BUS-210 2-3

docx

School

Southern New Hampshire University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

210

Subject

Business

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by CaptainHornetPerson971

Report
Ryan Hetu BUS-210 12 March 2022 Initially the director of retail operations asked me to evaluate the reason for the team’s overall drop in productivity and to make recommendations for the team’s improvement. Upon meeting with both the team members and management there are a few glaring perceptional problems and some procedural ones as well. These perceptional problems are feelings of micromanagement, misalignment of team member’s skills and the task assignment, and managers feeling tied to a process that has been set out for years in the company. The procedural problems are how productivity and efficiency are measured on both a management and team member level. First, there is a feeling of micromanagement on the part of the managers towards the team members. Though likely not the intention, perception can be reality and there is a procedural issue backing up the claim. Team members are sent a task list each week and are required to document everything in detailed timesheets daily to cross-reference the task list. Second, team members feel that they are mismatched when it comes to their skills and the tasks they are being assigned. As a result, there is a feeling of resentment and growing stress level between the team members. Third, the management team feels that they are tied to procedures and processes that have been rooted in the company with no real room to maneuver to apply their own or team member strengths. This has caused many unresolved issues which the managers are stating is one of the leading causes of the drop in productivity and efficiency of the retail team.
Overall, the problems identified are certainly explanations of the drop in productivity and efficiency but are by no means crippling to the retail team or the company. Specifically addressing the egregious procedural issue, the daily detailed timesheets and the separate email explaining any deviations from the assigned task lists need to stop. These are time sinks and are solely in place to shift the blame onto the team member when productivity is lower than expected. Instead, I would hold two short meetings at the beginning and end of the work week. In the beginning of the week meeting managers can layout the weekly task lists and how they see these tasks being completed as well as the metric of success for the week. Team members can volunteer to take the lead on certain tasks which will increase productivity of the team by allowing the team to focus on their personal strengths. In addition, the team members can identify potential issues that may arise, and management can begin work on solutions should that issue occur. The end of the week meeting is for management to restate the metric of success that was stated in the beginning of the week and compare it to what was attained. Management then outlining what they saw went right and what went wrong with the team that week so that all can learn from mistakes and successes of the team overall. Team members should be involved in this conversation so they can voice their opinions and complaints so that the team can keep short accounts and minimize the buildup of resentment and stress. If management and team members set aside time for these two meetings per week it will address the procedural issues that I discovered as well as addressing the team member’s various feelings of micromanagement, misalignment of skills to task assignment, and will remove the perception of managers being tied to time honored processes inside the company by doing something new.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help