1.
Ascertain the product cost for all the products using all three methods.
1.
Explanation of Solution
Compute the joint production and
Physical Measure Method:
Particulars | Y64 | G22 | X17 | Total |
Price | $10.50 | $6.75 | $4.22 | |
Units produced | 22,000 | 45,500 | 18,000 | 85,500 |
Separable | $65,500 | $34,250 | $55,400 | $155,150 |
Sales price at split-off | $2.24 | $2.88 | $0.44 | |
Sales value | $231,000 | $307,125 | $75,960 | $614,085 |
Sales value at split-off | $49,280 | $131,040 | $7,920 | $188,240 |
Increase in sales value | $116,220 | $141,835 | $12,640 | |
Units produced | 22,000 | 45,500 | 18,000 | $85,500 |
Percentage of Total | 25.7310% | 53.2164% | 21.0526% | |
Joint cost allocation | $91,602 | $189,450 | $74,947 | $356,000 |
Add: Separable Costs | $65,500 | $34,250 | $55,400 | $155,150 |
Total costs | $157,102 | $223,700 | $130,347 | |
(÷) Units produced | 22,000 | 45,500 | 18,000 | |
Cost per Unit | $7.1410 | $4.9165 | $7.2415 | |
Sales | $231,000 | $307,125 | $75,960 | $614,085 |
Allocated Costs | $91,602 | $189,450 | $74,947 | $356,000 |
Add: Separable Costs | $65,500 | $34,250 | $55,400 | $155,150 |
Total costs | $157,102 | $223,700 | $130,347 | $511,150 |
Gross Margin | $73,898 | $83,425 | ($54,387) | $102,936 |
Table (1)
Sales value at split-off Method:
Particulars | Y64 | G22 | X17 | Total |
Price | $10.50 | $6.75 | $4.22 | |
Separable Processing Costs | $65,500 | $34,250 | $55,400 | $155,150 |
Units produced | 22,000 | 45,500 | 18,000 | 85,500 |
Total Joint Cost | $356,000 | |||
Sales price at split-off | $2.24 | $2.88 | $0.44 | |
Sales value | $231,000 | $307,125 | $75,960 | $614,085 |
Sales value at split-off | $49,280 | $131,040 | $7,920 | $188,240 |
Sales Value at split-off | $49,280 | $131,040 | $7,920 | $188,240 |
Percentage of Total sales value | 26.1793% | 69.6133% | 4.2074% | 100.0000% |
Joint cost allocation | $93,198 | $247,823 | $14,978 | $356,000 |
Add: Separable Costs | $65,500 | $34,250 | $55,400 | $155,150 |
Total costs | $158,698 | $282,073 | $70,378 | |
(÷) Units produced | 22,000 | 45,500 | 18,000 | |
Cost per Unit | $7.2135 | $6.1994 | $3.9099 | |
Sales | $231,000 | $307,125 | $75,960 | $614,085 |
Allocated Costs | $93,198 | $247,823 | $14,978 | $356,000 |
Add: Separable Costs | $65,500 | $34,250 | $55,400 | $155,150 |
Total costs | $158,698 | $282,073 | $70,378 | $511,150 |
Gross Margin | $72,302 | $25,052 | $5,582 | $102,936 |
Table (2)
Net Realizable Value Method:
Particulars | Y64 | G22 | X17 | Total |
Price | $10.50 | $6.75 | $4.22 | |
Separable Processing Costs | $65,500 | $34,250 | $55,400 | $155,150 |
Units produced | 22,000 | 45,500 | 18,000 | 85,500 |
Total Joint Cost | $356,000 | $356,000 | ||
Sales value | $231,000 | $307,125 | $75,960 | $614,085 |
Sales Value of production | $231,000 | $307,125 | $75,960 | $614,085 |
Less: Separable Costs | $65,500 | $34,250 | $55,400 | $155,150 |
Sales Value at split-off | $165,500 | $272,875 | $20,560 | $458,935 |
Percentage of Total sales value | 36.0618% | 59.4583% | 4.4799% | 100.0000% |
Joint cost allocation | $128,380 | $211,672 | $15,949 | $356,000 |
Add: Separable Costs | $65,500 | $34,250 | $55,400 | $155,150 |
Total costs | $193,880 | $245,922 | $71,349 | $511,150 |
(÷) Units produced | 22,000 | 45,500 | 18,000 | |
Cost per Unit | $8.8127 | $5.4049 | $3.9638 | |
Sales | $231,000 | $307,125 | $75,960 | $614,085 |
Allocated Costs | $128,380 | $211,672 | $15,949 | $356,000 |
Add: Separable Costs | $65,500 | $34,250 | $55,400 | $155,150 |
Total costs | $193,880 | $245,922 | $71,349 | $511,150 |
Gross Margin | $37,120 | $61,203 | $4,611 | $102,935 |
Table (3)
2.
Ascertain the most appropriate method of cost allocation.
2.
Explanation of Solution
The Net Realizable Method would be the most preferred as all the products are further processed and this method records all the separable costs.
3.
Ascertain the products to be processed beyond the split off point and comment on the decision of Person Y.
3.
Explanation of Solution
The decision made by Person Y is acceptable as all the three products have better revenue after the further processing. Thus, its acceptable to process all the products.
4.
Ascertain the effectiveness of the strategy of Person Y.
4.
Explanation of Solution
The decision made by Person Y to reduce the recycling costs would be encouraged by the management. The customers are growing more aware of the environmental issues and are happy to pay a higher price, if the products are environmental friendly. Making use of the recycled product itself is an unique selling point for the company, and shall bring in more customers.
5.
Identify the issues Person Y should consider to execute the strategy effectively.
5.
Explanation of Solution
The issues faced by Person Y include:
- Source of raw materials and the quality of the goods
- Transportation charges involved in transit of raw materials
- Environmental risks related to transport of raw materials
- Changes in the foreign exchange prices and losses due to them
6.
Identify the steps to be taken by Person Y, to improve the overall operational efficiency.
6.
Explanation of Solution
Person Y may try the following steps to improve the overall operational efficiency:
- Reduce the waste resulting from the process of recycling
- Reducing the energy consumption in the production process
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 7 Solutions
Loose Leaf for Cost Management: A Strategic Emphasis
- AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337272094Author:WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Accounting Information SystemsAccountingISBN:9781337619202Author:Hall, James A.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
- Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis...AccountingISBN:9780134475585Author:Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. RajanPublisher:PEARSONIntermediate AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259722660Author:J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M ThomasPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationFinancial and Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259726705Author:John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting PrinciplesPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education