a.
Introduction: Audit is the activity performed by the professional known as the auditor. In audit the validity and reliability of the information given by the company is correct of not. True and fair view of the books of accounts is shown in the
Concerned topic for potential auditor that inherent and control risks at Kid Castle.
b.
Introduction: Audit is the activity performed by the professional known as the auditor. In audit the validity and reliability of the information given by the company is correct of not. True and fair view of the books of accounts is shown in the balance sheet of the company and annually present to the shareholder and boards of director of the company.
Review the financial statements and decision taken by the auditor that is likely to be concluded that there was a heightened risk of fraud.
c.
Introduction: Audit is the activity performed by the professional known as the auditor. In audit the validity and reliability of the information given by the company is correct of not. True and fair view of the books of accounts is shown in the balance sheet of the company and annually present to the shareholder and boards of director of the company.
Recommendation for the auditor plan to conduct more substantive
d.
Introduction: Audit is the activity performed by the professional known as the auditor. In audit the validity and reliability of the information given by the company is correct of not. True and fair view of the books of accounts is shown in the balance sheet of the company and annually present to the shareholder and boards of director of the company.
Give details about the appropriateness of hiring a foreign audit firm to conduct the majority of audit work on an engagements and on BSP’s action.
e.
Introduction: Audit is the activity performed by the professional known as the auditor. In audit the validity and reliability of the information given by the company is correct of not. True and fair view of the books of accounts is shown in the balance sheet of the company and annually present to the shareholder and boards of director of the company.
Design the frame work for showing quality professional decisions and where the things were wrong and other changes that should have been implied for different result.
f.
Introduction: Audit is the activity performed by the professional known as the auditor. In audit the validity and reliability of the information given by the company is correct of not. True and fair view of the books of accounts is shown in the balance sheet of the company and annually present to the shareholder and boards of director of the company.
The risk involved by audit firm in attempting to audit a company in an international location.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 7 Solutions
Bundle: Auditing: A Risk Based-approach, 11th + Mindtap Accounting, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card
- Jones & Jones, CPAS, a one-office public accounting firm, has been asked to audit Majestic Mfg. Co. for the 20X3 calendar year. Majestic is not a public interest entity as that term is defined in the Conceptual Framework for AICPA Independence Standards. A survey of Jones & Jones personnel revealed several instances where relationships with Majestic might impair independence. The partners of Jones & Jones want the audit engagement, but they will not terminate any staff person or ask any partner to resign to obtain the work. With the restriction on non-termination of partners or staff, which of the following is a threat to Jones and Jones' independence with Majestic? 1. Olson, a professional staff person, below the rank of manager, has been employed full time with Jones & Jones since August 20X2. Olson was also a director of Majestic for the first nine months of 20X2. II. Swanson is a manager with Jones & Jones. He had been treasurer of Majestic from January 20X0 through March 20X2. He…arrow_forwardFleming and Company CPAs, issued an unqualified opinion the 20x3 financial statements of Walton Corporation Late in 20X4, Walton determined that its controller had embezzled over $2,000,000. Fleming was unaware of the embezzlement. Walton has decided to sue Fleming to recover the $2,000,000. The suit is based upon Fleming's failure to discover the missing money while performing the audit. Which of the following is Fleming's best defense? Multiple Choice The controller was Walton's agent and as such had designed the controls which facilitated the embezzlement Fleming had no knowledge of the embezzlement. That the audit was performed in accordance with GAAS The financial statements were presented in conformity with GAAP.arrow_forwardRoss & Ross, CPAS, performed an audit of the financial statements of Ruby Manufacturing for the year ended December 31, 20X7 and issued their report on March 2, 20X8. As of April 1, 20X8, due to various circumstances, Ross & Ross was no longer independent from Ruby Manufacturing and did not perform any further audits of the company's financial statements. On June 15, 20X8, Ross & Ross was asked to re-sign the audited financial statements of Ruby Manufacturing for the year ended December 31, 20x7. Which of the following is TRUE regarding this situation? Since Ross & Ross, CPAS are no longer independent of Ruby Manufacturing, they may not re-sign the audit report. If post audit work was performed after March 2, 20X8, Ross & Ross, CPAs would not be able to re-sign the report. If post audit work was performed from April 1, 20X8 until June 15, 20X8, Ross & Ross, CPAs would not be able to re-sign the report. Since Ross & Ross, CPAS was independent at the time the report was issued, there is…arrow_forward
- Jones & Jones, CPAs, a one-office public accounting firm, has been asked to audit Majestic Mfg. Co. for the 20X3 calendar year. Majestic is not a public interest ent ity as that term is defined in the Conceptual Framework for AICPA Independence Standards. A survey of Jones & Jones personnel revealed several instances where relationships with Majestic might impair independence. The partners of Jones & Jones want the audit engagement, but they will not terminate any staff person or ask any partner to resign to obtain the work. With the restriction on non-termination of partners or staff, which of the following is a threat to Jones and Jones' independence with Majestic? 