ProgramObservation-CHDEV-1-VanessaAlvarado

docx

School

Fresno City College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1

Subject

English

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

4

Uploaded by ConstablePorpoise3799

Report
Alvarado 1 Vanessa Alvarado Raquel Ochs CHDEV-1-15458 6/13/2023 Program Observation Location: FCC Child Development Center, 1621 East University Avenue Fresno, CA 93741, 6/6/23 3pm Part 1.Environment 1. Learning Centers: 5 types of learning centers the FCC Child Development center has are an Art center, Reading center, Sensory center, Dramatic Play center, and a Block center. The art center had painting materials such as an easel and paint, construction paper, stickers, and glue. The Dramatic play center had child sized furniture such as a couch, dresser, bed, and table. The sensory center had a large sensory bin filled with sand, blocks, and small figurines such as machines and people. 2. Indoors: The indoor space was neat and tidy and children were able to easily reach for items they would want to play with or use. The first material I saw that had an impact on me were see- ing framed pictures of the children’s families. They were located on a child sized dresser and the children were able to look at the pictures when they missed their guardians. The second material I saw in use was the comfort corner. This was a corner with low light and a rocking chair where the kids could be soothed by an adult or self sooth if they chose. Both of these were a surprise for me to see as I am used to seeing a more sterile and non-comforting environment when it comes to care centers. The third material I saw in use was their fish tank. It had multiple uses from pro- viding visual comfort to providing a sense of independence as the children were “in charge” of feeding the fish.
Alvarado 2 3. Outdoors: The outdoor area was large and tidy with materials easily accessible to the children. The first material I observed was the water play area. I was surprised and delighted to see as I don’t regularly see water play in childcare areas. The second material I observed was the garden. I was excited to see that it was full and lush. Most schools implement garden projects but the plants usually end up dying so it was nice to see a thriving garden. The last material I saw was the building blocks. There were multiple type of block offered from foam bricks to wooden bricks to Lego bricks. It was nice to see the variety of materials given to the children. Part 2: Analysis and Conclusion 1.Quality: The first observation made was the safe adult to child ratio. There were 4 adults and 6 children preset while I was observing. This is well within ratio as there can only be a max of 4 children to 1 adult. The second observation I made was the safety of the children. All the doors that lead to a classroom were locked and could only be opened by a number combination. The third observation I made was the health of the children. The room was kept tidy and clean as well as watching the teachers regularly cleaning the children’s hand, cups, and placemats. 2.DAP: The curriculum and activities were developmentally appropriate for the 2-year-old class I was in. The children were given naps, they were encouraged to use their voice and a talk about their feelings when upset, and the experiences were play oriented and the children chose to ex- pand upon or stop the activity. 3.Interactions: The adults had well established relationships with the children. The adults re- sponses were warm and encouraging and helped the children listen to their bodies when hungry. The adults supported the children’s play by allowing the child to take the lead when playing “grown-up.” There was also positivity and comfort provided when one of the children scraped
Alvarado 3 their knee on the rug. The adult walked the child through what they were going to do which eased the child’s anxiety and discomfort with the application of the bandage. 4. Intentional Teaching: The first activity I observed was the end of nap time. The adults knew which children slept less or would seek out comfort once awake and were listening for the cues as to when they woke up. The child who wanted comfort was immediately held and provided a picture of his family to view. The children who woke up first were immediately given the option to go into snack or have quiet play. The next activity I observed was snack time. The snack was pre prepped and laid out for when the children woke up. The children were invited and encour- aged to listen to their bodies if they were still hungry after snack or even if they weren’t hungry. The children were encouraged to feed themselves but assistance was provided of it got too chal- lenging for them. The third activity I observed was free play. During free play one adult super- vised the play, one adult engaged in dramatic play, one adult supervised the children still eating, and one adult prepped the pizza dough for the next days activity. The weeks theme was food and throughout the week the children were encouraged to taste new foods as well as make their own food. 5. Closing Statement: Overall, this was a wonderful program to observe, and I would love the opportunity to work in a similar program. The staff were warm and inviting to not only the chil- dren but myself. The indoor and outdoor areas looked fun and engaging and the planned activi- ties kept the children interested. My favorite aspect of the program was getting to see the chil- dren saying goodbye. While the children were excited to see their adults they were also sad to leave their teachers showing the strong bonds they have built.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Alvarado 4