Principles of Microeconomics
Principles of Microeconomics
8th Edition
ISBN: 9781337470384
Author: N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher: Cengage Learning US
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 9, Problem 5PA

Subpart (a):

To determine

The impact of free trade on the country.

Subpart (a):

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Here, in the case of the country, the domestic price was $20 and the quantity demanded and supplied was 3 million. Thus, the economy was in its initial equilibrium without trade. When free trade was allowed, the price fell to the world price of $16 and the quantity demanded increased to 4 million, whereas the quantity supplied decreased to just 1 million. This can be illustrated on the graph as follows:

Principles of Microeconomics, Chapter 9, Problem 5PA

In figure 1, horizontal axis measures quantity and vertical axis measures price. The curve ‘S” and “D’ indicates supply and demand respectively.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

International trade: It is the trade relation between the countries.

Export: It is the process of selling domestic goods in the international market. Thus, the goods produced in the domestic firms will be sold to other foreign countries. So, it is the outflow of domestic goods and services to the foreign economy.

Import: It is the process of purchasing the foreign-made goods and services by the domestic country. Thus, it is the inflow of foreign goods and services to the domestic economy.

Comparative advantage: It is the ability of the country to produce the goods and services at lower opportunity costs than other countries.

Sub part (b):

To determine

The impact of free trade on the country.

Sub part (b):

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

From the graph, we can easily identify that the consumer surplus before free trade was the area below the demand curve and above the price line of $20. When the price falls to $16, due to free trade, the consumer surplus increases by the area of A+B+C. The area of A, B, and C can be calculated as follows:

Area of A=([(PriceHigherPriceLower)(Quantity1)]+[12×(PriceHigherPriceLower)×(Quantity2Quantity1)])[(2016)(1,000,000)]+[12×(2016)×(3,000,0001,000,000)]=4,000,000+4,000,000=8,000,000

Area of B=[12×(PriceHigherPriceLower)×(Quantity2Quantity1)]=12×(2016)×(3,000,0001,000,000)=4,000,000

Area of C=[12×(PriceHigherPriceLower)×(Quantity3Quantity2)]=12×(2016)×(4,000,0003,000,000)=2,000,000

Thus, the increase in the consumer surplus can be calculated by adding these together as follows:

Increase in consumer surplus=Area of A+Area of B+Area of C=8,000,000+4,000,000+2,000,000=14,000,000

Thus, the consumer surplus increases by $14 million.

Before free trade, the producer surplus (which is the area below the price line of $20)  is above the supply curve, and after free trade, it falls by the area of A. Thus, the producer surplus falls by the area of A, which is equal to $8 million.

The total surplus of the economy after the trade increases by the areas of B+C, which means that the total surplus of the economy has increased by $6 million.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

International trade: It is the trade relation between the countries.

Export: It is the process of selling domestic goods in the international market. Thus, the goods produced in the domestic firms will be sold to other foreign countries. So, it is the outflow of domestic goods and services to the foreign economy.

Import: It is the process of purchasing the foreign-made goods and services by the domestic country. Thus, it is the inflow of foreign goods and services to the domestic economy.

Comparative advantage: It is the ability of the country to produce the goods and services at lower opportunity costs than other countries.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
answer
Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.
Not use ai please
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
  • Text book image
    Economics:
    Economics
    ISBN:9781285859460
    Author:BOYES, William
    Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Economics:
Economics
ISBN:9781285859460
Author:BOYES, William
Publisher:Cengage Learning