Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

6. Rent seeking The following graph shows the demand, marginal revenue, and marginal cost curves for a single-price monopolist that produces a drug that helps relieve arthritis pain. Place the grey point (star symbol) in the appropriate location on the graph to indicate the monopoly outcome such that the dashed lines reveal the profit-maximizing price and quantity of a single-price monopolist. Then, use the green rectangle (triangle symbols) to show the profits earned by the monopolist. 18 200 20 16 16 14 PRICE (Dollars per dose) 12 10 10 8 4 2 MC = ATC MR Demand 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 QUANTITY (Millions of doses per year) Monopoly Outcome Monopoly Profits Suppose that should the patent on this particular drug expire, the market would become perfectly competitive, with new firms immediately entering the market with essentially identical products. Further suppose that in this case the original firm will hire lobbyists and make donations to several key politicians to extend its…

Consider a call option on a stock that does not pay dividends. The stock price is $100 per share, and the risk-free interest rate is 10%. The call strike is $100 (at the money). The stock moves randomly with u=2 and d=0.5. 1. Write the system of equations to replicate the option using A shares and B bonds. 2. Solve the system of equations and determine the number of shares and the number of bonds needed to replicate the option. Show your answer with 4 decimal places (x.xxxx); do not round intermediate calculations. This is easy to do in Excel. A = B = 3. Use A shares and B bonds from the prior question to calculate the premium on the option. Again, do not round intermediate calculations and show your answer with 4 decimal places. Call premium =

Answer these questions using replication or the risk neutral probability. Both methods will produce the same answer. Show your work to receive credit. 6. What is the premium of a call with a higher strike. Show your work to receive credit; do not round intermediate calculations. S0 = $100, u=2, d=0.5, r=10%, strike=$150

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.

Answer 6

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.

Answer 7

Chapter 9, Problem 37P

To determine

Calculate the incremental benefit–cost ratio of the mutual alternative.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Model DA: Cost (C) is $200,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $360,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $10,000 per year. In year (n1) 25, the remodeling expenditure (RE) is $4,800,000.

Model CS: Cost (C) is $50,000,000. The annual maintenance cost (AM1) is $175,000 in the first year, and it (AMI) increases by $8,000 per year. The re-painting cost (RP) is $100,000 per 10 year except in year 50.

The time period (n) is 50 years. Revenue (RD1) from the alternate DA is $10,900,000 greater than the alternate CS, and it (RDI) increases by $200,000 per year till the year (n2) 15. Thereafter, revenue (RD15) is $13,700,000 per year, and the time period (n3) is 10, (n4) is 20, (n5) is 30, and (n6) is 40. The salvage value is $5 million for both the projects. The interest rate (i) is 8%.

Since both the projects have the same salvage value, it is ignored in the calculation of benefit–cost ratio. The present worth of cost for alternate DA (PWDA) can be calculated as follows:

PWDA=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RE(1+i)n1=(200,000,000+360,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+10,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+4,800,000(1+0.08)25)=(200,000,000+360,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+10,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+4,800,0006.848475)=(200,000,000+360,000(45.9016133.752129)+10,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+360,000(12.233485)+10,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+10,000×12.5(11.167424)+700,885.96)=(200,000,000+4,404,054.6+1,395,928+700,885.96)=206,500,868.56

The present worth of the alternate is $206,500,868.56.

The present worth of cost for alternate CS (PWCS) can be calculated as follows:

PWCS=C+AM1((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n)+AMI×1i((1+i)n−1i(1+i)n−n(1+i)n)+RP((1+i)n3+(1+i)n4+(1+i)n5+(1+i)n6)=(50,000,000+175,000((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50)+8,000×10.08((1+0.08)50−10.08(1+0.08)50−50(1+0.08)50)+100,000((1+0.08)10+(1+0.08)20+(1+0.08)30+(1+0.08)40))=(50,000,000+175,000(46.901613−10.08(46.901613))+8,000×12.5(46.901613−10.08(46.901613)−5046.901613)+100,000(2.158925+4.660957+10.062657+21.724521))=(50,000,000+175,000(45.9016133.752129)+8,000×12.5(45.9016133.752129−1.066061)+100,00038.60706)=(50,000,000+175,000(12.233485)+8,000×12.5(12.233485−1.066061)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+8,000×12.5(11.167424)+2,590.1998)=(50,000,000+2,140,859.875+1,116,742.4+2,590.1998)=53,260,192.47

The present worth of the alternate is $53,260,192.47.

The present worth of the incremental benefit (PWB) between alternates DA and CS can be calculated as follows:

PWB=RD1((1+i)n1−1i(1+i)n1)+RDI×1i((1+i)n2−1i(1+i)n2−n2(1+i)n2)+RD15((1+i)n−n2−1i(1+i)n−n2)(1+i)n2=(10,900,000((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15)+200,000×10.08((1+0.08)15−10.08(1+0.08)15−15(1+0.08)15)+13,700,000((1+0.08)50−15−10.08(1+0.08)50−15)(1+0.08)15)=(10,900,000(3.172169−10.08(3.172169))+200,000×12.5(3.172169−10.08(3.172169)−15(3.172169))+13,700,000(14.785344−10.08(14.785344))3.172169)=(10,900,000(2.1721690.253774)+200,000×12.5(2.1721690.253774−4.728626)+13,700,000(13.7853441.182828)3.172169)=(10,900,000(8.559463)+200,000×12.5(8.559463−4.728626)+13,700,000(11.654563)3.172169)=(93,298,146.7+9,577,092.6+50,333,860.87)=153,209,100.17

The present worth of the incremental benefit is $153,209,100.17.

The incremental benefit–cost ratio (BC) between the initial alternate do nothing and the new alternate 1 can be calculated as follows:

BC=PWBPWDA−PWCS=153,209,100.17206,500,868.56−53,260,192.47=153,209,100.17153,240,676.09=1

The incremental benefit–cost ratio is 1. Since the incremental benefit cost ratio is equal to 1, select the new alternate DA and eliminate the alternate CS.