MindTap Economics, 1 term (6 months) Printed Access Card for Tucker's Macroeconomics for Today, 10th
MindTap Economics, 1 term (6 months) Printed Access Card for Tucker's Macroeconomics for Today, 10th
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337622332
Author: Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher: Cengage Learning
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 9, Problem 1SQP

(a):

To determine

Unplanned inventory in the economy.

(a):

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The unplanned inventory investment can be calculated by subtracting the consumption from the real GDP and subtracting the autonomous investment from this value. In the first case, where the level of employment is 40 millions, the consumption is $300, whereas the real GDP is $325. The autonomous investment is $100. Thus, the unplanned inventory can be calculated as follows:

Unplanned inventory=(Real GDPConsumption)Autonomous investment=(325300)100=25100=75

Thus, the unplanned inventory in this case is -75. Similarly, the other case unplanned inventory can be calculated and the table can be completed as follows:

Possible levels of employment (millions of workers)Real GDP (Output) equals disposable income (billions of dollars)Consumption (billions of dollars)Unplanned inventory (billions of dollars)
40$325$300$-75
45375325-50
50425350-25
554753750
6052540025
6557542550
7062545075
Economics Concept Introduction

Aggregate expenditure: Aggregate expenditure is the measure of the national income. Thus, it is the sum value of the final goods and services produced in the economy, which is measured by the summation of the expenditures made by the factors during the given period of time.

(b):

To determine

Marginal propensity to consume and save.

(b):

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The marginal propensity to consume can be calculated by dividing the change in the consumption by the change in the disposable income. In the first place, when the consumption increases from $300 to $325, the change in the consumption is $25 billion. The real GDP was $325 and it changes to $375, which denotes the change in the disposable income by $50 billion. Thus, MPC can be calculated as follows:

Marginal Propensity to Consume=Change in consumptionChange in disposable income=$25billion$50billion=0.5

Thus, MPC is 0.5. The MPS can be calculated by subtracting the MPC from 1 as follows:

MPS=1MPC=10.5=0.5

Thus, the MPS is also equal to 0.5.

(c):

To determine

Equilibrium level of output when the economy employs 40 million workers.

(c):

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The level of unplanned inventory in the economy when employing 40 million workers is $75 billion. Thus, it means that the businesses in the economy would invest more and expand their output in the economy. This leads to an increase in the real GDP and the equilibrium level of real GDP, which is at $475 billion, where the unplanned inventory is $0.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
General Accounting Question solution and give me Blank ? C
It is possible to use transformational leadership strategies to reach unethical objectives.  Traditional leadership theories and morals standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues. For the statement above, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statements.
Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:9781337613040
Author:Tucker
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
MACROECONOMICS FOR TODAY
Economics
ISBN:9781337613057
Author:Tucker
Publisher:CENGAGE L
Text book image
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Text book image
Economics:
Economics
ISBN:9781285859460
Author:BOYES, William
Publisher:Cengage Learning