Concept explainers
Write Lewis structures for the following species, including all resonance forms, and show formal charges: (a)
(a)
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Interpretation: The resonance structure of
Concept Introduction: Sometimes the chemical bonding of a molecule cannot be represented using a single Lewis structure. In these cases, the chemical bonding are described by delocalization of electrons and is known as resonance.
In some molecules, there is possibility of more than one Lewis structure where all the structures are equally acceptable. One of the acceptable Lewis structures of these molecules is called resonance structure.
All the possible resonance structures are imaginary whereas the resonance hybrid is real.
Any of the possible structure does not exist as such like a stable real molecule. So it is not possible to isolate one resonance structure.
These structures will differ only in the arrangement of the electrons not in the relative position of the atomic nuclei.
Structure with greater number of covalent bonds are more stable comparing to that with lower number of covalent bonds.
Structure which does not involve charge separation is more stable when comparing with structure having positive and negative charge separation.
While drawing resonance structure of a molecule some rules should be followed where the position, over whole charge and chemical framework remains intact. Also only π and nonbonding electron has been moved in all the three resonance structures
Formal charge:
A formal charge (FC) is the charge assigned to an atom in a molecule, irrespective of relative electronegativity by thinking that electrons in all chemical bonds are shared equally among atoms.
This method is used to identify the most probable Lewis structures if more than one possibility exists for a compound.
The Lewis structure with formal charge on each of the atoms close to zero is taken as the most plausible structure.
Formal charge of an atom can be determined by the given formula.
Answer to Problem 9.51QP
Resonance structure:
Formal charges:
Explanation of Solution
Determine the resonance structure for
In the case of chlorate ion, the chemical bonding of a molecule cannot be represented using a single Lewis structure. The chemical bonding are described by delocalization of electrons forming 2 possible resonance structures. Both the resonance structures are similar. In all the 2 resonance structures the position, over whole charge and chemical framework remains intact.
Structure of the chlorate ion chlorate ion is given below.
The formal charge of the given compound is calculated,
- Hydrogen atom
Substituting these values to the equation,
- Carbon atom
Substituting these values to the equation,
- First oxygen atom having double bond with carbon
Substituting these values to the equation,
- Oxygen atom which having single bond with carbon
Substituting these values to the equation,
(b)
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Interpretation: The resonance structure of
Concept Introduction: Sometimes the chemical bonding of a molecule cannot be represented using a single Lewis structure. In these cases, the chemical bonding are described by delocalization of electrons and is known as resonance.
In some molecules, there is possibility of more than one Lewis structure where all the structures are equally acceptable. One of the acceptable Lewis structures of these molecules is called resonance structure.
All the possible resonance structures are imaginary whereas the resonance hybrid is real.
Any of the possible structure does not exist as such like a stable real molecule. So it is not possible to isolate one resonance structure.
These structures will differ only in the arrangement of the electrons not in the relative position of the atomic nuclei.
Structure with greater number of covalent bonds are more stable comparing to that with lower number of covalent bonds.
Structure which does not involve charge separation is more stable when comparing with structure having positive and negative charge separation.
While drawing resonance structure of a molecule some rules should be followed where the position, over whole charge and chemical framework remains intact. Also only π and nonbonding electron has been moved in all the three resonance structures
Formal charge:
A formal charge (FC) is the charge assigned to an atom in a molecule, irrespective of relative electronegativity by thinking that electrons in all chemical bonds are shared equally among atoms.
This method is used to identify the most probable Lewis structures if more than one possibility exists for a compound.
The Lewis structure with formal charge on each of the atoms close to zero is taken as the most plausible structure.
Formal charge of an atom can be determined by the given formula.
Answer to Problem 9.51QP
Resonance structure:
Formal charges:
Explanation of Solution
Resonance structure of
In the case of chlorate ion, the chemical bonding of a molecule cannot be represented using a single Lewis structure. The chemical bonding are described by delocalization of electrons forming 2 possible resonance structures. Both the resonance structures are similar. In all the 2 resonance structures the position, over whole charge and chemical framework remains intact.