1. Olson, a professional staff person, below the rank of manager, has been employed full time with Jones & Jones since August 20X2. Olson was also a director of Majestic for the first nine months of 20X2. II. Swanson is a manager with Jones & Jones. He had been treasurer of Majestic from January 20XO through March 20X2. He…arrow_forwardIn an audit of the Marco Corporation as of December 31, 2013,the following situations exist. No entries have been made in the accounting records inrelation to these items.1. During the year 2013, the Marco Corporation was named as a defendant in a suit fordamages by the Dalton Company for breach of contract. An adverse decision to theMarco Corporation was rendered and the Dalton Company was awarded $4,000,000damages. At the time of the audit, the case was under appeal to a higher court.2. On December 23, 2013, the Marco Corporation declared a common stock dividendof 1,000 shares with a par value of $1,000,000 of its common stock, payableFebruary 2, 2014, to the common stockholders of record December 30, 2013.3. The Marco Corporation has guaranteed the payment of interest on the 10-year, firstmortgage bonds of the Newart Company, an affiliate. Outstanding bonds of theNewart Company amount to $5,500,000 with interest payable at 5% per annum, dueJune 1 and December 1 of each year. The…arrow_forwardBertoli & Cos. PA, a CPA firm that practices in the US, is engaged to audit Rigatoni Ltd., an Italian firm that is not listed on a stock exchange. Bertoli's financial statements will be used only outside the US. Bertoli should comply: Only with US generally accepted auditing standards. With International Standards on Auditing, but not with US generally accepted auditing standards. With International Standards on Auditing and US generally accepted auditing standards, except for requirements related to the form and content of the report.arrow_forward
- For each separate case, state whether the action or situation shows a violation of the AICPACode of Professional Conduct; if so, explain why and cite the relevant rule or interpretation.a. Your client, Contrary Corporation, is very upset over the fact that your audit last yearfailed to detect an $800,000 inventory overstatement caused by employee theft and falsification of the records. The board discussed the matter and authorized its attorneys toexplore the possibility of a lawsuit for damages.b. Contrary Corporation filed a lawsuit alleging negligent audit work, seeking $1 million indamages.c. In response to the lawsuit by Contrary, you decided to bring litigation against certain officers of the company alleging management fraud and deceit. You are asking for a damagejudgment of $500,000.d. The Allright Insurance Company paid Contrary Corporation $700,000 under a fidelitybond covering an inventory theft by employees. Allright is suing your public accountingfirm for damages on the…arrow_forwardRead the facts of the case in Problem 2-26 to become familiar withthe fraud involving Koss Corporation. From the company’s October 7,2009, proxy statement (Def 14A filing with the SEC), we know the followingfacts about the company’s audit committee and its members:Thomas L. Doerr 65, has been a director of the company since 1987. In1972, Mr. Doerr co-founded Leeson Electric Corporation and served asits president and CEO until 1982. The company manufactures industrialelectric motors. In 1983, Mr. Doerr incorporated Doerr Corporation asa holding company for the purpose of acquiring established companiesinvolved in distributing products to industrial and commercial markets.Currently, Mr. Doerr serves as president of Doerr Corporation.Mr. Doerr owns no stock in Koss Corporation and received $24,000 incash compensation during 2009 to serve on the audit committee.Lawrence S. Mattson 77, has been a director of the company since 1978.Mr. Mattson is the retired president of Oster company, a…arrow_forwardThe audit partner has just advised you that he has been approached to accept the appointment of auditor to Games Limited. Games Limited is a manufacturer of gaming machines and has been named in a recent anti-corruption inquiry as having offered incentives to state government members to support a proposed bill which would allow an increased number of gaming machines in licensed premises. No charges have yet been laid against Games Limited or any of its employees. The audit partner explains to you that Games Limited’s auditors were re-appointed for the current financial year at the Annual General Meeting held two months ago. However, Games Limited’s managing director is unhappy with the existing auditing firm as the audit partner assigned to Games Limited has been changed. Required: The audit partner is unsure whether he should accept the appointment and has asked you to outline any ethical, legal and other factors to be considered in his decision about whether to accept the…arrow_forward
- Under PCAOB standards (AS 3101) approved in 2017, all U.S. public companies will be required to disclose whether any critical audit matter (CAM) arose during the current period audit or state that there was none. True Falsearrow_forwardThe firm of Bulaklak and Bubuyog, CPAs, has two offices, one in Quezon City and one in Solano, Nueva Vizcaya. The firm has audited the Hardin Corporation out of its QC office for the past 5 years. For each of the following independent cases, which occurred during the year under audit, indicate whether the independence of either (1) the CPA involved or (2) the firm would be impaired. Bango Bulaklak, a partner in the Solano Branch, fell wildly in love with Jerry Bee, the treasurer for Hardin Corporation. They were married in Las Vegas. During the week, Bulaklak still lives in Solano and works in that branch, while Jerry Bee lives in QC, working for Hardin. On weekends they commute to their home in Santiago City. Bulaklak does not participate in the engagement. Big Bubuyog is the father of Small Bubuyog, a QC partner. Big B has a material investment in Hardin. Small B is unaware of his father’s investment, but does participate in the engagement. Sally, a senior in the Solano office, has…arrow_forwardSawyer and Sawyer, CPAs, audited the financial statements of Rattler Corporation that were included in Rattler’s Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC. Subsequently, Rattler Corporation went bankrupt and the stockholders of the corporation brought a class-action lawsuit against management, Sawyer and Sawyer, and the corporation’s board of directors and attorneys for misstatements of the financial statements. Assume that the jury in the case decides that responsibility for $5 million in losses should be allocated as follows: Management 70% Board of directors 20 Auditors 5 Attorneys 5 100% Under what securities act would the stockholders initiate this lawsuit? Assuming that all the defendants in the case are financially able to pay their share of the losses, calculate the amount of losses that would be allocated to Sawyer and Sawyer. Assuming that management had no financial resources, describe how Sawyer and Sawyer’s share of the losses might be increased.arrow_forward
- Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage LearningAuditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College Pub