Deceptive Ledger The Harriette Walters Case
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Calhoun Community College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
552
Subject
Accounting
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by AngieS93
Deceptive Ledger: The Harriette Walters Case
Harriette Walters was involved in one of the largest and most infamous embezzlement scams in the history of the Washington, D.C. government. Walters was the manager of the tax office of the D.C. Office of Tax and Revenue, and her major function was to monitor property tax assessments and modifications (Southall, 2009). DC Watch Report of Investigation states, ‘Walters’ scheme was not highly sophisticated; to the contrary, it was rudimentary. When we interviewed her, Walters mused repeatedly that she had been “hiding in plain sight.” The report summarizes the main failures that allowed her scheme to
succeed for nearly 20 years and to drain more than $48 million from District coffers. Their conclusion states that Walters was able to perpetrate this long-standing fraud because of a failure of controls, a dysfunctional work environment, and a lack of oversight.’
Framework of Conspiracy
Between 1989 and 2007, Walters conducted a major fraud conspiracy that stole more than $48 million from the District of Columbia government. Walters used a variety of strategies to disguise
her fraudulent operations. One significant strategy was to construct bogus tax credits and changes in the tax assessment system, giving the appearance that actual refunds were being issued. She also changed the names and addresses associated with the bogus refunds to prevent detection. Despite significant modifications in accounting and administrative systems, Walters' fraudulent real estate tax refund tactics remained constant and effective (Jacoby et al., 2011).
Spreading the Wealth
Walters' bogus refund requests appeared real, with valid vouchers and supporting documents. Supporting documents were routinely copied from legitimate tax returns for unrelated properties.
Refunds were manually handled and made payable to bogus entities or real property owners' names, although they were instructed to be paid "care of" fictitious entities. In both cases, Walters arranged for the reimbursement checks to be delivered to her rather than addressed to the intended beneficiaries (Splinter, 2009).
Iron Hand of Authority
Furthermore, Walters exploited her position of authority to harass and quiet subordinates who were suspicious of her actions. She was notorious for instilling dread in her department and maintaining tight control to prevent anyone from disclosing the scam. Walters' ability to preserve
the appearance of routine in the tax office enabled her to continue the theft plan for nearly two decades.
Fraud Triangle – Opportunity and Pressures
We can examine how the fraud triangle applies to Harriette Walters and the D.C. tax office embezzlement plot, focusing on opportunity and pressures.
Opportunity
: Walters was the tax office manager, which gave her a special position of power and accountability. Because of her position, she was able to alter the tax assessment system and, without being discovered right away, process bogus refunds. She fabricated fake tax credits and modifications without setting off alarms by taking advantage of flaws in the tax office's internal systems and oversight. Walters was able to
execute the scam because she had access to the required systems and the technological know-how. Because of her position, she was able to create and conceal fraudulent transactions by controlling and manipulating financial documents.
Pressures (Motivation)
: Walters was greatly influenced by financial incentives to commit fraud. She struggled financially on her own, wanting a more opulent lifestyle and having debts that kept growing. Walters had a compelling financial incentive to embezzle
money because of her lavish spending patterns and passion for luxury goods like pricey cars and fancy clothes. Walters's prolonged engagement in fraudulent operations was encouraged by the pressure to uphold a façade of success and money as well as her dread of exposure and the possible fallout if her financial difficulties were discovered.
In Harriette Walters' case, the combination of opportunity and financial constraints inside the Fraud Triangle produced an environment ripe for deception. Walters took advantage of her position of trust and power, identified possibilities within the system's flaws, and succumbed to financial pressures that drove her to pilfer monies. The combination of these elements contributed to the length and breadth of the fraud scheme.
Interviews: Insights and Revelations
Investigators would have likely sought to speak with a variety of pertinent individuals in order to compile a thorough case, learn more about the scale of the fraudulent operations, and learn more about the embezzlement plan carried out by Harriette Walters in the D.C. tax office. The important individuals that investigators might have tried to speak with would be the bank employees and tellers, Harriett's coworkers, anyone who would have approved or examined the
forged paperwork, the beneficiaries of the monies, and finally Jayrece and Harriette would have been my first priority.
Busted!
An internal probe showed irregularities in the tax office's financial records, revealing the fraud in 2007. ‘It is stunning that Walters’ scheme came to light not because of anything any District employee said or did, but only because a bank employee asked the right questions and contacted the authorities’ (DC Watch, page 7, pp 2). Employing a range of interview techniques to gather information effectively, FBI investigators used the confrontation technique and documentary evidence technique on Walters, after gathering sufficient evidence to press charges against her. Harriette Walters first denied FBI investigators' confrontation while they were at her Washington, DC, residence. She was accused of lying by Agent Andrew Sekela, who produced return receipts with her signature on them. Walters finally gave a six-page confession after breaking down in tears when presented with overwhelming evidence. She described in her confession how she evaded suspicion for so many years. Walter’s was also befriended by an FBI agent, which helped her trust the agents and prosecutors (Wilber, 2009).
Fraud Prevention Measures
Forensic accountants play an important role in detecting and preventing fraudulent activity. A forensic accountant may have proposed the following actions to prevent the type of fraud committed by Harriette Walters in the D.C. tax office:
Enhance Internal Controls
: Increase internal controls to include segregation of duties, ensuring that no single person controls all aspects of a financial transaction. This prevents a single person from changing records without being detected.
Frequent internal audits
: Perform routine internal audits of financial records, particularly in divisions in charge of important financial activities such as tax assessments. Potential fraudulent activity as well as abnormalities and inconsistencies can be found with the aid of internal audits.
Employee Training and Awareness
: Employees should receive thorough instruction on
ethical behavior, preventing fraud, and the significance of reporting any questionable activity. Early reporting can be encouraged, and fraud can be discouraged by fostering an awareness culture.
Hotline for Whistleblowers
: Establish a reporting system or whistleblower hotline where staff members can confidentially report any allegations of wrongdoing or fraud. This gives people a private avenue to voice their concerns without worrying about consequences.
Examine and Revise Procedures and Policies
: Review and update financial policies and processes on a regular basis to reflect evolving risks and situations. Make certain that staff members are informed of these policies and follow them.
Analytics and Surveillance of Data
: Make use of data analytics technologies to keep an eye on financial transactions and spot trends that can point to fraud. Put proactive monitoring mechanisms in place to identify irregularities either periodically or in real time.
External audits conducted independently
: Hire outside auditors to carry out unbiased audits on a regular basis. The objective viewpoint of external auditors allows them to spot problems that internal reviews might miss.
Task Rotation
: Establish a policy allowing staff to switch up their job duties. This may lessen the possibility of collusion and make it harder for people to participate in long-
term fraudulent activities.
Tone at the Top and Ethical Leadership
: Encourage moral leadership and establish a firm "tone at the top." Integrity is promoted and a culture of ethics is set by the leadership's dedication to moral behavior.
Consistent Fraud Risk Assessments:
Evaluate fraud risks that are particular to the company and its activities on a regular basis. This entails spotting any weak points and putting in place safeguards to lessen the risk.
Summary
Harriette Walters, the tax office manager in the D.C. Office of Tax and Revenue, initiated one of the largest embezzlement schemes in Washington, D.C.'s history. Between 1989 and 2007, Walters used the tax assessment system to fraudulently refund approximately $48 million in property taxes. She fabricated phony tax credits and adjustments and endorsed and deposited return cheques into accounts controlled by herself and her collaborators. To conceal her acts,
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Walters instilled terror in subordinates, intimidated them, and kept tight control over her department. The scam was discovered in 2007 through internal investigations, which led to Walters' incarceration. The Harriette Walters case is a sharp reminder of the significance of awareness, coordination, and a multifaceted approach to fraud prevention in both public and private sectors.
The lessons obtained from such cases help to develop anti-fraud efforts and improve forensic accounting standards.
References
Read the following:
Jacoby, P. F., Lorigo, S., & McCallum, B. T. (2011). Fraudulent tax refunds: The notorious career of Harriette Walters.
Current Issues in Auditing, 5
(1), A23–A38. doi: 10.2308/ciia.2011.5.1.A23 (
Fraudulent Tax Refunds - Current Issues in Auditing 2011.pdf
The Council of the District of Columbia. (2008).
Report of investigation.
http://www.dcwatch.com/govern/otr081215.pdf
Links to an external site.
. (This report is 122 pages long, but it has an excellent table of contents to help narrow down what you want to find. It is comprehensive, detailed, and thorough. I highly encourage you to take advantage of it.
Report of Investigation - The Council of the District of Columbia.pdf
Wells, J. T., & McFadden, G. (2010, May/June). A property tax scam: Washington D.C. $48 Million Embezzlement.
