To compute B + : To compute B +, the closure of an attribute “B” over a set of functional dependencies “F”, refer the algorithm in Figure 7.19 of the textbook. The result is initialized to {B}. For the first repetition, The condition is not satisfied in first and second functional dependency. The condition B is a subset of {B} is satisfied for the functional dependency B → D Hence “D” is added to the result. Therefore, the result = {B,D}. The condition “D” is a subset of {B,D} is satisfied for the functional dependency D → A Hence “A” is added to the result

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Expert Solution & Answer

Chapter 7, Problem 30E

a.

Explanation of Solution

To compute B⁺:

To compute B^+, the closure of an attribute “B” over a set of functional dependencies “F”, refer the algorithm in Figure 7.19 of the textbook.

The result is initialized to {B}.

For the first repetition,

The condition is not satisfied in first and second functional dependency.

The condition B is a subset of {B} is satisfied for the functional dependency B→D Hence “D” is added to the result.

Therefore, the result = {B,D}.

The condition “D” is a subset of {B,D} is satisfied for the functional dependency D→A Hence “A” is added to the result

b.

Explanation of Solution

To prove:

“AG” is super key.

Proof:

This can be proved by proving the existence of functional dependency so that AG→ABCDEG It is given that A→BCD.

The union of the similar sets is the set with itself (AA=A).

To get A→ABCD, use Armstrong’s augmentation axiom with “A”.

BC→DE is given and to get ABCD→ABCDE, use Armstrong’s augmentation axiom with ABCD

c.

Explanation of Solution

Canonical cover:

“D” is irrelevant in first and second dependencies because of third dependency.

Hence remove the attribute “D” from the first and second functional dependencies to achieve A→BC and BC→E.

According to the sub-part “a”, B⁺ is computed as {B,D,A,C,E}.

The functional dependency B→E can be determined from the above set and from this the functional dependency BC→E becomes irrelevant

d.

Explanation of Solution

Third Normal Form (3NF) decomposition:

In the canonical cover, functional dependency is exists such that the attribute set id is a subset of other dependency.

Hence, each functional dependency will generate its own relation.

The relations according to the functional dependencies in the canonical cover are,

r1(A,B,C)

r2(B,D,E)

r3(D,A)

“G” has to part of all super keys as it is not dependent on any attribute...

e.

Explanation of Solution

Boyce-Codd Normal Form (BCNF) decomposition:

To compute the BCNF decomposition of the schema relation “r” using the original set “F” of functional dependency, follow the steps below,

For the relation not being in BCNF, the first original functional dependency is responsible.

So, according to first functional dependency , the original relation is decomposed as follows,
...

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Why is Linux popular? What would make someone choose a Linux OS over others? What makes a server? How is a server different from a workstation? What considerations do you have to keep in mind when choosing between physical, hybrid, or virtual server and what are the reasons to choose a virtual installation over the other options?

Objective you will: 1. Implement a Binary Search Tree (BST) from scratch, including the Big Five (Rule of Five) 2. Implement the TreeSort algorithm using a in-order traversal to store sorted elements in a vector. 3. Compare the performance of TreeSort with C++'s std::sort on large datasets. Part 1: Understanding TreeSort How TreeSort Works TreeSort is a comparison-based sorting algorithm that leverages a Binary Search Tree (BST): 1. Insert all elements into a BST (logically sorting them). 2. Traverse the BST in-order to extract elements in sorted order. 3. Store the sorted elements in a vector. Time Complexity Operation Average Case Worst Case (Unbalanced Tree)Insertion 0(1log n) 0 (n)Traversal (Pre-order) 0(n) 0 (n)Overall Complexity 0(n log n) 0(n^2) (degenerated tree) Note: To improve performance, you could use a…

I need help fixing the minor issue where the text isn't in the proper place, and to ensure that the frequency cutoff is at the right place. My code: % Define frequency range for the plot f = logspace(1, 5, 500); % Frequency range from 10 Hz to 100 kHz w = 2 * pi * f; % Angular frequency % Parameters for the filters - let's adjust these to get more reasonable cutoffs R = 1e3; % Resistance in ohms (1 kΩ) C = 1e-6; % Capacitance in farads (1 μF) % For bandpass, we need appropriate L value for desired cutoffs L = 0.1; % Inductance in henries - adjusted for better bandpass response % Calculate cutoff frequencies first to verify they're in desired range f_cutoff_RC = 1 / (2 * pi * R * C); f_resonance = 1 / (2 * pi * sqrt(L * C)); Q_factor = (1/R) * sqrt(L/C); f_lower_cutoff = f_resonance / (sqrt(1 + 1/(4*Q_factor^2)) + 1/(2*Q_factor)); f_upper_cutoff = f_resonance / (sqrt(1 + 1/(4*Q_factor^2)) - 1/(2*Q_factor)); % Transfer functions % Low-pass filter (RC) H_low = 1 ./ (1 + 1i * w *…

Answer 2

Expert Solution & Answer

Chapter 7, Problem 30E

a.

