MACROECONOMICS FOR TODAY-W/LMS MINDTAP
MACROECONOMICS FOR TODAY-W/LMS MINDTAP
9th Edition
ISBN: 9781305927117
Author: Tucker
Publisher: CENGAGE L
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 8, Problem 1SQP
To determine

Validity of Say’s law and long-term unemployment according to classical economists.

Expert Solution & Answer
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The classical economists believe in price-wage flexibility. They state that underemployment and under consumption will not co-exist in the economy in the long run. When products are unsold in the market, it creates a surplus and this would induce the firms to reduce the price of the products. When the price reduces, it implies that the wage rate also decreases and the unemployed people would be willing to work at a lower wage rate. This implies that under consumption lead to an increase in the employment and a decrease in the rate of unemployment. Say’s law is valid as the price-wage flexibility facilitates the notion ‘supply creates its own demand’.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
General Accounting Question solution and give me Blank ? C
It is possible to use transformational leadership strategies to reach unethical objectives.  Traditional leadership theories and morals standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues. For the statement above, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statements.
Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Macroeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781337617390
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506756
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506725
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Survey Of Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781337111522
Author:Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:Cengage,
Text book image
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc