Book Title
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337605656
Author: CROSS
Publisher: CENGAGE L
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 7, Problem 1IS
Summary Introduction
Case summary: The company R manufactures tire rims and sells it to the company S that installs them on cars. One set of rims was defective and was installed on the car by the company S without any inspection. Then, the car with the defective rims was sold to the company T that further sold the car to the person U. The car got involved in an accident due to the defective rims and the person U got injured.
To find: Liability of the company S.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Rim Corporation makes tire rims that it sells to Superior Vehicles, Inc., which installs them on cars. One set ofrims is defective, which an inspection would reveal. Superior does not inspect the rims. The car with the defectiverims is sold to Town Auto Sales, which sells the car toUri. Soon, the car is in an accident caused by the defective rims, and Uri is injured. Is Superior Vehicles liable?Explain your answer. (See Strict Product Liability.)
After two years of research and the investment of considerable funds, coast-to-coast company (cc) develops a new product that it hopes will produce substantial profits. CC learns that a competitor, National sales, Inc, has made and begun to sell a nearly identical prod-uct CC learns from a reliable source that national paod a CC employee to obtain the plans for CC's product while it was in development. What legal re-course does CC have against National ?
Mr. Antipatiko filed a suit against Gerald, a registered medical technologist. Mr. Antipatiko went to the clinic and requested for Hepa B test needed for his employment. It was Gerald who obtained the blood from Mr. Antipatiko and consequently processed it for sampling. However, the test result indicated a “REACTIVE/POSITIVE”. Gerald performed another confirmatory test to ensure a reliable result. Still, the second test done had the same result. Gerald then issued the lab result indicating “REACTIVE/POSITIVE” after conformity with the Pathologist. Mr. Antipatiko was declined employment and was so furious and went to the clinic to confront Gerald stating that the result was inaccurate. He threatened Gerald saying that he will file an administrative case against him. If you were Gerald, how will you address and handle the situation? Provide your reason and basis to prevent the threatened suit.
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Jane Jackson purchased a sealed can of Katydids, chocolate-covered pecan caramel candies manufac- tured by NestlT. Shortly after, Jackson bit into one of the candies and allegedly broke a tooth on a pecan shell embedded in the candy. She filed a complaint, asserting breach of implied warranty. How would you argue on behalf of the company? How would you argue on behalf of Jackson? In your answer, discuss both the reasonable expectation test and the foreign substance/natural substance test.arrow_forwardWhich of the following actos covered under a Personal Auks poley WOU al or of INGICE WREST OA An auto that is covered by a pelle se tare si se to see the interesting them on occident An auto that is inoked in an accidentting in damage that esessed the state accident repeating threshold An auto that is insured by a company which at the time of an accidente delaying syment of another com under the poly An auto whose owner has het teda proof of thancial responsibility after an accidentarrow_forwardUsing the IRAC model to answer the question. Jim and Jane got married last Sunday. The next day they travelled to Extended Stay Hotel in Miami for their honeymoon. They arrived at the Hotel, checked in and proceeded to their room. At the back of the front door in their room was a notice excluding liability, which read that “ Extended Stay will not be responsible for articles lost or stolen, unless it is logged at the front desk for safe custody.” However, this exclusion clause could only be seen after the door is closed as well as, the actual notice was small and colored in black, with a white background. Regrettably, with all the excitement of their honeymoon, both Jim and Jane did not even notice the exclusion clause at the back of the door. One day when they were out shopping, someone came into their room and stole Jim’s laptop.…arrow_forward
- need help asaparrow_forwardAs part of its business, Kinko’s Graphics Corporation (Kinko’s) copied excerpts from books, compiled them in “packets,” and sold the packets to college students. Kinko’s did this without permission from the owners of the copyrights to the books and without paying copyright fees or royalties. Kinko’s has more than two hundred stores nationwide and reported $15 million in assets and $3 million in profits for 1989. Basic Books, Harper & Row, John Wiley & Sons, and others (plaintiffs) sued Kinko’s for violation of the Copyright Act of 1976. Plaintiffs owned copyrights to the works copied and sold by Kinko’s and derived substantial income from royalties. They argued that Kinko’s had infringed on their copyrights by copying excerpts from their books and selling the copies to college students for profit. Kinko’s admitted that it had copied excerpts without permission and had sold them in packets to students, but it contended that its actions constituted a fair use of the works in…arrow_forwardTrevor Rowe a well known businessman saw an article in the gleaner that indicated that he was a jail bird. As a result, he lost customers. He wrote to the gleaner, seeking a retraction of the story, and found out that there was in fact another man in the community with the same name who had gone to jail. What is the position of either party? The Gleaner can prevent litigation by offering to make amends. The Gleaner doesn’t have to retract the story as it was true for one of the men. There is no action as the story was already published. The businessman can go straight to Court. There is no action at there are two persons with the same name.arrow_forward
- 19) The Elle Corporation manufactures fingernail polish. Suzy buys a container of Elle's fingernail polish, applies it to her nails, and suffers a severe allergic reaction. She sues Elle under the implied warranty of merchantability, The test for determining whether Suzy will recover is whether: A) the nail polish she bought was suitable for the needs of the average consumer. B) the nail polish she bought properly performed its function of coloring one's nails. C) such a reaction in an appreciable number of consumers was reasonably foreseeable. D) the ingredient causing the reaction was foreign to the nail polish or natural to it. nating one model, Bobby noticesarrow_forwardalculator Under a Commercial General Liability policy, which of the following actions is an obligation of the insures? O A To inspect the insured premises for safety To renew the policy period from the date of loss To pay claims only when there has been a judgment against the insured To pay a claim for which the insured has been found legally responsible OB. O. C. OD.arrow_forwardBrenda Brandt was admitted to Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center (Health Center) to receive treatment for urinary incontinence. During the course of an operation, the doctor surgically implanted a ProteGen Sling (sling) in Brandt. Subsequently, the manufacturer of the sling, Boston Scientific Corporation, issued a recall of the sling because it was causing medical complications in some patients. Brandt suffered serious complications and had the sling surgically removed. Brandt sued Boston Scientific Corporation and Health Center for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability included in Article 2 (Sales) of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Health Center filed a motion with the court to have the case against it dismissed. Health Center argued that it was a provider of services and not a merchant that sold goods, and because the UCC (Sales) applies to the sale of goods, Health Center was not subject to the UCC. Health Center proved that Brandt’s bill was $11,174.50 total charge…arrow_forward
- Under a Commercial General Liability policy, which of the following actions is an obligation of the insurer? OA. To inspect the insured premises for safety OB. To renew the policy period from the date of loss OC. To pay claims only when there has been a judgment against the insured To pay a daim for which the insured has been found legally responsible ODarrow_forwardYou are served with Plaintiff's complaint. Plaintiff is suing you! You are furious. Should you ignore Plaintiff's complaint and hope it goes away? Why or why not? What could possibly go wrong? If you do respond to Plaintiff's complaint, should you just deny all of Plaintiff's allegations so Plaintiff will go away, or include something else?arrow_forwardX bought a skin whitening product she saw on tv because it was claimed to be "the best in the market today." The product did not actually deliver the result expected by X. There is vitiation of consent due to fraud.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education