Subpart (a):
Aggregate saving, unplanned investment.
Subpart (a):
Explanation of Solution
The savings can be calculated by using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (1) to calculate the aggregate saving (S).
Thus, the aggregate saving is -$500 at the aggregate income is $1,000 and consumption is $1,500.
The unplanned investment can be calculated by using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (2) to calculate the unplanned investment.
Thus, the unplanned investment is -$750 at the aggregate income is $1,000 and consumption is $1,500.
Table -1 shows the value of the aggregate saving and unplanned investment obtained by using Equation (1) and (2).
Table – 1
Aggregate Income (Y) (in $) |
Aggregate Consumption (C) (in $) |
Planned investment (I) (in $) |
Aggregate Saving (S) (in $) |
Unplanned investment (UI) (in $) |
1,000 | 1,500 | 250 | -500 | -750 |
1,500 | 1,875 | 250 | -375 | -625 |
2,000 | 2,250 | 250 | -250 | -500 |
2,500 | 2,625 | 250 | -125 | -375 |
3,000 | 3,000 | 250 | 0 | -250 |
3,500 | 3,375 | 250 | +125 | -125 |
4,000 | 3,750 | 250 | +250 | 0 |
4,500 | 4,125 | 250 | +375 | +125 |
The economy will be in equilibrium when
When the aggregate output is lower than the equilibrium point, the unplanned investment is negative, this implies the inventories are lower than desired. So the firm will expand production to increase inventories thereby increasing the aggregate output.
When the aggregate output is above the equilibrium point, the unplanned investment is positive, this implies the inventories are higher than desired. So the firm will reduce production to decrease inventories thereby decreasing the aggregate output.
Concept introduction:
Aggregate output: Aggregate output refers to the total quantity of goods and services produced over a given period of time in an economy.
Consumption function: The consumption function is the relationship between consumption and disposable income.
Saving: The saving is an income that is used by a consumer to spend for future consumption.
Subpart (b):
MPC, MPS and Multiplier.
Subpart (b):
Explanation of Solution
Marginal propensity to consume (MPC):
The marginal propensity to consume can be calculated by using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (3) to calculate the marginal propensity to consume.
Thus, the marginal propensity to consume is 0.75, which is applicable for all ranges since the change in consumption and change in income is same throughout.
Marginal propensity to save (MPS):
The marginal propensity to save can be calculated by using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (4) to calculate the marginal propensity to save.
Thus, the marginal propensity to save is 0.25 which is applicable for all ranges since the change in saving and change in income is same throughout.
Multiplier:
The multiplier is calculated as follows:
The multiplier is 4.
Concept introduction:
Marginal propensity to consume (MPC): Marginal propensity to consume refers to the sensitivity of change in the consumption level due to the changes occurred in the income level.
Marginal propensity to save (MPS): The ratio of change in saving when there is a change in disposable income.
Multiplier: Multiplier is defined as the number which denotes the proportionate increase in income due to increase in investment.
Subpart (c):
Aggregate saving, unplanned investment.
Subpart (c):
Explanation of Solution
The new planned investment is $375
Substitute the values in Equation (1) to calculate the aggregate saving (S).
Thus, the aggregate saving is -$500 at the aggregate income is $1,000 and consumption is $1,500.
Substituting the respective values in Equation (2) the new unplanned investment is calculated as follows.
Thus, the unplanned investment is -$875 at the aggregate income is $1,000 and consumption is $1,500.
Table -2 shows the value of the aggregate saving and the new unplanned investment obtained by using Equation (1) and (2).
Table – 2
Aggregate Income (Y) (in $) |
Aggregate Consumption (C) (in $) |
Planned investment (I) (in $) |
Aggregate Saving (S) (in $) |
Unplanned investment (UI) (in $) |
1,000 | 1,500 | 375 | -500 | -875 |
1,500 | 1,875 | 375 | -375 | -750 |
2,000 | 2,250 | 375 | -250 | -625 |
2,500 | 2,625 | 375 | -125 | -500 |
3,000 | 3,000 | 375 | 0 | -375 |
3,500 | 3,375 | 375 | +125 | -250 |
4,000 | 3,750 | 375 | +250 | -125 |
4,500 | 4,125 | 375 | +375 | 0 |
The economy will be in equilibrium when
If the planned investment (I) increases by $125 (250 to 375), then the income rises by $500
Concept introduction:
Aggregate output: Aggregate output refers to the total quantity of goods and services produced over a given period of time in an economy.
