Two Questions.edited (1).edited

docx

School

Nairobi Institute of Technology - Westlands *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

MISC

Subject

Biology

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by dannetke

1 A Comparative Analysis of the Green Revolution and the Bio-revolution: Impacts and Future Expectations Name Institution Affiliation Course Date

2 Question 1: Compare and contrast the Green Revolution and the Bio-revolution, including an explanation of the key characteristics and impacts of each one. How have globalization and these agricultural changes shaped our world? What can we expect in the future? Introduction Both the Green Revolution and the Bio-revolution were considerable changes in agriculture that had diverse effects on the planet. Bio-revolution focuses on using biotechnology to improve agricultural methods, while the Green Revolution sought to raise food production via technical breakthroughs. Both revolutions have been significantly impacted by globalization, which has influenced their propagation and effects globally. The mid-20th century Green Revolution introduced high-yield crop varieties, synthetic fertilizers, and pesticides. This essay will compare and contrast these revolutions, examine the influence of globalization and the revolutions on the world, and make some predictions. Moreover, the Green Revolution has various characteristics and significant impacts. Introducing high-yield crop types was a crucial aspect of the Green Revolution. In order to boost production, scientists and researchers created new strains of typical crops, including wheat, rice, and maize (Von der Goltz, 2020). These genetically enhanced types were deliberately designed to withstand pests, illnesses, and unfavorable environmental factors, increasing crop yields overall. This innovation in crop development was crucial in increasing agricultural productivity and resolving concerns about food shortages in many developing nations. Moreover, the broad adoption of contemporary agricultural techniques and technology was another vital aspect of the Green Revolution. Agricultural mechanization increased as farmers used equipment like tractors, harvesters, and irrigation systems. Synthetic insecticides and fertilizers were also used more and more often. These technical developments greatly simplified the agricultural process, increasing

3 production and efficiency. Furthermore, the Green Revolution had a number of noteworthy impacts. First and foremost, it was essential in reducing food shortages and famine in several regions of the globe. The creation and spread of high-yielding crop types contributed to supplying the expanding food demand, especially in densely populated areas. Millions of people's living conditions improved due to increased food availability and better nutrition due to increased agricultural output (Eliazer Nelson, 2019). Second, the socioeconomic impacts of the Green Revolution were significant. It increased agricultural productivity, which led to economic prosperity and decreased rural poverty. Farmers' improved revenues from higher agricultural yields allowed them to spend more on essential services like healthcare and education. Agribusiness sectors and the development of rural economies were supported by excess food production, which allowed for the expansion of agricultural markets and facilitated commerce (Von der Goltz, 2020). Lastly, the Green Revolution significantly impacted the ecology. It unquestionably enhanced food output, but it also had a negative impact on ecosystems. The overwhelming dependence on synthetic pesticides and fertilizers led to contamination of air, water, and soil. In addition, problems with habitat loss and water shortages were exacerbated by the development of cropland due to deforestation and the depletion of water resources for irrigation (Von der Goltz, 2020). Concerns regarding the long-term viability of the agricultural techniques pushed during the Green Revolution were raised as a result of these environmental effects. The main characteristics of the Green Revolution were the introduction of high-yielding crop varieties and the use of contemporary agricultural practices. Some of its effects were increased food production, economic growth, and environmental issues. Additionally, the Bio Revolution, on the other hand, has many essential features and effects. Significant advancements in genetic engineering and synthetic biology characterize the

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

4 Bio Revolution. The genetic composition of creatures, including plants, animals, and microbes, may now be altered and modified by scientists (Eliazer Nelson, 2019). This capability allows the generation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) with improved nutritional value, productivity, and pest and disease resistance. By creating new biological systems and species, synthetic biology revolutionizes health, energy, and environmental cleanup (Liu, 2020). Fusing fields and technologies is another important aspect of the bio revolution. Interdisciplinary techniques and partnerships have emerged as the lines between biology, computer science, engineering, and other subjects have become hazier. Convergence has led to new uses. Biotechnology and nanotechnology have led to nanomedicine, which may improve diagnostics and drug delivery. Biology and data science also have driven bioinformatics and personalized medicine. Furthermore, the Bio Revolution also impacted several areas. First, it changed medicine and healthcare. CRISPR-Cas9 may treat hereditary illnesses (Liu, 2020). Monoclonal antibodies and other biopharmaceutical processes also cure cancer and autoimmune diseases. The Bio Revolution allows genetically tailored medical treatment. Second, the Bio Revolution has significantly impacted agriculture and food production. Crops with higher yields, more nutritional value, and better resilience to pests, diseases, and environmental pressures have all been developed using genetic engineering methods. This may solve food security issues and lessen agriculture's adverse ecological effects (Eliazer Nelson, 2019). To guarantee the proper implementation of new technologies, rigorous examination of possible hazards and ethical issues is necessary. Overall, advancements in genetic engineering, synthetic biology, and multidisciplinary cooperation are the main characteristics of the Bio Revolution. Innovative developments in healthcare and tailored treatment, improvements in agriculture and food

