Deceptive Ledger The Harriette Walters Case

docx

School

Calhoun Community College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

552

Subject

Accounting

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

5

Uploaded by AngieS93

Report
Deceptive Ledger: The Harriette Walters Case Harriette Walters was involved in one of the largest and most infamous embezzlement scams in the history of the Washington, D.C. government. Walters was the manager of the tax office of the D.C. Office of Tax and Revenue, and her major function was to monitor property tax assessments and modifications (Southall, 2009). DC Watch Report of Investigation states, ‘Walters’ scheme was not highly sophisticated; to the contrary, it was rudimentary. When we interviewed her, Walters mused repeatedly that she had been “hiding in plain sight.” The report summarizes the main failures that allowed her scheme to succeed for nearly 20 years and to drain more than $48 million from District coffers. Their conclusion states that Walters was able to perpetrate this long-standing fraud because of a failure of controls, a dysfunctional work environment, and a lack of oversight.’ Framework of Conspiracy Between 1989 and 2007, Walters conducted a major fraud conspiracy that stole more than $48 million from the District of Columbia government. Walters used a variety of strategies to disguise her fraudulent operations. One significant strategy was to construct bogus tax credits and changes in the tax assessment system, giving the appearance that actual refunds were being issued. She also changed the names and addresses associated with the bogus refunds to prevent detection. Despite significant modifications in accounting and administrative systems, Walters' fraudulent real estate tax refund tactics remained constant and effective (Jacoby et al., 2011). Spreading the Wealth Walters' bogus refund requests appeared real, with valid vouchers and supporting documents. Supporting documents were routinely copied from legitimate tax returns for unrelated properties. Refunds were manually handled and made payable to bogus entities or real property owners' names, although they were instructed to be paid "care of" fictitious entities. In both cases, Walters arranged for the reimbursement checks to be delivered to her rather than addressed to the intended beneficiaries (Splinter, 2009). Iron Hand of Authority Furthermore, Walters exploited her position of authority to harass and quiet subordinates who were suspicious of her actions. She was notorious for instilling dread in her department and maintaining tight control to prevent anyone from disclosing the scam. Walters' ability to preserve the appearance of routine in the tax office enabled her to continue the theft plan for nearly two decades. Fraud Triangle – Opportunity and Pressures We can examine how the fraud triangle applies to Harriette Walters and the D.C. tax office embezzlement plot, focusing on opportunity and pressures. Opportunity : Walters was the tax office manager, which gave her a special position of power and accountability. Because of her position, she was able to alter the tax assessment system and, without being discovered right away, process bogus refunds. She fabricated fake tax credits and modifications without setting off alarms by taking advantage of flaws in the tax office's internal systems and oversight. Walters was able to
execute the scam because she had access to the required systems and the technological know-how. Because of her position, she was able to create and conceal fraudulent transactions by controlling and manipulating financial documents. Pressures (Motivation) : Walters was greatly influenced by financial incentives to commit fraud. She struggled financially on her own, wanting a more opulent lifestyle and having debts that kept growing. Walters had a compelling financial incentive to embezzle money because of her lavish spending patterns and passion for luxury goods like pricey cars and fancy clothes. Walters's prolonged engagement in fraudulent operations was encouraged by the pressure to uphold a façade of success and money as well as her dread of exposure and the possible fallout if her financial difficulties were discovered. In Harriette Walters' case, the combination of opportunity and financial constraints inside the Fraud Triangle produced an environment ripe for deception. Walters took advantage of her position of trust and power, identified possibilities within the system's flaws, and succumbed to financial pressures that drove her to pilfer monies. The combination of these elements contributed to the length and breadth of the fraud scheme. Interviews: Insights and Revelations Investigators would have likely sought to speak with a variety of pertinent individuals in order to compile a thorough case, learn more about the scale of the fraudulent operations, and learn more about the embezzlement plan carried out by Harriette Walters in the D.C. tax office. The important individuals that investigators might have tried to speak with would be the bank employees and tellers, Harriett's coworkers, anyone who would have approved or examined the forged paperwork, the beneficiaries of the monies, and finally Jayrece and Harriette would have been my first priority. Busted! An internal probe showed irregularities in the tax office's financial records, revealing the fraud in 2007. ‘It is stunning that Walters’ scheme came to light not because of anything any District employee said or did, but only because a bank employee asked the right questions and contacted the authorities’ (DC Watch, page 7, pp 2). Employing a range of interview techniques to gather information effectively, FBI investigators used the confrontation technique and documentary evidence technique on Walters, after gathering sufficient evidence to press charges against her. Harriette Walters first denied FBI investigators' confrontation while they were at her Washington, DC, residence. She was accused of lying by Agent Andrew Sekela, who produced return receipts with her signature on them. Walters finally gave a six-page confession after breaking down in tears when presented with overwhelming evidence. She described in her confession how she evaded suspicion for so many years. Walter’s was also befriended by an FBI agent, which helped her trust the agents and prosecutors (Wilber, 2009). Fraud Prevention Measures Forensic accountants play an important role in detecting and preventing fraudulent activity. A forensic accountant may have proposed the following actions to prevent the type of fraud committed by Harriette Walters in the D.C. tax office:
