To provide definitions to terms used regularly by third party payers and explain these terms affect the providers’ incentives, fees and overall utilization.
a)
Fee for service payment model.
Answer to Problem 1QAP
The fee for service payment model is a traditional payment method in medical care where the provider bills for each service provided.
Explanation of Solution
Within a fee for service payment model providers can pass reimburse all their costs, with no regard on how inefficient the production of services. This system can be described as a cost-plus pricing system.
There is no incentive for providers to search for more efficient methods of production in a cost-plus environment. Furthermore, patients have no incentive to search for providers who offer lower prices. In comparison, competitive markets reward providers for offering quality products at the lowest price. However, in cost-plus markets, providers are rewarded by offering more services at higher prices while passing on the additional costs to third-party payers.
Introduction:
Certain concepts that exist within health care involve certain variances in terms of providers’ incentives, fees and overall utilization.
b)
Assignment.
b)
Answer to Problem 1QAP
An assignment can be defined as a Medicare policy that provides physicians a guaranteed payment of 80 percent of the allowable fee. By accepting an assignment, physicians agree to accept the allowable fee as full payment and forgo the practice of balance billing.
Explanation of Solution
From the perspective of the physician, the problem of assignment centers on the relationship between the fee usually charged for the service provided and the Medicare allowable fee, which is often much lower. Physicians' issue with the Medicare allowable fee is that it is below their average cost of providing medical services. Even though providing care to the Medicare segment of the market may not cover fully allocated costs, each transaction is reimbursed at a rate that covers the physician’s
c)
Capitation.
c)
Answer to Problem 1QAP
Capitation can be defined as a payment method that provides a fixed, per capita payment to providers for a specified medical benefits package. Capitation requires the providers to treat a well-defined population for a fixed sum of money, paid in advance, without regard to the number or nature of the services provided to each person.
Explanation of Solution
Providing care for a fixed fee changes the nature of the physician-patient relationship. Capitation has reduced the incentive of providers to purchase services that are largely unnecessary and take advantage of uninformed consumers. However, there is a risk of omitting potentially beneficial care in the name of cost-saving. However, under capitation, all necessary care is provided for a well-defined group. Hence utilization of services is in control of the provider.
d)
Risk Sharing.
d)
Answer to Problem 1QAP
Risk sharing contracts involves in the spreading of financial risks of health care towards the providers.
Explanation of Solution
Risk-sharing discourages the over utilization of services, the use of expensive technology, brand-name prescription drugs, referrals to specialists, and inpatient hospital procedures. Many managed care plans contract with primary care physicians using either prepayment or capitation (lump-sum payments per enrollee determined in advance). Prepayment shifts the financial risk to the providers. Rather than making payments on a per-service basis, primary care physicians will receive a fixed payment determined in advance to provide all necessary primary and preventive care for a specific group of patients. Some managed care plans involve withholding a percentage of the authorized payment so that providers control utilization and cost. Primary care physicians serve as gatekeepers who are under strict budgets for hospital services, specialty referrals, and prescription drugs for patients they cover. Bonuses are provided to physicians who provide care within the predetermined budgets. Those who do not are penalized. They are penalized through either forfeiting part or all of their withholdings to the plan. This risk-sharing arrangement provides strong incentives for physicians to control utilization.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 8 Solutions
EBK HEALTH ECONOMICS AND POLICY
- Not use ai pleasearrow_forwardFor the statement below, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statement. Incompetent leaders can't be ethical leaders. Traditional leadership theories and moral standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues.arrow_forwardpresentation on "Dandelion Insomnia." Poemarrow_forward
- Don't used Ai solutionarrow_forward"Whether the regulator sells or gives away tradeable emission permits free of charge, the quantities of emissions produced by firms are the same." Assume that there are n identical profit-maximising firms where profit for each firm is given by π(e) with л'(e) > 0; π"(e) < 0 and e denotes emissions. Individual emissions summed over all firms gives E which generates environmental damages D(E). Show that the regulator achieves the optimal level of total pollution through a tradeable emission permit scheme, where the permits are distributed according to the following cases: Case (i) the firm purchases all permits; Case (ii) the firm receives all permits free; and Page 3 of 5 ES30031 Case (iii) the firm purchases a portion of its permits and receives the remainder free of charge.arrow_forwardcompare and/or contrast the two plays we've been reading, Antigone and A Doll's House.arrow_forward
- Please answer step by steparrow_forwardSuppose there are two firms 1 and 2, whose abatement costs are given by c₁ (e₁) and C2 (е2), where e denotes emissions and subscripts denote the firm. We assume that c{(e) 0 for i = 1,2 and for any level of emission e we have c₁'(e) # c₂' (e). Furthermore, assume the two firms make different contributions towards pollution concentration in a nearby river captured by the transfer coefficients ε₁ and 2 such that for any level of emission e we have C₂'(e) # The regulator does not know the resulting C₁'(e) Τι environmental damages. Using an analytical approach explain carefully how the regulator may limit the concentration of pollution using (i) a Pigouvian tax scheme and (ii) uniform emissions standards. Discuss the cost-effectiveness of both approaches to control pollution.arrow_forwardBill’s father read that each year a car’s value declines by 10%. He also read that a new car’s value declines by 12% as it is driven off the dealer’s lot. Maintenance costs and the costs of “car problems” are only $200 per year during the 2-year warranty period. Then they jump to $750 per year, with an annual increase of $500 per year.Bill’s dad wants to keep his annual cost of car ownership low. The car he prefers cost $30,000 new, and he uses an interest rate of 8%. For this car, the new vehicle warranty is transferrable.(a) If he buys the car new, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(b) If he buys the car after it is 2 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(c) If he buys the car after it is 4 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(d) If he buys the car after it is 6 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(e) What strategy do you recommend? Why? Please show each step and formula,…arrow_forward
- O’Leary Engineering Corp. has been depreciating a $50,000 machine for the last 3 years. The asset was just sold for 60% of its first cost. What is the size of the recaptured depreciation or loss at disposal using the following depreciation methods?(a) Straight-line with N = 8 and S = 2000(b) Double declining balance with N = 8(c) 40% bonus depreciation with the balance using 7-year MACRS Please show every step and formula, don't use excel. The answer should be (a) $2000 loss, (b) $8000 deo recap, (c) $14257 dep recap, thank you.arrow_forwardThe cost of garbage pickup in Green Gulch is $4,500,000 for Year 1. The population is increasing at 6%, the nominal cost per ton is increasing at 5%, and the general inflation rate is estimated at 4%.(a) Estimate the cost in Year 4 in Year-1 dollars and in nominal dollars.(b) Reference a data source for trends in volume of garbage per person. How does including this change your answer? Please show every step and formula, don't use excel. The answer should be $6.20M, $5.2M, thank you.arrow_forwardPlease show each step with formulas, don't use Excel. The answer should be 4 years, $16,861.arrow_forward