5 production, and possible answers to environmental problems are just a few examples of its effects. Moreover, there are similarities and differences between Green Revolution and the Bio- revolution. The agricultural industry has seen tremendous technological breakthroughs due to both Green Revolution and the Bio-revolution. The Green Revolution brought about high- yielding crop types, automation, and the use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides. Similar to the Green Revolution, the Bio-Revolution depends on the fusion of disciplines, genetic engineering, and synthetic biology to improve agricultural techniques. Both revolutions seek to reduce food shortages and boost production (Liu, 2020). The Green Revolution made this possible by introducing crop types with high yields and contemporary agricultural techniques, which increased crop yields and increased access to food. Like the Green Revolution, bio-revolution employs genetic engineering and biotechnology to generate crops with more significant results, better nutrition, and pest and disease resistance. However, the two revolutions differed significantly from one another. The Green Revolution was centered on enhancing agricultural practices by creating and accepting crop varieties with high yields and contemporary farming techniques. Its main objective was to use automation and traditional breeding methods to boost output and alleviate food shortages (Eliazer Nelson, 2019). Bio-revolution uses biotechnology, genetic engineering, and synthetic biology to enhance agriculture. Genetic material must be manipulated to create GMOs with desired traits. Revolutions affect the environment differently. Due to synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, the Green Revolution polluted land, water, and air. Farming caused habitat loss and water deficit owing to deforestation and water depletion. Bio- revolution may provide long-term solutions. Bioremediation, biofuels, and sustainable materials may be made using synthetic biology and biotechnology.

6 Furthermore, globalization and both the Green Revolution and the Bio-revolution shaped our world. Global commerce and communication aided the distribution of agricultural technology, inputs, and information across nations, facilitating the acceptance of biotechnological developments and Green Revolution techniques (Liu, 2020). Multinational enterprises significantly aided global agricultural innovation promotion and dissemination. However, the loss of indigenous farming traditions and biodiversity and the standardization of agricultural practices are further effects of globalization. Additionally, the concentration of power in the hands of a few agricultural businesses has been exacerbated by globalization, creating questions about equality and food sovereignty. Further, there is anticipation of considerable improvements in agricultural methods in the future, notably in the area of biotechnology. These developments will concentrate on creating crops resistant to climate change, precision farming methods, and nutritional improvement (Liu, 2020). Genetically modified crops and other sustainable pest and disease control strategies will be given priority (Von der Goltz, 2020). Urban agriculture and vertical farming will spread as they make use of regulated settings and cutting- edge technology. Sustainable agriculture will also benefit from improvements in crop efficiency, especially photosynthetic and resource-use efficiency. The Green Revolution and Bio-revolution transformed agriculture and our planet. The mid-20th century Green Revolution used high- yielding crops, better irrigation, fertilizers, and pesticides to enhance food output and eliminate hunger. The Green Revolution changed agriculture, especially in emerging nations like India. The Green Revolution also enhanced agricultural output and food security but destroyed indigenous farming practices, biodiversity, and equality. Chemical inputs like fertilizers and pesticides degrade the ecosystem, eroding soil and polluting water. Multinationals gained influence, creating equity and food sovereignty issues. Bio-revolution, an extension of the Green

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

7 Revolution, exploits biotechnology, especially genetic engineering, in agriculture. GM crops may solve agricultural issues, including climate change, food security, and resource shortages. GM crops have improved farmer incomes, yields, and pesticide usage. The Green Revolution and Bio-revolution have had a major influence on agricultural and global food systems. However, GM crops have been controversial owing to safety, environmental, and socioeconomic issues. The future of agriculture is expected to witness continued advancements, focusing on biotechnology, climate resilience, precision farming, and sustainable practices. Further, the chosen topic for the essay is Green Revolution and the Bio-revolution, comparing their characteristics, impacts, and future expectations. One real-life example of the Green Revolution's influence is the transformation of India's agricultural sector. The application of genetic engineering in agriculture is a real-life example of Bio-revolution's impact. Conclusion This paper has compared and contrasted the two major agricultural revolutions that have impacted our world: the Green Revolution and the Bio-revolution. The Green Revolution highlighted environmental concerns while increasing food supply and raising living standards by introducing high-yield crop varieties and contemporary agricultural techniques. The bio- revolution, on the other hand, has changed healthcare, agriculture, and the environment and is defined by advances in genetic engineering and synthetic biology. With the proliferation of agricultural technology and the consolidation of power in agribusiness firms, globalization has impacted both revolutions. Future developments in biotechnology, environmentally friendly farming methods, and precision farming strategies are anticipated. In addressing issues of global food security, fostering sustainable development, and taking into account the ethical and environmental consequences of technology breakthroughs, this perspective emphasizes the

