
the table given and calculate the asked questions.
Concept Introduction:
Rule of 70: It is a numerical formula to determine the time period, that a variable will take to double itself.
Formula to calculate number of years variable will take to double itself:

Here:
- R is current constant growth rate.
- N is number of year it will take to be double.

Answer to Problem 3P
a. Ratio of per capita GDP in 2012.
i. Middle-income to high-income countries.
Given,
Real GDP of middle-income country in 2015 is $4,584.
Real GDP of high-income country in 2015 is $41,038.
Formula to calculate ratio of per capita GDP of middle-income country to high-income country,

Substitute $4,584 for real GDP for the middle-income country and $41,038 for real GDP for the high-income country.

In the given case, ratio of per capita GDP of middle-income country to high-income country is 0.112.
ii. Low-income to high-income countries.
Given,
Real GDP of low-income country in 2015 is $588.
Real GDP of high-income country 2015 is $41,038.
Formula to calculate ratio of per capita GDP of low-income country to high-income country,

Substitute $588 for real GDP for the low-income country and $41,038 for real GDP for the high-income country.

In the given case, ratio of per capita GDP of low-income country to high-income country is 0.014.
iii. Low-income to middle-income countries.
Given:
Real GDP of low-income country in 2015 is $588.
Real GDP of middle-income country in 2015 is $4,584.
Formula to calculate ratio of per capita GDP of low-income country to middle-income country,

Substitute $588 for real GDP for the low-income country and $4,584 for real GDP for the middle-income country.

In the given case, ratio of per capita GDP of low-income country to middle-income country is 0.128.
b. Number of years taken by the low income and middle-income countries to double their per capita GDP.
Given,
Growth rate of low-income country is 2.3%.
Growth rate of middle-income country is 4.4%.
Formula to calculate number of year variable takes to double,

According to the given case, to double GDP the low-income country and middle-income country will take 30 years and 16 years respectively.
Number of years taken by low-income country to double its GDP.
Substitute 2.3 for yearly rate of growth in (I).

Therefore, to double GDP the low-income country will take 30 years.
Number of years taken by middle-income country to double its GDP.
Substitute 4.4 for yearly rate of growth in (I).

Therefore, to double GDP the middle-income country will take 16 years.
c. Per capita GDP of each of the regions in 2085.
Given,
Growth rate of high-income country is 1.0%.
Growth rate of low-income country is 2.3%.
Growth rate of middle-income country is 4.4%.
Formula to calculate number of year variable takes to double,

Substitute 1.0 for yearly rate of growth in (I).

- Therefore, in 70 years, which will be in 2085, GDP per capita of high-income countries will be $82,076
- If per capita GDP is to be projected then middle-income country will double its per capita GDP by 4 times
Therefore, in 2085 per capita GDP of middle-income country will be $73,344
- If per capita GDP is to be projected then low-income country, will double its per capita GDP by 2 times
Therefore, in 2085 per capita GDP of low-income country will be $2,352
d. Projected per capita GDP in 2085.
Calculated (in part c. ),
Real GDP of low-income country in 2085 is $2,352.
Real GDP of middle-income country in 2085 is $73,344.
Real GDP of high-income country in 2085 is $82,076.
Middle-income to high-income countries.
Formula to calculate ratio of per capita GDP of middle-income country to high-income country,

Substitute $73,344. for real GDP for the middle-income country and $82,076 for real GDP for the high-income country.

Thus, ratio of per capita GDP of middle-income country to high-income country is 0.893.
Low-income to high-income countries.
Formula to calculate ratio of per capita GDP of low-income country to high-income country,

Substitute $2,352 for real GDP for the low-income country and $82,076 for real GDP for the high-income country.

Thus, ratio of per capita GDP of low-income country to high-income country is 0.028.
Low-income to middle-income countries.
Formula to calculate ratio of per capita GDP of low-income country to middle-income country,

Substitute $2,352 for real GDP for the low-income country and $73,344 for real GDP for the middle-income country.

Thus, ratio of per capita GDP of low-income country to middle-income country is 0.032.
e. Comparison of part a. and part d.
According to the data calculated in the above parts the inequality between low-income countries and middle-income countries will increase with time.
Explanation of Solution
- According to the calculated data, per capita GDP of low-income country and middle-income country have improved but per capita GDP of high-income country has not improved that much.
- According to the calculated data, the growth middle-income countries are so fast that its growth in 2085 will surpass the present high-income countries growth.
- The middle-income is growing at much faster rate as compared to low-income countries. Therefore, the inequality between low-income countries and middle-income countries will increase.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- Problem 2. If the consumer preference can be represented by a CES function with δ = 0.5, i.e. u(x, y) = x0.5 + y0.5. Let the prices and income be (px, py, w). 1. Set up the Lagrangian expression.2. Take the first-order conditions.3. Substitute into budget constraint to derive the optimal consumption bundles.arrow_forward1. A town relies on four different sources for its non-drinking water needs: dam water, reclaimed water, rain water, and desalinated water. The different sources carry different risks and costs. For instance, desalinated water is fully reliable due to abundant sea water, but it is more expensive than other options. Reclaimed water also has relatively lower risk than rain or dam water since a certain amount can be obtained, even during the dry. season, by the treatment of daily generated waste water. Using any of the four options requires an investment in that resource. The return on a particular water source is defined as the amount of water generated by the source per dollar of investment in it. The expected returns and standard deviations of those returns for the four water sources are described in the following table: Water resource Expected return St. Deviation Dam water 2.7481 0.2732 Reclaimed water 1.6005 0.0330 Rain water 0.5477 0.2865 Desalinated water 0.3277 0.0000 Higher…arrow_forward1. Imagine a society that produces military goods and consumer goods, which we'll call "guns" and "butter." a. Draw a production possibilities frontier for guns and butter. Using the concept of opportunity cost, explain why it most likely has a bowed-out shape. b. Show a point that is impossible for the economy to achieve. Show a point that is feasible but inefficient. c. Imagine that the society has two political parties, called the Hawks (who want a strong military) and the Doves (who want a smaller military). Show a point on your production possibilities frontier that the Hawks might choose and a point the Doves might choose. d. Imagine that an aggressive neighboring country reduces the size of its military. As a result, both the Hawks and the Doves reduce their desired production of guns by the same amount. Which party would get the bigger "peace dividend," measured by the increase in butter production? Explain.arrow_forward
- A health study tracked a group of persons for five years. At the beginning of the study, 20%were classified as heavy smokers, 30% as light smokers, and 50% as nonsmokers. Resultsof the study showed that light smokers were twice as likely as nonsmokers to die duringthe five-year study, but only half as likely as heavy smokers.A randomly selected participant from the study died during the five-year period. Calculatethe probability that the participant was a heavy smokerarrow_forwardConsider two assets with the following returns: State Prob. of state R₁ R2 1 23 13 25% 5% 2 -10% 1% Compute the optimal portfolio for an investor having a Bernoulli utility of net returns u(r) = 2√√r+ 10. Compute the certainty equivalent of the optimal portfolio. Do the results change if short-selling is not allowed? If so, how?arrow_forwardIn the graph at the right, the average variable cost is curve ☐. The average total cost is curve marginal cost is curve The C Cost per Unit ($) Per Unit Costs A 0 Output Quantity Barrow_forward
- What are some of the question s that I can ask my economic teacher?arrow_forwardAnswer question 2 only.arrow_forward1. A pension fund manager is considering three mutual funds. The first is a stock fund, the second is a long-term government and corporate fund, and the third is a (riskless) T-bill money market fund that yields a rate of 8%. The probability distributions of the risky funds have the following characteristics: Standard Deviation (%) Expected return (%) Stock fund (Rs) 20 30 Bond fund (RB) 12 15 The correlation between the fund returns is .10.arrow_forward
- Frederick Jones operates a sole proprietorship business in Trinidad and Tobago. His gross annual revenue in 2023 was $2,000,000. He wants to register for VAT, but he is unsure of what VAT entails, the requirements for registration and what he needs to do to ensure that he is fully compliant with VAT regulations. Make reference to the Vat Act of Trinidad and Tobago and explain to Mr. Jones what VAT entails, the requirements for registration and the requirements to be fully compliant with VAT regulations.arrow_forwardCan you show me the answers for parts a and b? Thanks.arrow_forwardWhat are the answers for parts a and b? Thanksarrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