Journal of Business Case Studies. 6
(3), 59–64. (
A Property Tax Scam - Journal of Business Case Studies.pdf
Wilber, D. Q. (2009, September 13). In tax scam investigation, A race for missing loot.
The Washington Post.
(
Tax Scam Investigation, A Race for Missing Loot - The Washington Post.pdf
Southall, A. (2009, June 30). 17-Year Term for Official in Tax Scam. New York Times.
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/01/us/01embezzle.html
Splinter, D. (2009, July 10). DC Tax Collector “Spreading the Wealth” with $48 Million
Stolen Property Taxes. Tax Foundation Blog
. https://taxfoundation.org/blog/dc-
tax-collector-spreading-wealth-48-million-stolen-property-taxes/
Related Documents
Related Questions
In a recent financial fraud case, city employees in Brooklyn, New York, accessed electronic databases to defraud the city of $20 million. Several employees in collusion with the former deputy tax collector completely erased or reduced $13 million in property taxes and $7 million in accrued interest that taxpayers owed. In exchange for this service, the taxpayers paid the employees involved bribes of 10 to 30 percent of their bills. Required Discuss the control techniques that could prevent or detect this fraud.
arrow_forward
In a financial fraud case, city employees in Brooklyn, New York, accessed digital databases to defraud the city of $20 million. Several employees, in collusion with the former deputy tax collector, completely erased or reduced $13 million in property taxes and $7 million in accrued interest that taxpayers owed. In exchange for this service, the taxpayers paid the employees involved bribes of 10 to 30 percent of their bills.
Required
Discuss the control techniques that could prevent or detect this fraud.
arrow_forward
Jim Block, CFE, is investigating Randy Smith for his role in a potential kickback scheme. Gathering evidence about Randy's financial activity has been difficult. While on a stakeout at Randy's home, Jim sees Randy's wife take out the garbage and place it on the curb. Jim takes the trash bag, sorts through its contents, and discovers multiple bank statements that provide details about some of Randy's illicit financial transactions. Is jim's acquirement of the bank statements legal even though there was no search warrant? Fully explain!
arrow_forward
Assume that Brooke Miles, accounts payable clerk for West Coast Design Inc., stole $48,350 by paying fictitious invoices for goods that were neverreceived. The clerk set up accounts in the names of the fictitious companies and cashed the checks at a local bank. Describe a control procedure thatwould have prevented or detected the fraud.
arrow_forward
Rohini works as an accountant with PQR Ltd. She embezzled $20,000 from the company bank account. She was caught in the annual audit of the company. She justified her action saying that her employer has not given any pay rise, so she had to take $20,000 from the account.
Explain in your own words the internal control that may have failed in the above situation. Also explain which element of the fraud triangle Rohini is referring to justify her action.
arrow_forward
The Perfect Crime?
Consider the following story of an actual embezzlement.This was the ingenious embezzler’s scheme: (a) He hired a print shop to print a private stock of Ajax Company checks in the company’s numerical sequence. (b) In his job as an accounts payable clerk at Ajax, he intercepted legitimate checks written by the accounts payable department and signed by the Ajax treasurer and destroyed them. (c) He substituted thesame numbered check from the private stock, payable to himself in the same amount as the legitimate check, and he “signed” it with a rubber stamp that looked enough like the Ajax Company treasurer’s signature to fool the paying bank. (d) He deposited the money in his own bank account. The bank statement reconciler (a different person) was able to agree the check numbers and amounts listed in the cleared items in the bank statement to the recorded cash disbursement (check number and amount) and thus did not notice the embezzler’s scheme.The embezzler was able to…
arrow_forward
What is a good response to....
Embezzlement is a type of fraud that happens when someone within an organization misuses their position of trust to steal money. This breach of trust is an intentional form of deceit to misappropriately utilize these funds for their own gain. Reviewing sales, refunds, returns, cash deposits, and voided transactions would help identify any form of fraud as an assistant manager. If there are any discrepancies identified, it would help to review logs of who accessed software at specific times to help identify the culprit. If there was something identified the next step would be to reports the findings to higher management depending on company protocol and be a confidant during the investigation process. It is not advisable to have direct confrontation as it could lead to further deceitful actions with the intent to cover up their actions.
arrow_forward
You are asked to be interviewed by a student newspaper regarding the nature of accounting fraud. The reporter says, “As I understand it, asset misappropriations are more likely to be found are more likely to be found in small organizations, but not in larger organizations. On the other hand, fraudulent financial reporting is more likely to be found in larger organizations.” How would you respond to the reporter’s observation?
