Explain the difference and similarities between evidence in a legal case and evidence in an audit of financial statements.
Explanation of Solution
Audit Evidence: The piece of evidence provided by the audit team to prove their opinion with respect to the audit are known as audit evidences. It includes accounting information related to the evidence and their source.
Evidence in legal case and in an audit of financial statements is used by balanced person to conclude. The incorrect decision in both circumstances are not welcomed. Likewise investors could lose significant amount of money, if investors rely on materially misstated financial statements. On the whole the guilt of a defendant in a legal case has to been proven in a way that should be beyond a reasonable doubt. This is related to the concept of adequate evidence in audit situation. An auditor cannot be completely convinced that judge or jury’s opinion is correct but it should attains high level of assurance.
The difference is that legal case depends on witness and other parties involved. Inquiry is an evidence used by auditor and other evidence like confirmation with third parties, physical examination and inspection are also used extensively. Because of the nature of the conclusion made, a legal case also differs from an audit. In legal case a judge or jury decides the guilt or innocence of the defendant but in audit, after evaluating the evidence the auditor issues one of several audit opinions.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 7 Solutions
Auditing And Assurance Services
- State the objectives of the ordinary audit of financial statements. In general terms, how do auditors meet those objectives?arrow_forwardExplain the concept of “Reasonable Assurance” in the context of financial statement audit.arrow_forwardExplain the auditor’s responsibility to consider compliance with laws and regulations. How does this responsibility differ for laws and regulations that have a direct effect on the financial statements compared to other laws and regulations that do not have a direct effect?arrow_forward
- Using the concept of justice, evaluate how an auditor would assess the equality of interests in the financial reporting process.arrow_forwardJustify the auditor's duty to evaluate conformity with applicable rules and regulations. How does this obligation vary between rules and regulations that have a direct impact on financial statements and those that do not?arrow_forwardHow would you distinguish forensic accounting, fraud auditing, and investigative auditing from financial auditing?arrow_forward
- Justify the auditor's need to evaluate conformity with applicable rules and regulations. How does this obligation vary for laws and regulations that have a direct impact on financial statements vs those that do not?arrow_forwardExplain the auditor's role in ensuring that rules and regulations are followed. How does this obligation vary for laws and regulations that have a direct impact on financial statements vs those that do not?arrow_forwardPlease discuss the audit process focusing on the concept of materiality in the audit plan, interpretation of financial ratios, as well as documentation and sampling in respect of audit evidence?arrow_forward
- Consider the concepts of sufficient and appropriate audit evidence. Assess how audit risk relates to audit evidence. How do auditors audit accounting estimates and other subjective information? What are analytical procedures, and why are they a useful audit tool? Explain the importance of audit documentation.arrow_forwardIn the context of financial reporting, define the idea of materiality. What is the difference between the auditor's use of materiality during the audit's planning stage and during the audit's final review stage?arrow_forwardidentify the primary audit objective for anaccrued liability such as Bankrates SEM accrual. what circumstances relevent to accrued liabilities can prove to be particularly challenging for auditors?arrow_forward
- Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage LearningAuditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College PubBusiness/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...AccountingISBN:9781337485913Author:BROOKSPublisher:Cengage
- Accounting Information SystemsAccountingISBN:9781337619202Author:Hall, James A.Publisher:Cengage Learning,