
Concept explainers
Explanation of Solution
Given:
Five employees are available for performing four jobs. The time taken to perform each job by each of the person is given in the following table:
Time | (hours) | |||
Person | Job 1 | Job 2 | Job 3 | Job 4 |
1 | 22 | 18 | 30 | 18 |
2 | 18 | M | 27 | 22 |
3 | 26 | 20 | 28 | 28 |
4 | 16 | 22 | M | 14 |
5 | 21 | M | 25 | 28 |
To Determine:
Find an optimal assignment order of jobs to minimize the total time required for performing four jobs using Hungarian method.
Assignment of employees to jobs:
Step 1:
Add another column for Job 5 with zero costs, since the table is not balanced.
Time | (hours) | ||||
Person | Job 1 | Job 2 | Job 3 | Job 4 | Job 5 |
1 | 22 | 18 | 30 | 18 | 0 |
2 | 18 | M | 27 | 22 | 0 |
3 | 26 | 20 | 28 | 28 | 0 |
4 | 16 | 22 | M | 14 | 0 |
5 | 21 | M | 25 | 28 | 0 |
Step 2:
Take minimum from each row and subtract from the corresponding row. The new resultant table will be as follows:
Time | (hours) | ||||
Person | Job 1 | Job 2 | Job 3 | Job 4 | Job 5 |
1 | 22 | 18 | 30 | 18 | 0 |
2 | 18 | M | 27 | 22 | 0 |
3 | 26 | 20 | 28 | 28 | 0 |
4 | 16 | 22 | M | 14 | 0 |
5 | 21 | M | 25 | 28 | 0 |
Minimum | 16 | 18 | 25 | 14 | 0 |
Step 3:
Take minimum from each column and subtract from the corresponding column. The new resultant table will be as follows:
Time | (hours) | ||||
Person | Job 1 | Job 2 | Job 3 | Job 4 | Job 5 |
1 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 0 |
2 | 2 | M | 2 | 8 | 0 |
3 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 0 |
4 | 0 | 4 | M | 0 | 0 |
5 | 5 | M | 0 | 14 | 0 |
Step 4:
Draw minimum number of lines for covering all zeros in the resultant table...

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

Chapter 7 Solutions
Operations Research : Applications and Algorithms
- Need help with coding in this in python!arrow_forwardIn the diagram, there is a green arrow pointing from Input C (complete data) to Transformer Encoder S_B, which I don’t understand. The teacher model is trained on full data, but S_B should instead receive missing data—this arrow should not point there. Please verify and recreate the diagram to fix this issue. Additionally, the newly created diagram should meet the same clarity standards as the second diagram (Proposed MSCATN). Finally provide the output image of the diagram in image format .arrow_forwardPlease provide me with the output image of both of them . below are the diagrams code make sure to update the code and mentionned clearly each section also the digram should be clearly describe like in the attached image. please do not provide the same answer like in other question . I repost this question because it does not satisfy the requirment I need in terms of clarifty the output of both code are not very well details I have two diagram : first diagram code graph LR subgraph Teacher Model (Pretrained) Input_Teacher[Input C (Complete Data)] --> Teacher_Encoder[Transformer Encoder T] Teacher_Encoder --> Teacher_Prediction[Teacher Prediction y_T] Teacher_Encoder --> Teacher_Features[Internal Features F_T] end subgraph Student_A_Model[Student Model A (Handles Missing Values)] Input_Student_A[Input M (Data with Missing Values)] --> Student_A_Encoder[Transformer Encoder E_A] Student_A_Encoder --> Student_A_Prediction[Student A Prediction y_A] Student_A_Encoder…arrow_forward
- Why I need ?arrow_forwardHere are two diagrams. Make them very explicit, similar to Example Diagram 3 (the Architecture of MSCTNN). graph LR subgraph Teacher_Model_B [Teacher Model (Pretrained)] Input_Teacher_B[Input C (Complete Data)] --> Teacher_Encoder_B[Transformer Encoder T] Teacher_Encoder_B --> Teacher_Prediction_B[Teacher Prediction y_T] Teacher_Encoder_B --> Teacher_Features_B[Internal Features F_T] end subgraph Student_B_Model [Student Model B (Handles Missing Labels)] Input_Student_B[Input C (Complete Data)] --> Student_B_Encoder[Transformer Encoder E_B] Student_B_Encoder --> Student_B_Prediction[Student B Prediction y_B] end subgraph Knowledge_Distillation_B [Knowledge Distillation (Student B)] Teacher_Prediction_B -- Logits Distillation Loss (L_logits_B) --> Total_Loss_B Teacher_Features_B -- Feature Alignment Loss (L_feature_B) --> Total_Loss_B Partial_Labels_B[Partial Labels y_p] -- Prediction Loss (L_pred_B) --> Total_Loss_B Total_Loss_B -- Backpropagation -->…arrow_forwardPlease provide me with the output image of both of them . below are the diagrams code I have two diagram : first diagram code graph LR subgraph Teacher Model (Pretrained) Input_Teacher[Input C (Complete Data)] --> Teacher_Encoder[Transformer Encoder T] Teacher_Encoder --> Teacher_Prediction[Teacher Prediction y_T] Teacher_Encoder --> Teacher_Features[Internal Features F_T] end subgraph Student_A_Model[Student Model A (Handles Missing Values)] Input_Student_A[Input M (Data with Missing Values)] --> Student_A_Encoder[Transformer Encoder E_A] Student_A_Encoder --> Student_A_Prediction[Student A Prediction y_A] Student_A_Encoder --> Student_A_Features[Student A Features F_A] end subgraph Knowledge_Distillation_A [Knowledge Distillation (Student A)] Teacher_Prediction -- Logits Distillation Loss (L_logits_A) --> Total_Loss_A Teacher_Features -- Feature Alignment Loss (L_feature_A) --> Total_Loss_A Ground_Truth_A[Ground Truth y_gt] -- Prediction Loss (L_pred_A)…arrow_forward
- Operations Research : Applications and AlgorithmsComputer ScienceISBN:9780534380588Author:Wayne L. WinstonPublisher:Brooks ColeA Guide to SQLComputer ScienceISBN:9781111527273Author:Philip J. PrattPublisher:Course Technology PtrNp Ms Office 365/Excel 2016 I NtermedComputer ScienceISBN:9781337508841Author:CareyPublisher:Cengage
- C++ for Engineers and ScientistsComputer ScienceISBN:9781133187844Author:Bronson, Gary J.Publisher:Course Technology PtrCOMPREHENSIVE MICROSOFT OFFICE 365 EXCEComputer ScienceISBN:9780357392676Author:FREUND, StevenPublisher:CENGAGE L


