Company Z is an online shoe and clothing retailer in Country U. Person H is the Chief Operating Officer of Company Z. He tries to abolish the conventional management hierarchy and finds a different way to run a company such as manager less system of distributed authority known Holacracy. It replaces the ideas of manager and traditional hierarchy of people in an organizational positions with roles which corresponds to the activity or a function. The manager less approach of holacracy is not for everyone in an organization but this system is for people who don’t want to be responsible for their own work which they are not comfortable with it. This new system faced lot of confusion and resistance from the employees. This leads to downfall of company from popular Fortune magazine 100 best companies to work. However, Person H remains committed to this system and backs up his enthusiasm with the internal survey reports of employee happiness and other measures. Characters in the case: Company Z: Online shoe and clothing retailer Person H: Chief Operating Officer of Company Z To discuss: Whether Person H has a responsibility to protect his employee’s livelihoods even when they are opposed to management philosophy.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 8, Problem 1CTQ

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Company Z is an online shoe and clothing retailer in Country U. Person H is the Chief Operating Officer of Company Z. He tries to abolish the conventional management hierarchy and finds a different way to run a company such as manager less system of distributed authority known Holacracy.

It replaces the ideas of manager and traditional hierarchy of people in an organizational positions with roles which corresponds to the activity or a function. The manager less approach of holacracy is not for everyone in an organization but this system is for people who don’t want to be responsible for their own work which they are not comfortable with it.

This new system faced lot of confusion and resistance from the employees. This leads to downfall of company from popular Fortune magazine 100 best companies to work. However, Person H remains committed to this system and backs up his enthusiasm with the internal survey reports of employee happiness and other measures.

Characters in the case:

Company Z: Online shoe and clothing retailer

Person H: Chief Operating Officer of Company Z

To discuss: Whether Person H has a responsibility to protect his employee’s livelihoods even when they are opposed to management philosophy.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Generally employers are having a moral obligation to look for welfare of their employees. Moral obligations such as a fair pay and good working condition. Tests of an employer’s morality in the cases of layoffs, plant closing and other dramatic events of nature has an impact on psychology, and financial impact on the entire workforce which leads to decrease the reputation of the company.

Thus, these kind of matters handled by employer with sensitivity and extraordinary caring. Whenever a new system was introduced in an organizations, most of the employees are resists new system they think that they will get affected by the system. Employees are having different views about the work and meaning of job in an organization.

Thus, Person H has a responsibility to protect his employees and their livelihoods even though employees are opposed the new system of management philosophy. All the employees should be treated fairly and with respect and company’s obligation is to see that employers don’t abuse their power or mistreat their employees.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Question 1M&H company ltd. sells television sets and has collected monthly sales data (in units) for the past 12months as shown in table 1below: TABLE 1 Month Sales (Units)1 1202 1353 1504 1655 1806 2007 1958 2109 225 10 24011 25512 270 Using the data provided, answer the following questions: a. Using a 3-month weighted moving average with weights 0.5, 0.3, and 0.2 (most recent monthhaving the highest weight), calculate the forecast for month 13. b. If the company applies an exponential smoothing method with a smoothing constant (α) = 0.2,and assumes an initial forecast of 120 units for Month 1, calculate the forecast for month 13.c. Calculate the Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) for the exponential smoothing method andweighted moving average method using the actual sales data for Months 4 to 12 and determinewhich method is more accurate. d. Compute the values of a (intercept) and b (slope) using the least squares method.e. Use the trend equation to forecast the demand for…

You may need to use the appropriate technology to answer this question. An event hall that hosts public lectures, book readings, poetry slams, and other similar events uses a one-week periodic review inventory system for the throat lozenges that it stocks for its patrons. A two-day lead time is needed for any order, and the event hall is willing to tolerate an average of one stock-out per year. (a) Using the event hall's service guideline, what is the probability of a stock-out associated with each replenishment decision? (Round your answer to four decimal places.) (b) What is the replenishment level if demand during the review period plus lead-time period is normally distributed with a mean of 50 units and a standard deviation of 12 units? (Round your answer to the nearest integer.) (c) What is the replenishment level if demand during the review period plus lead-time period is uniformly distributed between 45 and 95 units? (Round your answer to the nearest integer.)

provide scholarly research on the importance of internal risk assessement and auditng process in relation to US bank Cititbank loosing USD500 million in August 2020

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 8, Problem 1CTQ

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Company Z is an online shoe and clothing retailer in Country U. Person H is the Chief Operating Officer of Company Z. He tries to abolish the conventional management hierarchy and finds a different way to run a company such as manager less system of distributed authority known Holacracy.

It replaces the ideas of manager and traditional hierarchy of people in an organizational positions with roles which corresponds to the activity or a function. The manager less approach of holacracy is not for everyone in an organization but this system is for people who don’t want to be responsible for their own work which they are not comfortable with it.

