To think critically about: Whether plaintiff should pay damages or not.
Introduction:
Tort is an action that causes damage to someone or something. An action is considered tort if that act is wrongful.
Explanation of Solution
Plaintiff should only pay the damages if the accusation made by him is frivolous or fabricated and it become obvious during the legal proceedings that the accusation made by plaintiff is frivolous. Plaintiff should pay the damages to the defendant because the frivolous complaint had already cost the defendant time, money and goodwill in fighting this case.
If plaintiff loses the case because of lack of evidence, then plaintiff should not pay any damages. If the damages are levied even when it is not obvious that accusation is frivolous, then it will deter the other person to bring the accusation against other party in the court. It will hamper the system of justice.
Hence, the damages should be paid by plaintiff only when the complaint is frivolous.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter A Solutions
UNDERSTANDING BUSINESS (LL) >CUSTOM<
- One of the overriding interest in the study of healthcare law and ethics is to discover where pure legal analysis ends, and subjective judgments of constitutional principles and public policy begin. In the course of one semester, not only have we learned the substantive content and intent of healthcare law and regulation, but how ethical and normative dilemmas arise therefrom. We have seen how courts can be just and efficient in fact-finding, particularly in healthcare cases involving criminal law and torts (e.g., through our IIED workshop and jury verdict). But we have also seen how their decisions can be controversial, provoke public outrage, and raise even more unsettling ethical dilemmas in constitutional interpretation of the most basic of principles and guarantees, such as "life, liberty, and private property free speech", "due process of law", "equal protection of the laws, etc. From abortion to sterilization, from disability to surrogacy, from end-of-life to physician-assisted…arrow_forwardBriefly, what are the alternatives to suing someone in court to enforce your legal rights, and why would you consider them? What are the three main methods in which the doctrine of precedent operates within a legal system?arrow_forwardIn business, what is the purpose of discovery and what methods of discovery are used in a lawsuit?arrow_forward
- Although tort law is generally concerned with striking a balance between the desire to provide compensation and the desire to protect socially useful activities from liability, that issue is particularly important in the context of the tort of negligence. Why?arrow_forwardHow would U.S. society be affected if employers could not be held vicariously liable for their employees’ torts?arrow_forwardWhat are some defenses to tort claims, such as assumption of risk?arrow_forward
- Though this case is fictitious, the reality of collapsed mines in the coal industry is an unfortunate reality. The use of cases can cause general questions in ethics to come into clearer focus. Consider the case of the collapsed mine shaft. In a town in West Virginia, miners were digging coal in a tunnel thousands of feet below the surface. An explosion traps eight miners in a pocket. The explosion was one of great force, and the extent of the tunnel’s collapse was considerable. The cost of reaching the men in time to save their lives would amount to several million dollars. Discuss the case study questions in details, giving your opinion, and using the ethical theories in your discussion. 1. Did the manager owe more to the stockholders of the corporation or to the trapped workers? Discuss 2. Should he use the slower, safer, cheaper way of reaching them and save a large sum of money, or the faster, more dangerous, more expensive way, and possibly save their lives? Discuss…arrow_forwardThough this case is fictitious, the reality of collapsed mines in the coal industry is an unfortunate reality. The use of cases can cause general questions in ethics to come into clearer focus. Consider the case of the collapsed mine shaft. In a town in West Virginia, miners were digging coal in a tunnel thousands of feet below the surface. An explosion traps eight miners in a pocket. The explosion was one of great force, and the extent of the tunnel’s collapse was considerable. The cost of reaching the men in time to save their lives would amount to several million dollars. Discuss the case study questions in details, giving your opinion, and using the ethical theories in your discussion. 1. The problem facing the manager was whether the expenditure (Expenses) of such a large sum was worth it. Discuss 2. What, after all, was a human life worth? Discuss 3. Who should make the decision, and how should it be made? Discussarrow_forwardPart 3 – 5 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) provides a different approach to that of the common law tort of negligence. 1. How is it different? 2. Which approach would you recommend to someone who has suffered personal injury as a result of a defective product?arrow_forward
- An example of a legal object may be : a) an idea you have for a new business venture B) a 21-year old male person C) all natural and juristic persons D) all the abovearrow_forwardFederal government employees are protected somewhat by the Privacy Act of '74. Do employees in the private sector have any protections against intrusion into their work space and private lives? Do any of the common law tort remedies offer the potential of privacy rights for private sector employees?arrow_forwardLocate two scholarly articles on Agent Negligence, Intentional Torts, and Crimes: Employer Liability . Summarize the articles in your own words and explain how each is related to your topic. Do not use court cases in this section. You must use scholarly articles from the South University Online Library. Legal journals may provide some of the best sources of informationarrow_forward
- Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning