
The increase in the number of software developers from the year 2016 to the year 2026.

Answer to Problem 1IR
The increase in the number of software developers from 2016 to 2026 is approximately 260,000 workers.
Explanation of Solution
From the pictograph of “Jobs with Projected Highest Numerical Increase: 2016–2026”, it is observed that the number of symbols corresponding to software developers is 6.5.
Note that each symbol represents 40,000 workers.
Then, the increase in the number of software developers from 2016 to 2026 is
That is, 260,000 workers are software developers.
Thus, the increase in the number of software developers from 2016 to 2026 is approximately 260,000 workers.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 7 Solutions
Pearson eText Basic College Mathematics with Early Integrers -- Instant Access (Pearson+)
- 9.7 Given the equations 0.5x₁-x2=-9.5 1.02x₁ - 2x2 = -18.8 (a) Solve graphically. (b) Compute the determinant. (c) On the basis of (a) and (b), what would you expect regarding the system's condition? (d) Solve by the elimination of unknowns. (e) Solve again, but with a modified slightly to 0.52. Interpret your results.arrow_forward3. Determine the appropriate annihilator for the given F(x). a) F(x) = 5 cos 2x b) F(x)=9x2e3xarrow_forward12.42 The steady-state distribution of temperature on a heated plate can be modeled by the Laplace equation, 0= FT T + 200°C 25°C 25°C T22 0°C T₁ T21 200°C FIGURE P12.42 75°C 75°C 00°C If the plate is represented by a series of nodes (Fig. P12.42), cen- tered finite-divided differences can be substituted for the second derivatives, which results in a system of linear algebraic equations. Use the Gauss-Seidel method to solve for the temperatures of the nodes in Fig. P12.42.arrow_forward
- 9.22 Develop, debug, and test a program in either a high-level language or a macro language of your choice to solve a system of equations with Gauss-Jordan elimination without partial pivoting. Base the program on the pseudocode from Fig. 9.10. Test the program using the same system as in Prob. 9.18. Compute the total number of flops in your algorithm to verify Eq. 9.37. FIGURE 9.10 Pseudocode to implement the Gauss-Jordan algorithm with- out partial pivoting. SUB GaussJordan(aug, m, n, x) DOFOR k = 1, m d = aug(k, k) DOFOR j = 1, n aug(k, j) = aug(k, j)/d END DO DOFOR 1 = 1, m IF 1 % K THEN d = aug(i, k) DOFOR j = k, n aug(1, j) END DO aug(1, j) - d*aug(k, j) END IF END DO END DO DOFOR k = 1, m x(k) = aug(k, n) END DO END GaussJordanarrow_forward11.9 Recall from Prob. 10.8, that the following system of equations is designed to determine concentrations (the e's in g/m³) in a series of coupled reactors as a function of amount of mass input to each reactor (the right-hand sides are in g/day): 15c3cc33300 -3c18c26c3 = 1200 -4c₁₂+12c3 = 2400 Solve this problem with the Gauss-Seidel method to & = 5%.arrow_forward9.8 Given the equations 10x+2x2-x3 = 27 -3x-6x2+2x3 = -61.5 x1 + x2 + 5x3 = -21.5 (a) Solve by naive Gauss elimination. Show all steps of the compu- tation. (b) Substitute your results into the original equations to check your answers.arrow_forward
- Tangent planes Find an equation of the plane tangent to the following surfaces at the given points (two planes and two equations).arrow_forwardVectors u and v are shown on the graph.Part A: Write u and v in component form. Show your work. Part B: Find u + v. Show your work.Part C: Find 5u − 2v. Show your work.arrow_forwardVectors u = 6(cos 60°i + sin60°j), v = 4(cos 315°i + sin315°j), and w = −12(cos 330°i + sin330°j) are given. Use exact values when evaluating sine and cosine.Part A: Convert the vectors to component form and find −7(u • v). Show every step of your work.Part B: Convert the vectors to component form and use the dot product to determine if u and w are parallel, orthogonal, or neither. Justify your answer.arrow_forward
- Suppose that one factory inputs its goods from two different plants, A and B, with different costs, 3 and 7 each respective. And suppose the price function in the market is decided as p(x, y) = 100 - x - y where x and y are the demand functions and 0 < x, y. Then as x = y= the factory can attain the maximum profit,arrow_forwardBob and Teresa each collect their own samples to test the same hypothesis. Bob’s p-value turns out to be 0.05, and Teresa’s turns out to be 0.01. Why don’t Bob and Teresa get the same p-values? Who has stronger evidence against the null hypothesis: Bob or Teresa?arrow_forwardf(x) = = x - 3 x²-9 f(x) = {x + 1 x > 3 4 x < 3 -10 5 10 5 5. 10 5- 07. 10 -10 -5 0 10 5 -101 :: The function has a “step" or "jump" discontinuity at x = 3 where f(3) = 7. :: The function has a value of f (3), a limit as x approaches 3, but is not continuous at x = 3. :: The function has a limit as x approaches 3, but the function is not defined and is not continuous at x = 3. :: The function has a removable discontinuity at x=3 and an infinite discontinuity at x= -3.arrow_forward
- Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications ( 8th I...MathISBN:9781259676512Author:Kenneth H RosenPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationMathematics for Elementary Teachers with Activiti...MathISBN:9780134392790Author:Beckmann, SybillaPublisher:PEARSON
- Thinking Mathematically (7th Edition)MathISBN:9780134683713Author:Robert F. BlitzerPublisher:PEARSONDiscrete Mathematics With ApplicationsMathISBN:9781337694193Author:EPP, Susanna S.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Pathways To Math Literacy (looseleaf)MathISBN:9781259985607Author:David Sobecki Professor, Brian A. MercerPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





