(a)
Identify the 2011 and 2012 real
(a)
Explanation of Solution
Table-1 shows the value of nominal GDP and the GDP deflator as follows:
Table-1 | ||||
Nominal GDP (Billions of currency) |
GDP deflator (2005=100) | |||
Country | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 |
U | 15,075.7 | 15,684.8 | 113.4 | 115.4 |
C | 1,718.7 | 1,817.6 | 115.2 | 119.7 |
J | 470,623 | 475,867.9 | 91.6 | 91.6 |
I | 1,579.2 | 1,566.3 | 112.7 | 112.7 |
A | 1,444.6 | 1,488.3 | 127.4 | 127.4 |
UK | 1,515.8 | 1,541.5 | 117.1 | 117.1 |
The real GDP can be calculated using the formula as follows:
Substitute the respective values in equation (1) to calculate the rea; GDP of country U.
Therefore, the real GDP of Country U in 2011 is $13,294.2 billion.
Table-2 shows the value of the real GDP in 2011 and 2012, which is calculated using Equation-1 as follows:
Table-2 | ||||||
Nominal GDP (Billions of currency) | GDP deflator |
Real GDP |
Real GDP | |||
Country | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 |
U | 15,075.7 | 15,684.8 | 113.4 | 115.4 | 13,294.2 | 1,3591.68 |
C | 1,718.7 | 1,817.6 | 115.2 | 119.7 | 1,491.92 | 1,518.46 |
J | 470,623 | 475,867.9 | 92.4 | 91.6 | 509,332.25 | 519,506.44 |
I | 1,579.2 | 1,566.3 | 110.9 | 112.7 | 1,423.98 | 1,389.79 |
A | 1,444.6 | 1,488.3 | 128.1 | 127.4 | 1,127.7 | 1,168.21 |
UK | 1,515.8 | 1,541.5 | 115.5 | 117.1 | 1,312.38 | 1,316.39 |
(b)
Identify the inflation rate in 2012.
(b)
Explanation of Solution
The inflation rate in 2014 can be calculated using the formula as follows:
Use Equation-2 to calculate the inflation rate of Country U in 2014 as follows:
Therefore, the inflation rate is 1.76%.
Table-3 shows the value of the inflation rate, which is calculated using Equation-2 as follows:
Table-3 | |||||||
Nominal GDP (Billions of currency) | GDP deflator |
Real GDP |
Real GDP | Inflation rate | |||
Country | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2012 |
U | 15,075.7 | 15,684.8 | 113.4 | 115.4 | 13,294.2 | 1,3591.68 | 1.76% |
C | 1,718.7 | 1,817.6 | 115.2 | 119.7 | 1,491.92 | 1,518.46 | 3.90% |
J | 470,623 | 475,867.9 | 92.4 | 91.6 | 509,332.25 | 519,506.44 | -0.86% |
I | 1,579.2 | 1,566.3 | 110.9 | 112.7 | 1,423.98 | 1,389.79 | 1.62% |
A | 1,444.6 | 1,488.3 | 128.1 | 127.4 | 1,127.7 | 1,168.21 | -0.54% |
UK | 1,515.8 | 1,541.5 | 115.5 | 117.1 | 1,312.38 | 1,316.39 | 1.38% |
(c)
Identify the country that has the highest growth rate of real GDP.
(c)
Explanation of Solution
The growth rate can be calculated using the formula as follows:
Use Equatrion-3 to calculate the growth rate of real GDP as follows:
Therefore, the growth rate of real GDP is 2.237%.
Table-4 shows the growth rate in 2012, which is calculated using the Equation-3 as follows:
Table-4 | |||||||||||
Nominal GDP | Real GDP | Inflation rate | Growth rate | ||||||||
Country | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2012 | 2012 | |||||
U | 15,075.7 | 15,684.8 | 13,294.2 | 13,591.68 | 1.76% | 2.237% | |||||
C | 1,718.7 | 1,817.6 | 1,491.92 | 1,518.46 | 3.90% | 1.778% | |||||
J | 470,623 | 475,867.9 | 509,332.25 | 519,506.44 | -0.86% | 1.997% | |||||
I | 1,579.2 | 1,566.3 | 1,423.98 | 1,389.79 | 1.62% | -2.40% | |||||
A | 1,444.6 | 1,488.3 | 1,127.7 | 1,168.21 | -0.54% | 3.592% | |||||
UK | 1,515.8 | 1,541.5 | 1,312.38 | 1,316.39 | 1.38% | 0.305% |
According to Table-4, Country A has the highest growth rate of real GDP, which is 3.592% and Country I has the lowest growth rate of real GDP, which is -2.40%.
