The US and Canadian production possibility frontiers in two separate diagrams with footballs on the horizontal axis and lumber on the vertical axis. In autarky, if the United States wants to consume 500 footballs, how much lumber it can consume at most. Label this point in diagram as A. If Canada wants to consume 1 ton of lumber, in autarky how many footballs it can consume. Label this point as C in the diagram. The country having absolute advantage in lumber production The country having comparative advantage in lumber production. Each country specializes in the good in which it has the comparative advantage and there is trade. Footballs produce by the United States. Lumber produced by the Canada. If it is possible for the United States to consume 500 footballs and 7 tons of lumber. Label this point B. Whether it is possible for Canada at the same time to consume 500 footballs and 1 ton of lumber. Label this point as D. Concept Introduction: Constant opportunity cost - It implies to the cost where funds and resources are allocated to one project but could have been allocated to some other project instead.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 8, Problem 1P

To determine

The US and Canadian production possibility frontiers in two separate diagrams with footballs on the horizontal axis and lumber on the vertical axis.

In autarky, if the United States wants to consume 500 footballs, how much lumber it can consume at most. Label this point in diagram as A. If Canada wants to consume 1 ton of lumber, in autarky how many footballs it can consume. Label this point as C in the diagram.

The country having absolute advantage in lumber production

The country having comparative advantage in lumber production.

Each country specializes in the good in which it has the comparative advantage and there is trade. Footballs produce by the United States. Lumber produced by the Canada.

If it is possible for the United States to consume 500 footballs and 7 tons of lumber. Label this point B. Whether it is possible for Canada at the same time to consume 500 footballs and 1 ton of lumber. Label this point as D.

Concept Introduction:

Constant opportunity cost - It implies to the cost where funds and resources are allocated to one project but could have been allocated to some other project instead.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

1. Imagine a society that produces military goods and consumer goods, which we'll call "guns" and "butter." a. Draw a production possibilities frontier for guns and butter. Using the concept of opportunity cost, explain why it most likely has a bowed-out shape. b. Show a point that is impossible for the economy to achieve. Show a point that is feasible but inefficient. c. Imagine that the society has two political parties, called the Hawks (who want a strong military) and the Doves (who want a smaller military). Show a point on your production possibilities frontier that the Hawks might choose and a point the Doves might choose. d. Imagine that an aggressive neighboring country reduces the size of its military. As a result, both the Hawks and the Doves reduce their desired production of guns by the same amount. Which party would get the bigger "peace dividend," measured by the increase in butter production? Explain.

A health study tracked a group of persons for five years. At the beginning of the study, 20%were classified as heavy smokers, 30% as light smokers, and 50% as nonsmokers. Resultsof the study showed that light smokers were twice as likely as nonsmokers to die duringthe five-year study, but only half as likely as heavy smokers.A randomly selected participant from the study died during the five-year period. Calculatethe probability that the participant was a heavy smoker

Consider two assets with the following returns: State Prob. of state R₁ R2 1 23 13 25% 5% 2 -10% 1% Compute the optimal portfolio for an investor having a Bernoulli utility of net returns u(r) = 2√√r+ 10. Compute the certainty equivalent of the optimal portfolio. Do the results change if short-selling is not allowed? If so, how?