
Concept explainers
The six positions for six nonattacking rooks on B and the corresponding SDR of A.

Answer to Problem 1E
The six positions for nonattacking rooks on B correspond to the SDR
Explanation of Solution
Definition used:
Let Y be a finite set and
Calculation:
Given a chessboard B with forbidden positions.
Construct the rook family
From Figure 1, it is observed that there are a total of 16 forbidden positions out of 36 total positions.
In the above figure, each row has one of the labels
These labels indicate that the family
Thus,
It is possible to place six nonattacking rooks on the given board if and only if the associated family A has an SDR.
One of the possible SDR for the given board is
The six nonattacking rooks that correspond to the SDR
From Figure 2, it is observed that the six nonattacking are possible the given family A has an SDR.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 9 Solutions
Introductory Combinatorics
- Complete solution requiredarrow_forwardTopic: Group Theory | Abstract Algebra Question: Let G be a finite group of order 45. Prove that G has a normal subgroup of order 5 or order 9, and describe the number of Sylow subgroups for each. Instructions: • Use Sylow's Theorems (existence, conjugacy, and counting). • List divisors of 45 and compute possibilities for n for p = 3 and p = 5. Show that if n = 1, the subgroup is normal. Conclude about group structure using your analysis.arrow_forwardTopic: Group Theory | Abstract Algebra Question: Let G be a finite group of order 45. Prove that G has a normal subgroup of order 5 or order 9, and describe the number of Sylow subgroups for each. Instructions: • Use Sylow's Theorems (existence, conjugacy, and counting). • List divisors of 45 and compute possibilities for n for p = 3 and p = 5. Show that if n = 1, the subgroup is normal. Conclude about group structure using your analysis.arrow_forward
- Solve questions by Course Name (Ordinary Differential Equations II 2)arrow_forwardd((x, y), (z, w)) = |xz|+|yw|, show that whether d is a metric on R² or not?. Q3/Let R be a set of real number and d: R² x R² → R such that -> d((x, y), (z, w)) = max{\x - zl, ly - w} show that whether d is a metric on R² or not?. Q4/Let X be a nonempty set and d₁, d₂: XXR are metrics on X let d3,d4, d5: XX → R such that d3(x, y) = 4d2(x, y) d4(x, y) = 3d₁(x, y) +2d2(x, y) d5(x,y) = 2d₁ (x,y))/ 1+ 2d₂(x, y). Show that whether d3, d4 and d5 are metric on X or not?arrow_forwardplease Solve questions by Course Name( Ordinary Differential Equations II 2)arrow_forward
- Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications ( 8th I...MathISBN:9781259676512Author:Kenneth H RosenPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationMathematics for Elementary Teachers with Activiti...MathISBN:9780134392790Author:Beckmann, SybillaPublisher:PEARSON
- Thinking Mathematically (7th Edition)MathISBN:9780134683713Author:Robert F. BlitzerPublisher:PEARSONDiscrete Mathematics With ApplicationsMathISBN:9781337694193Author:EPP, Susanna S.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Pathways To Math Literacy (looseleaf)MathISBN:9781259985607Author:David Sobecki Professor, Brian A. MercerPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





