Sub part (a):
Equilibrium price and quantity.
Sub part (a):
Explanation of Solution
We have seen the
| Quantity demanded | Quantity supplied |
More than $7 | 0 | 4 |
$5 to $7 | 1 | 3 |
$3 to $5 | 2 | 2 |
$1 to $3 | 3 | 1 |
$ or less | 4 | 0 |
We can form the new table in which the quantity demanded and supplied at price points $2, $4 and $6 can be represented as follows:
Price | Quantity demanded | Quantity supplied |
$2 | 3 | 1 |
$4 | 2 | 2 |
$6 | 1 | 3 |
From the above table, we can easily identify that the quantity demanded and the quantity supplied are equal only at the price point of $4. Thus, the equilibrium price is $4 and the
Concept introduction:
Equilibrium price: It is the market price determined by equating the supply to the demand. At this equilibrium point, the supply will be equal to the demand and there will be no excess demand or
Sub part (b):
The consumer surplus and the producer surplus of water bottles.
Sub part (b):
Explanation of Solution
The value that the individual gives to the first bottle of water is $7, whereas the actual price paid by the individual is only $4 which means the individual gets a consumer surplus of $3 from the first bottle that he consumes. For the second bottle, the value that the individual gives is $5 and the price is $4. Here also, he receives the consumer surplus of $1but for the third bottle of water the value to the consumer is only $3, whereas the price is higher than the value and thus, he will not consume beyond 2 bottles. Thus the consumer surplus can be calculated by adding together the consumer surplus from the first bottle and the second bottle as follows:
Thus, the consumer surplus at price of $4 per bottle of water is $4.
The cost that the seller incurs to the first bottle of water is $1, whereas the actual price paid by the individual is only $4 which means the producer gets a surplus of $3 from the first bottle that he sells. For the second bottle, the value that the individual gives is $4 and the cost is only $3. Here also, he receives the producer surplus of $1. Thus the producer surplus can be calculated by adding together the surplus from the first bottle and the second bottle as follows:
Thus, the producer surplus at price of $4 per bottle of water is $4.
Thus, the total surplus of the economy can be calculated by adding the consumer surplus and the producer surplus together as follows:
Thus, the total surplus is $8.
Concept introduction:
Producer surplus: It is the difference between the lowest willing to accept price by the seller and the actual price that the seller receives for the commodity.
Consumer surplus: It is the difference between the highest willing price of the consumer and the actual price that the consumer pays.
Equilibrium price: It is the market price determined by equating the supply to the demand. At this equilibrium point, the supply will be equal to the demand and there will be no excess demand or excess supply in the economy. Thus, the economy will be at equilibrium.
Subpart (c):
The consumer surplus and the producer surplus of water bottles.
Subpart (c):
Explanation of Solution
The value that the individual gives to the first bottle of water is $7, whereas the actual price paid by the individual is only $4 which means the individual gets a consumer surplus of $3 from the first bottle that he consumes. Similarly the cost that the seller incurs to the first bottle of water is $1, whereas the actual price paid by the individual is only $4 which means the producer gets a surplus of $3 from the first bottle that he sells.
Thus, if the seller has produced only 1 bottle of water and the consumer had purchased only one bottle of water, each of them would receive a surplus of only $3. The total surplus can be then calculated by summating them together as follows:
Thus, the total surplus is $6. Thus, with decline in consumption and production by 1 unit, the total surplus declines by $2.
Concept introduction:
Producer surplus: It is the difference between the lowest willing to accept price by the seller and the actual price that the seller receives for the commodity.
Consumer surplus: It is the difference between the highest willing price of the consumer and the actual price that the consumer pays.
Equilibrium price: It is the market price determined by equating the supply to the demand. At this equilibrium point, the supply will be equal to the demand and there will be no excess demand or excess supply in the economy. Thus, the economy will be at equilibrium.
Subpart (d):
Total surplus of water bottles.
Subpart (d):
Explanation of Solution
When the producer produces 1 more unit of bottle, the cost for him will become $5, whereas the price remains at $4. This means that the total producer surplus will decline by $1 due to the additional cost of production. Then, the total producer surplus will become $3 and it declines by $1.
Similarly, when the consumer consumes 1 more unit of bottle of water, the cost becomes $4, whereas the value from the third bottle to him will be only $3 which means that the consumer surplus will decline by $1 here. Thus, the total decline in the total surplus can be calculated by summating the decline in the producer surplus and the consumer surplus as follows:
Thus, the total surplus declines by $2 when the producer produces one more bottle of water and the consumer consumes one more bottle of water.
