Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

not use ai please

1. Lisa has $48 per week set aside for coffees (x) and lunches (z). The price of coffee is $4 and lunches are $6. What is Lisa's budget line equation (with z on the left-hand side)? Graph the budget line, and show how it changes when the price of lunches rise to $8 (including intercepts). What is the new budget line equation? 2. Suppose utility for a consumer of movies (x) and golf (z) is U = 20x0.420.5. The consumer has set aside $1000 to consumer movies and golf for a year. a. If the price of movies is $20 and the price of golf is $40, what is the utility-maximizing consumption of movies and golf? b. Show the optimal consumption bundle on a graph, showing a budget line (with intercepts), a tangent indifference curve, and the optimal choice. 3. Sam has set aside $480 for entertainment this month, which is golf (x) and/or bowling (z). A round of golf is $40 and a night of bowling is $30. His utility function is U = 3x + 2z. a. What is his MRS? b. Solve for the optimal choice of golf…

Question Seven There are specific applications of the hidden-action or moral hazard model. Consider employment contracts signed between a firm's owners and a manager who runs the firm on behalf of the owners. The manager is offered an employment contract which they can accept and decide how much effort, e ≥ 0, to exert. Suppose that an increase in effort, e, increases the firm's gross profit, not including payments to the manager, but is personally costly to the manager and the firm's gross profit, Пg, takes the following form: Пg = e +ε, ε~N(0,2). Let s denote the salary, which may depend on effort and/or gross profit, depending on what the owner can observe, offered as part of the contract between the owner and manager. Suppose that the manager is risk averse and has a utility function with respect to salary of the form: Aσ² U(W)=μ- 2 a) Derive the optimal result of the owner's expected net profit where there is full information and state what it implies. b) Suppose now that the…

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.

Answer 6

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.

Answer 7

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.