The amount of quarterly estimated tax howard who is a self-employed freelancer with annual salary $ 120 , 000 need to pay to IRS each quarter with a federal income tax rate of 20%.

Question

Suppose we have a linear program in standard equation form maximize cTx subject to Ax = b. x ≥ 0. and suppose u, v, and w are all optimal solutions to this linear program. (a) Prove that zu+v+w is an optimal solution. (b) If you try to adapt your proof from part (a) to prove that that u+v+w is an optimal solution, say exactly which part(s) of the proof go wrong. (c) If you try to adapt your proof from part (a) to prove that u+v-w is an optimal solution, say exactly which part(s) of the proof go wrong.

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 9.III, Problem 17TIE

To determine

To calculate: The amount of quarterly estimated tax howard who is a self-employed freelancer

with annual salary $120,000 need to pay to IRS each quarter with a federal income tax rate of 20%.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Suppose we have a linear program in standard equation form maximize cTx subject to Ax = b. x ≥ 0. and suppose u, v, and w are all optimal solutions to this linear program. (a) Prove that zu+v+w is an optimal solution. (b) If you try to adapt your proof from part (a) to prove that that u+v+w is an optimal solution, say exactly which part(s) of the proof go wrong. (c) If you try to adapt your proof from part (a) to prove that u+v-w is an optimal solution, say exactly which part(s) of the proof go wrong.

a) Suppose that we are carrying out the 1-phase simplex algorithm on a linear program in standard inequality form (with 3 variables and 4 constraints) and suppose that we have reached a point where we have obtained the following tableau. Apply one more pivot operation, indicating the highlighted row and column and the row operations you carry out. What can you conclude from your updated tableau? x1 x2 x3 81 82 83 84 81 -2 0 1 1 0 0 0 3 82 3 0 -2 0 1 2 0 6 12 1 1 -3 0 0 1 0 2 84 -3 0 2 0 0 -1 1 4 -2 -2 0 11 0 0-4 0 -8

Microsoft Excel snapshot for random sampling: Also note the formula used for the last column 02 x✓ fx =INDEX(5852:58551, RANK(C2, $C$2:$C$51)) A B 1 No. States 2 1 ALABAMA Rand No. 0.925957526 3 2 ALASKA 0.372999976 4 3 ARIZONA 0.941323044 5 4 ARKANSAS 0.071266381 Random Sample CALIFORNIA NORTH CAROLINA ARKANSAS WASHINGTON G7 Microsoft Excel snapshot for systematic sampling: xfx INDEX(SD52:50551, F7) A B E F G 1 No. States Rand No. Random Sample population 50 2 1 ALABAMA 0.5296685 NEW HAMPSHIRE sample 10 3 2 ALASKA 0.4493186 OKLAHOMA k 5 4 3 ARIZONA 0.707914 KANSAS 5 4 ARKANSAS 0.4831379 NORTH DAKOTA 6 5 CALIFORNIA 0.7277162 INDIANA Random Sample Sample Name 7 6 COLORADO 0.5865002 MISSISSIPPI 8 7:ONNECTICU 0.7640596 ILLINOIS 9 8 DELAWARE 0.5783029 MISSOURI 525 10 15 INDIANA MARYLAND COLORADO