Concept introduction:
Producer surplus: It is the difference between the lowest willing to accept price by the seller and the actual price that the seller receives for the commodity.
Consumer surplus: It is the difference between the highest willing price of the consumer and the actual price that the consumer pays.
Equilibrium price: It is the market price determined by equating the supply to the demand. At this equilibrium point, the supply will be equal to the demand and there will be no excess demand or excess supply in the economy. Thus, the economy will be at equilibrium.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 7 Solutions
Bundle: Principles of Economics, 8th + MindTap Economics, 1 term (6 months) Printed Access Card
- While visiting and chatting with an old friend who lives in a rural area, a man's teenage daughter joins the conversation and shared that she wants to work on a farm after she graduates from college and that farming is her passion. She shared the graph that follows from the Bureau of Labor Statistics that she recently obtained that shows the average wage (salary) by profession. She was very confused about why different professions pay people different wages. She was expecting the pay rate for people who work in the farming industry to be paid more than other “unnecessary” professions. While sharing the data with you, she asked the following questions: Why do workers in business and financial operations get paid more than those who work in farming and health care? After all, farmers make food and health care workers help people’s health. I don’t get it, but who decides how much people in certain professions get paid? I mean who decides how much I should be compensated for my work? Why…arrow_forwardcaib 2 questions pleasearrow_forwardhow can a sugery drink like pepsi have a tax rise and not loose its customers ?arrow_forward
- Is competition good for business? Is it good for consumers? Explain why or why not for botharrow_forwardInstructions:- Need to do in assembly language. Submit your DOC file with all explanation, also submit your code file. no chatgpt pls no plagirism plsarrow_forward'producing more goods and services lowers environmental quality' is not the correct answer.arrow_forward
- A movement along an economy's production possibility frontier with output on one axis and environmental quality on the other shows that: technological improvements may lead to a sustainable economy with higher consumption in the future and better an improved environment. producing more goods and services lowers environmental quality. producing more goods and services raises environmental quality. a high use of natural resources to produce more goods and services today may lead to an unsustainable economy with lower consumption in the future.arrow_forwardDon't used Ai solutionarrow_forward= - 12. Recall the market setting in Question 3, where the demand curve is P = 10 – 2Q, and mar- ginal cost is c 2. Now suppose that two firms, numbered 1 and 2 compete over this de- mand curve. They produce quantities Q₁ and Q2, hence total output is given by Q = Q1+Q2. The best response function of firm 1 to firm 2, labeled Q₁ = B₁ (Q2) is given by (a) 2-2Q2 - 4 (b) 2-Q2 (c) 2 – 02 Q2 Q2 (d) 2- (e) 2-Q 4 13. In the previous question, the Cournot-Nash equilibrium quantity produced by each firm is (a) 1 (d) 2 (b) 3 2 (e) 52 (c) 43 3arrow_forward
- 2. Sweet taxes make the world sweeter! According to a study conducted by the World Health Organization, noncommunicable diseases, such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic lung disease, and stroke, are the main leading causes of deaths—almost 90% worldwide. These diseases also have social and economic costs. Cardiovascular diseases, for example, cost the economy of the European Union about 210 billion Euro in 2015. One method some European countries adopted to try to reduce the death rate from those leading causes was to impose high taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages. Assume that your next president loves the idea of sugar taxes and proposes a 30% tax on all sugary beverages in the country. And assume you are a marketing manager at a company that makes sugary soft drinks. The owner of the company heard the news and came to you for advice and asked you the following questions: So, buddy, should I be worried about our business if this sugar tax policy is implemented? Why? How do…arrow_forward3. The world is more beautiful with just a bit of makeup. Your friend Nora is an artist, and she loves makeup, so she decided to become a beautician. She recently began recording videos of herself applying makeup to others and posting those videos on social media. She typically charges about $250 for full facial makeup for special occasions like weddings, engagement parties, graduation parties, and so forth. Her work is great, and her videos made her famous on social media outlets, and now she has over 500,000 followers. The demand for her services has risen. People have to book her months in advance if they want her to do their makeup. She was excited about her success, and she wants to take advantage of it, so she wants to learn more about her opportunities and has texted you the following questions: Now people want my services so badly, do you think I should raise my prices from $250 to $500 to make more revenue (sales)? Or should I reduce my price to $150? Please educate me on…arrow_forwardDon't used Ai solution and hand raitingarrow_forward
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, IncEconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning