a
To find:
Pure Strategy Nash equilibria.
a

Explanation of Solution
In a two-player game,
Solve the following game for pure strategy Nash equilibria:
Player 1 | Player 2 | |||
D | E | F | ||
A | 7,6 | 5,8 | 0,0 | |
B | 5,8 | 7,6 | 1,1 | |
C | 0,0 | 1,1 | 4,4 |
To find the pure strategy Nash equilibria,one will use the underlining the “best response payoffs” method.
Step 1:
Underline the payoffs corresponding to player 1’s best responses. Player 1’s best response when Player 2 plays strategy D is A; one should underline the payoff corresponds to it. Player 1’s best response when Player 2 plays strategy E is B; one should underline the payoff corresponds to it. Player 1’s best response when Player 2 plays strategy F is C; one should underline the payoff corresponds to it. The matrix will be as follows:
Player 1 | Player 2 | |||
D | E | F | ||
A | 7,6 | 5,8 | 0,0 | |
B | 5,8 | 7,6 | 1,1 | |
C | 0,0 | 1,1 | 4,4 |
Step 2:
One should follow the same procedure for Player 2’s responses. One should underline the payoffs corresponding to player 2’s best responses. Player 2’s best response when Player 1 plays strategy A is E; one should underline the payoff corresponds to it. Player 2’s best response when Player 1 plays strategy B is D; one should underline the payoff corresponds to it. Player 2’s best response when Player 1 plays strategy C is F; one should underline the payoff corresponds to it. The matrix will be as follows:
Player 1 | Player 2 | |||
D | E | F | ||
A | 7,6 | 5,8 | 0,0 | |
B | 5,8 | 7,6 | 1,1 | |
C | 0,0 | 1,1 | 4,4 |
Step 3:
Now, one should look for the box where the responses of both the Players are underlined. It is the cell (C,F). This box corresponds to Nash equilibrium The given payoff is (4,4).
Introduction:
Nash equilibrium is a stable state in which different participants interact each other, in which no participant gains unilaterally, if strategy of other remains unchanged.
b)
To find:
Mixed strategy Nash equilibrium.
b)

Explanation of Solution
One should have to find the mixed strategy. Nash equilibrium for the firdt two strategies of both the players.
Player 1 | Player 2 | |||
D | E | |||
A | 7,6 | 5,8 | ||
B | 5,8 | 7,6 |
When a player doesnot have a dominant strategy, she plays a mixed strategy. Here, to get the mixed strategy, Nash equilibrium one should assume that Player 1 plays the strategy A with probability p and strategy B with probability (1-p). Player 2 plays the strategy D with probability q and strategy E with probability (1-q).
Step 1:
Here, the expected payoff of player 1 for strategy A is given by multiplying each of the payoffs corresponding to S by their respective probabilities and then summing them over. This way the expected payoff from strategy is:
The expected pay off from strategy B is:
These expected payoffs must be equal. Therefore:
Therefore, player 2 plays both of his strategy with equal probability of ½.
Step 2:
The expected payoff from strategy D is:
The expected payoff from strategy B is:
These expected payoffs must be equal.
Therefore, player 2 plays both of his strategy with equal probability of ½
Hence, the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium for the player 1 and player 2 is (0.5, 0.5)
Introduction:
Nash equilibrium is a stable state in which different participants interact each other, in which no participant gain unilaterally, if strategy of other remains unchanged.
c)
To ascertain:
Player’s expected payoffs
c)

Explanation of Solution
The expected payoff of the player for a given strategy in a mixed strategy game is given by summing over the actual probability multiplied by their respected probability.
In pure strategy equilibrium of the game described above is (4,4). That is the payoff of player A is 4 and that of B is also 4.
If player 1 choses strategy B, then the player 2 will play either of the strategy D or E with probability 0.5. Then for strategy A the expected payoff of player 1 is:
For player 2:
If player 2 choses strategy E, then the player 1 will play either of the strategy A or B with probability 0.5. Then for strategy E, the expected payoff of player 2 is:
Introduction:
Nash equilibrium is a stable state in which different participants interact each other, in which no participant gain unilaterally, if strategy of other remains unchanged.
d)
To ascertain:
Extensive form of the game.
d)

Explanation of Solution
The extensive form of a game corresponds to the game tree; where the action proceeds from left to right. The first move in this game belongs to player 1; he must chose whether to pay strategy A,B OR C. Then player 2 makes his decision. Payoffs are given at the end of the tree.
Introduction:
Nash equilibrium is a stable state in which different participants interact each other, in which no participant gain unilaterally, if strategy of other remains unchanged.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 8 Solutions
Bundle: Microeconomic Theory: Basic Principles and Extensions, 12th + MindTap Economics, 1 term (6 months) Printed Access Card
- How Command Economics Relate to Principle Of Economics?arrow_forwardhow commond economies relate to principle Of Economics ?arrow_forwardCritically analyse the five (5) characteristics of Ubuntu and provide examples of how they apply to the National Health Insurance (NHI) in South Africa.arrow_forward
- Critically analyse the five (5) characteristics of Ubuntu and provide examples of how they apply to the National Health Insurance (NHI) in South Africa.arrow_forwardOutline the nine (9) consumer rights as specified in the Consumer Rights Act in South Africa.arrow_forwardIn what ways could you show the attractiveness of Philippines in the form of videos/campaigns to foreign investors? Cite 10 examples.arrow_forward
- Explain the following terms and provide an example for each term: • Corruption • Fraud • Briberyarrow_forwardIn what ways could you show the attractiveness of a country in the form of videos/campaigns?arrow_forwardWith the VBS scenario in mind, debate with your own words the view that stakeholders are the primary reason why business ethics must be implemented.arrow_forward
- The unethical decisions taken by the VBS management affected the lives of many of their clients who trusted their business and services You are appointed as an ethics officer at Tyme Bank. Advise the management regarding the role of legislation in South Africa in providing the legal framework for business operations.arrow_forwardTyme Bank is a developing bank in South Africa and could potentially encounter challenges similar to those faced by VBS in the future. Explain five (5) benefits of applying business ethics at Tyme Bank to prevent similar ethical scandals.arrow_forward1.3. Explain the five (5) ethical challenges that can be associated with the implementation of the National Health Insurance (NHI) in South Africa.arrow_forward
- Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, IncMicroeconomics: Principles & PolicyEconomicsISBN:9781337794992Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. SolowPublisher:Cengage Learning