(d)
Identify the countries that have the highest and lowest inflation rate.
(d)
Explanation of Solution
According to Table-3, Country C has the highest inflation rate, which is 3.90% and Country J has the lowest inflation rate, which is -0.86%.
(e)
Identify the country that has the most inflation
(e)
Explanation of Solution
According to the data from Table-4, Country C has the highest inflation rate, which is 3.90%. Therefore, Country C has the most inflation during 2012.
Inflation: Inflation is a sustained rise in the price level of a selected basket of goods and service for a particular period.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 8 Solutions
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Course List)
- answerarrow_forwardDiscuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- For the statement below, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statement. Incompetent leaders can't be ethical leaders. Traditional leadership theories and moral standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues.arrow_forwardpresentation on "Dandelion Insomnia." Poemarrow_forwardDon't used Ai solutionarrow_forward
- "Whether the regulator sells or gives away tradeable emission permits free of charge, the quantities of emissions produced by firms are the same." Assume that there are n identical profit-maximising firms where profit for each firm is given by π(e) with л'(e) > 0; π"(e) < 0 and e denotes emissions. Individual emissions summed over all firms gives E which generates environmental damages D(E). Show that the regulator achieves the optimal level of total pollution through a tradeable emission permit scheme, where the permits are distributed according to the following cases: Case (i) the firm purchases all permits; Case (ii) the firm receives all permits free; and Page 3 of 5 ES30031 Case (iii) the firm purchases a portion of its permits and receives the remainder free of charge.arrow_forwardcompare and/or contrast the two plays we've been reading, Antigone and A Doll's House.arrow_forwardPlease answer step by steparrow_forward
- Suppose there are two firms 1 and 2, whose abatement costs are given by c₁ (e₁) and C2 (е2), where e denotes emissions and subscripts denote the firm. We assume that c{(e) 0 for i = 1,2 and for any level of emission e we have c₁'(e) # c₂' (e). Furthermore, assume the two firms make different contributions towards pollution concentration in a nearby river captured by the transfer coefficients ε₁ and 2 such that for any level of emission e we have C₂'(e) # The regulator does not know the resulting C₁'(e) Τι environmental damages. Using an analytical approach explain carefully how the regulator may limit the concentration of pollution using (i) a Pigouvian tax scheme and (ii) uniform emissions standards. Discuss the cost-effectiveness of both approaches to control pollution.arrow_forwardBill’s father read that each year a car’s value declines by 10%. He also read that a new car’s value declines by 12% as it is driven off the dealer’s lot. Maintenance costs and the costs of “car problems” are only $200 per year during the 2-year warranty period. Then they jump to $750 per year, with an annual increase of $500 per year.Bill’s dad wants to keep his annual cost of car ownership low. The car he prefers cost $30,000 new, and he uses an interest rate of 8%. For this car, the new vehicle warranty is transferrable.(a) If he buys the car new, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(b) If he buys the car after it is 2 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(c) If he buys the car after it is 4 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(d) If he buys the car after it is 6 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(e) What strategy do you recommend? Why? Please show each step and formula,…arrow_forwardO’Leary Engineering Corp. has been depreciating a $50,000 machine for the last 3 years. The asset was just sold for 60% of its first cost. What is the size of the recaptured depreciation or loss at disposal using the following depreciation methods?(a) Straight-line with N = 8 and S = 2000(b) Double declining balance with N = 8(c) 40% bonus depreciation with the balance using 7-year MACRS Please show every step and formula, don't use excel. The answer should be (a) $2000 loss, (b) $8000 deo recap, (c) $14257 dep recap, thank you.arrow_forward
- Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506756Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning