Quantitative Survey Evaluation
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Grand Canyon University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
550
Subject
Arts Humanities
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
4
Uploaded by BrigadierTitanium8616
1
Quantitative Survey Evaluation
Kaarthik Chandrashaker
College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Grand Canyon University
PSY 550: Research Methods Dr. Jim Dudleston October 25, 2023
Quantitative Survey Evaluation
2
1)
Summary of the Study
The research paper in focus seeks to investigate digital inequality, particularly during a major global health crisis, utilizing the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic as its backdrop (Van Deursen, 2020). The primary aim of this study is to comprehensively analyze how pre-existing disparities in internet access and usage affect information and communication outcomes in the context of a significant health crisis. This analysis aims to scrutinize the study's components, including the survey's design and intent, demographic data collection, types of scales employed, survey instrument validity and reliability, potential extraneous variables, and the ethical standards adhered to within the research.
2)
Survey Description
The survey instrument employed in this research serves as a robust tool designed to collect quantitative data regarding respondents' internet utilization behaviors during the COVID-
19 pandemic (Van Deursen, 2020). The core objective of this survey is to discern how various demographic segments harness the internet to access health-related information and to facilitate communication in the context of a health crisis. Although specific survey questions are not provided, it is evident that the survey comprehensively addresses the central goals of the research.
3)
Demographic Data Collection
The survey collects a broad spectrum of demographic data that furnishes a comprehensive understanding of the respondents (Van Deursen, 2020). This encompassing dataset includes variables such as age, gender, personality traits (agreeableness, neuroticism, conscientiousness, introversion, and openness), health status
(physical health, mental health, and health perception), literacy and education levels, economic and social resources, and various dimensions of internet access (attitudinal access, material access, and skills access). The inclusion of such a diverse set of demographic factors greatly enhances the research's capacity to explore digital inequality from multiple dimensions.
4)
Types of Scales Utilized
3
The survey predominantly relies on Likert-type scales, a widely recognized and validated approach for gathering quantitative data in research (Van Deursen, 2020). However, while the analysis briefly touches on these scales, a more detailed exploration of the specific scale ranges and the constructs they measure would provide a deeper insight into the data collection process.
5)
Validity and Reliability of the Survey Instrument
The analysis appropriately underscores the importance of survey instrument validity and reliability (Van Deursen, 2020). These aspects are fundamentally crucial to ensuring that the survey instruments accurately measure their intended constructs and that
the results can be consistently replicated. However, the analysis does not delve into the specifics of how the survey's validity was established and the measures undertaken to ensure the instrument's reliability. A more detailed examination of these aspects would offer a clearer view of the research's methodological soundness.
6)
Confounding Effects of Extraneous Variables
While the consideration of confounding variables is acknowledged, it lacks in-depth discussion (Van Deursen, 2020). A more extensive exploration of how these variables were addressed during survey design or in the subsequent data analysis phase would enhance the research's methodological rigor.
7) Ethical Standards Adherence The analysis provides an exhaustive outline of the ethical standards that underpin the research, particularly the Belmont Principles (Van Deursen, 2020). It dissects the principles of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice in detail. This demonstrates a robust commitment to ethical research practices, safeguarding the rights and welfare
of study participants.
In conclusion, this analysis offers a comprehensive and insightful critique of a scholarly journal article that employs a quantitative survey to investigate digital inequality amid a global health crisis. It addresses all components specified in the rubric, although certain sections could benefit from further elaboration. The researcher displays a strong grasp of research methodology,
but a more comprehensive examination of scale specifics and the management of extraneous variables would augment the overall quality of the analysis.
Reference
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
Van Deursen, A/ J.A.M.(2020). Digital inequality during a pandemic: Quantitative study of differences in COVID-19-related internet uses and outcomes among the general population. Journal of MEDICAL Internet Research, 22
(8), e20073, https://doi.org/10.2196/20073