Structure of the chlorate ion chlorate ion is given below.
The formal charge of the given compound is calculated,
- First hydrogen atom
Substituting these values to the equation,
- Second hydrogen atom
Substituting these values to the equation,
- Carbon atom
Substituting these values to the equation,
- Nitrogen atom
Substituting these values to the equation,
- First oxygen atom having double bond with nitrogen
Substituting these values to the equation,
- Oxygen atom which having single bond with nitrogen
Substituting these values to the equation,
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 9 Solutions
CHEMISTRY 1111 LAB MANUAL >C<
- Please correct answer and don't use hand ratingarrow_forwardNonearrow_forward%Reflectance 95 90- 85 22 00 89 60 55 50 70 65 75 80 50- 45 40 WA 35 30- 25 20- 4000 3500 Date: Thu Feb 06 17:21:21 2025 (GMT-05:0(UnknownD Scans: 8 Resolution: 2.000 3000 2500 Wavenumbers (cm-1) 100- 2981.77 1734.25 2000 1500 1000 1372.09 1108.01 2359.09 1469.82 1181.94 1145.20 1017.01 958.45 886.97 820.49 668.25 630.05 611.37arrow_forward
- Nonearrow_forwardCH3 CH H3C CH3 H OH H3C- -OCH2CH3 H3C H -OCH3 For each of the above compounds, do the following: 1. List the wave numbers of all the IR bands in the 1350-4000 cm-1 region. For each one, state what bond or group it represents. 2. Label equivalent sets of protons with lower-case letters. Then, for each 1H NMR signal, give the 8 value, the type of splitting (singlet, doublet etc.), and the number protons it represents. of letter δ value splitting # of protons 3. Redraw the compound and label equivalent sets of carbons with lower-case letters. Then for each set of carbons give the 5 value and # of carbons it represents. letter δ value # of carbonsarrow_forwardDraw the correct ionic form(s) of arginine at the pKa and PI in your titration curve. Use your titration curve to help you determine which form(s) to draw out.arrow_forward
- Carbohydrates- Draw out the Hawthorne structure for a sugar from the list given in class. Make sure to write out all atoms except for carbons within the ring. Make sure that groups off the carbons in the ring are in the correct orientation above or below the plane. Make sure that bonds are in the correct orientation. Include the full name of the sugar. You can draw out your curve within the text box or upload a drawing below.arrow_forwardHow many milliliters of 97.5(±0.5) wt% H2SO4 with a density of 1.84(±0.01) g/mL will you need to prepare 2.000 L of 0.110 M H2SO4? If the uncertainty in delivering H2SO4 is ±0.01 mL, calculate the absolute uncertainty in the molarity (0.110 M). Assume there is negligible uncertainty in the formula mass of H2SO4 and in the final volume (2.000 L) and assume random error.arrow_forwardDon't used hand raiting and don't used Ai solutionarrow_forward
- Chemistry: The Molecular ScienceChemistryISBN:9781285199047Author:John W. Moore, Conrad L. StanitskiPublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry & Chemical ReactivityChemistryISBN:9781337399074Author:John C. Kotz, Paul M. Treichel, John Townsend, David TreichelPublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry: Principles and PracticeChemistryISBN:9780534420123Author:Daniel L. Reger, Scott R. Goode, David W. Ball, Edward MercerPublisher:Cengage Learning
- General Chemistry - Standalone book (MindTap Cour...ChemistryISBN:9781305580343Author:Steven D. Gammon, Ebbing, Darrell Ebbing, Steven D., Darrell; Gammon, Darrell Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon, Darrell D.; Gammon, Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon; DarrellPublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry: Principles and ReactionsChemistryISBN:9781305079373Author:William L. Masterton, Cecile N. HurleyPublisher:Cengage Learning
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781285199047/9781285199047_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337399074/9781337399074_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780534420123/9780534420123_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305580343/9781305580343_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305079373/9781305079373_smallCoverImage.gif)