a)
Whether it is true, false, or ambiguous if the marginal productivity theory of income distribution is inconsistent with the presence of income disparities associated with gender, race, or ethnicity.
a)
Explanation of Solution
It is false because differences in marginal productivity are correlated with gender, race, or ethnicity among people or workers as income disparities are associated with them. The major source for this correlation can be past discrimination because it affects the marginal productivity of individuals such as restricting the workers to acquire human capital that can easily support them to increase their productivity. Moreover, this correlation can be incurred with the differences in work experience related to gender, race, or ethnicity such as women earning lower wages as compared to men with the assumption that women take more leaves from work for childcare. Therefore, this is false.
Introduction: According to the marginal productivity theory of income distribution, every individual will receive wage or income according to the total contribution or output that they produce.
b)
Whether it is true, false, or ambiguous if companies engage in workplace discrimination but these companies’ competitors do not are likely to have lower profits as a result of their actions.
b)
Explanation of Solution
This is true because when competitors of companies do not are likely to hire less able workers then companies discriminate against more able workers who can be considered the wrong gender, race, or ethnicity. Moreover, companies may earn fewer profits as compared to their competitors who are not involved in discrimination.
Introduction: According to the marginal productivity theory of income distribution, every individual will receive wage or income according to the total contribution or output that they produce.
Discrimination is an unjust treatment based on different categories such as age, sex, religion, etc.
c)
Whether it is true, false, or ambiguous if workers who are paid less because they have less experience are not the victims of discrimination.
c)
Explanation of Solution
This is ambiguous because if workers are paid less due to their less experience, then they may or may not be the victims of discrimination as it depends on the reason for their lack of experience. For example, if workers are young or they are involved in any other businesses before applying for the job, then they may have less experience and they would not be the victims of discrimination if they are paid less as this was their decision to choose another business rather than gaining experience in a particular field. But if workers have less experience due to their previous job discrimination, then they are the victims of discrimination if they are paid less in their current job.
Introduction: According to the marginal productivity theory of income distribution, every individual will receive wage or income according to the total contribution or output that they produce.
Discrimination is an unjust treatment based on different categories such as age, sex, religion, etc.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 73 Solutions
Krugman's Economics For The Ap® Course
- Consider the simple discrete job search model that we studied in class. Only the unemployed can receive one offer per period from F(w) that is a uniform distribution on [0,2]. There is a constant probability of being laid off at the end of each period while employed. Assume that she can get a new offer right away when laid off. We want to understand the reservation wage, WR, in this model. Assume that u(c) = c. The parameters are a discount factor ẞ and an unemployment benefit b.R and show that T is contraction on [0, ∞). Explicitly state any additional assumptions that you may need.(Grading guide line: 5pt for the exact form of T, 10pt for showing contraction, and 5pt for stating correct assumptions.)< (b) Discuss why (a) is useful to understand the reservation wage wд in this economy.< (c) We write WR = WR (b,ẞ,λ) to reveal its dependence on (b,ẞ,λ). Show that 0 ≤ aWR дь OWR дл ≤1 and ≥0. What about ? awR ав State any additional assumptions that you may need.< (d) Briefly explain the…arrow_forward3. Consider the market for paper. The process of producing paper creates pollution. Assume that the marginal damage function for pollution is given by: MDF = 3E where damages are measured in dollars and E is the level of emissions. Assume further that the function describing the marginal abatement cost of emissions is given by MAC 120-E where benefits are measured in dollars and E is the level of emissions. a. Graph the marginal damage function (MDF) and the marginal abatement cost function (MAC). b. What is the unregulated level of emissions Eu? What is the social welfare of this emissions level? c. Assume an existing emission quota limits emissions to E = 60. Show on the graph why this policy is inefficient. What is the deadweight loss caused by this policy?arrow_forwardshow written calculation for Barrow_forward
- Problem 1: 1. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 forever, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 5%? 2. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 forever, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 8%? 3. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 this year, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 8% and dividends are expected to grow at a rate of 2% per year?arrow_forwardd-farrow_forwardG please!arrow_forward
- 4. Consider two polluting firms, with the marginal abatement costs of polluters 1 and 2, respectively, equal to MAC₁ = 20-E1 MAC2 = 12-E2 a. What is the unregulated level of pollution for each firm? b. Assume policymakers have decided to cut the level of pollution in half. The way they intend to accomplish this goal is to require both firms to cut their pollution in half. What are the total costs of abatement from the policy? And how are these costs distributed between the firms? c. Is this uniform quota on emissions across firms the most cost-effective manner in which to reduce emissions by 50%?arrow_forwardDon't used hand raiting and don't used Ai solutionarrow_forwardThanks in advance!arrow_forward
- I need help figuring this out. I'm pretty sure this is correct?If Zambia is open to international trade in oranges without any restrictions, it will import 180 tons of oranges.I can't figure these two out: 1) Suppose the Zambian government wants to reduce imports to exactly 60 tons of oranges to help domestic producers. A tariff of ???? per ton will achieve this. 2) A tariff set at this level would raise ????in revenue for the Zambian government.arrow_forward16:10 ← BEC 3701 - Assignments-... KWAME NKRUMAH UNIVERSITY TEACHING FOR EXCELLENCE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE ADVANCED MICRO-ECONOMICS (BEC 3701) Assignments INSTRUCTIONS: Check instructions below: LTE 1) Let u(q1,q2) = ln q₁ + q2 be the (direct) utility function, where q₁ and q2the two goods. Denote P₁ and P2 as the prices of those two goods and let M be per period money income. Derive each of the following: a) the ordinary or Marshallian demand functions q₁ = d₂ (P₁, P₂, M) for i = 1,2 [3 Marks] b) the compensated or Hicksian demand functions q₁ = h₂ (P₁, P2, M) for i = 1,2 [3 Marks] c) the Indirect Utility Function uº = v(P₁, P2, M) [3 Marks] d) the Expenditure Function E(P1, P2, U°) [3 Marks] e) Draw a diagram of the solution. There should be two graphs, one above the other; the first containing the indifference curves and budget constraint that characterize the solution to the consumer's choice problem; the second characterizing the demand…arrow_forwardHow would you answer the question in the News Wire “Future Living Standards”? Why?arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education