Explanation of Solution

To compute B⁺:

To compute B^+, the closure of an attribute “B” over a set of functional dependencies “F”, refer the algorithm in Figure 7.19 of the textbook.

The result is initialized to {B}.

For the first repetition,

The condition is not satisfied in first and second functional dependency.

The condition B is a subset of {B} is satisfied for the functional dependency B→D Hence “D” is added to the result.

Therefore, the result = {B,D}.

The condition “D” is a subset of {B,D} is satisfied for the functional dependency D→A Hence “A” is added to the result

b.

Explanation of Solution

To prove:

“AG” is super key.

Proof:

This can be proved by proving the existence of functional dependency so that AG→ABCDEG It is given that A→BCD.

The union of the similar sets is the set with itself (AA=A).

To get A→ABCD, use Armstrong’s augmentation axiom with “A”.

BC→DE is given and to get ABCD→ABCDE, use Armstrong’s augmentation axiom with ABCD

c.

Explanation of Solution

Canonical cover:

“D” is irrelevant in first and second dependencies because of third dependency.

Hence remove the attribute “D” from the first and second functional dependencies to achieve A→BC and BC→E.

According to the sub-part “a”, B⁺ is computed as {B,D,A,C,E}.

The functional dependency B→E can be determined from the above set and from this the functional dependency BC→E becomes irrelevant

d.

Explanation of Solution

Third Normal Form (3NF) decomposition:

In the canonical cover, functional dependency is exists such that the attribute set id is a subset of other dependency.

Hence, each functional dependency will generate its own relation.

The relations according to the functional dependencies in the canonical cover are,

r1(A,B,C)

r2(B,D,E)

r3(D,A)

“G” has to part of all super keys as it is not dependent on any attribute...

e.

Explanation of Solution

Boyce-Codd Normal Form (BCNF) decomposition:

To compute the BCNF decomposition of the schema relation “r” using the original set “F” of functional dependency, follow the steps below,

For the relation not being in BCNF, the first original functional dependency is responsible.

So, according to first functional dependency , the original relation is decomposed as follows,
...

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 3

Expert Solution & Answer

Chapter 7, Problem 30E

a.

Explanation of Solution

To compute B⁺:

To compute B^+, the closure of an attribute “B” over a set of functional dependencies “F”, refer the algorithm in Figure 7.19 of the textbook.

The result is initialized to {B}.

For the first repetition,

The condition is not satisfied in first and second functional dependency.

The condition B is a subset of {B} is satisfied for the functional dependency B→D Hence “D” is added to the result.

Therefore, the result = {B,D}.

The condition “D” is a subset of {B,D} is satisfied for the functional dependency D→A Hence “A” is added to the result

b.

Explanation of Solution

To prove:

“AG” is super key.

Proof:

This can be proved by proving the existence of functional dependency so that AG→ABCDEG It is given that A→BCD.

The union of the similar sets is the set with itself (AA=A).

To get A→ABCD, use Armstrong’s augmentation axiom with “A”.

BC→DE is given and to get ABCD→ABCDE, use Armstrong’s augmentation axiom with ABCD

c.

Explanation of Solution

Canonical cover:

“D” is irrelevant in first and second dependencies because of third dependency.

Hence remove the attribute “D” from the first and second functional dependencies to achieve A→BC and BC→E.

According to the sub-part “a”, B⁺ is computed as {B,D,A,C,E}.

The functional dependency B→E can be determined from the above set and from this the functional dependency BC→E becomes irrelevant

d.

Explanation of Solution

Third Normal Form (3NF) decomposition:

In the canonical cover, functional dependency is exists such that the attribute set id is a subset of other dependency.

Hence, each functional dependency will generate its own relation.

The relations according to the functional dependencies in the canonical cover are,

r1(A,B,C)

r2(B,D,E)

r3(D,A)

“G” has to part of all super keys as it is not dependent on any attribute...

e.

Explanation of Solution

Boyce-Codd Normal Form (BCNF) decomposition:

To compute the BCNF decomposition of the schema relation “r” using the original set “F” of functional dependency, follow the steps below,

For the relation not being in BCNF, the first original functional dependency is responsible.

So, according to first functional dependency , the original relation is decomposed as follows,
...

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 4

Expert Solution & Answer

Chapter 7, Problem 30E

a.

Explanation of Solution

To compute B⁺:

To compute B^+, the closure of an attribute “B” over a set of functional dependencies “F”, refer the algorithm in Figure 7.19 of the textbook.

The result is initialized to {B}.

For the first repetition,

The condition is not satisfied in first and second functional dependency.

The condition B is a subset of {B} is satisfied for the functional dependency B→D Hence “D” is added to the result.

Therefore, the result = {B,D}.

The condition “D” is a subset of {B,D} is satisfied for the functional dependency D→A Hence “A” is added to the result

b.

Explanation of Solution

To prove:

“AG” is super key.

Proof:

This can be proved by proving the existence of functional dependency so that AG→ABCDEG It is given that A→BCD.

The union of the similar sets is the set with itself (AA=A).

To get A→ABCD, use Armstrong’s augmentation axiom with “A”.

BC→DE is given and to get ABCD→ABCDE, use Armstrong’s augmentation axiom with ABCD

c.

Explanation of Solution

Canonical cover:

“D” is irrelevant in first and second dependencies because of third dependency.

Hence remove the attribute “D” from the first and second functional dependencies to achieve A→BC and BC→E.

According to the sub-part “a”, B⁺ is computed as {B,D,A,C,E}.

The functional dependency B→E can be determined from the above set and from this the functional dependency BC→E becomes irrelevant

d.

Explanation of Solution

Third Normal Form (3NF) decomposition:

In the canonical cover, functional dependency is exists such that the attribute set id is a subset of other dependency.

Hence, each functional dependency will generate its own relation.

The relations according to the functional dependencies in the canonical cover are,

r1(A,B,C)

r2(B,D,E)

r3(D,A)

“G” has to part of all super keys as it is not dependent on any attribute...

e.

Explanation of Solution

Boyce-Codd Normal Form (BCNF) decomposition:

To compute the BCNF decomposition of the schema relation “r” using the original set “F” of functional dependency, follow the steps below,

For the relation not being in BCNF, the first original functional dependency is responsible.

So, according to first functional dependency , the original relation is decomposed as follows,
...

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 5

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 6

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 7

Chapter 7, Problem 30E

a.

Explanation of Solution

To compute B⁺:

To compute B^+, the closure of an attribute “B” over a set of functional dependencies “F”, refer the algorithm in Figure 7.19 of the textbook.

The result is initialized to {B}.

For the first repetition,

The condition is not satisfied in first and second functional dependency.

The condition B is a subset of {B} is satisfied for the functional dependency B→D Hence “D” is added to the result.

Therefore, the result = {B,D}.

The condition “D” is a subset of {B,D} is satisfied for the functional dependency D→A Hence “A” is added to the result

b.

Explanation of Solution

To prove:

“AG” is super key.

Proof:

This can be proved by proving the existence of functional dependency so that AG→ABCDEG It is given that A→BCD.

The union of the similar sets is the set with itself (AA=A).

To get A→ABCD, use Armstrong’s augmentation axiom with “A”.

BC→DE is given and to get ABCD→ABCDE, use Armstrong’s augmentation axiom with ABCD

c.

Explanation of Solution

Canonical cover:

“D” is irrelevant in first and second dependencies because of third dependency.

Hence remove the attribute “D” from the first and second functional dependencies to achieve A→BC and BC→E.

According to the sub-part “a”, B⁺ is computed as {B,D,A,C,E}.

The functional dependency B→E can be determined from the above set and from this the functional dependency BC→E becomes irrelevant

d.

Explanation of Solution

Third Normal Form (3NF) decomposition:

In the canonical cover, functional dependency is exists such that the attribute set id is a subset of other dependency.

Hence, each functional dependency will generate its own relation.

The relations according to the functional dependencies in the canonical cover are,

r1(A,B,C)

r2(B,D,E)

r3(D,A)

“G” has to part of all super keys as it is not dependent on any attribute...

e.

Explanation of Solution

Boyce-Codd Normal Form (BCNF) decomposition:

To compute the BCNF decomposition of the schema relation “r” using the original set “F” of functional dependency, follow the steps below,

For the relation not being in BCNF, the first original functional dependency is responsible.

So, according to first functional dependency , the original relation is decomposed as follows,
...

Answer 8

Chapter 7, Problem 30E

a.

Explanation of Solution

To compute B⁺:

To compute B^+, the closure of an attribute “B” over a set of functional dependencies “F”, refer the algorithm in Figure 7.19 of the textbook.

The result is initialized to {B}.

For the first repetition,

The condition is not satisfied in first and second functional dependency.

The condition B is a subset of {B} is satisfied for the functional dependency B→D Hence “D” is added to the result.

Therefore, the result = {B,D}.

The condition “D” is a subset of {B,D} is satisfied for the functional dependency D→A Hence “A” is added to the result

Answer 9

Chapter 7, Problem 30E

a.

Explanation of Solution

To compute B⁺:

To compute B^+, the closure of an attribute “B” over a set of functional dependencies “F”, refer the algorithm in Figure 7.19 of the textbook.

The result is initialized to {B}.

For the first repetition,

The condition is not satisfied in first and second functional dependency.

The condition B is a subset of {B} is satisfied for the functional dependency B→D Hence “D” is added to the result.

Therefore, the result = {B,D}.

The condition “D” is a subset of {B,D} is satisfied for the functional dependency D→A Hence “A” is added to the result

Answer 10

b.

Explanation of Solution

To prove:

“AG” is super key.

Proof:

This can be proved by proving the existence of functional dependency so that AG→ABCDEG It is given that A→BCD.

The union of the similar sets is the set with itself (AA=A).

To get A→ABCD, use Armstrong’s augmentation axiom with “A”.

BC→DE is given and to get ABCD→ABCDE, use Armstrong’s augmentation axiom with ABCD

Answer 11

b.

Explanation of Solution

To prove:

“AG” is super key.

Proof:

This can be proved by proving the existence of functional dependency so that AG→ABCDEG It is given that A→BCD.

The union of the similar sets is the set with itself (AA=A).

To get A→ABCD, use Armstrong’s augmentation axiom with “A”.

BC→DE is given and to get ABCD→ABCDE, use Armstrong’s augmentation axiom with ABCD

Answer 12

c.

Explanation of Solution

Canonical cover:

“D” is irrelevant in first and second dependencies because of third dependency.

Hence remove the attribute “D” from the first and second functional dependencies to achieve A→BC and BC→E.

According to the sub-part “a”, B⁺ is computed as {B,D,A,C,E}.

The functional dependency B→E can be determined from the above set and from this the functional dependency BC→E becomes irrelevant

Answer 13

c.

Explanation of Solution

Canonical cover:

“D” is irrelevant in first and second dependencies because of third dependency.

Hence remove the attribute “D” from the first and second functional dependencies to achieve A→BC and BC→E.

According to the sub-part “a”, B⁺ is computed as {B,D,A,C,E}.

The functional dependency B→E can be determined from the above set and from this the functional dependency BC→E becomes irrelevant

Answer 14

d.

Explanation of Solution

Third Normal Form (3NF) decomposition:

In the canonical cover, functional dependency is exists such that the attribute set id is a subset of other dependency.

Hence, each functional dependency will generate its own relation.

The relations according to the functional dependencies in the canonical cover are,

r1(A,B,C)

r2(B,D,E)

r3(D,A)

“G” has to part of all super keys as it is not dependent on any attribute...

Answer 15

d.

Explanation of Solution

Third Normal Form (3NF) decomposition:

In the canonical cover, functional dependency is exists such that the attribute set id is a subset of other dependency.

Hence, each functional dependency will generate its own relation.

The relations according to the functional dependencies in the canonical cover are,

r1(A,B,C)

r2(B,D,E)

r3(D,A)

“G” has to part of all super keys as it is not dependent on any attribute...

Answer 16

e.

Explanation of Solution

Boyce-Codd Normal Form (BCNF) decomposition:

To compute the BCNF decomposition of the schema relation “r” using the original set “F” of functional dependency, follow the steps below,

For the relation not being in BCNF, the first original functional dependency is responsible.

So, according to first functional dependency , the original relation is decomposed as follows,
...

Answer 17

e.

Explanation of Solution

Boyce-Codd Normal Form (BCNF) decomposition:

To compute the BCNF decomposition of the schema relation “r” using the original set “F” of functional dependency, follow the steps below,

For the relation not being in BCNF, the first original functional dependency is responsible.

So, according to first functional dependency , the original relation is decomposed as follows,
...

Answer 18

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 19

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 20

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 21

Ch. 7 - Prob. 1PE Ch. 7 - Prob. 2PE Ch. 7 - Explain how functional dependencies can be used to...Ch. 7 - Prob. 4PE Ch. 7 - Prob. 5PE Ch. 7 - Prob. 6PE Ch. 7 - Prob. 7PE Ch. 7 - Prob. 8PE Ch. 7 - Prob. 9PE Ch. 7 - Prob. 10PE

Explanation of Solution

Explanation of Solution

Explanation of Solution

Explanation of Solution

Explanation of Solution

Want to see the full answer?

Chapter 7 Solutions