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
Accounting
ISBN:9781305224414
Author:JENNINGS
Publisher:Cengage

Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning

Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305080577
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
Related Questions
- In a recent financial fraud case, city employees in Brooklyn, New York, accessed electronic databases to defraud the city of $20 million. Several employees in collusion with the former deputy tax collector completely erased or reduced $13 million in property taxes and $7 million in accrued interest that taxpayers owed. In exchange for this service, the taxpayers paid the employees involved bribes of 10 to 30 percent of their bills. Required Discuss the control techniques that could prevent or detect this fraud.arrow_forwardIn a financial fraud case, city employees in Brooklyn, New York, accessed digital databases to defraud the city of $20 million. Several employees, in collusion with the former deputy tax collector, completely erased or reduced $13 million in property taxes and $7 million in accrued interest that taxpayers owed. In exchange for this service, the taxpayers paid the employees involved bribes of 10 to 30 percent of their bills. Required Discuss the control techniques that could prevent or detect this fraud.arrow_forwardJim Block, CFE, is investigating Randy Smith for his role in a potential kickback scheme. Gathering evidence about Randy's financial activity has been difficult. While on a stakeout at Randy's home, Jim sees Randy's wife take out the garbage and place it on the curb. Jim takes the trash bag, sorts through its contents, and discovers multiple bank statements that provide details about some of Randy's illicit financial transactions. Is jim's acquirement of the bank statements legal even though there was no search warrant? Fully explain!arrow_forward
- Assume that Brooke Miles, accounts payable clerk for West Coast Design Inc., stole $48,350 by paying fictitious invoices for goods that were neverreceived. The clerk set up accounts in the names of the fictitious companies and cashed the checks at a local bank. Describe a control procedure thatwould have prevented or detected the fraud.arrow_forwardRohini works as an accountant with PQR Ltd. She embezzled $20,000 from the company bank account. She was caught in the annual audit of the company. She justified her action saying that her employer has not given any pay rise, so she had to take $20,000 from the account. Explain in your own words the internal control that may have failed in the above situation. Also explain which element of the fraud triangle Rohini is referring to justify her action.arrow_forwardThe Perfect Crime? Consider the following story of an actual embezzlement.This was the ingenious embezzler’s scheme: (a) He hired a print shop to print a private stock of Ajax Company checks in the company’s numerical sequence. (b) In his job as an accounts payable clerk at Ajax, he intercepted legitimate checks written by the accounts payable department and signed by the Ajax treasurer and destroyed them. (c) He substituted thesame numbered check from the private stock, payable to himself in the same amount as the legitimate check, and he “signed” it with a rubber stamp that looked enough like the Ajax Company treasurer’s signature to fool the paying bank. (d) He deposited the money in his own bank account. The bank statement reconciler (a different person) was able to agree the check numbers and amounts listed in the cleared items in the bank statement to the recorded cash disbursement (check number and amount) and thus did not notice the embezzler’s scheme.The embezzler was able to…arrow_forward
- What is a good response to.... Embezzlement is a type of fraud that happens when someone within an organization misuses their position of trust to steal money. This breach of trust is an intentional form of deceit to misappropriately utilize these funds for their own gain. Reviewing sales, refunds, returns, cash deposits, and voided transactions would help identify any form of fraud as an assistant manager. If there are any discrepancies identified, it would help to review logs of who accessed software at specific times to help identify the culprit. If there was something identified the next step would be to reports the findings to higher management depending on company protocol and be a confidant during the investigation process. It is not advisable to have direct confrontation as it could lead to further deceitful actions with the intent to cover up their actions.arrow_forwardYou are asked to be interviewed by a student newspaper regarding the nature of accounting fraud. The reporter says, “As I understand it, asset misappropriations are more likely to be found are more likely to be found in small organizations, but not in larger organizations. On the other hand, fraudulent financial reporting is more likely to be found in larger organizations.” How would you respond to the reporter’s observation?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Business Its Legal Ethical & Global EnvironmentAccountingISBN:9781305224414Author:JENNINGSPublisher:CengageAuditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College Pub
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
Accounting
ISBN:9781305224414
Author:JENNINGS
Publisher:Cengage

Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning

Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305080577
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:South-Western College Pub