Annotated Bibliography-1
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Metropolitan Community College, Omaha *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1056
Subject
English
Date
Jul 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
4
Uploaded by DeanBeaverMaster927
Chang1
Richard Chang Amy Rector
ENGL 1020
April 24, 2024
Annotated Bibliography
Qureshi, Basit. “Exploring the Use of ChatGPT as a Tool for Learning and Assessment in Undergraduate Computer Science Curriculum: Opportunities and Challenges.” Cornell University, Apr. 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2304.11214. This source discusses the use of ChatGPT in computer science courses and the benefits of using ChatGPT. Qureshi goes in depth about the origins of ChatGPT and how it works while also bringing up the positives and negatives of the use of ChatGPT on schoolwork. He also talked about a study that was conducted where a group of students used ChatGPT during a computer science test and another group of students hadn’t used ChatGPT. The results showed that the students who used ChatGPT had better scores than the ones who hadn’t. I
know this source is credible because I had found it on MCC’s databases, and the author is
a well-known professor at Prince Sultan University. I will use this source as evidence that
ChatGPT can help students learn better in class since it has a study that showed ChatGPT had helped students get better test results. I will also use this source to explain what ChatGPT is and how it works since the author went into greater detail on it than other sources I have found.
Chang2
Blose, Abreanna"As ChatGPT Enters the Classroom, Teachers Weigh Pros and Cons." NEA, 12 Apr. 2023, www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/chatgpt-enters-classroom-teachers-
weigh-pros-and-cons. In this source it talks about the pros and cons of teachers using ChatGPT and the academic integrity issues that it poses if students are able to use ChatGPT. It has interesting statistics such as “Within two months of the program’s launch, 51 percent of K-12 teachers reported using ChatGPT, according to a recent survey
by the Walton Family Foundation. Forty percent said they used it at least once a week; 53
percent anticipated increased use this year.”. The points that they make in this article are that it can simplify and improve educators’ lessons, translate assignments for students, and could bring the assignments reading level lower or higher for specific students. The cons they talk about are the misinformation that ChatGPT can produce, making assignments more formulaic, and cheating. I know that this source is credible since the URL has .org which means that it is posted on a registered organizations’ website. I plan on using this source as an insight on how ChatGPT can not only help students but also teachers. The statistics in this source are also helpful in showing my readers how often ChatGPT is used by teachers. Dolan, Eric W. “CHATGPT Linked to Declining Academic Performance and Memory Loss in New Study.” PsyPost, 25 Mar. 2024, www.psypost.org/chatgpt-linked-to-declining-
academic-performance-and-memory-loss-in-new-study/. This source talks about the cons of the use of ChatGPT on students. In the source it talks about how the reliance of ChatGPT correlated with higher levels of procrastination, memory loss, and a negative impact on academic performances. It also talks about how academic stress from high levels of academic workload and time pressure pushes students to use ChatGPT. There
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help