Annotated Bibliography-1
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Metropolitan Community College, Omaha *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1056
Subject
English
Date
Jul 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
4
Uploaded by DeanBeaverMaster927
Chang1
Richard Chang Amy Rector
ENGL 1020
April 24, 2024
Annotated Bibliography
Qureshi, Basit. “Exploring the Use of ChatGPT as a Tool for Learning and Assessment in Undergraduate Computer Science Curriculum: Opportunities and Challenges.” Cornell University, Apr. 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2304.11214. This source discusses the use of ChatGPT in computer science courses and the benefits of using ChatGPT. Qureshi goes in depth about the origins of ChatGPT and how it works while also bringing up the positives and negatives of the use of ChatGPT on schoolwork. He also talked about a study that was conducted where a group of students used ChatGPT during a computer science test and another group of students hadn’t used ChatGPT. The results showed that the students who used ChatGPT had better scores than the ones who hadn’t. I
know this source is credible because I had found it on MCC’s databases, and the author is
a well-known professor at Prince Sultan University. I will use this source as evidence that
ChatGPT can help students learn better in class since it has a study that showed ChatGPT had helped students get better test results. I will also use this source to explain what ChatGPT is and how it works since the author went into greater detail on it than other sources I have found.
Chang2
Blose, Abreanna"As ChatGPT Enters the Classroom, Teachers Weigh Pros and Cons." NEA, 12 Apr. 2023, www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/chatgpt-enters-classroom-teachers-
weigh-pros-and-cons. In this source it talks about the pros and cons of teachers using ChatGPT and the academic integrity issues that it poses if students are able to use ChatGPT. It has interesting statistics such as “Within two months of the program’s launch, 51 percent of K-12 teachers reported using ChatGPT, according to a recent survey
by the Walton Family Foundation. Forty percent said they used it at least once a week; 53
percent anticipated increased use this year.”. The points that they make in this article are that it can simplify and improve educators’ lessons, translate assignments for students, and could bring the assignments reading level lower or higher for specific students. The cons they talk about are the misinformation that ChatGPT can produce, making assignments more formulaic, and cheating. I know that this source is credible since the URL has .org which means that it is posted on a registered organizations’ website. I plan on using this source as an insight on how ChatGPT can not only help students but also teachers. The statistics in this source are also helpful in showing my readers how often ChatGPT is used by teachers. Dolan, Eric W. “CHATGPT Linked to Declining Academic Performance and Memory Loss in New Study.” PsyPost, 25 Mar. 2024, www.psypost.org/chatgpt-linked-to-declining-
academic-performance-and-memory-loss-in-new-study/. This source talks about the cons of the use of ChatGPT on students. In the source it talks about how the reliance of ChatGPT correlated with higher levels of procrastination, memory loss, and a negative impact on academic performances. It also talks about how academic stress from high levels of academic workload and time pressure pushes students to use ChatGPT. There
Chang3
are a lot of statistics in here that I can use for my essay that I can use for a counter argument. I know that this source is credible because it has .org as the domain. Das, Soumya Ranjan, and Madhusudan J.V. “Perceptions of higher education students towards CHATGPT usage.” International Journal of Technology in Education, vol. 7, no. 1, 4 Feb.
2024, pp. 86–106, https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.583. In this article it discusses the benefits
of ChatGPT if it is integrated correctly in higher education. It has a survey of 162 undergraduate, postgraduate, and doctoral students asking about the benefits, limitations, and ethical concerns of ChatGPT. The results showed a positive outlook of ChatGPT regarding the student’s perception. In the article it had charts and graphs of their survey which I could use as one of my main points. I know that this source is reliable because I got it off the MCC database. Ravaglia, Ray. “CHATGPT in Schools: Performance Enhancing Tool or Technology to Ban?” Forbes, Forbes Magazine, 5 Oct. 2023, www.forbes.com/sites/rayravaglia/2023/09/11/chatgpt-in-schools-performance-
enhancing-tool-or-technology-to-ban/?sh=24cc5cda184e. In this article it talks about how
many districts have banned the use of ChatGPT but states such as New York reversing bans, and Los Angeles working around more permissive policies. I can use this article to show that other districts outside of OPS have been seeing the benefits of ChatGPT. It also
has a survey of homeschool and schoolteachers about their opinions of ChatGPT. I can use this survey to strengthen my main idea. I know that this source is credible because it was published on Forbes which is a reputable article site. Pittalwala, Iqbal. “Is ChatGPT a Threat to Education?” University of California, 3 Feb. 2023, www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/chatgpt-threat-education. In this article it shows the
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Chang4
opinions of thought leaders at the University of California, Riverside. Most of their views
on ChatGPT were negative such as “ChatGPT is not well-suited for tasks that require logic, specialized knowledge, or up-to-date information.” and “The use of homework aids
in higher education is not new. For years, students have used sites like Chegg or Quizlet to cut corners as they complete homework assignments or take online quizzes.”, when asked about what ChatGPT can do and the main concerns of ChatGPT. I can use this source in my counterargument to strengthen it. I know that this article is credible since it has a .edu domain.
Kloosterman, Matthew. “Using CHATGPT to Support Student-Led Inquiry.” Edutopia
, George Lucas Educational Foundation, 24 Oct. 2023, www.edutopia.org/article/using-chatgpt-
support-student-led-inquiry/#:~:text=Experts%20provide%20students%20with
%20firsthand,answers%20from%20the%20simulated%20mentor. This article talks about the different ways that ChatGPT can be used to help students. The ways they talked about are simulating scenarios, empowering critical thinking, and how ChatGPT can be a mentor.
They give in-depth examples justifying each of these claims. This is useful for me since I can use it to support my main ideas further. I know that this article is credible since it has an .Edu domain.