Consumption function: The consumption function is the relationship between consumption and disposable income.
Saving: The saving is an income that is used by a consumer to spend for future consumption.
Planned investment: It includes additions to the capital stock and inventories and all those investments firms plan to make.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 8 Solutions
Principles Of Macroeconomics
- Problem 1: 1. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 forever, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 5%? 2. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 forever, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 8%? 3. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 this year, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 8% and dividends are expected to grow at a rate of 2% per year?arrow_forwardd-farrow_forwardG please!arrow_forward
- 4. Consider two polluting firms, with the marginal abatement costs of polluters 1 and 2, respectively, equal to MAC₁ = 20-E1 MAC2 = 12-E2 a. What is the unregulated level of pollution for each firm? b. Assume policymakers have decided to cut the level of pollution in half. The way they intend to accomplish this goal is to require both firms to cut their pollution in half. What are the total costs of abatement from the policy? And how are these costs distributed between the firms? c. Is this uniform quota on emissions across firms the most cost-effective manner in which to reduce emissions by 50%?arrow_forwardDon't used hand raiting and don't used Ai solutionarrow_forwardThanks in advance!arrow_forward
- I need help figuring this out. I'm pretty sure this is correct?If Zambia is open to international trade in oranges without any restrictions, it will import 180 tons of oranges.I can't figure these two out: 1) Suppose the Zambian government wants to reduce imports to exactly 60 tons of oranges to help domestic producers. A tariff of ???? per ton will achieve this. 2) A tariff set at this level would raise ????in revenue for the Zambian government.arrow_forward16:10 ← BEC 3701 - Assignments-... KWAME NKRUMAH UNIVERSITY TEACHING FOR EXCELLENCE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE ADVANCED MICRO-ECONOMICS (BEC 3701) Assignments INSTRUCTIONS: Check instructions below: LTE 1) Let u(q1,q2) = ln q₁ + q2 be the (direct) utility function, where q₁ and q2the two goods. Denote P₁ and P2 as the prices of those two goods and let M be per period money income. Derive each of the following: a) the ordinary or Marshallian demand functions q₁ = d₂ (P₁, P₂, M) for i = 1,2 [3 Marks] b) the compensated or Hicksian demand functions q₁ = h₂ (P₁, P2, M) for i = 1,2 [3 Marks] c) the Indirect Utility Function uº = v(P₁, P2, M) [3 Marks] d) the Expenditure Function E(P1, P2, U°) [3 Marks] e) Draw a diagram of the solution. There should be two graphs, one above the other; the first containing the indifference curves and budget constraint that characterize the solution to the consumer's choice problem; the second characterizing the demand…arrow_forwardHow would you answer the question in the News Wire “Future Living Standards”? Why?arrow_forward
- al Problems (v) T (ix) F 1. Out of total number of 2807 women, who were interviewed for employment in a textile factory, 912 were from textile areas and the rest from non-textile areas. Amongst the married women, who belonged to textile areas, 347 were having some work experience and 173 did not have work experience, while for non-textile areas the corresponding figures were 199 and 670 respectively. The total number of women having no experience was 1841 of whom 311 resided in textile areas. Of the total number of women, 1418 were unmarried and of these the number of women having experience in the textile and non-textile areas was 254 and 166 respectively. Tabulate the above information. [CA. (Foundation), May 2000 Exactly (14) of the total employees of a sugar mill were these were married and one-halfarrow_forwardHow did Jennifer Lopez use free enterprise to become successful ?arrow_forwardAn actuary analyzes a company’s annual personal auto claims, M and annual commercialauto claims, N . The analysis reveals that V ar(M ) = 1600, V ar(N ) = 900, and thecorrelation between M and N is ρ = 0.64. Compute V ar(M + N ).arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education