_Budgetary Variance Analysis (4)

docx

School

New Jersey City University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

507

Subject

Accounting

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

6

Uploaded by CaptainMetalEel13

Report
1 Budgetary Variance Analysis The University of Arizona Global Campus MHA612: Financial & Managerial Accounting January 8th, 2024
2 Budgetary Variance Analysis Determining the successes and failures within the budget requires measuring the financial performance of a business. Organizations may use budget analysis to understand their financial performance better and make necessary spending plan adjustments to identify more efficient methods to meet their financial objectives. Additionally, by clearly displaying historical performance and emphasizing areas that need improvement, budget variance analysis may assist leadership in forecasting and planning more successfully. The radiology department's annual budget is established in stone. By contrasting the allocated sum with the performance disclosed by the administration of the radiology department, the department's performance is evaluated. Radiology Department Budget The procedure for Actual Budget variance volume is equal to 100,000 20,000 (unfavorable). $1,320,000 $1,200,000 $120,000 (Favorable) is the amount of variable costs. ($600,000 $600,000 - $1,920,000 $1,800,000 $120,000) is the fixed costs. This is a favorable amount. $16 and $18 is the average cost/unit. Variable Cost/Unit $11 $12 Fixed Cost/Unit $5 $6 *Retrieved from (Cleverley et al., 2011). A proportion of the deviation may be obtained by dividing by the projected budget amount. According to Vareto (2022), the formula for calculating the percentage deviation is (sales/expenditures ÷ Budgeted sales/expenditures) subtracted by 1. Based on occurrence, the variance computation contrasts real costs with changed standard circumstances (Meinert et al., 2019). By examining spending, expenses, utilization, and volume, the radiology department can evaluate financial discrepancies related to budgetary constraints.
3 Budgetary Variance Mode for the Radiology Department Budget variance analysis can help the radiology department make more informed decisions in essential areas. The budgetary variance option might be used by the department to declare a successful outcome. The total and variable expenses of the radiology department have declined in tandem with the number of treatments compared to the spending. According to Cleverley et al. (2011), there was a decrease in volume but no rise in fixed costs. An increase of $1.00 resulted in the fixed cost per procedure rising to $6.00. Variable expenses are included in other increases. To find the overall variance, subtract the total actual cost from the total real procedures ($1,800,000 - $1,600,000 = $200,000). The budget cost per procedure ($100,000 x $16) must then be multiplied by the total actual operations to achieve $1,600,000. The radiology department manager's performance is inferior based on budgetary variance mode and prior allegations for a $120,000 cost variation. Analysis of the Radiology Department Budget The radiology department managers failed to consider the volume decline and cost increase. According to the table, a variance of $20,000 is unfavorable. Additionally, it informs us that there is a $120,000 positive variance. The computation states that the budgeted variable costs are less than the actual and anticipated fixed costs and equal to the expenditure variable. The expenditure variable equals $100,000.00, which is unfavorable when the numbers from the text are entered. There was a $20,000 negative variation and a $120,000 positive variation in the data; the unfavorable variance indicates the true cost instead of the indicated positive fluctuation in expenditure of $120,000. However, the radiology department has a $100,000 negative difference. We use the budget variance approach to compute volume. Within the budgetary constraints, the volume is the total of the standard, expected, and actual volumes. We are sure the anticipated volume won't be required based on the department's expenditure volume. Every company needs a budget.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
4 The management of the radiology department may attempt to control expenses by changing the volume, performance, and efficiency (Cleverley et al., 2011). The department can handle financial goals and milestones more skillfully if the medical organization's budget and finances are well understood and actively participated in. Regular assessment is crucial for financial stability and success since it tracks progress, identifies areas of over- or under-performance, and makes the required changes (Vareto, 2022). A strategy plan to enhance these numbers going forward may be implemented by identifying the elements influencing volume. It's critical to utilize a consistent presentation when disclosing budget deviations to communicate the variances, their causes, their magnitude, and their effects on the performance of the business (Vareto, 2022). In conclusion, the favorable and unfavorable factors are analyzed using the budgetary variable model. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a hospital's radiology department manager. The Department of Radiology reports a $120,000 positive variance and a $200,000 negative variation. The department must look into the positive variance associated with the spending variance. Managers ' and employees ' participation in budgeting increases their dedication to budget implementation (Homauni et al., 2023). Periodically providing managers at the radiology department with feedback on-budget performance is necessary to enable them to promptly spot variances in the budget and adjust their performance (Homauni et al., 2023). Regular budget variance analysis can aid in financial analysis by understanding whether financial objectives were met for a specific period (Vareto, 2022). The management can offset a negative variance in the financials by working to cut costs, which will also help offset the drop in volume.
5 References
6 Cleverley, W., Song, P., & Cleverley, J. (2011). Essentials of health care finance (7th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett. Homauni, A., Markazi-Moghaddam, N., Mosadeghkhah, A., Noori, M., Abbasiyan, K., & Balaye Jame, S. Z. (2023). Budgeting in Healthcare Systems and Organizations: A Systematic Review. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 52(9), 1889-1901. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v52i9.13571 Meinert, E., Alturkistani, A., Foley, K. A., Brindley, D., & Car, J. (2019). Examining Cost Measurements in Production and Delivery of Three Case Studies Using E-Learning for Applied Health Sciences: Cross-Case Synthesis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(6). https://doi.org/10.2196/13574 Vareto. (2022). Budget vs. Actuals Variance Analysis and why it matters for businesses . https://www.vareto.com/blog/what-is-budget-vs-actuals-variance- analysis#:~:text=The%20analysis%20can%20help%20companies,to%20improve %20their%20financial%20performance
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help