
To determine: Select the better site using center of gravity.
Introduction: Location is where a firm chooses to site its operations. Location decisions can large effects on expenses and incomes. Location choices are normally quite imperative to both substantial and private companies. The area choice directly affects an operation's expenses and also its capacity to serve clients.

Answer to Problem 15P
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
It is given that L1 and L2 are two possible sites.
Destination | Quantity |
D1 | 900 |
D2 | 300 |
D3 | 700 |
D4 | 600 |
D5 | 1,200 |
Determine the coordinates of each destination using the given map:
Destination | X | Y | Quantity |
D1 | 1 | 2 | 900 |
D2 | 2 | 4 | 300 |
D3 | 3 | 1 | 700 |
D4 | 4 | 2 | 600 |
D5 | 5 | 3 | 1,200 |
Determine the total quantity
It is calculated by adding all the sum of quantity.
Determine the Center of gravity for the optional location for each distribution center
It is calculated by multiplying each destination value with the quantity of each destination and the result is divided by total quantity.
Determine the coordinates for L1 and L2.
The below are the coordinates for L1 and L2: which are found using the map
Determine the distance between each location and the center of gravity.
It is calculated by adding the difference in X coordinates with the difference in Y coordinates.
Hence, L2 is closer to the better site using center of gravity
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 8 Solutions
Operations Management (Comp. Instructor's Edition)
- Gas sales across type: 80% of gas sales tend to be regular. 15% midgrade, 5% tend to be premium. $0.10 increase in price per gallon tends to decrease gallons sold by 1 to 3%. Jan-0.87, Feb-0.95, Mar-1.00, Apr-1.05, May-1.08, Jun1.15, Jul-1.13, Aug-1.07, Sep-1.02, Oct-0.94, Nov-0.89, Dec-0.85. You want the MAPE to be below 20%, if ypu can get it to or below 10% they'll throw in extra $10k. Wont get bonus if it is above 11% or 20%. It cannot be over 20%.arrow_forwardhelp me choose the correct path please. There are other optionsarrow_forwardNegotiators can gain several benefits from using the strategy of multiple equivalent simultaneous offers. By offering multiple options it reduces the chance of rejection. It also improves the chances of reaching reaching an agreement. By presenting multiple offers, it shows you are flexible. agree with the postarrow_forward
- Negotiators can gain several benefits from using the strategy of multiple equivalent simultaneous offers. By offering multiple options it reduces the chance of rejection. It also improves the chances of reaching reaching an agreement. By presenting multiple offers, it shows you are flexible. disagree with this post or add on to the postarrow_forwardThe strategy of Multiple Equivalent Simultaneous Offers involves presenting several equally valuable options to the other party during negotiations. This approach benefits negotiators by creating flexibility and increasing the chances of finding a mutually agreeable solution. By offering multiple options, negotiators show that they are open to compromise, which can build trust and make the negotiation process smoother. It also helps avoid getting stuck on one issue, as the other party can choose from several alternatives that meet their needs. In my experience, using MESOs in a work negotiation helped both parties reach an agreement more quickly because each option was carefully thought out to address different needs, and this made it easier for us to settle on one that worked for both sides. This strategy can also reveal what is most important to the other party, helping negotiators understand their priorities better. agree or disagree with the postarrow_forwardExamine the conflicts between improving customer service levels and controlling costs in sales. Strategies to Balance Both customer service levels and controlling costs in sales 1.Outsourcing and workforce optimization 2. AI-driven customer supportarrow_forward
- how can you gain trust in a negotiation setting?arrow_forward✓ Custom $€ .0 .on File Home Insert Share Page Layout Formulas Data Review View Help Draw Arial 10 B B14 ✓ X✓ fx 1400 > 甘く 曲 > 冠 > Comments Editing ✓ . . . P Q R S T 3 A Production cost ($/unit) B с D E F G H J K L M N $74.00 4 Inventory holding cost ($/unit) $1.50 5 Lost sales cost ($/unit) $82.00 6 Overtime cost ($/unit) $6.80 7 Undertime cost ($/unit) $3.20 8 Rate change cost ($/unit) $5.00 9 Normal production rate (units) 2,000 10 Ending inventory (previous Dec.) 800 11 Cumulative 12 13 Month Demand Cumulative Demand Product Production Availability Ending Inventory Lost Cumulative Cumulative Product Sales 14 January 1,400 1,475 15 FUERANZ222222223323333BRUINE 14 February 1,000 2,275 Month January February Demand Demand Production Availability Ending Inventory Lost Sales 1,400 #N/A 1,475 #N/A #N/A #N/A 1,000 #N/A 2,275 #N/A #N/A #N/A 16 March 1,800 2,275 March 1,800 #N/A 2,275 #N/A #N/A #N/A 17 April 2,700 2,275 April 2,700 #N/A 2,275 #N/A #N/A #N/A 18 May 3,000 2,275 May 3,000 #N/A…arrow_forwardFollow guidelines and summarize in a paragrapharrow_forward
- Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage LearningManagement, Loose-Leaf VersionManagementISBN:9781305969308Author:Richard L. DaftPublisher:South-Western College Pub


