Economics
Economics
5th Edition
ISBN: 9781319066604
Author: Paul Krugman, Robin Wells
Publisher: Worth Publishers
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 7, Problem 1BCQ
To determine

To explain:

The reason that Microsoft instituted an internal carbon tax to save energy and reduce carbon emission.

Introduction: A carbon tax aims to make individuals and firms pay the full social cost of carbon pollution. In theory, the tax will reduce pollution and encourage more environmentally friendly alternatives. However, critics argue a tax on carbon will increase costs for business and reduce levels of investment and economic growth.

Expert Solution & Answer
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Emission of carbon component from the production process cannot be attainable in short run; therefore to tackle the problem of pollution Microsoft levied internal carbon tax. Microsoft wants to change the production process to reduce the pollution, save energy, and to attain that goal carbon tax is a right policy as compare to the issue a company-wide directive.

The company is trying to reduce pollution, save energy, and use the carbon tax money to improve the environment; this policy will help to improve quality of environment and reduce the pollution.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
The table below shows pizza topping preferences for Marcus, Dakota, and Austin, and that each individual has strictly transitive preferences. Suppose that three individuals make up our "society." In this society, prefer pepperoni to cheese pizza; _prefer cheese to supreme; and prefer supreme to pepperoni. This example illustrates that _ Person Marcus Dakota Austin 0000 First Preference Pepperoni Supreme Cheese Second Preference Cheese Pepperoni Supreme Third Preference Supreme Cheese Pepperoni two-thirds; two-thirds; two-thirds; even if individuals' preferences might satisfy the transitive property, societal preferences may not. two-thirds; two-thirds; everyone; if individuals' preferences satisfy the transitive property, societal preferences must also. two-thirds; two-thirds; everyone; even if individuals' preferences might satisfy the transitive property, societal preferences may not. two-thirds; two-thirds; two-thirds; if individuals' preferences satisfy the transitive property,…
Consider the table below, which has data on insurance status and medical expenditures for different types of professors at Hypothetical University (HU), economics & criminology professors. Assume that there are an equal number of economics and criminology professors. Assume further that econ professors all have the same level of health and criminology professors all have the same level of health. In 2020, every professor was offered a full insurance contract with no premium. In 2021, HU charged any employee who wanted to keep health insurance the actuarially fair premium based on 2020 expenditures. This premium would be equal to and, as a result,professors dropped their coverage in 2021. _ 2020 2021 Insured? Avg. Expenditures Insured? Avg. Expenditures Economics Professors Criminology Professors Yes Yes $25,000 $15,000 000000 $15,000; criminology $25,000; econ $20,000; econ $15,000; econ $20,000; criminology $25,000; criminology ??? $28,000 ??? $10,000
Consider the table below, which has data on insurance status and medical expenditures for different types of professors at Hypothetical University (HU), economics & criminology professors. Assume that there are an equal number of economics and criminology professors. Assume further that econ professors all have the same level of health and criminology professors all have the same level of health. There is evidence of 2021 Insured? Avg. Expenditures Insured? Avg. Expenditures 2020 Economics Professors Criminology Professors Yes. Yes $25,000 $15,000 0000 ??? ??? $28,000 $10,000 I. moral hazard because in 2021 criminology professors dropped their coverage and health expenditures went down. II. adverse selection because in response to rising premiums after 2020, the professors with lower health expenditure dropped coverage Both I and II neither I nor II
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:Oxford University Press
Text book image
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education