8 significance of agricultural developments. The spread of agricultural techniques and their effects on the world-systems theory indicates the ties to globalization, highlighting the need for fair distribution and responsible use of agricultural technology worldwide. References Eliazer Nelson, A. R. L., Ravichandran, K., & Antony, U. (2019). The impact of the Green Revolution on indigenous crops of India. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 6(1), 1-10. Liu, S., Zhang, M., Feng, F., & Tian, Z. (2020). Toward a “green revolution” for soybean. Molecular plant, 13(5), 688-697. Von der Goltz, J., Dar, A., Fishman, R., Mueller, N. D., Barnwal, P., & McCord, G. C. (2020). Health impacts of the green revolution: Evidence from 600,000 births across the developing world. Journal of health economics, 74, 102373.

9 Question 2; Discuss forced migration, including distinctions between migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, and internally displaced persons. What are the responsibilities of countries in the global north to deal with this ongoing global crisis? Introduction Forced migration is a complicated, urgent subject that has catapulted into a global disaster. War, persecution, and natural disasters cause millions to leave their homes each year. Migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, and internally displaced individuals all face practical and legal issues related to the problem. Forced migration affects countries, regions, individuals, and communities. This paper discusses migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, and internally displaced persons (IDPs), their challenges, and the international community's solutions. The paper will also discuss the obligations placed on northern nations to address the current global catastrophe. Further, forced migration encompasses migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, and internally displaced people, each with their legal status. Dolezal et al. (2002) define "migrant" as someone who leaves their native nation for job, education, family reunion, or better living circumstances. People move freely to improve their lives. Refugees fled their countries due to real fears of violence, conflict, or persecution. They seek international protection because they cannot return home. Refugees are protected under the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol (Stankovic et al., 2021). Asylum seekers are refugees. When seeking refuge, individuals demonstrate a credible fear of persecution or other harm if they return home. They frequently face legal uncertainty and risk throughout application processing. IDPs, unlike refugees, are forced to flee their homes but have not crossed an international border (Dolezal et al., 2021).

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

10 War, bloodshed, natural disasters, and human rights abuses drive them to escape their country. In contrast to refugees, IDPs are covered by various humanitarian frameworks rather than the special legal safeguards provided by international refugee law. Forced migration demands complicated and nuanced answers. To provide adequate safety and assistance, forced migrants must be categorized. According to Dolezal et al. (2021), migrants leave their nations to find better prospects or reunite with relatives. They may migrate and follow the target country's immigration processes. Immigration laws control migrants' legal status and rights. Refugees escape their nations owing to legitimate concerns of persecution, war, or violence. They seek international protection because they cannot safely return home. The 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol protect refugees and require nations to grant sanctuary and protection. These laws determine refugee status. Asylum seekers fear persecution if they return home. They may be detained or deported while applying for asylum. Asylum seekers' treatment depends on national immigration policy. IDPs are persons who suffer violence, war, natural catastrophes, and human rights violations in their own countries. The Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement protect IDPs, although international refugee legislation does not. Recognizing each group's vulnerability and protecting their rights is crucial. Forced migration presents complicated difficulties that need adequate legal frameworks, support networks, and international collaboration to help people impacted. Additionally, in order to support migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, and internally displaced persons (IDPs), it's essential to identify their distinctions. They vary legally. Refugees have legal rights under international refugee law. They escaped persecution. However, asylum claimants are still seeking refugee status. They may be in an ambiguous legal situation throughout this time (Stankovic et al., 2021). However, migrants are a more diverse group and,

11 depending on the case, may be entitled to legal protections relating to their immigration status or the terms of their visa (Dolezal et al., 2021). The reasons for displacement still lead to another significant difference. Both refugees and internally displaced people (IDPs) have gone through this. However, in response to persecution or armed conflict, refugees travel across international boundaries for safety and protection. On the other hand, IDPs are also compelled to leave but stay within the limits of their nation. Their native country's turmoil, bloodshed, or natural calamities sometimes cause their displacement. Those who migrate, including economic migrants, do so willingly and for a variety of reasons, such as to pursue education, reunite with family, or seek out better employment possibilities. Their choice to relocate often has nothing to do with persecution or hostilities. Another crucial difference is in how rights and services are accessible. Refugees are protected under international law. Social services, employment, education, and healthcare are rights. International law seeks to guarantee that these people are treated with respect and given the aid they need while being displaced (Stankovic et al., 2021). However, attaining these rights may present more significant difficulties for migrants and IDPs. They may have trouble getting fundamental rights and services without legal protection. Understanding the distinctions between migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, and internally displaced people (IDPs) is crucial to understanding the experiences and needs of displaced people. Moreover, northern nations have several essential obligations when it comes to handling the current worldwide problem of forced migration. One of its key roles is providing refuge to refugees. International refugee law requires these governments to ensure that refugees get fair and effective asylum. They carry out their obligation to safeguard people compelled to flee their homes by offering sanctuary and protection to refugees (Dolezal et al., 2021). Active

12 participation in resettlement and humanitarian admittance initiatives is another duty of northern nations. For refugees who are unable to return home or assimilate into their initial asylum countries, resettlement offers a long-term alternative. Governments in the global north share the duty of giving aid and protection to people in need by taking part in these programs and maybe expanding their refugee quotas. Additionally, these nations must help first-asylum countries, often in the developing world, by offering financial, logistical, and technological support. These nations struggle to accommodate and provide for the fundamental requirements of populations who have been forcefully relocated while hosting sizable populations of refugees and internally displaced people. By providing assistance, governments in the global north lessen the load on these countries and increase their ability to safeguard and assist refugees and IDPs adequately. Further, the northern nations also have a responsibility to address the root causes of forced migration. This includes addressing violence, political instability, human rights violations, and economic inequality that force people to leave. Northern nations can help people remain in their native countries and establish a safe and prosperous future by actively participating in diplomacy, conflict resolution, and development. Furthermore, northern nations should invest in education and skills development programs for refugees. By providing access to quality education and vocational training, they can empower refugees to become self-reliant, contribute to their host communities, and potentially rebuild their home countries in the future. Furthermore, the global north also must actively support efforts to create peace and end conflicts that result in forced migration. Addressing political instability, military conflict, and human rights abuses might help these countries reduce forced displacement (Stankovic et al., 2021). Addressing forced migration's causes is vital. These include poverty, inequality, environmental degradation, and employment chances. Countries in the global north may help to

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

13 create circumstances that lessen the need for individuals to leave their homes forcibly by encouraging sustainable development, economic cooperation, and fair trade practices. Giving humanitarian aid is yet another essential duty. This involves making significant financial contributions to humanitarian relief programs aiding communities who have been forcefully displaced. Countries in the global north are responsible for safeguarding the welfare of people in need, whether by financial aid, donations to humanitarian groups, or the supply of critical resources like food, water, shelter, and healthcare. Xenophobia, racism, and prejudice towards immigrants, refugees, asylum seekers, and internally displaced people must be forcefully combated in northern nations (Dolezal et al., 2021). These nations may develop an atmosphere that encourages comprehension, acceptance, and integration by promoting inclusive communities, increasing knowledge of the contributions and rights of people that have been forcefully displaced, and combating harmful stereotypes and biases. Finally, it is crucial to improve global collaboration. The global north should collaborate with other nations, international organizations, and civil society groups to address forced migration. Sharing best practices and information and working together to tackle global migration concerns may provide more effective and long-term solutions. In general, nations in the northern hemisphere have a moral and legal obligation to deal with the continuing worldwide catastrophe of forced migration. These nations may aid in reducing the effects of forced migration and advancing a more just and compassionate world by offering protection, help, and support to people that have been forcefully displaced. Furthermore, the chosen topic of the essay, forced migration, is a huge worldwide problem shown by real-life examples like the Rohingya refugee crisis, the Syrian refugee crisis, and climate-related displacement. These examples show how violence, conflict, persecution, and natural disasters push people from their homes.

14 Conclusion This essay's body paragraphs explain the differences between migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, and internally displaced persons (IDPs) in the context of forced migration. Understanding these categories helps identify their needs and provide support. In order to confront the current worldwide catastrophe of forced migration and advance a more just and compassionate society, it is essential to have this knowledge. This issue also relates to globalization since it emphasizes how structural inequality and interdependence on a global scale influence cross-border migration. Analyzing the power dynamics and economic, political, and social elements that influence forced migration also has relevance to the world systems theory. Countries in the global north may actively participate in these challenges, address the underlying causes of displacement, and contribute to more practical and long-lasting solutions by upholding their obligations.

15 R eferences Dolezal, M. L., Alsubaie, M. K., Sheikh, I., Rosencrans, P., Walker, R. S., Zoellner, L. A., & Bentley, J. A. (2021). Differences in posttraumatic and psychosocial outcomes among refugees, asylum seekers, and internally displaced persons. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 209(1), 28-34. Stankovic, S., Ecke, J., & Wirtz, E. (2021). Forced migration. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Anthropology.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Two Questions.edited (1).edited

Related Documents