EDUC 632- ELE_Instruction_Commentary_Practice_Task_
doc
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Reinhardt University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
632
Subject
Communications
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
doc
Pages
5
Uploaded by clpeyton81
Elementary Education
Task 2: Instruction Commentary
ELE INSTRUCTION COMMENTARY Practice Task 2
Respond to the prompts below (
no more than 6 single-spaced pages, including prompts
) by typing your responses within the
brackets following each prompt. Do not delete or alter the prompts. Commentary pages exceeding the maximum will not be
scored. You may insert
no more than 2 additional pages of supporting documentation
at the end of this file. These pages
may include graphics, texts, or images that are not clearly visible in the video or a transcript for occasionally inaudible portions.
These pages do not count toward your page total.
1.
What lesson topic is shown in the video clip(s)?
[The teacher announced at exactly 1 minute and 15 seconds that the students would be
participating in a reading lesson centered around the idea of word sequencing and
sequencing events. Then, at 4 minutes and 35 seconds, the teacher informed the students
that they would be using the book "The Very Hungry Caterpillar" for their lesson.]
2.
Promoting a Positive Learning Environment
Refer to scenes in the video clips where the teacher candidate provided a positive learning
environment.
a.
How did s/he demonstrate mutual respect for, rapport with, and responsiveness to
students with varied needs and backgrounds, and
challenge students to engage in
learning?
[ Throughout the video, the student teacher consistently demonstrated mutual respect, rapport,
and responsiveness to students with diverse needs and backgrounds, while also challenging
them to engage in learning. She skillfully redirected students who were veering off task at
specific time marks: 6 minutes and 2 seconds (saying: “Boys”, 6 minutes and 53 (saying: “Let’s
not talk out”) seconds, and 11 minutes and 30 seconds (Pointing at a male student and saying
“can you help him write? He’s your partner, right?”). Additionally, at 13 minutes and 39 seconds,
she gently refocused an off-topic student by saying let’s get back to our sequence of events.
The teacher's respect for her students was evident throughout the entire video. She allowed
them ample time to express themselves without rushing and actively listened to their thoughts.
Moreover, at the 12-minute and 22-second mark through the 12 minute and 45second mark,
she ensured that all students had completed their tasks before moving forward, displaying her
commitment to inclusivity and equity.
When students provided incorrect answers, the teacher responded with kindness and
promptness. She often rephrased or redirected them towards the correct answer. Overall, the
teacher's interactions with her students fostered a comfortable and effective communication
dynamic, creating a friendly and supportive learning environment. ]
3.
Engaging Students in Learning
Refer to examples from the video clips in your responses to the prompts.
a.
Explain how the instruction engaged students in developing an essential literacy strategy
and related skills.
[ In this student teaching lesson on sequencing, the instruction effectively engages students in
the development of essential literacy strategies and related skills. The teacher used a variety of
techniques to promote student engagement.,
The lesson began at about the 2-minute mark with the teacher narrating a fictional story about a
woman's grocery shopping trip. This story served as the foundation for understanding
Copyright © 2016 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
1 of 5 | 6 pages maximum
All rights reserved.
V5_0916
The edTPA trademarks are owned by The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. Use of the edTPA trademarks is permitted
only pursuant to the terms of a written license agreement.
Elementary Education
Task 2: Instruction Commentary
sequencing. The student teacher utilized the turn and talk method at the 2 minute and 30
second mark, which provided students with the opportunity to discuss their findings with each
other. This collaborative approach not only fostered active participation but also encouraged
students to learn from one another, promoting a deeper understanding of the concept.
At 3 minutes and 57 seconds, the teacher presented the same story but with a different
arrangement of events, helping students comprehend the importance of sequencing and its
relevance to the lesson.
Furthermore, at 4 minutes and 42 seconds, the teacher provided the students with a sequencing
worksheet to complete as they followed along with the story. This approach offered a different
perspective on the skill being taught, allowing students to further enhance their engagement,
and understanding.
To actively involve the students, the teacher posed open-ended questions about the relevant
skill. For example, at 7 minutes and 7 seconds, the teacher asked about the initial/first event in
the story, encouraging students to think critically and engage in the lesson.
Overall, the combination of storytelling, open-ended questions, the use of worksheets, and the
turn and talk method effectively engaged students in the development of essential literacy
strategies and related skills, making the lesson interactive and impactful.]
b.
Describe how the instruction linked students’ prior academic learning and personal,
cultural, and community assets with new learning.
[The instruction in this lesson effectively links students' prior academic learning, personal,
cultural, and community assets with new learning. At the 2-minute mark, the teacher introduced
a familiar scenario of grocery shopping, which is an experience that the majority, if not all, of the
students can relate to and have firsthand experience with. Many students have been in a
situation where they noticed their favorite food was gone and went to the grocery store with their
parents to restock. They have witnessed their parents paying for the food at the register. This
shared experience within the class created a connection between the students' prior knowledge
and the new concept of sequencing.
The teacher also made the items that were purchased during the grocery shopping relatable to
the students. The mention of common household foods, such as bread, milk, eggs, and
especially ice cream, caught the students' attention. These familiar items further linked the
students' personal experiences and cultural knowledge with the lesson. The mention of ice
cream, in particular, likely sparked excitement and engagement among the students.
Furthermore, the teacher's retelling of the story with an incorrect sequencing of events at 4
minutes and 8 seconds facilitated the students' recognition that something was amiss. This
recognition was possible because the students were able to compare the incorrect sequence to
their own personal experiences and knowledge of how events typically unfold during a grocery
shopping trip. This connection between their prior experiences and the new learning helped the
students grasp the significance of sequencing and its relevance to the lesson.
Overall, by incorporating a familiar scenario and relatable items, and by prompting students to
compare their own experiences to the incorrect sequence, the instruction effectively linked
students' prior academic learning, personal, cultural, and community assets with the new
concept of sequencing. ]
Copyright © 2016 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
2 of 5 | 6 pages maximum
All rights reserved.
V5_0916
The edTPA trademarks are owned by The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. Use of the edTPA trademarks is permitted
only pursuant to the terms of a written license agreement.
Elementary Education
Task 2: Instruction Commentary
4.
Deepening Student Learning during Instruction
Refer to examples from the video clips in your explanations.
a.
Explain how the teacher candidate
elicited and built on student responses
to promote
thinking and apply the essential literacy strategy using related skills to comprehend
OR
compose text.
[ The teacher candidate effectively demonstrated their ability to engage students and enhance
their thinking skills while applying the essential literacy strategy of comprehending and
composing text during a lesson on sequencing events in a story. They began by assessing the
students' prior knowledge at 1 minute and 17 seconds, asking if anyone was familiar with
sequencing. Although no students provided the correct response, the teacher skillfully provided
the definition to initiate the lesson.
At 7 minutes and 5 seconds, the teacher prompted the students to recall the first event of the
story. Initially, incorrect responses were given, but the teacher skillfully built on these answers,
guiding the class towards the correct one. By clearly expressing their expectations for the
students' answers, the teacher successfully obtained the correct response at 9 minutes and 45
seconds when questioning them about the second event in the story.
Through their effective elicitation and building on student responses, the teacher candidate
encouraged critical thinking and the practical application of the essential literacy strategy. By
adjusting their instruction based on the students' understanding and guiding them towards the
correct answers, the teacher candidate fostered comprehension and composition skills related
to sequencing events in a story. ]
b.
Explain how the teacher candidate modeled the essential literacy strategy
AND
supported students as they practiced or applied the strategy to comprehend
OR
compose text in a meaningful context.
[ The teacher candidate effectively demonstrated the essential literacy strategy of sequencing
events in a story and provided support to students as they practiced and applied this strategy in
a meaningful way. By using a fictional story about a girl's trip to the grocery store, the teacher
guided the students through the sequencing process between the two minute and 48-second
mark and the three-minute and 50-second mark. Through verbal guidance, the teacher ensured
that the students had a clear understanding of sequencing by asking follow-up questions to
confirm their responses.
Throughout the process, the teacher candidate continually modeled and reiterated the different
parts of the story, specifically emphasizing the beginning and middle sections, until the students
were able to correctly identify the ending. This provided valuable practice for the students and
allowed them to apply their newly acquired knowledge during the reading session of the book
"The Very Hungry Caterpillar."
By conducting a pre-assessment on sequencing with the students and utilizing the fictional
grocery shopping story, the teacher candidate provided the students with practice opportunities
prior to engaging with "The Very Hungry Caterpillar." As a result, the students were able to
effectively apply their newly learned knowledge during the reading session, further enhancing
their understanding of sequencing events in a story.]
5.
Analyzing Teaching
Refer to examples from the video clips in your responses to the prompts.
Copyright © 2016 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
3 of 5 | 6 pages maximum
All rights reserved.
V5_0916
The edTPA trademarks are owned by The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. Use of the edTPA trademarks is permitted
only pursuant to the terms of a written license agreement.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Elementary Education
Task 2: Instruction Commentary
a.
What changes would you make to your instruction—for the whole class and/or for
students who need greater support or challenge—to better support student learning of
the central focus (e.g., missed opportunities)?
Consider the variety of learners in your class who may require different
strategies/support, such as students with IEPs or 504 plans, English language learners,
struggling readers, underperforming students or those with gaps in academic
knowledge, and/or gifted students.
[ 1. Whole Class Instruction:
a. Increase the use of visual aids: Incorporating visual aids such as graphic organizers or story
maps can help students visualize the sequence of events in a story. This can be particularly
helpful for struggling readers, English language learners, and students with IEPs or 504 plans
who may benefit from additional support in understanding and organizing information.
b. Provide more opportunities for practice: While the teacher candidate did provide practice
opportunities through the pre-assessment and the fictional grocery shopping story, it may be
beneficial to incorporate additional practice activities within the whole class instruction. This can
help reinforce the concept and ensure that all students have a solid understanding of
sequencing.
2. Differentiated Instruction for Students who Need Greater Support:
a. Use scaffolding techniques: For students who may be struggling with sequencing, providing
scaffolding techniques such as sentence starters or visual cues can help them organize their
thoughts and understand the sequence of events more effectively. This can be particularly
beneficial for struggling readers, English language learners, and students with IEPs or 504
plans.
b. Offer small group or one-on-one instruction: Some students may require more individualized
support in grasping the concept of sequencing. Providing small group or one-on-one instruction
can allow for targeted interventions and personalized instruction to meet their specific needs.
3. Differentiated Instruction for Students who Need Greater Challenge:
a. Provide extension activities: For students who have a strong grasp of sequencing and may
need additional challenge, offering extension activities can help deepen their understanding and
enhance their critical thinking skills. These activities can include analyzing the impact of different
sequencing choices or creating their own stories with complex sequences.
b. Encourage higher-order thinking: Engage gifted students in discussions that require higher-
order thinking skills, such as analyzing the author's purpose in choosing a particular sequence
of events or evaluating the impact of alternative sequencing choices on the story's outcome. ]
b.
Why do you think these changes would improve student learning? Support your
explanation with evidence of student learning
AND
principles from theory and/or
research.
[ These changes are expected to improve student learning based on both evidence of student
learning and principles from theory and research.
1. Increased use of visual aids: Visual aids have been shown to be effective in enhancing
comprehension and understanding of complex concepts. According to Mayer's Cognitive Theory
of Multimedia Learning, presenting information in both visual and verbal formats can enhance
Copyright © 2016 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
4 of 5 | 6 pages maximum
All rights reserved.
V5_0916
The edTPA trademarks are owned by The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. Use of the edTPA trademarks is permitted
only pursuant to the terms of a written license agreement.
Elementary Education
Task 2: Instruction Commentary
learning by reducing cognitive load and facilitating the integration of information. Visual aids
such as graphic organizers or story maps can help students organize and visualize the
sequence of events in a story, making it easier for them to understand and remember the
information. Research studies have shown that visual aids improve comprehension and
retention of information.
2. More opportunities for practice: Practice is crucial for reinforcing learning and promoting
mastery. By providing additional practice opportunities within the whole class instruction,
students have more chances to apply and consolidate their understanding of sequencing events
in a story. According to the principles of deliberate practice, repeated practice with feedback
helps students develop expertise and improve their performance. Additionally, research has
shown that spaced practice, which involves distributing practice sessions over time, leads to
better retention and transfer of knowledge.
3. Scaffolding techniques: Scaffolding is a well-established instructional approach that provides
temporary support to help students master a skill or concept. By using scaffolding techniques
such as sentence starters or visual cues, students who struggle with sequencing can receive
additional guidance and support to organize their thoughts and understand the sequence of
events. The Zone of Proximal Development suggests that students can achieve higher levels of
learning with the guidance and support of a knowledgeable other. Research has shown that
scaffolding techniques are effective in promoting learning and improving student performance.
4. Small group or one-on-one instruction: Providing individualized support through small group
or one-on-one instruction allows for targeted interventions tailored to students' specific needs.
This personalized approach enables teachers to address students' misconceptions, provide
immediate feedback, and offer additional explanations or examples as needed. According to the
principles of differentiated instruction, adapting instruction to meet individual student needs can
enhance engagement, motivation, and learning outcomes. Research has shown that
individualized instruction positively impacts student achievement.
5. Extension activities and higher-order thinking: Offering extension activities and encouraging
higher-order thinking can challenge and engage gifted students, promoting deeper
understanding and critical thinking skills. According to Bloom's Taxonomy, engaging students in
higher-order thinking tasks, such as analyzing, evaluating, and creating, promotes deeper levels
of learning and enhances cognitive skills. Research has shown that providing opportunities for
higher-order thinking leads to improved academic achievement and cognitive development. ]
Copyright © 2016 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University.
5 of 5 | 6 pages maximum
All rights reserved.
V5_0916
The edTPA trademarks are owned by The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. Use of the edTPA trademarks is permitted
only pursuant to the terms of a written license agreement.