The possibility of private insurance companies blocking the payment for kidney donation so as to curb the supply of donation.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 8, Problem 1DQ

To determine

The possibility of private insurance companies blocking the payment for kidney donation so as to curb the supply of donation.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In the given case, the chronic diseases are already known to the patient as well as to the insurer. So, to insure a person suffering from a chronic disease will lead to a definite cost incurred by the insurer.

On the other hand, a person who does not have any chronic disease, does not put a definite cost burden on the insurer, as there are equal chances of having a disease and not having a disease. So, in such a situation, there may be a gain or a loss to the insurer.

Though in the case of chronic disease, the insurer does not gain as he cannot say no to insured persons. Considering the fact that insurance companies are not meant just to earn profits, they must make continuous efforts to reduce the risk of insurance bearers.

As the concentration of power is in few hands, namely private insurance companies, so they would block payments for kidney donors. This is done to reduce the increased costs they have to bear due to increased transplants. So there is an economic incentive for them to oppose the idea of payments to donors given the cascading costs associated with increased transplants.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Cost refers to a particular amount that is incurred by a firm or an individual to acquire an asset or a service.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

evaluate the impact of government interventions, such as antitrust regulations, price controls, or subsidies, on various market structures. Select a specific industry and examine how these interventions have influenced competition, consumer welfare, and economic efficiency. Provide the pros and cons of government intervention.

Consider an economy that exhibits both population growth (L grows at rate n) and technological progress (A grows at rate a) described by the production function, Y = F(K, AL) = Ka (AL)¹-α Here K is capital and Y is output. (a) Show that this production function exhibits constant returns to scale. [2 marks] (b) What is the per-effective-worker production function, y = f(k), (where y = Y/AL k K/AL)? (Show your working.) [2 marks] (c) Find expressions for the steady-state capital-output ratio, capital stock per effective worker, and output per effective worker, as a function of the saving rate (s), the depreciation rate (8), the population growth rate (n), the rate of technological progress (a), and the coefficient a. (You may assume the condition that capital per effective worker evolves according to Ak = sf (k) - (a+n+8)k.) [5 marks] (d) Show that at the Golden Rule steady state the saving rate for this economy is equal to the parameter a. [6 marks]

A firm faces the following production function, Y = AKα L¹-a (1) Here Y is output, K is capital, L is fixed labour, and A is a measure of technology. The firm uses an optimal amount of capital determined by the condition, MPK = r +8 (2) Where MPK is the marginal productivity of capital, r is the real interest rate, and ♪ is the depreciation rate. (a) Using equations (1) and (2) find an expression for K*, the optimal amount of capital the firm should use. [3 marks] (b) Referring to your result from part (a), comment on what happens to K* when each of the following variables change (holding other variables constant), (i) The measure of technology (A) falls (ii) The depreciation rate (8) increases (iii) The real interest rate (r) increases [2 marks] [2 marks] [2 marks] [Hint: For each of parts (i)-(iii) you are being asked to comment on what happens to K* if just the variable mentioned in the question part changes. Your answer should state whether K* increases, decreases, or stays the…

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 8, Problem 1DQ

To determine

The possibility of private insurance companies blocking the payment for kidney donation so as to curb the supply of donation.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In the given case, the chronic diseases are already known to the patient as well as to the insurer. So, to insure a person suffering from a chronic disease will lead to a definite cost incurred by the insurer.

On the other hand, a person who does not have any chronic disease, does not put a definite cost burden on the insurer, as there are equal chances of having a disease and not having a disease. So, in such a situation, there may be a gain or a loss to the insurer.

Though in the case of chronic disease, the insurer does not gain as he cannot say no to insured persons. Considering the fact that insurance companies are not meant just to earn profits, they must make continuous efforts to reduce the risk of insurance bearers.

As the concentration of power is in few hands, namely private insurance companies, so they would block payments for kidney donors. This is done to reduce the increased costs they have to bear due to increased transplants. So there is an economic incentive for them to oppose the idea of payments to donors given the cascading costs associated with increased transplants.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Cost refers to a particular amount that is incurred by a firm or an individual to acquire an asset or a service.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 8, Problem 1DQ

To determine

The possibility of private insurance companies blocking the payment for kidney donation so as to curb the supply of donation.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In the given case, the chronic diseases are already known to the patient as well as to the insurer. So, to insure a person suffering from a chronic disease will lead to a definite cost incurred by the insurer.

On the other hand, a person who does not have any chronic disease, does not put a definite cost burden on the insurer, as there are equal chances of having a disease and not having a disease. So, in such a situation, there may be a gain or a loss to the insurer.

