Reading Essay Topic #3
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Arizona State University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
343
Subject
Communications
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by BrigadierFlag4281
Reading Essay Topic #3
Prompt #1:
What practices are not effective when trying to avoid the common information effect and hidden profiles?
Relying on insufficient communication channels, not actively seeking varied opinions within the team, and restricting information
sharing to commonly known facts are notable practices that are inefficient in avoiding the common information effect and hidden profiles. Hidden profiles may also endure as a result of disregarding team dynamics issues and a reluctance to acknowledge and value individual competence. These behaviors limit the ability of varied team members to collaborate and prevent the discovery of original thoughts.
What practices are effective (5 points)?
Promoting open communication, actively seeking out varied viewpoints, and using clear communication channels within the team are effective strategies to prevent the common information effect and discover hidden profiles. In order to lessen the effects of these cognitive biases and improve collaborative decision-making, it
is important to acknowledge and recognize individual skills as well as to resolve conflicts in a proactive manner. Contrast the suggestions in Chapter 6 in the MTT text regarding the common
information effect and hidden profiles with your own team-based experiences (5 points).
Through my experiences working in teams, I have seen situations where the common information effect was exacerbated by a lack of varied viewpoints and poor communication channels. On one project, we were so focused on what everyone already knew that we
failed to recognize the unique knowledge of a team member, which resulted in a less complete solution. On the other hand, in a later project, we made a concerted effort to solicit varied opinions and used open lines of communication. This allowed us to successfully circumvent the common information effect and unearth important ideas from hidden profiles. Our team relationships were greatly
improved by acknowledging unique competence and resolving issues, which allowed for open communication and collaboration. These incidents highlight how crucial it is to put in place sensible procedures to lessen the impact of shared knowledge and reveal hidden identities in collaborative settings.
Prompt #3
Do you think that individuals or groups are better decision-makers (5 points)?
I believe that a variety of factors influence how effective decision-
making is, therefore it's difficult to say that certain people or groups
make better decisions than others. Individuals frequently perform well in circumstances requiring prompt and decisive action because of their shortened decision-making process and sense of personal accountability. People with particular knowledge can also effectively
utilize their experience. However, when varied viewpoints, cooperative creativity, and thorough risk assessment are essential, groups perform exceptionally well. Group talks generate creative solutions that would not occur from individual thought processes alone. It is also crucial to consider the task's context, nature, and available resources when evaluating whether groups or individuals would make superior decisions in a particular situation.
Justify your choice:
The justification is found in the realization that decision-making efficacy varies depending on the situation. People that thrive in circumstances requiring prompt judgment or specialized knowledge can gain from reduced procedures and individual accountability. On the other hand, groups take use of varied viewpoints and creative collaboration, which is especially helpful in complicated situations that call for a thorough risk assessment. The best option amongst people and groups depends on the particular requirements and subtleties of the decision-making process.
In what situations would individuals be more effective decision-makers than groups, and in what situations would groups be better than individuals (5 points)?
When faced with circumstances that call for quick decisions, including emergencies or time-sensitive situations, people are frequently better at making those decisions. Furthermore, in situations where a choice calls for specific knowledge or experience,
those who possess the requisite abilities can decide quickly and intelligently without the need for in-depth deliberation. On the other hand, groups do better when faced with challenging problems that require the input of several viewpoints. Group decision-making is more appropriate for tasks that benefit from collaborative creativity and innovation, such as strategic planning or brainstorming sessions. Furthermore, a group's collective views can result in a more thorough appraisal of prospective outcomes in instances where risk assessment and mitigation are crucial, lowering the possibility of overlooking. The secret is realizing each person's and each group's distinct abilities and utilizing them.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help