ECONOMICS W/CONNECT+20 >C<
20th Edition
ISBN: 9781259714993
Author: McConnell
Publisher: MCG CUSTOM
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 8, Problem 3RQ
To determine
Heuristics and biases.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
3
Jin's Utility Function
Wealth
Utility
(Dollars)
60,000
4,000
61,000
4,110
62,000
4,209
63,000
4,288
Refer to Table 27-1. If Jin's current wealth is $61,000, then
O his gain in utility from gaining $1,000 is less than his loss in utility from losing $1,000. Jin is not risk
averse.
O his gain in utility from gaining $1,000 is greater than his loss in utility from losing $1,000. Jin is not risk
averse.
O his gain in utility from gaining $1,000 is greater than his loss in utility from losing $1,000. Jin is risk
averse.
his gain in utility from gaining $1,000 is less than his loss in utility from losing $1,000. Jin is risk averse.
6.
Chapter 8 Solutions
ECONOMICS W/CONNECT+20 >C<
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- If a risk-neutral individual owns a home worth $200,000 and there is a three percent chance the home will be destroyed by fire in the next year, then we know 15. that: a) He is willing to pay much more than $6,000 for full cover. b) He is willing to pay much less than $6,000 for full cover. c) He is willing to pay at most $6,000 for full cover. d) None of the above are correct. e) All of the above are correct.arrow_forwardMike is the proud owner of Prospect X, which he values at $10 (so, for Mike, CE(X) = $10). If EV(X) = $12, what is the most you can say about Mike's risk preferences and/or his utility of wealth function? (Select all that apply) O Mike's utility of wealth function must be concave. O Mike must be risk averse. O For Mike, it must be the case that U(EV(X) > $10. O If Mike had to choose between Prospect X and receiving $9 with certainty, he would choose the $9.arrow_forwardYour utility function for income is characterized by U(I) = 10.6, and you are %3D considering a job opportunity that may pay $30,000 per year or $80,000 per year with equal probabilities. Find the maximum you are willing to pay to fully insure yourself? [Please choose the closest answer] O $20,000 $25,000 $20,075 O $1,374 O $22,500 O $21,500 $27,398 O $2,468arrow_forward
- Definition: The certainty equivalent (CE) of a lottery is the amount of money you would have to be given with certainty to be just as well-off with that lottery. Definition: The risk premium is the amount of money that a risk-averse individual will pay to avoid taking the risk. In other words, risk premium measures the amount of income that an individual would give up to leave her indifferent between a risky choice and a certain one. Assume that you have a von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function over lotteries that give you and amount x if Event 1 happens and y if Event 1 does not happen: U(x, y) = p √x + (1-p) √y. (a) If p=0.5, calculate the utility of a lottery that gives you $10,000 if Event 1 happens and $100 if Event 1 does not happen. In addition, calculate the expected income of the lottery. (b) If you were sure to receive $4,900, what would your utility be? (Hint: If you receive $4,900 with certainty, then you receive $4,900 in both events.) (c) Calculate the certainty…arrow_forwardp Consider the following lottery scenarios. Which of these is an example of the Allais Paradox, a well-known deviation from expected utility theory? O a. Lottery P offers a 1% chance of winning $10,000 and a 99% chance of winning nothing, while Lottery Q offers a 50% chance of winning $200 and a 50% chance of winning nothing. Even though the expected value of Lottery P is greater, most people choose Lottery Q because they overweight the low probability event in P. O b. Lottery M offers a 90% chance of winning $5,000,000 and a 10% chance of winning nothing, while Lottery N offers a 10% chance of winning $50,000,000 and a 90% chance of winning nothing. Despite Lottery N having a higher expected value, a majority of people choose Lottery M. Oc. Lottery X offers a 50% chance of winning $1,000 and a 50% chance of winning nothing, while Lottery Y offers a guaranteed win of $450. Despite the higher expected value of Lottery X ($500 vs $450), a majority of people choose Lottery Y. O d. Lottery…arrow_forward4. Kate has von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function U(x1,x2) = m7. She currently has $2025. a. Would she be willing to undertake a gamble that involves a gain $2875 with probability + and a loss of $1125 with probability ? Show your work and explain your answer. b. Would she be willing to undertake a gamble that involves a gain $2599 with probability and a loss of $800 with probability ? Show your work and explain your answer.arrow_forward
- Situation 1 Suppose you have won $1000 on a game show. In addition to these winnings, youare now asked to choose between Option A: 50% chance of winning $1000 and 50% chance of winning nothing Option B: winning $500 for sure. Situation 2 Suppose you have won $2000 on a game show. In addition to these winnings, youare noW asked to choose between Option C: 50% chance of losing $1000 and 50% chance of losing nothing Option D: losing $500 for sure. They found that respondents are much more likely to choose Option B in the first case and Option C in the second case. Suppose the respondents are not indifferent between options. Show that their choices are inconsistent with the Expected Utility Theory.arrow_forward5. Consider a decision-maker who expects to have a car accident with chance ; if this occurs, he will incur $L in damages. He can purchase as much auto insurance, q, as he likes, at a price of p per dollar of coverage: this means that if he pays pq upfront (as the insurance premium), he'll receive a payment of q from the insurance company if an accident occurs. (a) Write out his expected utility from purchasing insurance level q, assuming a utility-of- wealth function u(w) and initial wealth wo. 1 (b) Show that the optimal level of insurance, q, solves u' (wo - L + (1 - p)q)) u' (wo - pq) = p(1 - π) T(1-P) (c) Now assume that u(w) 1 - e-aw, where a > 0 (this is known as a "CARA", or "constant absolute risk aversion", utility function; a parametrizes risk aversion). Solve explicitly for the optimal insurance, and show that it does not depend on wealth.arrow_forwardE2arrow_forward
- Please help me fix c. Thanks!arrow_forward1. Write down the behavioral trap that is more likely to occur in each of the following case and Justify your answer a) While investing her money on share market, Mila filters out the information that contradicts her original idea about some particular share. b) Lee attributes successful outcomes to her own actions and bad outcomes to external factors. c) Paul continues to invest in Aqua Company’s share despite its persistent negative return. d) Sifa buys only those shares that has a consistent upward trend of returns. e) Fariha suggests her friend Samia to invest on ABC Company’s share as she foresees higher return from it. f) Sunny sells a profitable Beximco share today that earned him positive return.arrow_forwardHelparrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education