Though in the case of chronic disease, the insurer does not gain as he cannot say no to insured persons. Considering the fact that insurance companies are not meant just to earn profits, they must make continuous efforts to reduce the risk of insurance bearers.

As the concentration of power is in few hands, namely private insurance companies, so they would block payments for kidney donors. This is done to reduce the increased costs they have to bear due to increased transplants. So there is an economic incentive for them to oppose the idea of payments to donors given the cascading costs associated with increased transplants.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Cost refers to a particular amount that is incurred by a firm or an individual to acquire an asset or a service.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 8, Problem 1DQ

To determine

The possibility of private insurance companies blocking the payment for kidney donation so as to curb the supply of donation.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In the given case, the chronic diseases are already known to the patient as well as to the insurer. So, to insure a person suffering from a chronic disease will lead to a definite cost incurred by the insurer.

On the other hand, a person who does not have any chronic disease, does not put a definite cost burden on the insurer, as there are equal chances of having a disease and not having a disease. So, in such a situation, there may be a gain or a loss to the insurer.

Though in the case of chronic disease, the insurer does not gain as he cannot say no to insured persons. Considering the fact that insurance companies are not meant just to earn profits, they must make continuous efforts to reduce the risk of insurance bearers.

As the concentration of power is in few hands, namely private insurance companies, so they would block payments for kidney donors. This is done to reduce the increased costs they have to bear due to increased transplants. So there is an economic incentive for them to oppose the idea of payments to donors given the cascading costs associated with increased transplants.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Cost refers to a particular amount that is incurred by a firm or an individual to acquire an asset or a service.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 8, Problem 1DQ

To determine

The possibility of private insurance companies blocking the payment for kidney donation so as to curb the supply of donation.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In the given case, the chronic diseases are already known to the patient as well as to the insurer. So, to insure a person suffering from a chronic disease will lead to a definite cost incurred by the insurer.

On the other hand, a person who does not have any chronic disease, does not put a definite cost burden on the insurer, as there are equal chances of having a disease and not having a disease. So, in such a situation, there may be a gain or a loss to the insurer.

Though in the case of chronic disease, the insurer does not gain as he cannot say no to insured persons. Considering the fact that insurance companies are not meant just to earn profits, they must make continuous efforts to reduce the risk of insurance bearers.

As the concentration of power is in few hands, namely private insurance companies, so they would block payments for kidney donors. This is done to reduce the increased costs they have to bear due to increased transplants. So there is an economic incentive for them to oppose the idea of payments to donors given the cascading costs associated with increased transplants.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Cost refers to a particular amount that is incurred by a firm or an individual to acquire an asset or a service.

Answer 6

Chapter 8, Problem 1DQ

To determine

The possibility of private insurance companies blocking the payment for kidney donation so as to curb the supply of donation.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In the given case, the chronic diseases are already known to the patient as well as to the insurer. So, to insure a person suffering from a chronic disease will lead to a definite cost incurred by the insurer.

On the other hand, a person who does not have any chronic disease, does not put a definite cost burden on the insurer, as there are equal chances of having a disease and not having a disease. So, in such a situation, there may be a gain or a loss to the insurer.

Though in the case of chronic disease, the insurer does not gain as he cannot say no to insured persons. Considering the fact that insurance companies are not meant just to earn profits, they must make continuous efforts to reduce the risk of insurance bearers.

As the concentration of power is in few hands, namely private insurance companies, so they would block payments for kidney donors. This is done to reduce the increased costs they have to bear due to increased transplants. So there is an economic incentive for them to oppose the idea of payments to donors given the cascading costs associated with increased transplants.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Cost refers to a particular amount that is incurred by a firm or an individual to acquire an asset or a service.

Answer 7

Chapter 8, Problem 1DQ

To determine

The possibility of private insurance companies blocking the payment for kidney donation so as to curb the supply of donation.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In the given case, the chronic diseases are already known to the patient as well as to the insurer. So, to insure a person suffering from a chronic disease will lead to a definite cost incurred by the insurer.

On the other hand, a person who does not have any chronic disease, does not put a definite cost burden on the insurer, as there are equal chances of having a disease and not having a disease. So, in such a situation, there may be a gain or a loss to the insurer.

Though in the case of chronic disease, the insurer does not gain as he cannot say no to insured persons. Considering the fact that insurance companies are not meant just to earn profits, they must make continuous efforts to reduce the risk of insurance bearers.

As the concentration of power is in few hands, namely private insurance companies, so they would block payments for kidney donors. This is done to reduce the increased costs they have to bear due to increased transplants. So there is an economic incentive for them to oppose the idea of payments to donors given the cascading costs associated with increased transplants.