3
stick. It also shows the larger companies that if the smaller companies can make a difference, then they can too. Question 2:
From your readings in Chapter 3, please review the Video Case Study on Employee Microchip. After your review of the video case study, please post a summary on your thoughts about the case study. Please correlate your thoughts to the readings from the chapter and one your personal ethics assessment results. You are encouraged to share some specific examples of your assessment results to support your opinion. However, if you would like to keep your results
private, you can speak to your results in general terms.
Please provide 1-2 examples to support your viewpoints that other learners will be able to assess and debate within our weekly discussion forum.
The Video Case Study on Employee Microchip brought to the table the idea of microchipping an employee in order to see what happens on the job. The company, Three Square Market, a Wisconsin based tech firm, offered implantable microchips to its employees. In our discussions for the week Quinton Harris stated “If New Market Square is a regular company in Corporate America, there is a lot of untold information for even asking for volunteers. As the speaker stated, this is a volunteer act, and legislation is stopping mandating the process.” If the opportunity presents itself, it would be a stretch that the company would go through the slightest to make mandatory company-wide (not exacting in truth). There is a lot of information that we do not know about implants and the procedure around them. I recall from the reading that this is being thought of to watch the employee on the job but there is no guarantee that it would be turned off or not turned on while they are at home are during that employee’s personal time. I do not agree with the implants. I understand an employer trying to