This new system faced lot of confusion and resistance from the employees. This leads to downfall of company from popular Fortune magazine 100 best companies to work. However, Person H remains committed to this system and backs up his enthusiasm with the internal survey reports of employee happiness and other measures.

Characters in the case:

Company Z: Online shoe and clothing retailer

Person H: Chief Operating Officer of Company Z

To discuss: Whether Person H has a responsibility to protect his employee’s livelihoods even when they are opposed to management philosophy.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Generally employers are having a moral obligation to look for welfare of their employees. Moral obligations such as a fair pay and good working condition. Tests of an employer’s morality in the cases of layoffs, plant closing and other dramatic events of nature has an impact on psychology, and financial impact on the entire workforce which leads to decrease the reputation of the company.

Thus, these kind of matters handled by employer with sensitivity and extraordinary caring. Whenever a new system was introduced in an organizations, most of the employees are resists new system they think that they will get affected by the system. Employees are having different views about the work and meaning of job in an organization.

Thus, Person H has a responsibility to protect his employees and their livelihoods even though employees are opposed the new system of management philosophy. All the employees should be treated fairly and with respect and company’s obligation is to see that employers don’t abuse their power or mistreat their employees.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 8, Problem 1CTQ

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Company Z is an online shoe and clothing retailer in Country U. Person H is the Chief Operating Officer of Company Z. He tries to abolish the conventional management hierarchy and finds a different way to run a company such as manager less system of distributed authority known Holacracy.

It replaces the ideas of manager and traditional hierarchy of people in an organizational positions with roles which corresponds to the activity or a function. The manager less approach of holacracy is not for everyone in an organization but this system is for people who don’t want to be responsible for their own work which they are not comfortable with it.

This new system faced lot of confusion and resistance from the employees. This leads to downfall of company from popular Fortune magazine 100 best companies to work. However, Person H remains committed to this system and backs up his enthusiasm with the internal survey reports of employee happiness and other measures.

Characters in the case:

Company Z: Online shoe and clothing retailer

Person H: Chief Operating Officer of Company Z

To discuss: Whether Person H has a responsibility to protect his employee’s livelihoods even when they are opposed to management philosophy.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Generally employers are having a moral obligation to look for welfare of their employees. Moral obligations such as a fair pay and good working condition. Tests of an employer’s morality in the cases of layoffs, plant closing and other dramatic events of nature has an impact on psychology, and financial impact on the entire workforce which leads to decrease the reputation of the company.

Thus, these kind of matters handled by employer with sensitivity and extraordinary caring. Whenever a new system was introduced in an organizations, most of the employees are resists new system they think that they will get affected by the system. Employees are having different views about the work and meaning of job in an organization.

Thus, Person H has a responsibility to protect his employees and their livelihoods even though employees are opposed the new system of management philosophy. All the employees should be treated fairly and with respect and company’s obligation is to see that employers don’t abuse their power or mistreat their employees.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 8, Problem 1CTQ

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Company Z is an online shoe and clothing retailer in Country U. Person H is the Chief Operating Officer of Company Z. He tries to abolish the conventional management hierarchy and finds a different way to run a company such as manager less system of distributed authority known Holacracy.

It replaces the ideas of manager and traditional hierarchy of people in an organizational positions with roles which corresponds to the activity or a function. The manager less approach of holacracy is not for everyone in an organization but this system is for people who don’t want to be responsible for their own work which they are not comfortable with it.

This new system faced lot of confusion and resistance from the employees. This leads to downfall of company from popular Fortune magazine 100 best companies to work. However, Person H remains committed to this system and backs up his enthusiasm with the internal survey reports of employee happiness and other measures.

Characters in the case:

Company Z: Online shoe and clothing retailer

Person H: Chief Operating Officer of Company Z

To discuss: Whether Person H has a responsibility to protect his employee’s livelihoods even when they are opposed to management philosophy.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Generally employers are having a moral obligation to look for welfare of their employees. Moral obligations such as a fair pay and good working condition. Tests of an employer’s morality in the cases of layoffs, plant closing and other dramatic events of nature has an impact on psychology, and financial impact on the entire workforce which leads to decrease the reputation of the company.

Thus, these kind of matters handled by employer with sensitivity and extraordinary caring. Whenever a new system was introduced in an organizations, most of the employees are resists new system they think that they will get affected by the system. Employees are having different views about the work and meaning of job in an organization.

Thus, Person H has a responsibility to protect his employees and their livelihoods even though employees are opposed the new system of management philosophy. All the employees should be treated fairly and with respect and company’s obligation is to see that employers don’t abuse their power or mistreat their employees.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 8, Problem 1CTQ

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Company Z is an online shoe and clothing retailer in Country U. Person H is the Chief Operating Officer of Company Z. He tries to abolish the conventional management hierarchy and finds a different way to run a company such as manager less system of distributed authority known Holacracy.

It replaces the ideas of manager and traditional hierarchy of people in an organizational positions with roles which corresponds to the activity or a function. The manager less approach of holacracy is not for everyone in an organization but this system is for people who don’t want to be responsible for their own work which they are not comfortable with it.

This new system faced lot of confusion and resistance from the employees. This leads to downfall of company from popular Fortune magazine 100 best companies to work. However, Person H remains committed to this system and backs up his enthusiasm with the internal survey reports of employee happiness and other measures.

Characters in the case:

Company Z: Online shoe and clothing retailer

Person H: Chief Operating Officer of Company Z

To discuss: Whether Person H has a responsibility to protect his employee’s livelihoods even when they are opposed to management philosophy.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Generally employers are having a moral obligation to look for welfare of their employees. Moral obligations such as a fair pay and good working condition. Tests of an employer’s morality in the cases of layoffs, plant closing and other dramatic events of nature has an impact on psychology, and financial impact on the entire workforce which leads to decrease the reputation of the company.

Thus, these kind of matters handled by employer with sensitivity and extraordinary caring. Whenever a new system was introduced in an organizations, most of the employees are resists new system they think that they will get affected by the system. Employees are having different views about the work and meaning of job in an organization.

Thus, Person H has a responsibility to protect his employees and their livelihoods even though employees are opposed the new system of management philosophy. All the employees should be treated fairly and with respect and company’s obligation is to see that employers don’t abuse their power or mistreat their employees.

Answer 6

Chapter 8, Problem 1CTQ

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Company Z is an online shoe and clothing retailer in Country U. Person H is the Chief Operating Officer of Company Z. He tries to abolish the conventional management hierarchy and finds a different way to run a company such as manager less system of distributed authority known Holacracy.

It replaces the ideas of manager and traditional hierarchy of people in an organizational positions with roles which corresponds to the activity or a function. The manager less approach of holacracy is not for everyone in an organization but this system is for people who don’t want to be responsible for their own work which they are not comfortable with it.

This new system faced lot of confusion and resistance from the employees. This leads to downfall of company from popular Fortune magazine 100 best companies to work. However, Person H remains committed to this system and backs up his enthusiasm with the internal survey reports of employee happiness and other measures.

Characters in the case:

Company Z: Online shoe and clothing retailer

Person H: Chief Operating Officer of Company Z

To discuss: Whether Person H has a responsibility to protect his employee’s livelihoods even when they are opposed to management philosophy.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Generally employers are having a moral obligation to look for welfare of their employees. Moral obligations such as a fair pay and good working condition. Tests of an employer’s morality in the cases of layoffs, plant closing and other dramatic events of nature has an impact on psychology, and financial impact on the entire workforce which leads to decrease the reputation of the company.

Thus, these kind of matters handled by employer with sensitivity and extraordinary caring. Whenever a new system was introduced in an organizations, most of the employees are resists new system they think that they will get affected by the system. Employees are having different views about the work and meaning of job in an organization.

Thus, Person H has a responsibility to protect his employees and their livelihoods even though employees are opposed the new system of management philosophy. All the employees should be treated fairly and with respect and company’s obligation is to see that employers don’t abuse their power or mistreat their employees.

Answer 7

Chapter 8, Problem 1CTQ

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Company Z is an online shoe and clothing retailer in Country U. Person H is the Chief Operating Officer of Company Z. He tries to abolish the conventional management hierarchy and finds a different way to run a company such as manager less system of distributed authority known Holacracy.

It replaces the ideas of manager and traditional hierarchy of people in an organizational positions with roles which corresponds to the activity or a function. The manager less approach of holacracy is not for everyone in an organization but this system is for people who don’t want to be responsible for their own work which they are not comfortable with it.

This new system faced lot of confusion and resistance from the employees. This leads to downfall of company from popular Fortune magazine 100 best companies to work. However, Person H remains committed to this system and backs up his enthusiasm with the internal survey reports of employee happiness and other measures.

Characters in the case:

Company Z: Online shoe and clothing retailer

Person H: Chief Operating Officer of Company Z

To discuss: Whether Person H has a responsibility to protect his employee’s livelihoods even when they are opposed to management philosophy.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Generally employers are having a moral obligation to look for welfare of their employees. Moral obligations such as a fair pay and good working condition. Tests of an employer’s morality in the cases of layoffs, plant closing and other dramatic events of nature has an impact on psychology, and financial impact on the entire workforce which leads to decrease the reputation of the company.

Thus, these kind of matters handled by employer with sensitivity and extraordinary caring. Whenever a new system was introduced in an organizations, most of the employees are resists new system they think that they will get affected by the system. Employees are having different views about the work and meaning of job in an organization.

Thus, Person H has a responsibility to protect his employees and their livelihoods even though employees are opposed the new system of management philosophy. All the employees should be treated fairly and with respect and company’s obligation is to see that employers don’t abuse their power or mistreat their employees.