Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk. An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor. However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse. Characters in the case: Person E: The patient Person X: The employee of the hospital Doctor Nurse To discuss: The priority involved in Person E’s care that is related to the health, well-being, and safety.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 7, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The priority involved in Person E’s care that is related to the health, well-being, and safety.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The evidence in the nursing literature supports practicing as directed by the protocol.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The indication to the nurses to respond to the given situation by safety literature.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

1. Outline some potential causes of epilepsy (3 marks) 2. Explain the mechanism of action of the antiepileptic drug carbamazepine and mention one thing that patients should be aware of when taking it (4 marks) 3. What are neural tube defects and how do they relate to antiepileptic drugs? (3 marks) 4. What class does sertraline belong to and what is it’s mechanism of action? 5. Explain what “serotonin syndrome” is and how it is thought to occur at a pharmacological level? In your answer include at least TWO symptoms of this condition. (4 marks) 6. Lithium toxicity can result from high concentrations of lithium in the blood. What are the signs of lithium toxicity and what are TWO classes of drugs that might interact with lithium? (3 marks) 7. The following questions relate to antipsychotics a)Antagonist activity at which receptor is most likely to be responsible for causing drowsiness? (1 mark) b)Antipsychotics might also cause hyperprolactinemia. Antagonist activity at which…

Help me solve this problem using dimensional analysis. The doctor writes an order to infuse a solution. The order reads : “Infuse 500 mL bag at 20 gtt/min.” The drip factor is 10gtt/mL. You start the IV infusion at 0500. At what time will the infusion be complete? Please be detailed. I typically write the order, the time I started at and what I need to find which is my time completed.

Schizophrenia Instructions:  Instrument/ Tool criteria:  For each assessment you are tasked with selecting, you will identify an instrument and:  List what DSM diagnosis the tool/instrument is used for. Identify an assessment/diagnosis instrument. Appraise a scholarly, peer-reviewed article that addresses the use of the instrument to support your choice as an evidence-based instrument for practice.  Evaluate the instrument’s appropriateness for diagnosing the condition it is designed to assess or if the developers of the instrument reported that the instrument is only part of a comprehensive assessment for the disorder.  Describe whether or not the instrument can be used to measure patient response to therapy/treatment or if it is strictly for assessment and diagnosis.  Discuss the psychometrics/scoring of the instrument, including reliability and validity.  Discuss any limitations associated with the use of the instrument.

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 7, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The priority involved in Person E’s care that is related to the health, well-being, and safety.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The evidence in the nursing literature supports practicing as directed by the protocol.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The indication to the nurses to respond to the given situation by safety literature.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 7, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The priority involved in Person E’s care that is related to the health, well-being, and safety.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The evidence in the nursing literature supports practicing as directed by the protocol.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The indication to the nurses to respond to the given situation by safety literature.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 7, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The priority involved in Person E’s care that is related to the health, well-being, and safety.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The evidence in the nursing literature supports practicing as directed by the protocol.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The indication to the nurses to respond to the given situation by safety literature.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 5

Chapter 7, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The priority involved in Person E’s care that is related to the health, well-being, and safety.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The evidence in the nursing literature supports practicing as directed by the protocol.

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The indication to the nurses to respond to the given situation by safety literature.

Answer 6

Chapter 7, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The priority involved in Person E’s care that is related to the health, well-being, and safety.

Answer 7

Chapter 7, Problem 4RP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The priority involved in Person E’s care that is related to the health, well-being, and safety.

Answer 8

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The evidence in the nursing literature supports practicing as directed by the protocol.

Answer 9

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The evidence in the nursing literature supports practicing as directed by the protocol.

Answer 10

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The indication to the nurses to respond to the given situation by safety literature.

Answer 11

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person X worked in the emergency department of a reputed hospital. The hospital had a good relationship with the patients but one incident made the life of the patient at risk.

An 8 year old child patient called Person E came with a right forearm fracture. The ED protocol states that a person must always be there with the child to take care because of diazepam sedation. The assisted doctor was working for more than 14 hours, hence, he asked the nurse to do the procedures. The nurse was a fresh graduate and is not comfortable in giving drugs and also, she does not wish to disturb the doctor.

However, she went and gave the dose against the protocol. The action of the nurse undermined the safety of the patient and this led to the act of negligence by both the doctor and the nurse.

Characters in the case:

Person E: The patient

Person X: The employee of the hospital

Doctor

Nurse

To discuss:

The indication to the nurses to respond to the given situation by safety literature.

Answer 12

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 13

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 14

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 15

Ch. 7 - Prob. 1RP Ch. 7 - Prob. 2RP Ch. 7 - Prob. 3RP Ch. 7 - Prob. 4RP Ch. 7 - Prob. 5RP Ch. 7 - Prob. 1DCR Ch. 7 - Prob. 2DCR Ch. 7 - Prob. 3DCR Ch. 7 - Prob. 4DCR Ch. 7 - Prob. 5DCR

Concept explainers

Videos

Want to see the full answer?

Chapter 7 Solutions