Sub part (a):
Equilibrium price and quantity.
Sub part (a):
Explanation of Solution
We have seen the
| Quantity demanded | Quantity supplied |
More than $7 | 0 | 4 |
$5 to $7 | 1 | 3 |
$3 to $5 | 2 | 2 |
$1 to $3 | 3 | 1 |
$ or less | 4 | 0 |
We can form the new table in which the quantity demanded and supplied at price points $2, $4 and $6 can be represented as follows:
Price | Quantity demanded | Quantity supplied |
$2 | 3 | 1 |
$4 | 2 | 2 |
$6 | 1 | 3 |
From the above table, we can easily identify that the quantity demanded and the quantity supplied are equal only at the price point of $4. Thus, the equilibrium price is $4 and the
Concept introduction:
Equilibrium price: It is the market price determined by equating the supply to the demand. At this equilibrium point, the supply will be equal to the demand and there will be no excess demand or
Sub part (b):
The consumer surplus and the producer surplus of water bottles.
Sub part (b):
Explanation of Solution
The value that the individual gives to the first bottle of water is $7, whereas the actual price paid by the individual is only $4 which means the individual gets a consumer surplus of $3 from the first bottle that he consumes. For the second bottle, the value that the individual gives is $5 and the price is $4. Here also, he receives the consumer surplus of $1but for the third bottle of water the value to the consumer is only $3, whereas the price is higher than the value and thus, he will not consume beyond 2 bottles. Thus the consumer surplus can be calculated by adding together the consumer surplus from the first bottle and the second bottle as follows:
Thus, the consumer surplus at price of $4 per bottle of water is $4.
The cost that the seller incurs to the first bottle of water is $1, whereas the actual price paid by the individual is only $4 which means the producer gets a surplus of $3 from the first bottle that he sells. For the second bottle, the value that the individual gives is $4 and the cost is only $3. Here also, he receives the producer surplus of $1. Thus the producer surplus can be calculated by adding together the surplus from the first bottle and the second bottle as follows:
Thus, the producer surplus at price of $4 per bottle of water is $4.
Thus, the total surplus of the economy can be calculated by adding the consumer surplus and the producer surplus together as follows:
Thus, the total surplus is $8.
Concept introduction:
Producer surplus: It is the difference between the lowest willing to accept price by the seller and the actual price that the seller receives for the commodity.
Consumer surplus: It is the difference between the highest willing price of the consumer and the actual price that the consumer pays.
Equilibrium price: It is the market price determined by equating the supply to the demand. At this equilibrium point, the supply will be equal to the demand and there will be no excess demand or excess supply in the economy. Thus, the economy will be at equilibrium.
Subpart (c):
The consumer surplus and the producer surplus of water bottles.
Subpart (c):
Explanation of Solution
The value that the individual gives to the first bottle of water is $7, whereas the actual price paid by the individual is only $4 which means the individual gets a consumer surplus of $3 from the first bottle that he consumes. Similarly the cost that the seller incurs to the first bottle of water is $1, whereas the actual price paid by the individual is only $4 which means the producer gets a surplus of $3 from the first bottle that he sells.
Thus, if the seller has produced only 1 bottle of water and the consumer had purchased only one bottle of water, each of them would receive a surplus of only $3. The total surplus can be then calculated by summating them together as follows:
Thus, the total surplus is $6. Thus, with decline in consumption and production by 1 unit, the total surplus declines by $2.
Concept introduction:
Producer surplus: It is the difference between the lowest willing to accept price by the seller and the actual price that the seller receives for the commodity.
Consumer surplus: It is the difference between the highest willing price of the consumer and the actual price that the consumer pays.
Equilibrium price: It is the market price determined by equating the supply to the demand. At this equilibrium point, the supply will be equal to the demand and there will be no excess demand or excess supply in the economy. Thus, the economy will be at equilibrium.
Subpart (d):
Total surplus of water bottles.
Subpart (d):
Explanation of Solution
When the producer produces 1 more unit of bottle, the cost for him will become $5, whereas the price remains at $4. This means that the total producer surplus will decline by $1 due to the additional cost of production. Then, the total producer surplus will become $3 and it declines by $1.
Similarly, when the consumer consumes 1 more unit of bottle of water, the cost becomes $4, whereas the value from the third bottle to him will be only $3 which means that the consumer surplus will decline by $1 here. Thus, the total decline in the total surplus can be calculated by summating the decline in the producer surplus and the consumer surplus as follows:
Thus, the total surplus declines by $2 when the producer produces one more bottle of water and the consumer consumes one more bottle of water.
