960 ft

Name: Carlos Andres Vargas Charry Student ID: 1009740826 Course: CIV1508 Airport Planning & Engineering Professor: Naren Doshi (2) security screening time will increase because capacity of x-ray machines is reduced to 400 pieces per hour to accommodate an explosives trace detection process – How many more screening points will be required? With the decrease in the performance of the machines to 400 pieces per hour, 2 additional machines will have to be added, that is, from 5 machines to 7 machines. (3) passengers are to be limited to one carry-on bag each. How would this limitation reduce the number of screening points required (assume the 400 piece per hour screening equipment for this answer)? It would reduce the number of machines to 4, 3 less in the case of a throughput of 2 bags per passenger, with a machine throughput of 400 feet per hour; and 1 less in the case of 2 bags per passenger and machine performance of 600 pieces per hour. DESIGN HOUR BAG LOAD INPUTS OUTPUTS Design Hour Passengers Checking In Use Check-In Value 2000 2,000 % of Passengers Checking Bags 60% Average # of Bags per Passenger 2 Total # of Bags to process in Peak Hour 2,400 10 minute Baggage flow rate 400 TSA Surge Factor ( based on a 10 minute baggage flow rate ) Applied 1.10 Equivalent Baggage Surge Rate (bags/hour) 2,640 % of Total bags that are over-odd/sized bags & too large for EDS 3% # of over-odd/sized bags requiring ETD inspections 79 Total # of Bags to process through Level 1 EDS Units 2,561 EDS/ETD EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS Level 1 EDS Screening - Process Rate(bags/hour) 400 # of Level 1 EDS Units required 7 DESIGN HOUR BAG LOAD INPUTS OUTPUTS Design Hour Passengers Checking In Use Check-In Value 2000 2,000 % of Passengers Checking Bags 60% Average # of Bags per Passenger 1 Total # of Bags to process in Peak Hour 1,200 10 minute Baggage flow rate 200 TSA Surge Factor ( based on a 10 minute baggage flow rate ) Applied 1.14 Equivalent Baggage Surge Rate (bags/hour) 1,370 % of Total bags that are over-odd/sized bags & too large for EDS 3% # of over-odd/sized bags requiring ETD inspections 41 Total # of Bags to process through Level 1 EDS Units 1,329 EDS/ETD EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS Level 1 EDS Screening - Process Rate(bags/hour) 400 # of Level 1 EDS Units required 4

Name: Carlos Andres Vargas Charry Student ID: 1009740826 Course: CIV1508 Airport Planning & Engineering Professor: Naren Doshi In this case they could charge between 3 and 4% more for international passengers, since this is the space needed to process them. (b) In addition to the extra area possibly required to accommodate international passengers name two other factors which might be cited to justify an additional change for accommodating international passengers? In addition to the additional area used to process international passengers, the salary, number of officers who will process their passports and customs control must be taken into account, as these employment costs must be balanced. In addition, of the salaries for the maintenance of the customs and passports processing areas. Departure concourse area 4228 sq. m Queuing Area Check in 5625 sq.ft Security Check Area 10500 sq. ft Security Screening Area 3620 sq.ft Holdrooms 7800 sq.ft Passport Control 900 sq.ft 1.373 Baggage Claim Area 14000 sq.ft Customs Area 1180 sq.ft 1.800 Arrival Waiting 17700 sq.ft TT 65553 sq.ft International Additional Usage 3.173