Enhance Internal Controls : Increase internal controls to include segregation of duties, ensuring that no single person controls all aspects of a financial transaction. This prevents a single person from changing records without being detected. Frequent internal audits : Perform routine internal audits of financial records, particularly in divisions in charge of important financial activities such as tax assessments. Potential fraudulent activity as well as abnormalities and inconsistencies can be found with the aid of internal audits. Employee Training and Awareness : Employees should receive thorough instruction on ethical behavior, preventing fraud, and the significance of reporting any questionable activity. Early reporting can be encouraged, and fraud can be discouraged by fostering an awareness culture. Hotline for Whistleblowers : Establish a reporting system or whistleblower hotline where staff members can confidentially report any allegations of wrongdoing or fraud. This gives people a private avenue to voice their concerns without worrying about consequences. Examine and Revise Procedures and Policies : Review and update financial policies and processes on a regular basis to reflect evolving risks and situations. Make certain that staff members are informed of these policies and follow them. Analytics and Surveillance of Data : Make use of data analytics technologies to keep an eye on financial transactions and spot trends that can point to fraud. Put proactive monitoring mechanisms in place to identify irregularities either periodically or in real time. External audits conducted independently : Hire outside auditors to carry out unbiased audits on a regular basis. The objective viewpoint of external auditors allows them to spot problems that internal reviews might miss. Task Rotation : Establish a policy allowing staff to switch up their job duties. This may lessen the possibility of collusion and make it harder for people to participate in long- term fraudulent activities. Tone at the Top and Ethical Leadership : Encourage moral leadership and establish a firm "tone at the top." Integrity is promoted and a culture of ethics is set by the leadership's dedication to moral behavior. Consistent Fraud Risk Assessments: Evaluate fraud risks that are particular to the company and its activities on a regular basis. This entails spotting any weak points and putting in place safeguards to lessen the risk. Summary Harriette Walters, the tax office manager in the D.C. Office of Tax and Revenue, initiated one of the largest embezzlement schemes in Washington, D.C.'s history. Between 1989 and 2007, Walters used the tax assessment system to fraudulently refund approximately $48 million in property taxes. She fabricated phony tax credits and adjustments and endorsed and deposited return cheques into accounts controlled by herself and her collaborators. To conceal her acts,
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Walters instilled terror in subordinates, intimidated them, and kept tight control over her department. The scam was discovered in 2007 through internal investigations, which led to Walters' incarceration. The Harriette Walters case is a sharp reminder of the significance of awareness, coordination, and a multifaceted approach to fraud prevention in both public and private sectors. The lessons obtained from such cases help to develop anti-fraud efforts and improve forensic accounting standards.
References Read the following: Jacoby, P. F., Lorigo, S., & McCallum, B. T. (2011). Fraudulent tax refunds: The notorious career of Harriette Walters. Current Issues in Auditing, 5 (1), A23–A38. doi: 10.2308/ciia.2011.5.1.A23 ( Fraudulent Tax Refunds - Current Issues in Auditing 2011.pdf The Council of the District of Columbia. (2008). Report of investigation. http://www.dcwatch.com/govern/otr081215.pdf Links to an external site. . (This report is 122 pages long, but it has an excellent table of contents to help narrow down what you want to find. It is comprehensive, detailed, and thorough. I highly encourage you to take advantage of it. Report of Investigation - The Council of the District of Columbia.pdf Wells, J. T., & McFadden, G. (2010, May/June). A property tax scam: Washington D.C. $48 Million Embezzlement. Journal of Business Case Studies. 6 (3), 59–64. ( A Property Tax Scam - Journal of Business Case Studies.pdf Wilber, D. Q. (2009, September 13). In tax scam investigation, A race for missing loot. The Washington Post. ( Tax Scam Investigation, A Race for Missing Loot - The Washington Post.pdf Southall, A. (2009, June 30). 17-Year Term for Official in Tax Scam. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/01/us/01embezzle.html Splinter, D. (2009, July 10). DC Tax Collector “Spreading the Wealth” with $48 Million Stolen Property Taxes. Tax Foundation Blog . https://taxfoundation.org/blog/dc- tax-collector-spreading-wealth-48-million-stolen-property-taxes/