Concept introduction:
Producer surplus: It is the difference between the lowest willing to accept price by the seller and the actual price that the seller receives for the commodity.
Consumer surplus: It is the difference between the highest willing price of the consumer and the actual price that the consumer pays.
Equilibrium price: It is the market price determined by equating the supply to the demand. At this equilibrium point, the supply will be equal to the demand and there will be no excess demand or excess supply in the economy. Thus, the economy will be at equilibrium.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 7 Solutions
EBK PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS
- Suppose you have the three scenarios proposed below. Using the language of the Levy and Meltzer paper, Scenario(s). Scenario(s) _ can best be described as a randomized experiment. can best be described as an observational study, and Scenario A: Researchers randomly assign some individuals to a high-intensity workout program and others to a low-intensity program. They then track the participants to see how their cardiovascular health changes over time. Scenario B: Researchers randomly assign individuals to receive varying levels of nutrition education. They track participants and see how eating habits changed. Scenario C: Researchers have data on individuals' workout habits and their cardiovascular health. They use this data to describe the relationship between workout intensity and cardiovascular health. A; B and C A; B and C × A and B; C C; A and B B and C; Aarrow_forwardSuppose you observe that when the price of a particular vitamin supplement_ by 3%, the quantity purchased increased by 0.9%. This implies that this vitamin supplement is price in demand and that the price elasticity of demand is equal to _ ☑ rises; inelastic; 0.3 O O rises; inelastic; 0.9 falls; inelastic; 0.3 rises; elastic; 3 falls; inelastic; 0.9arrow_forwardA manager asks an employee, "Should we use our research budget to improve the quality of the products we already make, or to develop new products?" The manager's question is best classified as which one of the following fundamental economic questions?arrow_forward
- Suppose that the hypothetical country of Paddyland suffers a chronic scarcity of its staple grain, rice. True or False: Paddyland must be a developing country, since scarcity is not a problem in developed countries.arrow_forwardKnowledge Check 01 Cyber Devices manufactures PCTV products that enable people to watch television content on their computers. It sells its product to retailers for $50. A tuner component that goes into each of these devices costs $5 to acquire. The total variable cost at an activity level of 1,000 units equals q, $50,000 $5 $1,000 $5,000J owing statements about opportunity costs is not correct? An opportunity cost is the potential benefit that is given up when one alternative is selected over another. An opportunity cost cannot be changed by any decision made now or in the future. Opportunity costs are not usually found in accounting records. Opportunity costs are costs that must be explicitly considered in every decision a manager makes.arrow_forwardnotarrow_forward
- 1. Child Care That Cares A group of your friends got together and decided to start a childcare business in their town. The town currently has three other childcare centers. The clients are mostly the children of working parents. Your friends realize that they are going to enter a market that already has competition and that they will have to compete for the same customers. Their goal is to attract as many customers as possible, keep their prices within reach, be different, and at the same time make profits in the long run. Your friends approached you to ask you the following questions to help them make the best business decision: If we provide a bit different services than the competition, such as longer hours, healthy lunch, and smaller staff to children ratio, do you think we can charge significantly higher prices than our competition? Explain why. Given that we have competition, what do we need to do to make our business profitable? How can we determine whether we are making…arrow_forward2. Truck or Train? They both move, right? Your uncle and aunt operate a food truck near a busy train station. Their primary customers are commuters who work in another town. They told you that it costs them about $1,000 daily to run the food truck from 7:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. (on average $100 per hour). They average $1,500 in revenue per day. They want to make more money, and they have the idea of extending their hours until 9:00 p.m. daily. They want your opinion, so they ask you the following questions: If we extend our hours from 5:00 p.m. to either 7:00 pm or 9:00 p.m., how do we know it’s worth it? How do we know that it is beneficial to close later knowing that every additional hour of operation costs us $100? Do you think it is a good idea to raise our prices to increase our revenues? How do we know if raising prices is beneficial to us? What should we do if our costs exceed our revenues over time? Should we stay in business or shut down? Why?arrow_forwardNAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) is an agreement that does what? Allows the free migration of people between countries in North America Limits tariffs and trade restrictions Ensures that all countries have strong environmental and workers rights regulations All of the abovearrow_forward
- The percentage of people employed in the primary sector in North America has ________ over the last 100 years. Increased Decreased Stayed at about the same level Fluctuatedarrow_forwardThe percentage of people employed in the primary sector in North America has ________ over the last 100 years. Increased Decreased Stayed at about the same level Fluctuatedarrow_forwardWhich of the following is an example of employment in the primary sector? Car salesman Miner College professor Carpenterarrow_forward
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, IncEconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning