The person JP created a soft-drink and named it C on the basis of coca-leaves and kola nuts that were used as ingredients in the drink. The company CC prevented the American company K and others from using its trademark in their products. The company K of America and other companies alleged that CC trademark was a fraudulent misrepresentation because the name of the product represented that product contains cocaine, which it no longer did. To Find: The result of the case if the company CC had tried to make the common people believe that its products contained cocaine.

Question

a 45 year old patient was under doctor care for the past twenty years for chronic arthritis, trying many different drugs without success. A new drug appeared having been ceritifed by health canada and the doctor explained that like all the rest, the drug would have a range of side effects, among which was possible depression. The patient took the drug and within a week suffered a mood swing and committed suicide. Concerned by this new and two other cases, Health Canada suspended the drug from Canada, pending durtehr review. The family of deceased sued the paharmaceautical maker and Health Canada. Aside form issues of the doctor's possible professional liability, discuss the issues of manufacturer's liability and negligence raised in this scenario

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 8, Problem 1CT

Summary Introduction

Case summary:The person JP created a soft-drink and named it C on the basis of coca-leaves and kola nuts that were used as ingredients in the drink. The company CC prevented the American company K and others from using its trademark in their products. The company K of America and other companies alleged that CC trademark was a fraudulent misrepresentation because the name of the product represented that product contains cocaine, which it no longer did.

To Find: The result of the case if the company CC had tried to make the common people believe that its products contained cocaine.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

a 45 year old patient was under doctor care for the past twenty years for chronic arthritis, trying many different drugs without success. A new drug appeared having been ceritifed by health canada and the doctor explained that like all the rest, the drug would have a range of side effects, among which was possible depression. The patient took the drug and within a week suffered a mood swing and committed suicide. Concerned by this new and two other cases, Health Canada suspended the drug from Canada, pending durtehr review. The family of deceased sued the paharmaceautical maker and Health Canada. Aside form issues of the doctor's possible professional liability, discuss the issues of manufacturer's liability and negligence raised in this scenario

The general rule is that there is no duty to rescue another, absent a special relationship. Was the Court correct to impose a duty on the psychologist to a third party? What are the implications for a society where legal duties to rescue are enforced? What are your refined ideas about the relationship of law and ethical behavior?

Do you believe that the Papa John's CEO's behavior was ethical or unethical? Why? Should the public have taken more of a stance against his actions? If so, what action(s) could the public have taken? If not, give reasons why the public should not involve itself in such situations. Should the government have taken any action in this situation, given that the CEO was making a point against legislation it had introduced? If so, explain the action that you believe