W Market is a supermarket chain specializing in fresh, organic produce from local sources. It has a large operation across the world to watch over and the mission to sell the highest-quality natural and organic products available. It depends on an organizational structure that combines aspects of a mom-and-pop operation with a traditional corporate hierarchy. The company got its start when JM and RL borrowed money from friends and family to open a small natural food store in Austin. Their business began to boom and soon merged with another store. However, they faced a huge setback when a destructive flood struck the city. W Market lost its building and all of its produce and inventory. Fortunately, it was soon back in business. Initially, the staff was small enough with everyone doing any sort of job. Gradually, the business grew and it opened many stores. Labor was divided between four partners, with each specializing in one or more of the tasks critical to the business. The partners decided to depend on separate and local suppliers in each regions they had stores. A decentralized structure gives the company the flexibility to adapt to changes without involving needless bureaucracy. Characters in the case: The important characters and factors discussed in this case are W Market, its owners JM, RL and partners, and the decentralized structure of W Market. Adequate information: W Market is a supermarket chain specializing in fresh, organic produce from local sources. The business grew with time and it opened many stores. In the business, labor is divided between four partners, with each specializing in one or more of the tasks critical to the business. They depend on separate and local suppliers in each regions they had stores. A decentralized structure gives the company the flexibility to adapt to changes without involving needless bureaucracy. To explain: With reason whether the corporate culture at W Market is somewhat resistant to change or accepting of change.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 8, Problem 3VC

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

W Market is a supermarket chain specializing in fresh, organic produce from local sources. It has a large operation across the world to watch over and the mission to sell the highest-quality natural and organic products available. It depends on an organizational structure that combines aspects of a mom-and-pop operation with a traditional corporate hierarchy.

The company got its start when JM and RL borrowed money from friends and family to open a small natural food store in Austin. Their business began to boom and soon merged with another store. However, they faced a huge setback when a destructive flood struck the city. W Market lost its building and all of its produce and inventory. Fortunately, it was soon back in business. Initially, the staff was small enough with everyone doing any sort of job. Gradually, the business grew and it opened many stores.

Labor was divided between four partners, with each specializing in one or more of the tasks critical to the business. The partners decided to depend on separate and local suppliers in each regions they had stores. A decentralized structure gives the company the flexibility to adapt to changes without involving needless bureaucracy.

Characters in the case:

The important characters and factors discussed in this case are W Market, its owners JM, RL and partners, and the decentralized structure of W Market.

Adequate information:

W Market is a supermarket chain specializing in fresh, organic produce from local sources. The business grew with time and it opened many stores. In the business, labor is divided between four partners, with each specializing in one or more of the tasks critical to the business. They depend on separate and local suppliers in each regions they had stores. A decentralized structure gives the company the flexibility to adapt to changes without involving needless bureaucracy.

To explain: With reason whether the corporate culture at W Market is somewhat resistant to change or accepting of change.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Hi, Amazon works with four different vendors to package and send magazines to customers. We want to identify the top three vendors. Remember Amazon’s goals: Maintain high customer satisfaction, Ship products on time, Minimize costs. Each vendor is rated on several performance metrics. Can you identify the vendors that best meet Amazon’s goals? Thank you, Nadia Loomis

What defines the bargaining zone in a negotiation?- The bargaining zone, or the zone of possible agreement (ZOPA), is the scale of acceptable outcomes in a negotiation. At one end is the lowest price/ set of terms one party is ready to accept, and the other end of the scale is the highest price/ desired terms of the negotiation. Typically, each party starts on either side of the scale at the beginning of a negotiation. Successful negotiations meet in the middle of this range of acceptable outcomes, resulting in a mutually beneficial agreement (Thompson, 2020). How does a positive or negative bargaining zone affect the outcome of a negotiation and one's BATNA? - The bargaining zone (ZOPA) directly impacts the strength of one's BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement). A strong BATNA provides leverage to negotiate better terms in a positive bargaining zone, where the buyer's maximum exceeds the seller's minimum (Thompson, 2020). The negotiator can push closer to their…

How does a positive or negative bargaining zone affect the outcome of a negotiation and one's BATNA? Provide a real life example.